Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Open-enrollment charter campus

Meridian World School LLC

Meridian World School LLC · Round Rock · 1,757 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
96/1002025-26
Change
+2 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+8.0 ptsvs 88 average · 60 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
9 of 60tied with 1 other
A96

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 96 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 88 average for 60 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Current strength

Chronically absent lower than the similar-context average

2.3% −7 pts vs 9.3%

  • 2.3% is 7 percentage points lower than the 9.3% average among 52 charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
  • 3rd-lowest of 52 charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

STAAR result

All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
79%vs 67.4% avg · +11.6 pts
Masters
49%vs 37.7% avg · +11.3 pts

Among 60 charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

STAAR result

Math above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
74%vs 61.8% avg · +12.2 pts
Masters
42%vs 33.1% avg · +8.9 pts

Among 58 charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Meridian World School LLC is rated A by TEA, scoring 96 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 88 average for 60 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context. It is up 2 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 9th of 60 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context (tied with 1 other).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. After high school: the following fall
  6. Who this school serves
  7. Student counts behind the percentages
  8. Enrollment over time
  9. Discipline and removal from class
  10. Spending per student
  11. Teachers and actual class size
  12. Where this school ranks best
  13. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
908070 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas charter averageMeridian World School LLC 9496929796 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 96 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas charter average
2025-26A9688.0 60 reporting81.7 829 reporting
2024-25A9789.3 48 reporting81.3 797 reporting
2023-24A9288.9 48 reporting79.5 776 reporting
2022-23A9688.0 44 reporting79.6 749 reporting
2021-22A9489.9 38 reporting84.5 700 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement96 A+7.5 vs similar economic context · 60 reporting
  • School Progress88 B+6.2 vs similar economic context · 58 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps96 A+10.5 vs similar economic context · 57 reporting
  • Academic Growth86 B+5.4 vs similar economic context · 57 reporting
  • Relative Performance88 B+15.7 vs similar economic context · 58 reporting
  • Meridian World School LLC
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (60 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement96A—
School Progress88B2
Closing the Gaps96A—
Academic Growth86B4
Relative Performance88B2

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (96), so School Progress (88) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 96.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level94%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 60 reporting
  • Meets grade level79%+12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 60 reporting
  • Masters grade level49%+11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 60 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level95%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 59 reporting
  • Meets grade level86%+11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 59 reporting
  • Masters grade level56%+12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 59 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level92%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 58 reporting
  • Meets grade level74%+12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 58 reporting
  • Masters grade level42%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 58 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level95%+11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 53 reporting
  • Meets grade level76%+13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 53 reporting
  • Masters grade level47%+12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 53 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level91%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 32 reporting
  • Meets grade level75%+12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 32 reporting
  • Masters grade level45%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 32 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (60 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Graduation

Four-Year
97.7%+25.3 pts vs similar economic context average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 23 rated charter campuses reporting
Five-Year
100.0%+44.2 pts vs similar economic context average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 23 rated charter campuses reporting
Six-Year
96.3%+44.7 pts vs similar economic context average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 23 rated charter campuses reporting
Dropout Rate
0.0%−0.6 pts vs similar economic context average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 23 rated charter campuses reporting

These measures use TEA's standard-accountability population. Each comparison average includes only charter campuses in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported charter campus rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.

College, career and military readiness

Total credit for CCMR criteria
95.0%+8.3 pts vs similar economic context
CCMR criteria
CriterionThis school% of graduatesAveragesimilar economic contextDifferencepercentage pointsReportingselected comparison
Total credit for CCMR criteria95.0%86.7%+8.3 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 19 rated charter campuses reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course81.4%73.3%+8.1 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 20 rated charter campuses reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA81.4%69.8%+11.6 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 20 rated charter campuses reporting
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)81.4%41.6%+39.8 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 20 rated charter campuses reporting
Earned college credit for a dual credit course0.0%18.8%−18.8 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 20 rated charter campuses reporting
Earned an industry-based certification0.0%3.1%−3.1 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 20 rated charter campuses reporting
Earned a level I or level II certificate0.0%0.0%+0.0 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 20 rated charter campuses reporting
Earned an associate degree0.0%0.8%−0.8 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 20 rated charter campuses reporting
Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit0.0%2.8%−2.8 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 20 rated charter campuses reporting
Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness1.2%1.9%−0.7 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 20 rated charter campuses reporting
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student7.0%5.5%+1.5 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 20 rated charter campuses reporting
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces0.0%1.6%−1.6 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 20 rated charter campuses reporting

Every row is a share of this school's graduates, and every row is a way of meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this school minus the average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate, counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported charter campus percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only charter campuses for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

After high school: the following fall

Where school graduates appeared in Texas public higher-education records the fall after graduation. This is a limited next-step measure, not an eventual college-going or completion rate.

Graduates in the report
77

Class of 2023–24

Enrolled in Texas public higher education
43

55.8% of graduates

Not found in Texas public higher-ed records
29

37.7% of graduates

Not trackable
5

Fall 2024

Graduates in the report

This school
77
Selected comparison
66.4

average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 13 rated charter campuses reporting

Enrolled in Texas public higher education

This school
43
Selected comparison
38.3

average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 13 rated charter campuses reporting

Texas-public enrollment rate

This school
55.8%
Selected comparison
54.2%

average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 13 rated charter campuses reporting

+1.6 pts vs similar economic context

Not-found rate

This school
37.7%
Selected comparison
38.6%

average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 13 rated charter campuses reporting

−0.9 pts vs similar economic context

Not-trackable rate

This school
6.5%
Selected comparison
7.2%

average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 13 rated charter campuses reporting

−0.7 pts vs similar economic context

Most common named Texas public destinations

  1. AUSTIN COMMUNITY COLLEGE (012015)11
  2. U. OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN (003658)11
  3. TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY (003632)6

Selected comparison counts are neutral cohort scale context. The percentages put differently sized graduating classes on the same basis, but still cover only the limited Texas-public system observed by this report.

Source: Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board, high-school graduates enrolled in higher education, fetched 24 August 2026. The report covers graduates who enrolled in a Texas public college or university the following fall and includes only districts or campuses with more than 25 graduates.

“Not found” does not mean a graduate did not continue their education. It can include private or out-of-state college, work, military service, enrollment after the fall term, or another path the Texas public system does not observe.

“Not trackable” is not an outcome. THECB uses it for graduates with a non-standard identifier that could not be matched to higher-education records.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
1,757
Economically disadvantaged
8.4%−0.7 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
15.1%+0.7 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
9.0%−3.5 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
97.1%+1.6 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
2.3%−7.0 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Meridian World School LLC

African American: 10.4%Hispanic: 16.2%White: 22.5%American Indian: 0.1%Asian: 45.6%Pacific Islander: 0.5%Two or More Races: 4.8%
  • African American 10.4%
  • Hispanic 16.2%
  • White 22.5%
  • American Indian 0.1%
  • Asian 45.6%
  • Pacific Islander 0.5%
  • Two or More Races 4.8%

Selected comparison average For charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 60 reporting for every category shown · 60 in full cohort

African American: 8.8%Hispanic: 21%White: 31.2%American Indian: 0.5%Asian: 32.6%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 5.7%
  • African American 8.8%
  • Hispanic 21%
  • White 31.2%
  • American Indian 0.5%
  • Asian 32.6%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 5.7%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
1,757
Economically disadvantaged students
148
Emergent bilingual students
265
Special education students
159

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
61
Students in TEA mobility denominator
1,639
TEA-published mobility rate
3.7%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 1,757 students in 2025–26, an increase of 12 (0.7%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
1,757

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
+12

Increase · +0.7%

Change since 2021–22
+73

Increase · +4.3%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
1,757
Selected comparison
631

average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 60 rated charter campuses reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Meridian World School LLC
School yearStudents enrolledMeridian World School LLCChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 1,684 First available year 682.8
2022–23 1,690 Increase of 6 (0.4%) 644.9
2023–24 1,729 Increase of 39 (2.3%) 648.6
2024–25 1,745 Increase of 16 (0.9%) 649.5
2025–26 1,757 Increase of 12 (0.7%) 631

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting charter campuses in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
27

1.5% of cumulative year-end enrollment

Disciplinary actions
37

2.09 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
1,774

2024–25

Share of students · 2024–25

This school
1.5%
Selected comparison
5.1%

average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 36 rated charter campuses reporting

−3.6 pts vs similar economic context

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
2.09
Selected comparison
8.4

average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 39 rated charter campuses reporting

−6.3 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Meridian World School LLC
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 1,747 32 1.8% 71 4.06 2.6% 3.5
2021–22 1,727 40 2.3% 106 6.14 4.6% 6.4
2022–23 1,737 73 4.2% 104 5.99 4.4% 7
2023–24 1,775 84 4.7% 155 8.73 4.8% 8.1
2024–25 1,774 27 1.5% 37 2.09 5.1% 8.4
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Meridian World School LLC in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline 27 1.5% 37 2.09 5.1% 8.4
In-school suspensions 19 1.1% 22 1.24 4.3% 5.9
Out-of-school suspensions 14 0.8% 14 0.79 3.4% 5.3
DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized charter campuses can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$6k$13k$20k20182020202220242025
  • Meridian World School LLC
  • Parent district: Meridian World School LLC
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$8,764
Selected comparison
$10,823

average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 52 rated charter campuses reporting

−$2,059 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $8,764 per student for this campus, $11,581 per student for its parent district, Meridian World School LLC, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearMeridian World School LLCParent district: Meridian World School LLCTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$6,627$8,881$13,054$7,309 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 33 rated charter campuses reporting
2019$6,801$9,307$13,108$7,303 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 35 rated charter campuses reporting
2020$7,292$9,600$14,058$7,749 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 36 rated charter campuses reporting
2021$7,415$10,041$14,797$7,605 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 37 rated charter campuses reporting
2022$7,858$10,328$15,708$9,036 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 39 rated charter campuses reporting
2023$8,332$10,663$16,792$9,878 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 45 rated charter campuses reporting
2024$8,693$11,047$18,125$10,220 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 49 rated charter campuses reporting
2025$8,764$11,581$18,972$10,823 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 52 rated charter campuses reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$72,522+$9,701 vs similar economic context
Teachers
104+68.2 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
16.9−0.7 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Meridian World School LLC

Beginning: 1%1 to 5 years: 23%6 to 10 years: 25.5%11 to 20 years: 36.8%21 to 30 years: 11.4%Over 30 years: 2.4%
  • Beginning 1%
  • 1 to 5 years 23%
  • 6 to 10 years 25.5%
  • 11 to 20 years 36.8%
  • 21 to 30 years 11.4%
  • Over 30 years 2.4%

Selected comparison average For charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 60 reporting for every category shown · 60 in full cohort

Beginning: 7.1%1 to 5 years: 28.1%6 to 10 years: 13.1%11 to 20 years: 15.4%21 to 30 years: 6.8%Over 30 years: 1.2%
  • Beginning 7.1%
  • 1 to 5 years 28.1%
  • 6 to 10 years 13.1%
  • 11 to 20 years 15.4%
  • 21 to 30 years 6.8%
  • Over 30 years 1.2%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Meridian World School LLC in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classMeridian World School LLC · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten22.220.9
Grade 122.821.4
Grade 225.221.9
Grade 325.522.7
Grade 425.222.9
Grade 525.321.6
Grade 625.722
Secondary English21.217.8
Secondary languages other than English17.217
Secondary math14.415.8
Secondary science2019.3
Secondary social studies18.818.7

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 12 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this school ranks best

Out of 120 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

#2–3 rankings

Second- and third-place results

9 measures

  • 2of 44

    Attendance

    Similar size · of the 44 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 2of 44

    Chronically absent (lowest is best)

    Similar size · of the 44 that report this measure

  • 3of 44

    All Subjects — Approaches

    Similar size · of the 44 that report this measure

  • 3of 44

    All Subjects — Meets

    Similar size · of the 44 that report this measure

  • 3of 44

    Reading — Approaches

    Similar size · of the 44 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 3of 44

    Reading — Meets

    Similar size · of the 44 that report this measure

  • 3of 44

    Math — Approaches

    Similar size · of the 44 that report this measure

  • 3of 44

    Science — Approaches

    Similar size · of the 44 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 3of 28

    Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)

    Similar size · of the 28 that report this measure

#4–10 rankings

Fourth- through tenth-place results

17 measures

  • 4of 44

    Overall score

    Similar size · of the 44 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 4of 44

    Student Achievement

    Similar size · of the 44 that report this measure

  • 4of 44

    All Subjects — Masters

    Similar size · of the 44 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 4of 44

    Math — Meets

    Similar size · of the 44 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 4of 44

    Math — Masters

    Similar size · of the 44 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 4of 44

    Science — Meets

    Similar size · of the 44 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 4of 40

    Social Studies — Meets

    Similar size · of the 40 that report this measure

  • 4of 40

    Social Studies — Masters

    Similar size · of the 40 that report this measure

  • 4of 28

    Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA

    Similar size · of the 28 that report this measure

  • 5of 44

    Reading — Masters

    Similar size · of the 44 that report this measure

  • 5of 44

    Science — Masters

    Similar size · of the 44 that report this measure

  • 5of 40

    Social Studies — Approaches

    Similar size · of the 40 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 6of 44

    Closing the Gaps

    Similar size · of the 44 that report this measure

  • 6of 44

    Academic Growth

    Similar size · of the 44 that report this measure

  • 6of 20

    Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 20 that report this measure

  • 7of 20

    Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 20 that report this measure

  • 9of 19

    College, career or military ready

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 19 that report this measure · tied with 1

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 246801001.