+4.0 ptsvs 87 average · 1,071 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
325 of 1,071tied with 92 others
Score vs region
+11.1 ptsvs 79.9 average · 519 rated schools in Region 13: Austin
Region 13: Austin placement
78 of 519tied with 34 others
Score vs county
+13.1 ptsvs 77.9 average · 195 rated schools in Travis County
Travis County placement
30 of 195tied with 10 others
Score vs similar-size group
+10.8 ptsvs 80.2 average · 3,733 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
454 of 3,733tied with 190 others
Score vs state
+9.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
1,157 of 7,646tied with 413 others
A91
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 95 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 87 average for 1,071 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 79.9 average for 519 rated schools in Region 13: Austin.The current score is above the 77.9 average for 195 rated schools in Travis County.The current score is above the 80.2 average for 3,733 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
69%vs 63.7% avg · +5.3 pts
Masters
43%vs 31.6% avg · +11.4 pts
Among 1,048 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Mathews Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 91 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 87 average for 1,071 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 2 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 325th of 1,071 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 92 others).
Mathews Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 91 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 79.9 average for 519 rated schools in Region 13: Austin. It is down 2 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 78th of 519 rated schools in Region 13: Austin (tied with 34 others).
Mathews Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 91 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 77.9 average for 195 rated schools in Travis County. It is down 2 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 30th of 195 rated schools in Travis County (tied with 10 others).
Mathews Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 91 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.2 average for 3,733 similarly sized rated schools. It is down 2 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 454th of 3,733 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 190 others).
Mathews Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 91 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is down 2 points since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 95 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement92 A+4.3 vs similar economic context · 1,048 reporting
School Progress91 A+6.9 vs similar economic context · 1,046 reporting
Closing the Gaps90 A+5.6 vs similar economic context · 1,038 reporting
Academic Growth91 A+11.0 vs similar economic context · 1,028 reporting
Relative Performance86 B+6.0 vs similar economic context · 1,046 reporting
Mathews Elem
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,071 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
92
A
—
School Progress
91
A
—
Closing the Gaps
90
A
—
Academic Growth
91
A
—
Relative Performance
86
B
4
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (92), so
School Progress (91) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 92.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level90%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,048 reporting
Meets grade level69%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,048 reporting
Masters grade level43%+11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,048 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level93%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,047 reporting
Meets grade level78%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,047 reporting
Masters grade level55%+22 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,047 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level89%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,045 reporting
Meets grade level64%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,045 reporting
Masters grade level36%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,045 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level82%−3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 956 reporting
Meets grade level57%−6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 956 reporting
Masters grade level24%−10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 956 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,071 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
377
Economically disadvantaged
31.3%−1.0 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
12.7%+2.4 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
20.2%+2.9 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
95.2%±0.0 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
9.9%−1.0 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Mathews Elem
African American 3.7%
Hispanic 33.7%
White 46.2%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 9.8%
Two or More Races 6.4%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,071 reporting for every category shown · 1,071 in full cohort
African American 9.1%
Hispanic 30.4%
White 48%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 7.3%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 4.8%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 13: Austin · 519 reporting for every category shown · 519 in full cohort
African American 6.8%
Hispanic 49.9%
White 31.9%
American Indian 0.2%
Asian 6.7%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 4.4%
Selected comparison averageFor Travis County · 195 reporting for every category shown · 195 in full cohort
African American 9.2%
Hispanic 55.1%
White 25.8%
American Indian 0.2%
Asian 5.6%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.9%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 3,733 reporting for every category shown · 3,733 in full cohort
African American 11.6%
Hispanic 54.6%
White 27.1%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 2.9%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.3%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
377
Economically disadvantaged students
118
Emergent bilingual students
48
Special education students
76
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
22
Students in TEA mobility denominator
313
TEA-published mobility rate
7%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 377 students in 2025–26, an increase of 11 (3.0%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
377
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
+11
Increase · +3.0%
Change since 2021–22
+25
Increase · +7.1%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
377
Selected comparison
785.8
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,058 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Mathews Elem
School year
Students enrolledMathews Elem
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
352
First available year
797.7
2022–23
345
Decrease of 7 (2.0%)
800.7
2023–24
347
Increase of 2 (0.6%)
797.5
2024–25
366
Increase of 19 (5.5%)
794
2025–26
377
Increase of 11 (3.0%)
785.8
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Not reported
Rate not available
Disciplinary actions
Not reported
Rate not available
Cumulative year-end enrollment
385
2024–25
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Mathews Elem
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
374
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
2021–22
371
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
2022–23
366
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
2023–24
371
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
2024–25
385
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Mathews Elem in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
In-school suspensions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Out-of-school suspensions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Mathews Elem
Parent district: Austin ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$10,252
Selected comparison
$11,764
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,050 rated schools reporting
−$1,512 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $10,252 per student for this campus, $26,839 per student for its parent district, Austin ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Mathews Elem
Parent district: Austin ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$7,125
$13,757
$13,054
$7,646
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 945 rated schools reporting
2019
$7,097
$14,067
$13,108
$7,790
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 962 rated schools reporting
2020
$7,327
$16,747
$14,058
$8,122
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 972 rated schools reporting
2021
$8,938
$18,042
$14,797
$8,540
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 983 rated schools reporting
2022
$8,468
$18,220
$15,708
$9,780
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,003 rated schools reporting
2023
$8,826
$16,721
$16,792
$10,333
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,020 rated schools reporting
2024
$9,981
$19,064
$18,125
$11,450
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,032 rated schools reporting
2025
$10,252
$26,839
$18,972
$11,764
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,050 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$63,604−$4,550 vs similar economic context
Teachers
26−25.6 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
14.7+0.2 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Mathews Elem
Beginning 21.4%
1 to 5 years 35.4%
6 to 10 years 19.5%
11 to 20 years 7.8%
21 to 30 years 16%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,071 reporting for every category shown · 1,071 in full cohort
Beginning 4.9%
1 to 5 years 22.5%
6 to 10 years 19.7%
11 to 20 years 32.2%
21 to 30 years 17.3%
Over 30 years 3.2%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 13: Austin · 519 reporting for every category shown · 519 in full cohort
Beginning 5.9%
1 to 5 years 28%
6 to 10 years 19.4%
11 to 20 years 28.3%
21 to 30 years 14.4%
Over 30 years 3.2%
Selected comparison averageFor Travis County · 195 reporting for every category shown · 195 in full cohort
Beginning 6%
1 to 5 years 30.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 26.7%
21 to 30 years 13.2%
Over 30 years 2.8%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 3,733 reporting for every category shown · 3,733 in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.5%
6 to 10 years 18.9%
11 to 20 years 28.9%
21 to 30 years 16.5%
Over 30 years 3.6%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Mathews Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classMathews Elem · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten
16.3
18.5
Grade 1
22.5
19.1
Grade 2
23
19.6
Grade 3
21.6
20.3
Grade 4
18
19.9
Grade 5
25.5
21.5
Grade 6
16.2
18.7
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 7 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Out of 105 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
Other top-5% rankings
High placements in larger reporting groups
3 measures
11of 192
Relative Performance
Travis County · of the 192 that report this measure · tied with 3
108of 3,479
Reading — Masters
Similar size · of the 3,479 that report this measure · tied with 10
192of 3,479
All Subjects — Masters
Similar size · of the 3,479 that report this measure · tied with 22
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 227901123.