Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Maude Mae Kirchner Elem

Maverick County · Region 20: San Antonio · 103 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
84/1002025-26
Change
−8 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+5.8 ptsvs 78.2 average · 2,100 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
602 of 2,100tied with 79 others
B84

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 87 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 78.2 average for 2,100 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Recent domain gain

Student Achievement rose 8 points

75 to 83 2024-25 to 2025-26

  • 83 is 9.4 points above the 73.6 average among 1,944 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

STAAR result

All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
61%vs 43.6% avg · +17.4 pts
Masters
22%vs 17.2% avg · +4.8 pts

Among 1,944 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

STAAR result

Math above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
57%vs 39.1% avg · +17.9 pts
Masters
22%vs 14.7% avg · +7.3 pts

Among 1,934 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Maude Mae Kirchner Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 84 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 78.2 average for 2,100 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 8 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 602nd of 2,100 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 79 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Enrollment over time
  8. Discipline and removal from class
  9. Spending per student
  10. Teachers and actual class size
  11. Where this school ranks best
  12. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
9080706050 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageMaude Mae Kirchner Elem 9261798984 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 87 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26B8478.2 2,100 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25B8977.8 2,089 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24C7975.4 2,077 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23D6175.9 2,054 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22A9281.8 2,035 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement83 B+9.4 vs similar economic context · 1,944 reporting
  • School Progress89 B+9.6 vs similar economic context · 1,939 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps72 C−3.4 vs similar economic context · 1,925 reporting
  • Academic Growth68 D−4.5 vs similar economic context · 1,888 reporting
  • Relative Performance89 B+11.2 vs similar economic context · 1,939 reporting
  • Maude Mae Kirchner Elem
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,100 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement83B7
School Progress89B1
Closing the Gaps72C8
Academic Growth68D2
Relative Performance89B1

Closest to moving up: School Progress, 1 point below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (89), so Student Achievement (83) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 89.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level81%+11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,944 reporting
  • Meets grade level61%+17 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,944 reporting
  • Masters grade level22%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,944 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level84%+12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,942 reporting
  • Meets grade level61%+13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,942 reporting
  • Masters grade level22%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,942 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level76%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,934 reporting
  • Meets grade level57%+18 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,934 reporting
  • Masters grade level22%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,934 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level85%+17 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,793 reporting
  • Meets grade level77%+38 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,793 reporting
  • Masters grade level23%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,793 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,100 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
103
Economically disadvantaged
76.7%−0.2 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
39.8%+14.0 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
13.6%−5.2 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
95.3%+1.7 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
11.5%−7.9 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Maude Mae Kirchner Elem

Hispanic: 92.2%White: 5.8%American Indian: 1.9%
  • Hispanic 92.2%
  • White 5.8%
  • American Indian 1.9%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,100 reporting for every category shown · 2,100 in full cohort

African American: 13.5%Hispanic: 64%White: 17.3%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 1.8%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 2.9%
  • African American 13.5%
  • Hispanic 64%
  • White 17.3%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 1.8%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 2.9%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
103
Economically disadvantaged students
79
Emergent bilingual students
41
Special education students
14

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
12
Students in TEA mobility denominator
96
TEA-published mobility rate
12.5%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 103 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 5 (4.6%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
103

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
−5

Decrease · −4.6%

Change since 2021–22
−13

Decrease · −11.2%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
103
Selected comparison
638.7

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,073 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Maude Mae Kirchner Elem
School yearStudents enrolledMaude Mae Kirchner ElemChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 116 First available year 657.1
2022–23 132 Increase of 16 (13.8%) 660.1
2023–24 119 Decrease of 13 (9.8%) 657.2
2024–25 108 Decrease of 11 (9.2%) 655.3
2025–26 103 Decrease of 5 (4.6%) 638.7

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Not reported

Rate not available

Disciplinary actions
Not reported

Rate not available

Cumulative year-end enrollment
111

2024–25

TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Maude Mae Kirchner Elem
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 109 Not reported — Not reported — — —
2021–22 124 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
2022–23 131 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
2023–24 123 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
2024–25 111 Not reported — Not reported — — —
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Maude Mae Kirchner Elem in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline Not reported — Not reported — — —
In-school suspensions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Out-of-school suspensions Not reported — Not reported — — —
DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$7k$14k$20k20182020202220242025
  • Maude Mae Kirchner Elem
  • Parent district: Eagle Pass ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$14,135
Selected comparison
$13,029

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,087 rated schools reporting

+$1,106 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $14,135 per student for this campus, $14,008 per student for its parent district, Eagle Pass ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearMaude Mae Kirchner ElemParent district: Eagle Pass ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$10,790$10,596$13,054$8,052 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,966 rated schools reporting
2019$9,488$10,878$13,108$8,198 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,987 rated schools reporting
2020$12,066$11,034$14,058$8,731 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,005 rated schools reporting
2021$12,245$11,721$14,797$9,304 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,017 rated schools reporting
2022$10,960$12,928$15,708$10,632 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,035 rated schools reporting
2023$10,521$13,823$16,792$11,274 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,054 rated schools reporting
2024$12,069$13,526$18,125$12,286 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,075 rated schools reporting
2025$14,135$14,008$18,972$13,029 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,087 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$64,471−$2,295 vs similar economic context
Teachers
9−34.4 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
11.4−2.6 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Maude Mae Kirchner Elem

Beginning: 11.1%1 to 5 years: 11.1%6 to 10 years: 22.2%11 to 20 years: 44.4%21 to 30 years: 11.1%
  • Beginning 11.1%
  • 1 to 5 years 11.1%
  • 6 to 10 years 22.2%
  • 11 to 20 years 44.4%
  • 21 to 30 years 11.1%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,100 reporting for every category shown · 2,100 in full cohort

Beginning: 6.8%1 to 5 years: 27.5%6 to 10 years: 19%11 to 20 years: 27.2%21 to 30 years: 15.2%Over 30 years: 3.7%
  • Beginning 6.8%
  • 1 to 5 years 27.5%
  • 6 to 10 years 19%
  • 11 to 20 years 27.2%
  • 21 to 30 years 15.2%
  • Over 30 years 3.7%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Maude Mae Kirchner Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classMaude Mae Kirchner Elem · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten1118
Grade 11518.3
Grade 214.718.4
Grade 31618.7
Grade 41919
Grade 51920
Grade 61818

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 7 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this school ranks best

Out of 105 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

#1 rankings

First-place results

2 measures

  • 1of 23

    Per-student spending

    Maverick County · of the 23 that report this measure

  • 1of 19

    Science — Meets

    Maverick County · of the 19 that report this measure · tied with 1

#2–3 rankings

Second- and third-place results

6 measures

  • 2of 20

    Chronically absent (lowest is best)

    Maverick County · of the 20 that report this measure

  • 2of 19

    Relative Performance

    Maverick County · of the 19 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 2of 19

    Reading — Meets

    Maverick County · of the 19 that report this measure · tied with 2

  • 3of 19

    School Progress

    Maverick County · of the 19 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 3of 19

    All Subjects — Meets

    Maverick County · of the 19 that report this measure

  • 3of 19

    Reading — Approaches

    Maverick County · of the 19 that report this measure · tied with 1

#4–10 rankings

Fourth- through tenth-place results

10 measures

  • 4of 20

    Attendance

    Maverick County · of the 20 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 4of 19

    Student Achievement

    Maverick County · of the 19 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 5of 19

    Math — Meets

    Maverick County · of the 19 that report this measure

  • 5of 19

    Math — Masters

    Maverick County · of the 19 that report this measure · tied with 2

  • 6of 19

    All Subjects — Masters

    Maverick County · of the 19 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 6of 19

    Reading — Masters

    Maverick County · of the 19 that report this measure · tied with 2

  • 6of 19

    Science — Approaches

    Maverick County · of the 19 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 7of 19

    All Subjects — Approaches

    Maverick County · of the 19 that report this measure

  • 9of 23

    Overall score

    Maverick County · of the 23 that report this measure · tied with 2

  • 10of 19

    Math — Approaches

    Maverick County · of the 19 that report this measure

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 159901107.