Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Markham Elem

Matagorda County · Region 03: Victoria · 244 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
94/1002025-26
Change
±0 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+11.7 ptsvs 82.3 average · 1,652 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
69 of 1,652tied with 28 others
A94

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is flat; under the rules in force back then it scored 96 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 82.3 average for 1,652 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Recent domain gain

Closing the Gaps rose 3 points

90 to 93 2024-25 to 2025-26

  • 93 is 13.4 points above the 79.6 average among 1,580 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

STAAR result

All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
79%vs 53.9% avg · +25.1 pts
Masters
49%vs 23.6% avg · +25.4 pts

Among 1,598 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

STAAR result

Math above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
83%vs 47.6% avg · +35.4 pts
Masters
52%vs 19.4% avg · +32.6 pts

Among 1,590 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Markham Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 94 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 82.3 average for 1,652 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is unchanged since 2021-22.

Ranks 69th of 1,652 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 28 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Enrollment over time
  8. Discipline and removal from class
  9. Spending per student
  10. Teachers and actual class size
  11. Where this school ranks best
  12. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
908070 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageMarkham Elem 9493959494 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 96 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26A9482.3 1,652 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25A9482.6 1,625 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24A9580.5 1,599 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23A9381.1 1,580 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22A9483.6 1,558 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement94 A+11.9 vs similar economic context · 1,598 reporting
  • School Progress95 A+13.3 vs similar economic context · 1,593 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps93 A+13.4 vs similar economic context · 1,580 reporting
  • Academic Growth95 A+19.0 vs similar economic context · 1,564 reporting
  • Relative Performance93 A+13.7 vs similar economic context · 1,593 reporting
  • Markham Elem
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,652 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement94A—
School Progress95A—
Closing the Gaps93A—
Academic Growth95A—
Relative Performance93A—

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (95), so Student Achievement (94) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 95.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level96%+18 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,598 reporting
  • Meets grade level79%+25 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,598 reporting
  • Masters grade level49%+25 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,598 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level96%+16 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,596 reporting
  • Meets grade level78%+19 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,596 reporting
  • Masters grade level47%+22 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,596 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level96%+21 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,590 reporting
  • Meets grade level83%+35 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,590 reporting
  • Masters grade level52%+33 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,590 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level92%+13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,476 reporting
  • Meets grade level68%+15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,476 reporting
  • Masters grade level44%+19 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,476 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,652 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
244
Economically disadvantaged
48.6%−0.6 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
8.2%−4.6 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
21.0%+2.4 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
95.8%+1.2 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
6.4%−7.6 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Markham Elem

African American: 8.6%Hispanic: 54.3%White: 32.5%American Indian: 0.4%Asian: 0.4%Two or More Races: 3.7%
  • African American 8.6%
  • Hispanic 54.3%
  • White 32.5%
  • American Indian 0.4%
  • Asian 0.4%
  • Two or More Races 3.7%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,652 reporting for every category shown · 1,652 in full cohort

African American: 9.4%Hispanic: 40%White: 42.6%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 3.3%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 4.2%
  • African American 9.4%
  • Hispanic 40%
  • White 42.6%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 3.3%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 4.2%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
243
Economically disadvantaged students
118
Emergent bilingual students
20
Special education students
51

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
19
Students in TEA mobility denominator
202
TEA-published mobility rate
9.4%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 244 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 11 (4.3%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
244

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
−11

Decrease · −4.3%

Change since 2021–22
+8

Increase · +3.4%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
244
Selected comparison
657.9

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,614 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Markham Elem
School yearStudents enrolledMarkham ElemChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 236 First available year 657.2
2022–23 254 Increase of 18 (7.6%) 662.5
2023–24 257 Increase of 3 (1.2%) 662.2
2024–25 255 Decrease of 2 (0.8%) 659.2
2025–26 244 Decrease of 11 (4.3%) 657.9

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Suppressed

Rate not available

Disciplinary actions
Suppressed

Rate not available

Cumulative year-end enrollment
269

2024–25

TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Markham Elem
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 236 Suppressed — 21 8.90 — 18
2021–22 246 13 5.3% 21 8.54 11.7% 25.6
2022–23 272 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
2023–24 264 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
2024–25 269 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Markham Elem in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
In-school suspensions Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Out-of-school suspensions Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$7k$13k$20k20182020202220242025
  • Markham Elem
  • Parent district: Tidehaven ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$9,082
Selected comparison
$12,071

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,623 rated schools reporting

−$2,989 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $9,082 per student for this campus, $17,616 per student for its parent district, Tidehaven ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearMarkham ElemParent district: Tidehaven ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$7,835$13,991$13,054$7,827 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,501 rated schools reporting
2019$7,720$16,683$13,108$8,015 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,520 rated schools reporting
2020$8,784$17,054$14,058$8,515 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,532 rated schools reporting
2021$9,089$18,388$14,797$8,914 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,550 rated schools reporting
2022$10,677$17,400$15,708$10,243 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,560 rated schools reporting
2023$9,355$16,840$16,792$10,740 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,579 rated schools reporting
2024$8,962$17,705$18,125$11,619 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,597 rated schools reporting
2025$9,082$17,616$18,972$12,071 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,623 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$65,649−$1,360 vs similar economic context
Teachers
15−27.8 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
16.1−4.0 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Markham Elem

1 to 5 years: 37.1%6 to 10 years: 44.4%11 to 20 years: 18.5%
  • 1 to 5 years 37.1%
  • 6 to 10 years 44.4%
  • 11 to 20 years 18.5%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,652 reporting for every category shown · 1,652 in full cohort

Beginning: 5.6%1 to 5 years: 24.2%6 to 10 years: 19.3%11 to 20 years: 29.7%21 to 30 years: 16.7%Over 30 years: 4.2%
  • Beginning 5.6%
  • 1 to 5 years 24.2%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.3%
  • 11 to 20 years 29.7%
  • 21 to 30 years 16.7%
  • Over 30 years 4.2%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Markham Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classMarkham Elem · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten15.718
Grade 125.518.4
Grade 225.518.6
Grade 32119.1
Grade 415.519.1
Grade 51520

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this school ranks best

Out of 105 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

#1 rankings

First-place results

6 measures

  • 1of 114

    Academic Growth

    Region 03: Victoria · of the 114 that report this measure

  • 1of 15

    Overall score

    Matagorda County · of the 15 that report this measure · tied with 2

  • 1of 13

    Student Achievement

    Matagorda County · of the 13 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 1of 13

    School Progress

    Matagorda County · of the 13 that report this measure

  • 1of 13

    All Subjects — Masters

    Matagorda County · of the 13 that report this measure

  • 1of 13

    Math — Masters

    Matagorda County · of the 13 that report this measure

#2–3 rankings

Second- and third-place results

13 measures

  • 2of 116

    Math — Meets

    Region 03: Victoria · of the 116 that report this measure

  • 2of 14

    Chronically absent (lowest is best)

    Matagorda County · of the 14 that report this measure

  • 2of 13

    Relative Performance

    Matagorda County · of the 13 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 2of 13

    All Subjects — Approaches

    Matagorda County · of the 13 that report this measure

  • 2of 13

    All Subjects — Meets

    Matagorda County · of the 13 that report this measure

  • 2of 13

    Reading — Approaches

    Matagorda County · of the 13 that report this measure

  • 2of 13

    Reading — Meets

    Matagorda County · of the 13 that report this measure

  • 2of 13

    Reading — Masters

    Matagorda County · of the 13 that report this measure

  • 2of 13

    Math — Approaches

    Matagorda County · of the 13 that report this measure

  • 2of 13

    Science — Approaches

    Matagorda County · of the 13 that report this measure

  • 3of 13

    Closing the Gaps

    Matagorda County · of the 13 that report this measure

  • 3of 13

    Science — Meets

    Matagorda County · of the 13 that report this measure

  • 3of 13

    Science — Masters

    Matagorda County · of the 13 that report this measure

#4–10 rankings

Fourth- through tenth-place results

1 measure

  • 4of 14

    Attendance

    Matagorda County · of the 14 that report this measure

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 158902102.