+6.2 ptsvs 87.8 average · 968 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
87 of 968tied with 65 others
Score vs region
+15.5 ptsvs 78.5 average · 301 rated schools in Region 12: Waco
Region 12: Waco placement
9 of 301tied with 5 others
Score vs county
+17.0 ptsvs 77 average · 83 rated schools in McLennan County
McLennan County placement
3 of 83tied with 1 other
Score vs similar-size group
+7.2 ptsvs 86.8 average · 431 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
26 of 431tied with 30 others
Score vs state
+12.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
379 of 7,646tied with 208 others
A94
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 93 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 87.8 average for 968 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 78.5 average for 301 rated schools in Region 12: Waco.The current score is above the 77 average for 83 rated schools in McLennan County.The current score is above the 86.8 average for 431 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
79%vs 65.3% avg · +13.7 pts
Masters
35%vs 33.3% avg · +1.7 pts
Among 948 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Midway HS is rated A by TEA, scoring 94 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 87.8 average for 968 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 3 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 87th of 968 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 65 others).
Midway HS is rated A by TEA, scoring 94 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 78.5 average for 301 rated schools in Region 12: Waco. It is up 3 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 9th of 301 rated schools in Region 12: Waco (tied with 5 others).
Midway HS is rated A by TEA, scoring 94 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 77 average for 83 rated schools in McLennan County. It is up 3 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 3rd of 83 rated schools in McLennan County (tied with 1 other).
Midway HS is rated A by TEA, scoring 94 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 86.8 average for 431 similarly sized rated schools. It is up 3 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 26th of 431 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 30 others).
Midway HS is rated A by TEA, scoring 94 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is up 3 points since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 93 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement95 A+6.5 vs similar economic context · 948 reporting
School Progress94 A+9.4 vs similar economic context · 945 reporting
Closing the Gaps93 A+7.6 vs similar economic context · 938 reporting
Academic Growth85 B+4.1 vs similar economic context · 928 reporting
Relative Performance94 A+13.9 vs similar economic context · 945 reporting
Midway HS
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (968 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
95
A
—
School Progress
94
A
—
Closing the Gaps
93
A
—
Academic Growth
85
B
5
Relative Performance
94
A
—
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (95), so
School Progress (94) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 95.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level93%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 948 reporting
Meets grade level79%+14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 948 reporting
Masters grade level35%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 948 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level89%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 947 reporting
Meets grade level80%+11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 947 reporting
Masters grade level25%−10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 947 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level94%+11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 944 reporting
Meets grade level71%+12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 944 reporting
Masters grade level31%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 944 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level97%+11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 863 reporting
Meets grade level81%+17 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 863 reporting
Masters grade level53%+17 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 863 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
Approaches grade level97%+12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 482 reporting
Meets grade level83%+21 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 482 reporting
Masters grade level43%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 482 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (968 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Graduation
Four-Year
99.5%+7.2 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 273 rated schools reporting
Five-Year
99.0%+6.8 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 273 rated schools reporting
Six-Year
99.5%+7.6 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 274 rated schools reporting
Dropout Rate
0.0%−0.3 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 274 rated schools reporting
These measures use TEA's standard-accountability population. Each comparison average includes only schools in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported school rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.
College, career and military readiness
Total credit for CCMR criteria
98.0%+8.8 pts vs similar economic context
CCMR criteria
Criterion
This school% of graduates
Averagesimilar economic context
Differencepercentage points
Reportingselected comparison
Total credit for CCMR criteria
98.0%
89.2%
+8.8
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 274 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course
88.0%
65.0%
+23.0
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 275 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA
51.4%
44.0%
+7.4
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 275 rated schools reporting
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)
33.8%
21.0%
+12.8
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 275 rated schools reporting
Earned college credit for a dual credit course
32.1%
38.9%
−6.8
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 275 rated schools reporting
Earned an industry-based certification
15.2%
35.1%
−19.9
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 275 rated schools reporting
Earned a level I or level II certificate
0.1%
0.7%
−0.6
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 275 rated schools reporting
Earned an associate degree
0.1%
4.6%
−4.5
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 275 rated schools reporting
Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit
0.0%
6.7%
−6.7
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 275 rated schools reporting
Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness
4.7%
2.5%
+2.2
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 275 rated schools reporting
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student
4.6%
6.7%
−2.1
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 275 rated schools reporting
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces
2.2%
3.0%
−0.8
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 275 rated schools reporting
Every row is a share of this school's graduates, and every row is a way of
meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this
school minus the average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate,
counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that
criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported school percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
After high school: the following fall
Where school graduates appeared in Texas public higher-education records the fall after graduation. This is a limited next-step measure, not an eventual college-going or completion rate.
Graduates in the report
689
Class of 2023–24
Enrolled in Texas public higher education
430
62.4% of graduates
Not found in Texas public higher-ed records
246
35.7% of graduates
Not trackable
13
Fall 2024
Graduates in the report
This school
689
Selected comparison
305.2
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 231 rated schools reporting
Enrolled in Texas public higher education
This school
430
Selected comparison
147.8
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 231 rated schools reporting
Texas-public enrollment rate
This school
62.4%
Selected comparison
49.6%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 231 rated schools reporting
+12.8 pts vs similar economic context
Not-found rate
This school
35.7%
Selected comparison
44.0%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 231 rated schools reporting
−8.3 pts vs similar economic context
Not-trackable rate
This school
1.9%
Selected comparison
6.4%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 231 rated schools reporting
−4.5 pts vs similar economic context
Most common named Texas public destinations
MCLENNAN COMMUNITY COLLEGE (003590)146
BAYLOR UNIVERSITY (003545)58
TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY (003632)31
Selected comparison counts are neutral cohort scale context. The percentages put differently sized graduating classes on the same basis, but still cover only the limited Texas-public system observed by this report.
Source: Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board, high-school graduates enrolled in higher education, fetched 24 August 2026. The report covers graduates who enrolled in a Texas public college or university the following fall and includes only districts or campuses with more than 25 graduates.
“Not found” does not mean a graduate did not continue their education. It can include private or out-of-state college, work, military service, enrollment after the fall term, or another path the Texas public system does not observe.
“Not trackable” is not an outcome. THECB uses it for graduates with a non-standard identifier that could not be matched to higher-education records.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
2,663
Economically disadvantaged
28.7%−0.9 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
2.4%−7.8 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
12.1%−5.1 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
95.6%+0.3 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
10.4%+0.1 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Midway HS
African American 12.2%
Hispanic 24.6%
White 52.6%
American Indian 0.2%
Asian 5.1%
Pacific Islander 0.3%
Two or More Races 5%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 968 reporting for every category shown · 968 in full cohort
African American 9%
Hispanic 29.2%
White 48.1%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 8.3%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 5%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 12: Waco · 301 reporting for every category shown · 301 in full cohort
African American 14.2%
Hispanic 37.4%
White 40.7%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 1.1%
Pacific Islander 0.7%
Two or More Races 5.7%
Selected comparison averageFor McLennan County · 83 reporting for every category shown · 83 in full cohort
African American 13.9%
Hispanic 38.4%
White 42.1%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 0.9%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 4.3%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 431 reporting for every category shown · 431 in full cohort
African American 14%
Hispanic 52%
White 23.1%
American Indian 0.4%
Asian 7.1%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 3.2%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
2,663
Economically disadvantaged students
764
Emergent bilingual students
63
Special education students
322
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
284
Students in TEA mobility denominator
2,800
TEA-published mobility rate
10.1%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 2,663 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 24 (0.9%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
2,663
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
−24
Decrease · −0.9%
Change since 2021–22
+107
Increase · +4.2%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
2,663
Selected comparison
804.2
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 959 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Midway HS
School year
Students enrolledMidway HS
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
2,556
First available year
820.4
2022–23
2,648
Increase of 92 (3.6%)
823.2
2023–24
2,730
Increase of 82 (3.1%)
817.2
2024–25
2,687
Decrease of 43 (1.6%)
813.6
2025–26
2,663
Decrease of 24 (0.9%)
804.2
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
309
11.0% of cumulative year-end enrollment
Disciplinary actions
797
28.46 per 100 students
Cumulative year-end enrollment
2,800
2024–25
Share of students · 2024–25
This school
11.0%
Selected comparison
8.5%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 716 rated schools reporting
+2.5 pts vs similar economic context
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
This school
28.46
Selected comparison
17.2
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 801 rated schools reporting
+11.3 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Midway HS
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
2,621
219
8.4%
463
17.67
6.8%
12.3
2021–22
2,678
361
13.5%
843
31.48
9.1%
18.5
2022–23
2,740
392
14.3%
831
30.33
9.4%
19.2
2023–24
2,844
357
12.6%
846
29.75
8.9%
18.5
2024–25
2,800
309
11.0%
797
28.46
8.5%
17.2
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Midway HS in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
309
11.0%
797
28.46
8.5%
17.2
In-school suspensions
264
9.4%
465
16.61
7.7%
13.5
Out-of-school suspensions
109
3.9%
197
7.04
4.2%
5.6
DAEP placements
114
4.1%
131
4.68
3.1%
3.6
Mandatory DAEP placements
75
2.7%
86
3.07
2.5%
2.8
Discretionary DAEP placements
44
1.6%
45
1.61
1.5%
1.8
JJAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Midway HS
Parent district: Midway ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$8,578
Selected comparison
$11,503
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 953 rated schools reporting
−$2,925 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $8,578 per student for this campus, $13,883 per student for its parent district, Midway ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Midway HS
Parent district: Midway ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$7,152
$10,262
$13,054
$7,633
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 858 rated schools reporting
2019
$7,491
$11,161
$13,108
$7,741
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 871 rated schools reporting
2020
$8,108
$11,669
$14,058
$8,078
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 881 rated schools reporting
2021
$7,909
$16,485
$14,797
$8,495
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 890 rated schools reporting
2022
$13,091
$20,276
$15,708
$9,714
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 908 rated schools reporting
2023
$9,631
$15,559
$16,792
$10,213
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 925 rated schools reporting
2024
$7,268
$14,035
$18,125
$11,260
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 941 rated schools reporting
2025
$8,578
$13,883
$18,972
$11,503
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 953 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$60,598−$7,722 vs similar economic context
Teachers
167+114.6 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
15.9+1.4 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Midway HS
Beginning 6.3%
1 to 5 years 24.3%
6 to 10 years 21.6%
11 to 20 years 28.1%
21 to 30 years 15.8%
Over 30 years 3.8%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 968 reporting for every category shown · 968 in full cohort
Beginning 4.8%
1 to 5 years 22.4%
6 to 10 years 19.7%
11 to 20 years 32.3%
21 to 30 years 17.4%
Over 30 years 3.2%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 12: Waco · 301 reporting for every category shown · 301 in full cohort
Beginning 6.8%
1 to 5 years 26.8%
6 to 10 years 19%
11 to 20 years 27.1%
21 to 30 years 16.2%
Over 30 years 4.2%
Selected comparison averageFor McLennan County · 83 reporting for every category shown · 83 in full cohort
Beginning 6.3%
1 to 5 years 26%
6 to 10 years 19.6%
11 to 20 years 27.2%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 4.9%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 431 reporting for every category shown · 431 in full cohort
Beginning 5.5%
1 to 5 years 24.6%
6 to 10 years 20.4%
11 to 20 years 30%
21 to 30 years 15.4%
Over 30 years 3.4%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Midway HS in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classMidway HS · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Secondary English
22
16.8
Secondary languages other than English
23.2
19.1
Secondary math
23.6
17.5
Secondary science
24.9
19.1
Secondary social studies
24.4
19.2
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 5 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Out of 200 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#1 rankings
First-place results
5 measures
1of 75
School Progress
McLennan County · of the 75 that report this measure · tied with 1
1of 75
Relative Performance
McLennan County · of the 75 that report this measure
1of 35
Social Studies — Meets
McLennan County · of the 35 that report this measure
1of 18
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)
McLennan County · of the 18 that report this measure
1of 18
Earned a level I or level II certificate
McLennan County · of the 18 that report this measure
#2–3 rankings
Second- and third-place results
5 measures
2of 75
Student Achievement
McLennan County · of the 75 that report this measure · tied with 1
2of 75
All Subjects — Meets
McLennan County · of the 75 that report this measure · tied with 1
2of 35
Social Studies — Masters
McLennan County · of the 35 that report this measure
3of 83
Overall score
McLennan County · of the 83 that report this measure · tied with 1
3of 70
Science — Masters
McLennan County · of the 70 that report this measure · tied with 1
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
18 measures
4of 75
All Subjects — Approaches
McLennan County · of the 75 that report this measure
4of 75
Math — Approaches
McLennan County · of the 75 that report this measure · tied with 1
4of 75
Math — Meets
McLennan County · of the 75 that report this measure
4of 35
Social Studies — Approaches
McLennan County · of the 35 that report this measure · tied with 1
4of 18
College, career or military ready
McLennan County · of the 18 that report this measure · tied with 1
4of 18
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA
McLennan County · of the 18 that report this measure
5of 75
Closing the Gaps
McLennan County · of the 75 that report this measure · tied with 1
5of 75
Reading — Meets
McLennan County · of the 75 that report this measure
5of 70
Science — Meets
McLennan County · of the 70 that report this measure
5of 18
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course
McLennan County · of the 18 that report this measure
5of 18
Earned an associate degree
McLennan County · of the 18 that report this measure
7of 70
Science — Approaches
McLennan County · of the 70 that report this measure · tied with 1
7of 18
Earned college credit for a dual credit course
McLennan County · of the 18 that report this measure
9of 18
Four-Year Graduation Rate
McLennan County (standard accountability only) · of the 18 that report this measure
9of 18
Six-Year Graduation Rate
McLennan County (standard accountability only) · of the 18 that report this measure
9of 18
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces
McLennan County · of the 18 that report this measure
10of 75
All Subjects — Masters
McLennan County · of the 75 that report this measure
10of 18
Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness
McLennan County · of the 18 that report this measure
Other top-5% rankings
High placements in larger reporting groups
1 measure
19of 427
Attendance
Similar size · of the 427 that report this measure · tied with 3
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 161903001.