+11.7 ptsvs 80.3 average · 1,992 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
155 of 1,992tied with 41 others
Score vs region
+10.2 ptsvs 81.8 average · 208 rated schools in Region 16: Amarillo
Region 16: Amarillo placement
25 of 208tied with 9 others
Score vs county
+2.0 ptsvs 90 average · 4 rated schools in Sherman County
Score vs similar-size group
+11.0 ptsvs 81 average · 1,562 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
193 of 1,562tied with 52 others
Score vs state
+10.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
838 of 7,646tied with 318 others
A92
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 77 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 80.3 average for 1,992 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 81.8 average for 208 rated schools in Region 16: Amarillo.The current score is above the 90 average for 4 rated schools in Sherman County.The current score is above the 81 average for 1,562 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
66%vs 48.8% avg · +17.2 pts
Masters
35%vs 20% avg · +15 pts
Among 1,898 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Mary Allen Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 92 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.3 average for 1,992 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 15 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 155th of 1,992 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 41 others).
Mary Allen Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 92 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.8 average for 208 rated schools in Region 16: Amarillo. It is up 15 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 25th of 208 rated schools in Region 16: Amarillo (tied with 9 others).
Mary Allen Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 92 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 90 average for 4 rated schools in Sherman County. It is up 15 points since 2021-22.
Mary Allen Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 92 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81 average for 1,562 similarly sized rated schools. It is up 15 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 193rd of 1,562 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 52 others).
Mary Allen Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 92 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is up 15 points since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated C with 77 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement91 A+12.6 vs similar economic context · 1,898 reporting
School Progress92 A+10.9 vs similar economic context · 1,891 reporting
Closing the Gaps92 A+14.4 vs similar economic context · 1,873 reporting
Academic Growth92 A+17.9 vs similar economic context · 1,835 reporting
Relative Performance91 A+11.6 vs similar economic context · 1,891 reporting
Mary Allen Elem
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,992 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
91
A
—
School Progress
92
A
—
Closing the Gaps
92
A
—
Academic Growth
92
A
—
Relative Performance
91
A
—
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (92), so
Student Achievement (91) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 92.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level85%+11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,898 reporting
Meets grade level66%+17 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,898 reporting
Masters grade level35%+15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,898 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level95%+19 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,895 reporting
Meets grade level76%+23 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,895 reporting
Masters grade level50%+29 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,895 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level76%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,887 reporting
Meets grade level56%+13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,887 reporting
Masters grade level21%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,887 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,992 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
222
Economically disadvantaged
62.5%−0.3 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
34.7%+17.8 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
9.7%−9.2 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
96.5%+2.3 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
4.5%−11.8 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Mary Allen Elem
Hispanic 60.6%
White 37%
Asian 0.9%
Two or More Races 1.4%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,992 reporting for every category shown · 1,992 in full cohort
African American 10.7%
Hispanic 50%
White 32.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 2.2%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 3.8%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 16: Amarillo · 208 reporting for every category shown · 208 in full cohort
African American 4.1%
Hispanic 49.5%
White 41.7%
American Indian 0.4%
Asian 1.7%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 2.6%
Selected comparison averageFor Sherman County · 4 reporting for every category shown · 4 in full cohort
African American 0.6%
Hispanic 60.9%
White 35.6%
American Indian 0.6%
Asian 0.4%
Two or More Races 2%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 1,562 reporting for every category shown · 1,562 in full cohort
African American 9%
Hispanic 49%
White 37.3%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 1.3%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.1%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
216
Economically disadvantaged students
135
Emergent bilingual students
75
Special education students
21
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
8
Students in TEA mobility denominator
156
TEA-published mobility rate
5.1%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 222 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 8 (3.5%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
222
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
−8
Decrease · −3.5%
Change since 2021–22
−12
Decrease · −5.1%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
222
Selected comparison
618.3
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,956 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Mary Allen Elem
School year
Students enrolledMary Allen Elem
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
234
First available year
631.3
2022–23
231
Decrease of 3 (1.3%)
636.6
2023–24
227
Decrease of 4 (1.7%)
633.9
2024–25
230
Increase of 3 (1.3%)
630.7
2025–26
222
Decrease of 8 (3.5%)
618.3
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Suppressed
Rate not available
Disciplinary actions
Suppressed
Rate not available
Cumulative year-end enrollment
234
2024–25
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Mary Allen Elem
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
239
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
2021–22
250
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2022–23
240
Suppressed
—
16
6.67
—
31.5
2023–24
234
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2024–25
234
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Mary Allen Elem in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
In-school suspensions
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Out-of-school suspensions
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Mary Allen Elem
Parent district: Stratford ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$7,794
Selected comparison
$12,536
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,963 rated schools reporting
−$4,742 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $7,794 per student for this campus, $16,675 per student for its parent district, Stratford ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Mary Allen Elem
Parent district: Stratford ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$6,409
$16,510
$13,054
$7,921
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,816 rated schools reporting
2019
$6,566
$21,793
$13,108
$8,069
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,832 rated schools reporting
2020
$7,095
$18,982
$14,058
$8,668
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,854 rated schools reporting
2021
$6,636
$17,022
$14,797
$9,108
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,868 rated schools reporting
2022
$6,477
$15,449
$15,708
$10,442
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,890 rated schools reporting
2023
$6,732
$14,520
$16,792
$11,124
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,914 rated schools reporting
2024
$6,862
$16,780
$18,125
$11,982
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,943 rated schools reporting
2025
$7,794
$16,675
$18,972
$12,536
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,963 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$57,705−$8,665 vs similar economic context
Teachers
20−22.2 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
10.8−3.1 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Mary Allen Elem
Beginning 20%
1 to 5 years 30%
6 to 10 years 15%
21 to 30 years 15%
Over 30 years 20%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,992 reporting for every category shown · 1,992 in full cohort
Beginning 6.1%
1 to 5 years 26%
6 to 10 years 19.1%
11 to 20 years 28.2%
21 to 30 years 16%
Over 30 years 4.2%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 16: Amarillo · 208 reporting for every category shown · 208 in full cohort
Beginning 6%
1 to 5 years 26.5%
6 to 10 years 18%
11 to 20 years 28.4%
21 to 30 years 16.2%
Over 30 years 5%
Selected comparison averageFor Sherman County · 4 reporting for every category shown · 4 in full cohort
Beginning 10.3%
1 to 5 years 32.4%
6 to 10 years 14.7%
11 to 20 years 17.2%
21 to 30 years 12.8%
Over 30 years 12.6%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 1,562 reporting for every category shown · 1,562 in full cohort
Beginning 6.6%
1 to 5 years 24.1%
6 to 10 years 17.6%
11 to 20 years 28.3%
21 to 30 years 17.7%
Over 30 years 5.1%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Mary Allen Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classMary Allen Elem · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten
20.5
18
Grade 1
12.7
18.2
Grade 2
18.3
18.4
Grade 3
17
18.6
Grade 4
17.5
19
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 5 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Out of 72 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#2–3 rankings
Second- and third-place results
1 measure
3of 190
Academic Growth
Region 16: Amarillo · of the 190 that report this measure · tied with 3
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
2 measures
4of 196
Reading — Masters
Region 16: Amarillo · of the 196 that report this measure · tied with 2
5of 196
Reading — Approaches
Region 16: Amarillo · of the 196 that report this measure · tied with 3
Other top-5% rankings
High placements in larger reporting groups
4 measures
46of 1,929
Chronically absent (lowest is best)
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,929 that report this measure · tied with 4
49of 1,929
Attendance
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,929 that report this measure · tied with 5
75of 1,895
Reading — Meets
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,895 that report this measure · tied with 12
83of 1,898
All Subjects — Masters
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,898 that report this measure · tied with 13
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 211902102.