Recent movement
Overall score rose 3 points
69 to 72 2024-25 to 2025-26
See the full measureTraditional public school campus
M B North E C Lrn Ctr
Orange County · Region 05: Beaumont · 313 students
Official school websiteSchool information and family resources
- Current score
- 72/1002025-26
- Change
- +7 ptssince 2021-22
- Score vs similar economic context
- −5.7 ptsvs 77.7 average · 1,606 rated schools serving a similar economic context
- Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
- 1,140 of 1,606tied with 31 others
- Score vs region
- −3.4 ptsvs 75.4 average · 150 rated schools in Region 05: Beaumont
- Region 05: Beaumont placement
- 94 of 150tied with 6 others
- Score vs county
- −3.5 ptsvs 75.5 average · 23 rated schools in Orange County
- Orange County placement
- 16 of 23tied with 2 others
- Score vs similar-size group
- −8.5 ptsvs 80.5 average · 2,927 similarly sized rated schools
- Similar size placement
- 2,316 of 2,927tied with 56 others
- Score vs state
- −9.3 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
- Texas placement
- 6,213 of 7,646tied with 140 others
C72
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 67 in 2021-22. The current score is below the 77.7 average for 1,606 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is below the 75.4 average for 150 rated schools in Region 05: Beaumont.The current score is below the 75.5 average for 23 rated schools in Orange County.The current score is below the 80.5 average for 2,927 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is below the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
Recent movement
Overall score rose 3 points
69 to 72 2024-25 to 2025-26
See the full measureRecent movement
Overall score rose 3 points
69 to 72 2024-25 to 2025-26
See the full measureRecent movement
Overall score rose 3 points
69 to 72 2024-25 to 2025-26
See the full measureRecent movement
Overall score rose 3 points
69 to 72 2024-25 to 2025-26
See the full measureSelected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
M B North E C Lrn Ctr is rated C by TEA, scoring 72 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 77.7 average for 1,606 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 7 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 1,140th of 1,606 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 31 others).
M B North E C Lrn Ctr is rated C by TEA, scoring 72 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 75.4 average for 150 rated schools in Region 05: Beaumont. It is up 7 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 94th of 150 rated schools in Region 05: Beaumont (tied with 6 others).
M B North E C Lrn Ctr is rated C by TEA, scoring 72 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 75.5 average for 23 rated schools in Orange County. It is up 7 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 16th of 23 rated schools in Orange County (tied with 2 others).
M B North E C Lrn Ctr is rated C by TEA, scoring 72 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 80.5 average for 2,927 similarly sized rated schools. It is up 7 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 2,316th of 2,927 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 56 others).
M B North E C Lrn Ctr is rated C by TEA, scoring 72 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is up 7 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 6,213th of 7,646 rated Texas schools (tied with 140 others).
Put the numbers in context
Compare with
Jump to a section
5 years of ratings
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated Not Rated with 67 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
View the yearly scores and comparisons
| Year | Rating | Score | Selected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rate | StateTexas average |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | C | 72 | 77.7 1,606 reporting | 81.3 7,646 reporting |
| 2024-25 | D | 69 | 77.4 1,589 reporting | 81.2 7,554 reporting |
| 2023-24 | D | 67 | 73.8 1,573 reporting | 78.9 7,466 reporting |
| 2022-23 | D | 68 | 73.1 1,570 reporting | 79.1 7,377 reporting |
| 2021-22 | D | 65 | 81.8 1,554 reporting | 83.7 7,283 reporting |
Where the score comes from
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
- M B North E C Lrn Ctr
- Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,606 in cohort)
| Domain | Score | Grade | Points to next grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| Student Achievement | — | Not rated | — |
| School Progress | — | Not rated | — |
| Closing the Gaps | — | Not rated | — |
| Academic Growth | — | Not rated | — |
| Relative Performance | — | Not rated | — |
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
- Students
- 313
- Economically disadvantaged
- 96.8%+3.8 pts vs similar economic context
- English learners
- 9.3%−33.6 pts vs similar economic context
- Special education
- 12.5%−4.8 pts vs similar economic context
- Attendance
- —
- Chronically absent
- —
Student demographics
M B North E C Lrn Ctr
- African American 53.7%
- Hispanic 16.9%
- White 21.4%
- American Indian 0.6%
- Pacific Islander 0.3%
- Two or More Races 7%
Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,606 reporting for every category shown · 1,606 in full cohort
- African American 15.1%
- Hispanic 77.4%
- White 4.5%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 1.2%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 1.4%
Selected comparison average For Region 05: Beaumont · 150 reporting for every category shown · 150 in full cohort
- African American 20.1%
- Hispanic 22.9%
- White 50.9%
- American Indian 0.4%
- Asian 1.6%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 3.9%
Selected comparison average For Orange County · 23 reporting for every category shown · 23 in full cohort
- African American 11.8%
- Hispanic 16.9%
- White 65.5%
- American Indian 0.4%
- Asian 1.2%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 4.1%
Selected comparison average For similarly sized schools · 2,927 reporting for every category shown · 2,927 in full cohort
- African American 11%
- Hispanic 53.4%
- White 29.7%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 2.3%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 3.2%
Statewide average 7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
- African American 11.5%
- Hispanic 52.6%
- White 27.8%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 4.2%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
- Students in this TEA accountability summary
- 313
- Economically disadvantaged students
- 303
- Emergent bilingual students
- 29
- Special education students
- 39
TEA context labels
- Highest grade is early education, pre-K or kindergarten
Campus mobility · 2024–25
- Mobile students
- Not reported
- Students in TEA mobility denominator
- Not reported
- TEA-published mobility rate
- Not reported
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 313 students in 2025–26, an increase of 5 (1.6%) from 2024–25.
- Latest enrollment
- 313
2025–26
- Change from 2024–25
- +5
Increase · +1.6%
- Change since 2021–22
- +11
Increase · +3.6%
Enrollment in 2025–26
- This school
- 313
- Selected comparison
- 553.7
| School year | Students enrolledM B North E C Lrn Ctr | Change from previous school year | Average enrollmentselected comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021–22 | 302 | First available year | 603.4 |
| 2022–23 | 323 | Increase of 21 (7.0%) | 599.3 |
| 2023–24 | 326 | Increase of 3 (0.9%) | 589 |
| 2024–25 | 308 | Decrease of 18 (5.5%) | 581.5 |
| 2025–26 | 313 | Increase of 5 (1.6%) | 553.7 |
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
- Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
- Not reported
Rate not available
- Disciplinary actions
- Not reported
Rate not available
- Cumulative year-end enrollment
- 353
2024–25
| School year | Cumulative enrollment | Studentsall discipline | Students% of enrollment | Actionsall discipline | Actionsper 100 students | Studentsselected comparison average % | Actionsselected comparison average per 100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020–21 | 311 | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| 2021–22 | 360 | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| 2022–23 | 375 | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| 2023–24 | 366 | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| 2024–25 | 353 | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
See 2024–25 discipline categories
| Category | Students | Students% of enrollment | Actions | Actionsper 100 students | Studentsselected comparison average % | Actionsselected comparison average per 100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All discipline | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| In-school suspensions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Out-of-school suspensions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| DAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory DAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary DAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
- M B North E C Lrn Ctr
- Parent district: West Orange-Cove CISD
- Texas average
- Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
- This school
- $16,267
- Selected comparison
- $13,464
For 2025, TEA reported $16,267 per student for this campus, $17,894 per student for its parent district, West Orange-Cove CISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
| Year | M B North E C Lrn Ctr | Parent district: West Orange-Cove CISD | Texas average | Selected comparison average | Reportingselected comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | $8,158 | $14,789 | $13,054 | $8,394 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,519 rated schools reporting |
| 2019 | $9,679 | $15,218 | $13,108 | $8,381 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,536 rated schools reporting |
| 2020 | $14,202 | $17,680 | $14,058 | $8,886 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,539 rated schools reporting |
| 2021 | $15,509 | $21,507 | $14,797 | $9,766 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,541 rated schools reporting |
| 2022 | $9,695 | $19,393 | $15,708 | $11,265 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,555 rated schools reporting |
| 2023 | $10,711 | $20,559 | $16,792 | $11,763 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,570 rated schools reporting |
| 2024 | $12,174 | $16,770 | $18,125 | $12,827 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,577 rated schools reporting |
| 2025 | $16,267 | $17,894 | $18,972 | $13,464 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,588 rated schools reporting |
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers
- Average salary
- $56,542−$12,099 vs similar economic context
- Teachers
- 21−18.6 vs similar economic context
- Students per staff member
- 15.3+0.5 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
M B North E C Lrn Ctr
- Beginning 9.8%
- 1 to 5 years 41.5%
- 6 to 10 years 24.4%
- 11 to 20 years 9.8%
- 21 to 30 years 9.8%
- Over 30 years 4.9%
Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,606 reporting for every category shown · 1,606 in full cohort
- Beginning 7.7%
- 1 to 5 years 27.1%
- 6 to 10 years 18.5%
- 11 to 20 years 27%
- 21 to 30 years 14.8%
- Over 30 years 3.4%
Selected comparison average For Region 05: Beaumont · 150 reporting for every category shown · 150 in full cohort
- Beginning 8.3%
- 1 to 5 years 26%
- 6 to 10 years 18.2%
- 11 to 20 years 25.1%
- 21 to 30 years 15.2%
- Over 30 years 6.5%
Selected comparison average For Orange County · 23 reporting for every category shown · 23 in full cohort
- Beginning 4.5%
- 1 to 5 years 29.4%
- 6 to 10 years 20.7%
- 11 to 20 years 24.7%
- 21 to 30 years 16.2%
- Over 30 years 4.5%
Selected comparison average For similarly sized schools · 2,927 reporting for every category shown · 2,927 in full cohort
- Beginning 6.2%
- 1 to 5 years 25.1%
- 6 to 10 years 18.6%
- 11 to 20 years 28.8%
- 21 to 30 years 16.9%
- Over 30 years 4.1%
Statewide average 7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
- Beginning 6.2%
- 1 to 5 years 25.6%
- 6 to 10 years 19.2%
- 11 to 20 years 28.7%
- 21 to 30 years 15.9%
- Over 30 years 3.7%
Where this school ranks best
Out of 10 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#2–3 rankings
Second- and third-place results
1 measure
-
2of 23
Per-student spending
Orange County · of the 23 that report this measure
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Download the full dataset · this campus's district
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 181906104.