+1.2 ptsvs 78.8 average · 2,070 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
957 of 2,070tied with 105 others
Score vs region
±0.0 ptsvs 80 average · 352 rated schools in Region 07: Kilgore
Region 07: Kilgore placement
195 of 352tied with 11 others
Score vs county
−0.5 ptsvs 80.5 average · 28 rated schools in Henderson County
Henderson County placement
17 of 28tied with 2 others
Score vs similar-size group
−0.1 ptsvs 80.1 average · 4,394 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
2,302 of 4,394tied with 163 others
Score vs state
−1.3 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
4,402 of 7,646tied with 276 others
B80
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 87 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 78.8 average for 2,070 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is level with the 80 average for 352 rated schools in Region 07: Kilgore.The current score is below the 80.5 average for 28 rated schools in Henderson County.The current score is level with the 80.1 average for 4,394 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is below the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
51%vs 44.8% avg · +6.2 pts
Masters
20%vs 17.8% avg · +2.2 pts
Among 1,936 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Malakoff Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 80 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 78.8 average for 2,070 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 12 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 957th of 2,070 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 105 others).
Malakoff Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 80 out of 100 for 2025-26 — level with the 80 average for 352 rated schools in Region 07: Kilgore. It is down 12 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 195th of 352 rated schools in Region 07: Kilgore (tied with 11 others).
Malakoff Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 80 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 80.5 average for 28 rated schools in Henderson County. It is down 12 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 17th of 28 rated schools in Henderson County (tied with 2 others).
Malakoff Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 80 out of 100 for 2025-26 — level with the 80.1 average for 4,394 similarly sized rated schools. It is down 12 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 2,302nd of 4,394 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 163 others).
Malakoff Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 80 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is down 12 points since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 87 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement78 C+3.1 vs similar economic context · 1,936 reporting
School Progress85 B+5.1 vs similar economic context · 1,930 reporting
Closing the Gaps67 D−9.0 vs similar economic context · 1,914 reporting
Academic Growth69 D−3.9 vs similar economic context · 1,870 reporting
Relative Performance85 B+6.7 vs similar economic context · 1,930 reporting
Malakoff Elem
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,070 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
78
C
2
School Progress
85
B
5
Closing the Gaps
67
D
3
Academic Growth
69
D
1
Relative Performance
85
B
5
Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 3 points below C in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (85), so
Student Achievement (78) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 85.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level81%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,936 reporting
Meets grade level51%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,936 reporting
Masters grade level20%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,936 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level83%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,933 reporting
Meets grade level51%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,933 reporting
Masters grade level17%−2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,933 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level80%+12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,924 reporting
Meets grade level51%+11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,924 reporting
Masters grade level23%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,924 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,070 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
443
Economically disadvantaged
73.6%+0.1 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
10.6%−12.1 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
20.5%+1.7 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
95.0%+1.3 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
10.5%−8.2 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Malakoff Elem
African American 11.1%
Hispanic 26.2%
White 55.5%
American Indian 0.7%
Asian 0.5%
Pacific Islander 0.5%
Two or More Races 5.6%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,070 reporting for every category shown · 2,070 in full cohort
African American 12.8%
Hispanic 60.4%
White 21.1%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 1.9%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 3.2%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 07: Kilgore · 352 reporting for every category shown · 352 in full cohort
African American 13.6%
Hispanic 28.4%
White 52.2%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 0.8%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 4.7%
Selected comparison averageFor Henderson County · 28 reporting for every category shown · 28 in full cohort
African American 6.7%
Hispanic 25.4%
White 62.9%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 0.5%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 4.2%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,394 reporting for every category shown · 4,394 in full cohort
African American 11.8%
Hispanic 55%
White 25.7%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 3.6%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
443
Economically disadvantaged students
326
Emergent bilingual students
47
Special education students
91
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
46
Students in TEA mobility denominator
328
TEA-published mobility rate
14%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 443 students in 2025–26, an increase of 14 (3.3%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
443
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
+14
Increase · +3.3%
Change since 2021–22
−33
Decrease · −6.9%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
443
Selected comparison
639.4
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,038 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Malakoff Elem
School year
Students enrolledMalakoff Elem
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
476
First available year
656.5
2022–23
457
Decrease of 19 (4.0%)
660.7
2023–24
462
Increase of 5 (1.1%)
658.6
2024–25
429
Decrease of 33 (7.1%)
655.8
2025–26
443
Increase of 14 (3.3%)
639.4
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
45
9.7% of cumulative year-end enrollment
Disciplinary actions
80
17.28 per 100 students
Cumulative year-end enrollment
463
2024–25
Share of students · 2024–25
This school
9.7%
Selected comparison
13.2%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,567 rated schools reporting
−3.5 pts vs similar economic context
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
This school
17.28
Selected comparison
31.8
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,677 rated schools reporting
−14.5 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Malakoff Elem
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
530
33
6.2%
50
9.43
9.3%
18.5
2021–22
531
37
7.0%
64
12.05
13.0%
31.1
2022–23
513
37
7.2%
65
12.67
13.6%
33.3
2023–24
498
48
9.6%
100
20.08
13.5%
33.1
2024–25
463
45
9.7%
80
17.28
13.2%
31.8
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Malakoff Elem in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
45
9.7%
80
17.28
13.2%
31.8
In-school suspensions
43
9.3%
73
15.77
11.8%
23.8
Out-of-school suspensions
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Malakoff Elem
Parent district: Malakoff ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$9,966
Selected comparison
$13,139
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,050 rated schools reporting
−$3,173 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $9,966 per student for this campus, $27,810 per student for its parent district, Malakoff ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Malakoff Elem
Parent district: Malakoff ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$6,921
$11,992
$13,054
$8,051
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,924 rated schools reporting
2019
$7,264
$12,712
$13,108
$8,191
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,943 rated schools reporting
2020
$6,927
$13,540
$14,058
$8,744
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,964 rated schools reporting
2021
$8,333
$14,978
$14,797
$9,285
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,977 rated schools reporting
2022
$8,296
$19,071
$15,708
$10,577
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,997 rated schools reporting
2023
$9,138
$39,791
$16,792
$11,193
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,014 rated schools reporting
2024
$8,615
$44,594
$18,125
$12,321
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,038 rated schools reporting
2025
$9,966
$27,810
$18,972
$13,139
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,050 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$67,455+$875 vs similar economic context
Teachers
31−12.3 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
14.3+0.3 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Malakoff Elem
1 to 5 years 12.6%
6 to 10 years 12.6%
11 to 20 years 37.4%
21 to 30 years 31.3%
Over 30 years 6.1%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,070 reporting for every category shown · 2,070 in full cohort
Beginning 6.7%
1 to 5 years 27.2%
6 to 10 years 19%
11 to 20 years 27.2%
21 to 30 years 15.3%
Over 30 years 3.8%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 07: Kilgore · 352 reporting for every category shown · 352 in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 24.6%
6 to 10 years 17.7%
11 to 20 years 28%
21 to 30 years 17.3%
Over 30 years 6%
Selected comparison averageFor Henderson County · 28 reporting for every category shown · 28 in full cohort
Beginning 6.7%
1 to 5 years 19.3%
6 to 10 years 18.2%
11 to 20 years 28%
21 to 30 years 16.6%
Over 30 years 11.1%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,394 reporting for every category shown · 4,394 in full cohort
Beginning 6.1%
1 to 5 years 25.9%
6 to 10 years 19.3%
11 to 20 years 28.9%
21 to 30 years 16.2%
Over 30 years 3.4%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Malakoff Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classMalakoff Elem · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten
22
18
Grade 1
15.5
18.2
Grade 2
17.9
18.3
Grade 3
17.2
18.6
Grade 4
23.5
18.9
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 5 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Out of 90 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
8 measures
6of 27
Math — Masters
Henderson County · of the 27 that report this measure
7of 28
Attendance
Henderson County · of the 28 that report this measure
7of 28
Chronically absent (lowest is best)
Henderson County · of the 28 that report this measure
9of 27
Reading — Approaches
Henderson County · of the 27 that report this measure
9of 27
Math — Approaches
Henderson County · of the 27 that report this measure · tied with 1
10of 27
Relative Performance
Henderson County · of the 27 that report this measure · tied with 1
10of 27
All Subjects — Approaches
Henderson County · of the 27 that report this measure
10of 27
Math — Meets
Henderson County · of the 27 that report this measure
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 107906102.