+8.8 ptsvs 83.2 average · 1,511 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
155 of 1,511tied with 84 others
Score vs region
+9.8 ptsvs 82.2 average · 1,157 rated schools in Region 10: Richardson
Region 10: Richardson placement
161 of 1,157tied with 55 others
Score vs county
+10.6 ptsvs 81.4 average · 563 rated schools in Dallas County
Dallas County placement
66 of 563tied with 12 others
Score vs similar-size group
+11.4 ptsvs 80.6 average · 4,450 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
386 of 4,450tied with 172 others
Score vs state
+10.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
838 of 7,646tied with 318 others
A92
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 93 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 83.2 average for 1,511 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 82.2 average for 1,157 rated schools in Region 10: Richardson.The current score is above the 81.4 average for 563 rated schools in Dallas County.The current score is above the 80.6 average for 4,450 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
72%vs 55.8% avg · +16.2 pts
Masters
48%vs 25% avg · +23 pts
Among 1,468 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Math/Science/Tech Magnet is rated A by TEA, scoring 92 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 83.2 average for 1,511 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 2 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 155th of 1,511 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 84 others).
Math/Science/Tech Magnet is rated A by TEA, scoring 92 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 82.2 average for 1,157 rated schools in Region 10: Richardson. It is down 2 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 161st of 1,157 rated schools in Region 10: Richardson (tied with 55 others).
Math/Science/Tech Magnet is rated A by TEA, scoring 92 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.4 average for 563 rated schools in Dallas County. It is down 2 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 66th of 563 rated schools in Dallas County (tied with 12 others).
Math/Science/Tech Magnet is rated A by TEA, scoring 92 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.6 average for 4,450 similarly sized rated schools. It is down 2 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 386th of 4,450 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 172 others).
Math/Science/Tech Magnet is rated A by TEA, scoring 92 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is down 2 points since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 93 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement93 A+9.7 vs similar economic context · 1,468 reporting
School Progress91 A+9.0 vs similar economic context · 1,465 reporting
Closing the Gaps91 A+10.5 vs similar economic context · 1,456 reporting
Academic Growth88 B+11.3 vs similar economic context · 1,439 reporting
Relative Performance91 A+11.7 vs similar economic context · 1,465 reporting
Math/Science/Tech Magnet
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,511 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
93
A
—
School Progress
91
A
—
Closing the Gaps
91
A
—
Academic Growth
88
B
2
Relative Performance
91
A
—
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (93), so
School Progress (91) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 93.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level89%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,468 reporting
Meets grade level72%+16 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,468 reporting
Masters grade level48%+23 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,468 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level91%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,467 reporting
Meets grade level76%+15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,467 reporting
Masters grade level53%+26 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,467 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level88%+11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,463 reporting
Meets grade level68%+19 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,463 reporting
Masters grade level43%+22 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,463 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level85%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,358 reporting
Meets grade level72%+17 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,358 reporting
Masters grade level49%+22 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,358 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,511 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
669
Economically disadvantaged
44.5%−0.8 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
26.5%+14.6 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
17.8%−0.5 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
97.0%+2.3 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
4.2%−9.1 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Math/Science/Tech Magnet
African American 29.9%
Hispanic 18.2%
White 29.7%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 15.4%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 6.3%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,511 reporting for every category shown · 1,511 in full cohort
African American 9.2%
Hispanic 38%
White 44.2%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 3.8%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 4.3%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 10: Richardson · 1,157 reporting for every category shown · 1,157 in full cohort
African American 17.4%
Hispanic 43.5%
White 24.5%
American Indian 0.6%
Asian 9.9%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 4%
Selected comparison averageFor Dallas County · 563 reporting for every category shown · 563 in full cohort
African American 21.3%
Hispanic 59%
White 10.9%
American Indian 0.6%
Asian 5.4%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 2.6%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,450 reporting for every category shown · 4,450 in full cohort
African American 12.4%
Hispanic 54%
White 24.4%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 5.1%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 3.6%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
669
Economically disadvantaged students
298
Emergent bilingual students
177
Special education students
119
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
22
Students in TEA mobility denominator
566
TEA-published mobility rate
3.9%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 669 students in 2025–26, an increase of 2 (0.3%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
669
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
+2
Increase · +0.3%
Change since 2021–22
+83
Increase · +14.2%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
669
Selected comparison
679.9
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,473 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Math/Science/Tech Magnet
School year
Students enrolledMath/Science/Tech Magnet
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
586
First available year
677.4
2022–23
601
Increase of 15 (2.6%)
682.9
2023–24
628
Increase of 27 (4.5%)
683.7
2024–25
667
Increase of 39 (6.2%)
679.8
2025–26
669
Increase of 2 (0.3%)
679.9
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
14
2.1% of cumulative year-end enrollment
Disciplinary actions
15
2.22 per 100 students
Cumulative year-end enrollment
677
2024–25
Share of students · 2024–25
This school
2.1%
Selected comparison
11.3%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,161 rated schools reporting
−9.2 pts vs similar economic context
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
This school
2.22
Selected comparison
24.7
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,250 rated schools reporting
−22.5 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Math/Science/Tech Magnet
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
586
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
2021–22
612
12
2.0%
18
2.94
11.4%
24.4
2022–23
604
15
2.5%
23
3.81
11.7%
25.7
2023–24
639
12
1.9%
17
2.66
11.7%
26.3
2024–25
677
14
2.1%
15
2.22
11.3%
24.7
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Math/Science/Tech Magnet in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
14
2.1%
15
2.22
11.3%
24.7
In-school suspensions
14
2.1%
15
2.22
10.2%
19
Out-of-school suspensions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Math/Science/Tech Magnet
Parent district: Richardson ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$11,370
Selected comparison
$12,069
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,480 rated schools reporting
−$699 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $11,370 per student for this campus, $18,058 per student for its parent district, Richardson ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Math/Science/Tech Magnet
Parent district: Richardson ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$9,784
$13,362
$13,054
$7,815
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,357 rated schools reporting
2019
$8,836
$14,350
$13,108
$8,019
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,378 rated schools reporting
2020
$10,461
$14,083
$14,058
$8,457
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,387 rated schools reporting
2021
$10,134
$14,192
$14,797
$8,872
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,407 rated schools reporting
2022
$12,149
$17,047
$15,708
$10,244
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,420 rated schools reporting
2023
$13,782
$19,884
$16,792
$10,642
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,438 rated schools reporting
2024
$14,461
$19,167
$18,125
$11,681
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,454 rated schools reporting
2025
$11,370
$18,058
$18,972
$12,069
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,480 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$72,589+$5,389 vs similar economic context
Teachers
46+1.8 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
14.5−6.2 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Math/Science/Tech Magnet
Beginning 6.3%
1 to 5 years 39.6%
6 to 10 years 23.9%
11 to 20 years 14.1%
21 to 30 years 13.9%
Over 30 years 2.4%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,511 reporting for every category shown · 1,511 in full cohort
Beginning 5.4%
1 to 5 years 23.8%
6 to 10 years 19.5%
11 to 20 years 30.3%
21 to 30 years 16.8%
Over 30 years 3.9%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 10: Richardson · 1,157 reporting for every category shown · 1,157 in full cohort
Beginning 6.9%
1 to 5 years 29%
6 to 10 years 20.1%
11 to 20 years 27.5%
21 to 30 years 13.7%
Over 30 years 2.8%
Selected comparison averageFor Dallas County · 563 reporting for every category shown · 563 in full cohort
Beginning 7.5%
1 to 5 years 30.2%
6 to 10 years 21.2%
11 to 20 years 26.5%
21 to 30 years 11.9%
Over 30 years 2.7%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,450 reporting for every category shown · 4,450 in full cohort
Beginning 6.1%
1 to 5 years 26.6%
6 to 10 years 19.9%
11 to 20 years 29%
21 to 30 years 15.3%
Over 30 years 2.9%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Math/Science/Tech Magnet in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classMath/Science/Tech Magnet · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten
17.1
18
Grade 1
21.4
18.4
Grade 2
20.3
18.6
Grade 3
21.1
19.3
Grade 4
19.2
19.2
Grade 5
23.2
20.2
Grade 6
20.3
17.9
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 7 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Out of 105 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
Other top-5% rankings
High placements in larger reporting groups
5 measures
12of 552
Attendance
Dallas County · of the 552 that report this measure · tied with 2
30of 1,468
All Subjects — Masters
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,468 that report this measure · tied with 4
35of 1,467
Reading — Masters
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,467 that report this measure · tied with 2
53of 1,463
Math — Masters
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,463 that report this measure · tied with 6
58of 1,107
Chronically absent (lowest is best)
Region 10: Richardson · of the 1,107 that report this measure · tied with 8
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 057916142.