Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Midway HS

McLennan County · Region 12: Waco · 2,663 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
94/1002025-26
Change
+3 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+6.2 ptsvs 87.8 average · 968 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
87 of 968tied with 65 others
A94

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 93 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 87.8 average for 968 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

STAAR result

All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
79%vs 65.3% avg · +13.7 pts
Masters
35%vs 33.3% avg · +1.7 pts

Among 948 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

STAAR result

Math above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
71%vs 59.5% avg · +11.5 pts
Masters
31%vs 28.2% avg · +2.8 pts

Among 944 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

STAAR result

Science above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
81%vs 63.9% avg · +17.1 pts
Masters
53%vs 36.1% avg · +16.9 pts

Among 863 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Midway HS is rated A by TEA, scoring 94 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 87.8 average for 968 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 3 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 87th of 968 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 65 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. After high school: the following fall
  6. Who this school serves
  7. Student counts behind the percentages
  8. Enrollment over time
  9. Discipline and removal from class
  10. Spending per student
  11. Teachers and actual class size
  12. Where this school ranks best
  13. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
908070 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageMidway HS 9196959594 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 93 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26A9487.8 968 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25A9587.6 954 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24A9586.3 942 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23A9686.7 924 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22A9187.8 909 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement95 A+6.5 vs similar economic context · 948 reporting
  • School Progress94 A+9.4 vs similar economic context · 945 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps93 A+7.6 vs similar economic context · 938 reporting
  • Academic Growth85 B+4.1 vs similar economic context · 928 reporting
  • Relative Performance94 A+13.9 vs similar economic context · 945 reporting
  • Midway HS
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (968 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement95A—
School Progress94A—
Closing the Gaps93A—
Academic Growth85B5
Relative Performance94A—

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (95), so School Progress (94) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 95.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level93%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 948 reporting
  • Meets grade level79%+14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 948 reporting
  • Masters grade level35%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 948 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level89%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 947 reporting
  • Meets grade level80%+11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 947 reporting
  • Masters grade level25%−10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 947 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level94%+11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 944 reporting
  • Meets grade level71%+12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 944 reporting
  • Masters grade level31%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 944 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level97%+11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 863 reporting
  • Meets grade level81%+17 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 863 reporting
  • Masters grade level53%+17 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 863 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level97%+12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 482 reporting
  • Meets grade level83%+21 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 482 reporting
  • Masters grade level43%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 482 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (968 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Graduation

Four-Year
99.5%+7.2 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 273 rated schools reporting
Five-Year
99.0%+6.8 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 273 rated schools reporting
Six-Year
99.5%+7.6 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 274 rated schools reporting
Dropout Rate
0.0%−0.3 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 274 rated schools reporting

These measures use TEA's standard-accountability population. Each comparison average includes only schools in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported school rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.

College, career and military readiness

Total credit for CCMR criteria
98.0%+8.8 pts vs similar economic context
CCMR criteria
CriterionThis school% of graduatesAveragesimilar economic contextDifferencepercentage pointsReportingselected comparison
Total credit for CCMR criteria98.0%89.2%+8.8 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 274 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course88.0%65.0%+23.0 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 275 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA51.4%44.0%+7.4 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 275 rated schools reporting
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)33.8%21.0%+12.8 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 275 rated schools reporting
Earned college credit for a dual credit course32.1%38.9%−6.8 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 275 rated schools reporting
Earned an industry-based certification15.2%35.1%−19.9 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 275 rated schools reporting
Earned a level I or level II certificate0.1%0.7%−0.6 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 275 rated schools reporting
Earned an associate degree0.1%4.6%−4.5 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 275 rated schools reporting
Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit0.0%6.7%−6.7 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 275 rated schools reporting
Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness4.7%2.5%+2.2 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 275 rated schools reporting
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student4.6%6.7%−2.1 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 275 rated schools reporting
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces2.2%3.0%−0.8 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 275 rated schools reporting

Every row is a share of this school's graduates, and every row is a way of meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this school minus the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate, counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported school percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

After high school: the following fall

Where school graduates appeared in Texas public higher-education records the fall after graduation. This is a limited next-step measure, not an eventual college-going or completion rate.

Graduates in the report
689

Class of 2023–24

Enrolled in Texas public higher education
430

62.4% of graduates

Not found in Texas public higher-ed records
246

35.7% of graduates

Not trackable
13

Fall 2024

Graduates in the report

This school
689
Selected comparison
305.2

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 231 rated schools reporting

Enrolled in Texas public higher education

This school
430
Selected comparison
147.8

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 231 rated schools reporting

Texas-public enrollment rate

This school
62.4%
Selected comparison
49.6%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 231 rated schools reporting

+12.8 pts vs similar economic context

Not-found rate

This school
35.7%
Selected comparison
44.0%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 231 rated schools reporting

−8.3 pts vs similar economic context

Not-trackable rate

This school
1.9%
Selected comparison
6.4%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 231 rated schools reporting

−4.5 pts vs similar economic context

Most common named Texas public destinations

  1. MCLENNAN COMMUNITY COLLEGE (003590)146
  2. BAYLOR UNIVERSITY (003545)58
  3. TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY (003632)31

Selected comparison counts are neutral cohort scale context. The percentages put differently sized graduating classes on the same basis, but still cover only the limited Texas-public system observed by this report.

Source: Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board, high-school graduates enrolled in higher education, fetched 24 August 2026. The report covers graduates who enrolled in a Texas public college or university the following fall and includes only districts or campuses with more than 25 graduates.

“Not found” does not mean a graduate did not continue their education. It can include private or out-of-state college, work, military service, enrollment after the fall term, or another path the Texas public system does not observe.

“Not trackable” is not an outcome. THECB uses it for graduates with a non-standard identifier that could not be matched to higher-education records.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
2,663
Economically disadvantaged
28.7%−0.9 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
2.4%−7.8 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
12.1%−5.1 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
95.6%+0.3 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
10.4%+0.1 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Midway HS

African American: 12.2%Hispanic: 24.6%White: 52.6%American Indian: 0.2%Asian: 5.1%Pacific Islander: 0.3%Two or More Races: 5%
  • African American 12.2%
  • Hispanic 24.6%
  • White 52.6%
  • American Indian 0.2%
  • Asian 5.1%
  • Pacific Islander 0.3%
  • Two or More Races 5%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 968 reporting for every category shown · 968 in full cohort

African American: 9%Hispanic: 29.2%White: 48.1%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 8.3%Pacific Islander: 0.1%Two or More Races: 5%
  • African American 9%
  • Hispanic 29.2%
  • White 48.1%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 8.3%
  • Pacific Islander 0.1%
  • Two or More Races 5%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
2,663
Economically disadvantaged students
764
Emergent bilingual students
63
Special education students
322

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
284
Students in TEA mobility denominator
2,800
TEA-published mobility rate
10.1%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 2,663 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 24 (0.9%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
2,663

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
−24

Decrease · −0.9%

Change since 2021–22
+107

Increase · +4.2%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
2,663
Selected comparison
804.2

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 959 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Midway HS
School yearStudents enrolledMidway HSChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 2,556 First available year 820.4
2022–23 2,648 Increase of 92 (3.6%) 823.2
2023–24 2,730 Increase of 82 (3.1%) 817.2
2024–25 2,687 Decrease of 43 (1.6%) 813.6
2025–26 2,663 Decrease of 24 (0.9%) 804.2

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
309

11.0% of cumulative year-end enrollment

Disciplinary actions
797

28.46 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
2,800

2024–25

Share of students · 2024–25

This school
11.0%
Selected comparison
8.5%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 716 rated schools reporting

+2.5 pts vs similar economic context

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
28.46
Selected comparison
17.2

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 801 rated schools reporting

+11.3 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Midway HS
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 2,621 219 8.4% 463 17.67 6.8% 12.3
2021–22 2,678 361 13.5% 843 31.48 9.1% 18.5
2022–23 2,740 392 14.3% 831 30.33 9.4% 19.2
2023–24 2,844 357 12.6% 846 29.75 8.9% 18.5
2024–25 2,800 309 11.0% 797 28.46 8.5% 17.2
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Midway HS in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline 309 11.0% 797 28.46 8.5% 17.2
In-school suspensions 264 9.4% 465 16.61 7.7% 13.5
Out-of-school suspensions 109 3.9% 197 7.04 4.2% 5.6
DAEP placements 114 4.1% 131 4.68 3.1% 3.6
Mandatory DAEP placements 75 2.7% 86 3.07 2.5% 2.8
Discretionary DAEP placements 44 1.6% 45 1.61 1.5% 1.8
JJAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$6k$14k$21k20182020202220242025
  • Midway HS
  • Parent district: Midway ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$8,578
Selected comparison
$11,503

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 953 rated schools reporting

−$2,925 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $8,578 per student for this campus, $13,883 per student for its parent district, Midway ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearMidway HSParent district: Midway ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$7,152$10,262$13,054$7,633 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 858 rated schools reporting
2019$7,491$11,161$13,108$7,741 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 871 rated schools reporting
2020$8,108$11,669$14,058$8,078 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 881 rated schools reporting
2021$7,909$16,485$14,797$8,495 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 890 rated schools reporting
2022$13,091$20,276$15,708$9,714 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 908 rated schools reporting
2023$9,631$15,559$16,792$10,213 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 925 rated schools reporting
2024$7,268$14,035$18,125$11,260 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 941 rated schools reporting
2025$8,578$13,883$18,972$11,503 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 953 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$60,598−$7,722 vs similar economic context
Teachers
167+114.6 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
15.9+1.4 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Midway HS

Beginning: 6.3%1 to 5 years: 24.3%6 to 10 years: 21.6%11 to 20 years: 28.1%21 to 30 years: 15.8%Over 30 years: 3.8%
  • Beginning 6.3%
  • 1 to 5 years 24.3%
  • 6 to 10 years 21.6%
  • 11 to 20 years 28.1%
  • 21 to 30 years 15.8%
  • Over 30 years 3.8%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 968 reporting for every category shown · 968 in full cohort

Beginning: 4.8%1 to 5 years: 22.4%6 to 10 years: 19.7%11 to 20 years: 32.3%21 to 30 years: 17.4%Over 30 years: 3.2%
  • Beginning 4.8%
  • 1 to 5 years 22.4%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.7%
  • 11 to 20 years 32.3%
  • 21 to 30 years 17.4%
  • Over 30 years 3.2%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Midway HS in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classMidway HS · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Secondary English2216.8
Secondary languages other than English23.219.1
Secondary math23.617.5
Secondary science24.919.1
Secondary social studies24.419.2

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 5 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this school ranks best

Out of 200 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

#1 rankings

First-place results

5 measures

  • 1of 75

    School Progress

    McLennan County · of the 75 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 1of 75

    Relative Performance

    McLennan County · of the 75 that report this measure

  • 1of 35

    Social Studies — Meets

    McLennan County · of the 35 that report this measure

  • 1of 18

    Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)

    McLennan County · of the 18 that report this measure

  • 1of 18

    Earned a level I or level II certificate

    McLennan County · of the 18 that report this measure

#2–3 rankings

Second- and third-place results

5 measures

  • 2of 75

    Student Achievement

    McLennan County · of the 75 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 2of 75

    All Subjects — Meets

    McLennan County · of the 75 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 2of 35

    Social Studies — Masters

    McLennan County · of the 35 that report this measure

  • 3of 83

    Overall score

    McLennan County · of the 83 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 3of 70

    Science — Masters

    McLennan County · of the 70 that report this measure · tied with 1

#4–10 rankings

Fourth- through tenth-place results

18 measures

  • 4of 75

    All Subjects — Approaches

    McLennan County · of the 75 that report this measure

  • 4of 75

    Math — Approaches

    McLennan County · of the 75 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 4of 75

    Math — Meets

    McLennan County · of the 75 that report this measure

  • 4of 35

    Social Studies — Approaches

    McLennan County · of the 35 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 4of 18

    College, career or military ready

    McLennan County · of the 18 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 4of 18

    Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA

    McLennan County · of the 18 that report this measure

  • 5of 75

    Closing the Gaps

    McLennan County · of the 75 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 5of 75

    Reading — Meets

    McLennan County · of the 75 that report this measure

  • 5of 70

    Science — Meets

    McLennan County · of the 70 that report this measure

  • 5of 18

    Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course

    McLennan County · of the 18 that report this measure

  • 5of 18

    Earned an associate degree

    McLennan County · of the 18 that report this measure

  • 7of 70

    Science — Approaches

    McLennan County · of the 70 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 7of 18

    Earned college credit for a dual credit course

    McLennan County · of the 18 that report this measure

  • 9of 18

    Four-Year Graduation Rate

    McLennan County (standard accountability only) · of the 18 that report this measure

  • 9of 18

    Six-Year Graduation Rate

    McLennan County (standard accountability only) · of the 18 that report this measure

  • 9of 18

    Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces

    McLennan County · of the 18 that report this measure

  • 10of 75

    All Subjects — Masters

    McLennan County · of the 75 that report this measure

  • 10of 18

    Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness

    McLennan County · of the 18 that report this measure

Other top-5% rankings

High placements in larger reporting groups

1 measure

  • 19of 427

    Attendance

    Similar size · of the 427 that report this measure · tied with 3

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 161903001.