Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Mcanally MS

Parker County · Region 11: Fort Worth · 887 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
93/1002025-26
Change
+2 ptssince 2022-23
Score vs similar economic context
+2.8 ptsvs 90.2 average · 717 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
155 of 717tied with 97 others
A93

At a glance

The available rating history is moving up. The current score is above the 90.2 average for 717 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Recent domain gain

Relative Performance rose 6 points

79 to 85 2024-25 to 2025-26

  • 85 is 6 points above the 79 average among 702 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

STAAR result

All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
75%vs 71.9% avg · +3.1 pts
Masters
45%vs 41.4% avg · +3.6 pts

Among 704 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

STAAR result

Math above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
73%vs 67.8% avg · +5.2 pts
Masters
40%vs 36.4% avg · +3.6 pts

Among 702 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Mcanally MS is rated A by TEA, scoring 93 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 90.2 average for 717 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 2 points since 2022-23.

Ranks 155th of 717 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 97 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 4 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Enrollment over time
  8. Discipline and removal from class
  9. Spending per student
  10. Teachers and actual class size
  11. Where this school ranks best
  12. Where this comes from

4 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
908070 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageMcanally MS 91919293 2022-232023-242024-252025-26

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26A9390.2 717 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25A9290.4 711 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24A9189.3 695 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23A9189.7 680 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement93 A+1.8 vs similar economic context · 704 reporting
  • School Progress91 A+4.6 vs similar economic context · 702 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps94 A+6.3 vs similar economic context · 700 reporting
  • Academic Growth91 A+6.7 vs similar economic context · 698 reporting
  • Relative Performance85 B+6.0 vs similar economic context · 702 reporting
  • Mcanally MS
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (717 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement93A—
School Progress91A—
Closing the Gaps94A—
Academic Growth91A—
Relative Performance85B5

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (93), so School Progress (91) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 93.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level92%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 704 reporting
  • Meets grade level75%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 704 reporting
  • Masters grade level45%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 704 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level94%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 704 reporting
  • Meets grade level79%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 704 reporting
  • Masters grade level52%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 704 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level92%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 702 reporting
  • Meets grade level73%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 702 reporting
  • Masters grade level40%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 702 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level96%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 661 reporting
  • Meets grade level83%+16 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 661 reporting
  • Masters grade level52%+11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 661 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level84%−4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 282 reporting
  • Meets grade level54%−14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 282 reporting
  • Masters grade level32%−11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 282 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (717 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
887
Economically disadvantaged
17.2%−0.7 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
1.7%−9.1 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
16.9%+0.5 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
95.6%−0.2 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
7.0%−0.6 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Mcanally MS

African American: 2.3%Hispanic: 20.2%White: 69.9%Asian: 2.3%Two or More Races: 5.4%
  • African American 2.3%
  • Hispanic 20.2%
  • White 69.9%
  • Asian 2.3%
  • Two or More Races 5.4%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 717 reporting for every category shown · 717 in full cohort

African American: 7%Hispanic: 22.3%White: 48.5%American Indian: 0.4%Asian: 16.2%Pacific Islander: 0.1%Two or More Races: 5.5%
  • African American 7%
  • Hispanic 22.3%
  • White 48.5%
  • American Indian 0.4%
  • Asian 16.2%
  • Pacific Islander 0.1%
  • Two or More Races 5.5%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
886
Economically disadvantaged students
152
Emergent bilingual students
15
Special education students
150

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
63
Students in TEA mobility denominator
935
TEA-published mobility rate
6.7%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 887 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 11 (1.2%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
887

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
−11

Decrease · −1.2%

Change since 2022–23
+19

Increase · +2.2%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
887
Selected comparison
864.1

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 713 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Mcanally MS
School yearStudents enrolledMcanally MSChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2022–23 868 First available year 893.9
2023–24 928 Increase of 60 (6.9%) 882.6
2024–25 898 Decrease of 30 (3.2%) 873
2025–26 887 Decrease of 11 (1.2%) 864.1

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
96

10.3% of cumulative year-end enrollment

Disciplinary actions
195

20.99 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
929

2024–25

Share of students · 2024–25

This school
10.3%
Selected comparison
6.1%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 474 rated schools reporting

+4.2 pts vs similar economic context

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
20.99
Selected comparison
11.2

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 546 rated schools reporting

+9.8 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Mcanally MS
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2022–23 912 154 16.9% 301 33.00 6.5% 12
2023–24 969 110 11.3% 196 20.23 6.3% 11.7
2024–25 929 96 10.3% 195 20.99 6.1% 11.2
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Mcanally MS in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline 96 10.3% 195 20.99 6.1% 11.2
In-school suspensions 82 8.8% 142 15.29 5.7% 9
Out-of-school suspensions 30 3.2% 43 4.63 2.9% 3.8
DAEP placements Suppressed — 10 1.08 — 2.3
Mandatory DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$7k$15k$23k20232025
  • Mcanally MS
  • Parent district: Aledo ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$7,348
Selected comparison
$10,994

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 711 rated schools reporting

−$3,646 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $7,348 per student for this campus, $16,370 per student for its parent district, Aledo ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearMcanally MSParent district: Aledo ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2023$7,468$15,972$16,792$9,940 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 681 rated schools reporting
2024$7,856$21,873$18,125$10,907 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 696 rated schools reporting
2025$7,348$16,370$18,972$10,994 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 711 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$70,318+$1,155 vs similar economic context
Teachers
54−1.5 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
16.5+1.5 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Mcanally MS

1 to 5 years: 14.9%6 to 10 years: 28.8%11 to 20 years: 37%21 to 30 years: 15.8%Over 30 years: 3.5%
  • 1 to 5 years 14.9%
  • 6 to 10 years 28.8%
  • 11 to 20 years 37%
  • 21 to 30 years 15.8%
  • Over 30 years 3.5%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 717 reporting for every category shown · 717 in full cohort

Beginning: 4.4%1 to 5 years: 22.9%6 to 10 years: 20%11 to 20 years: 32.7%21 to 30 years: 17.2%Over 30 years: 2.8%
  • Beginning 4.4%
  • 1 to 5 years 22.9%
  • 6 to 10 years 20%
  • 11 to 20 years 32.7%
  • 21 to 30 years 17.2%
  • Over 30 years 2.8%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Mcanally MS in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classMcanally MS · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Grade 626.419.2
Secondary English26.718.1
Secondary languages other than English23.220.4
Secondary math2618.3
Secondary science27.720.7
Secondary social studies2520.9

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this school ranks best

Out of 120 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

#1 rankings

First-place results

1 measure

  • 1of 41

    Closing the Gaps

    Parker County · of the 41 that report this measure

#2–3 rankings

Second- and third-place results

6 measures

  • 2of 40

    Academic Growth

    Parker County · of the 40 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 3of 42

    School Progress

    Parker County · of the 42 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 3of 42

    All Subjects — Masters

    Parker County · of the 42 that report this measure · tied with 2

  • 3of 42

    Reading — Approaches

    Parker County · of the 42 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 3of 42

    Reading — Masters

    Parker County · of the 42 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 3of 37

    Science — Masters

    Parker County · of the 37 that report this measure · tied with 1

#4–10 rankings

Fourth- through tenth-place results

11 measures

  • 4of 42

    Math — Meets

    Parker County · of the 42 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 4of 42

    Math — Masters

    Parker County · of the 42 that report this measure

  • 4of 37

    Science — Meets

    Parker County · of the 37 that report this measure

  • 5of 42

    All Subjects — Approaches

    Parker County · of the 42 that report this measure · tied with 2

  • 5of 37

    Science — Approaches

    Parker County · of the 37 that report this measure

  • 6of 42

    Relative Performance

    Parker County · of the 42 that report this measure · tied with 2

  • 6of 18

    Social Studies — Masters

    Parker County · of the 18 that report this measure

  • 8of 42

    All Subjects — Meets

    Parker County · of the 42 that report this measure

  • 8of 42

    Reading — Meets

    Parker County · of the 42 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 8of 18

    Social Studies — Meets

    Parker County · of the 18 that report this measure

  • 9of 18

    Social Studies — Approaches

    Parker County · of the 18 that report this measure

Other top-5% rankings

High placements in larger reporting groups

1 measure

  • 44of 810

    Math — Approaches

    Region 11: Fort Worth · of the 810 that report this measure · tied with 15

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 184907042.