Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Lueders-Avoca Elem/JH

Jones County · Region 14: Abilene · 72 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
69/1002025-26
Change
−12 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
−11.0 ptsvs 80 average · 1,996 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
1,688 of 1,996tied with 71 others
D69

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 79 in 2021-22. The current score is below the 80 average for 1,996 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Current strength

Academic Growth above the similar-context average

81 +7.1 pts vs 73.9

  • 81 is 7.1 points above the 73.9 average among 1,829 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Current strength

Chronically absent lower than the similar-context average

4.1% −12.4 pts vs 16.5%

  • 4.1% is 12.4 percentage points lower than the 16.5% average among 1,933 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Current strength

Attendance above the similar-context average

96.1% +2 pts vs 94.1%

  • 96.1% is 2 percentage points above the 94.1% average among 1,933 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Lueders-Avoca Elem/JH is rated D by TEA, scoring 69 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 80 average for 1,996 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 12 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 1,688th of 1,996 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 71 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Enrollment over time
  8. Discipline and removal from class
  9. Spending per student
  10. Teachers and actual class size
  11. Where this school ranks best
  12. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
9080706050 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageLueders-Avoca Elem/JH 8161598169 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated C with 79 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26D6980.0 1,996 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25B8179.8 1,971 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24F5977.9 1,951 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23D6178.4 1,918 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22B8182.2 1,894 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement58 F−20.0 vs similar economic context · 1,894 reporting
  • School Progress81 B+0.2 vs similar economic context · 1,886 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps68 D−9.2 vs similar economic context · 1,867 reporting
  • Academic Growth81 B+7.1 vs similar economic context · 1,829 reporting
  • Relative Performance56 F−23.2 vs similar economic context · 1,886 reporting
  • Lueders-Avoca Elem/JH
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,996 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement58F2
School Progress81B9
Closing the Gaps68D2
Academic Growth81B9
Relative Performance56F4

Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 2 points below C in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (81), so Student Achievement (58) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 81.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level57%−17 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,894 reporting
  • Meets grade level31%−17 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,894 reporting
  • Masters grade level11%−9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,894 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level57%−19 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,890 reporting
  • Meets grade level37%−16 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,890 reporting
  • Masters grade level13%−8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,890 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level57%−14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,881 reporting
  • Meets grade level33%−10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,881 reporting
  • Masters grade level13%−3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,881 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level56%−18 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,730 reporting
  • Meets grade level22%−24 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,730 reporting
  • Masters grade level0%−21 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,730 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level60%−14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 940 reporting
  • Meets grade level0%−46 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 940 reporting
  • Masters grade level0%−21 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 940 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,996 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
72
Economically disadvantaged
63.9%−0.2 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
0.0%−17.5 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
26.4%+7.5 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
96.1%+2.0 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
4.1%−12.4 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Lueders-Avoca Elem/JH

Hispanic: 22.2%White: 75%Two or More Races: 2.8%
  • Hispanic 22.2%
  • White 75%
  • Two or More Races 2.8%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,996 reporting for every category shown · 1,996 in full cohort

African American: 11%Hispanic: 51.1%White: 31.5%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 2.2%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 3.7%
  • African American 11%
  • Hispanic 51.1%
  • White 31.5%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 2.2%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 3.7%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
72
Economically disadvantaged students
46
Emergent bilingual students
0
Special education students
19

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
6
Students in TEA mobility denominator
50
TEA-published mobility rate
12%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 72 students in 2025–26, an increase of 12 (20.0%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
72

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
+12

Increase · +20.0%

Change since 2021–22
+2

Increase · +2.9%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
72
Selected comparison
622.7

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,960 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Lueders-Avoca Elem/JH
School yearStudents enrolledLueders-Avoca Elem/JHChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 70 First available year 637.3
2022–23 76 Increase of 6 (8.6%) 643.8
2023–24 77 Increase of 1 (1.3%) 640.6
2024–25 60 Decrease of 17 (22.1%) 635.5
2025–26 72 Increase of 12 (20.0%) 622.7

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
12

17.4% of cumulative year-end enrollment

Disciplinary actions
18

26.09 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
69

2024–25

Share of students · 2024–25

This school
17.4%
Selected comparison
12.9%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,533 rated schools reporting

+4.5 pts vs similar economic context

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
26.09
Selected comparison
30.2

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,651 rated schools reporting

−4.1 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Lueders-Avoca Elem/JH
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 92 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
2021–22 81 10 12.3% 17 20.99 12.8% 29.7
2022–23 84 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
2023–24 82 15 18.3% 22 26.83 13.1% 31.6
2024–25 69 12 17.4% 18 26.09 12.9% 30.2
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Lueders-Avoca Elem/JH in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline 12 17.4% 18 26.09 12.9% 30.2
In-school suspensions 12 17.4% 15 21.74 11.6% 23.1
Out-of-school suspensions Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$7k$20k$33k20182020202220242025
  • Lueders-Avoca Elem/JH
  • Parent district: Lueders-Avoca ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$20,762
Selected comparison
$12,664

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,967 rated schools reporting

+$8,099 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $20,762 per student for this campus, $31,569 per student for its parent district, Lueders-Avoca ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearLueders-Avoca Elem/JHParent district: Lueders-Avoca ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$11,511$18,784$13,054$7,924 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,822 rated schools reporting
2019$12,278$19,260$13,108$8,081 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,838 rated schools reporting
2020$15,135$21,740$14,058$8,668 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,861 rated schools reporting
2021$14,279$23,015$14,797$9,094 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,873 rated schools reporting
2022$19,144$26,206$15,708$10,439 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,895 rated schools reporting
2023$16,156$25,362$16,792$11,147 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,918 rated schools reporting
2024$15,159$25,718$18,125$12,066 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,947 rated schools reporting
2025$20,762$31,569$18,972$12,664 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,967 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$53,699−$12,690 vs similar economic context
Teachers
12−30.0 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
5.8−8.1 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Lueders-Avoca Elem/JH

1 to 5 years: 40.3%6 to 10 years: 16.1%11 to 20 years: 24.2%21 to 30 years: 3.2%Over 30 years: 16.1%
  • 1 to 5 years 40.3%
  • 6 to 10 years 16.1%
  • 11 to 20 years 24.2%
  • 21 to 30 years 3.2%
  • Over 30 years 16.1%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,996 reporting for every category shown · 1,996 in full cohort

Beginning: 6.2%1 to 5 years: 26.2%6 to 10 years: 19.1%11 to 20 years: 28%21 to 30 years: 15.9%Over 30 years: 4.1%
  • Beginning 6.2%
  • 1 to 5 years 26.2%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.1%
  • 11 to 20 years 28%
  • 21 to 30 years 15.9%
  • Over 30 years 4.1%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Lueders-Avoca Elem/JH in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classLueders-Avoca Elem/JH · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten618
Grade 19.318.2
Grade 26.518.4
Grade 3818.6
Grade 4519
Grade 5419.8
Grade 6517.7
Secondary English7.515.1
Secondary math7.515.9
Secondary science7.517.3
Secondary social studies7.517.2

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 11 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this school ranks best

Out of 117 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

#1 rankings

First-place results

2 measures

  • 1of 13

    Attendance

    Jones County · of the 13 that report this measure

  • 1of 13

    Chronically absent (lowest is best)

    Jones County · of the 13 that report this measure

#2–3 rankings

Second- and third-place results

2 measures

  • 2of 13

    Per-student spending

    Jones County · of the 13 that report this measure

  • 3of 13

    Academic Growth

    Jones County · of the 13 that report this measure · tied with 1

#4–10 rankings

Fourth- through tenth-place results

7 measures

  • 6of 13

    Math — Masters

    Jones County · of the 13 that report this measure

  • 7of 13

    School Progress

    Jones County · of the 13 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 7of 13

    Reading — Masters

    Jones County · of the 13 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 10of 13

    All Subjects — Masters

    Jones County · of the 13 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 10of 13

    Math — Meets

    Jones County · of the 13 that report this measure

  • 10of 13

    Science — Approaches

    Jones County · of the 13 that report this measure

  • 10of 12

    Closing the Gaps

    Jones County · of the 12 that report this measure

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 127905101.