+2.6 ptsvs 88.4 average · 906 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
331 of 906tied with 82 others
Score vs region
+9.5 ptsvs 81.5 average · 182 rated schools in Region 17: Lubbock
Region 17: Lubbock placement
34 of 182tied with 11 others
Score vs county
+9.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 84 rated schools in Lubbock County
Lubbock County placement
12 of 84tied with 5 others
Score vs similar-size group
+10.7 ptsvs 80.3 average · 4,725 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
577 of 4,725tied with 262 others
Score vs state
+9.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
1,157 of 7,646tied with 413 others
A91
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 95 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 88.4 average for 906 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 81.5 average for 182 rated schools in Region 17: Lubbock.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 84 rated schools in Lubbock County.The current score is above the 80.3 average for 4,725 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
69%vs 66.9% avg · +2.1 pts
Masters
38%vs 35.2% avg · +2.8 pts
Among 887 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Lubbock-Cooper West Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 91 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 88.4 average for 906 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 2 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 331st of 906 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 82 others).
Lubbock-Cooper West Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 91 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.5 average for 182 rated schools in Region 17: Lubbock. It is down 2 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 34th of 182 rated schools in Region 17: Lubbock (tied with 11 others).
Lubbock-Cooper West Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 91 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 84 rated schools in Lubbock County. It is down 2 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 12th of 84 rated schools in Lubbock County (tied with 5 others).
Lubbock-Cooper West Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 91 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.3 average for 4,725 similarly sized rated schools. It is down 2 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 577th of 4,725 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 262 others).
Lubbock-Cooper West Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 91 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is down 2 points since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 95 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement91 A+1.8 vs similar economic context · 887 reporting
School Progress85 B+0.1 vs similar economic context · 885 reporting
Closing the Gaps90 A+4.1 vs similar economic context · 880 reporting
Academic Growth85 B+3.3 vs similar economic context · 872 reporting
Relative Performance82 B+2.0 vs similar economic context · 885 reporting
Lubbock-Cooper West Elem
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (906 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
91
A
—
School Progress
85
B
5
Closing the Gaps
90
A
—
Academic Growth
85
B
5
Relative Performance
82
B
8
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (91), so
School Progress (85) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 91.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level89%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 887 reporting
Meets grade level69%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 887 reporting
Masters grade level38%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 887 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level91%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 887 reporting
Meets grade level74%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 887 reporting
Masters grade level43%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 887 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level89%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 885 reporting
Meets grade level71%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 885 reporting
Masters grade level37%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 885 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level84%−3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 812 reporting
Meets grade level50%−15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 812 reporting
Masters grade level29%−8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 812 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (906 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
585
Economically disadvantaged
25.9%−0.9 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
3.6%−6.5 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
20.4%+3.3 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
95.9%+0.5 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
4.5%−5.3 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Lubbock-Cooper West Elem
African American 2.6%
Hispanic 29.8%
White 58.7%
Asian 4.8%
Two or More Races 4.1%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 906 reporting for every category shown · 906 in full cohort
African American 8.6%
Hispanic 27.8%
White 48.4%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 9.7%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 5.1%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 17: Lubbock · 182 reporting for every category shown · 182 in full cohort
African American 5%
Hispanic 61%
White 30.8%
American Indian 0.2%
Asian 1%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 1.9%
Selected comparison averageFor Lubbock County · 84 reporting for every category shown · 84 in full cohort
African American 8.8%
Hispanic 54.8%
White 31.4%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 1.8%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 2.7%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,725 reporting for every category shown · 4,725 in full cohort
African American 12.2%
Hispanic 54.6%
White 24.4%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.7%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 3.6%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
584
Economically disadvantaged students
151
Emergent bilingual students
21
Special education students
119
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
44
Students in TEA mobility denominator
512
TEA-published mobility rate
8.6%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 585 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 39 (6.3%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
585
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
−39
Decrease · −6.3%
Change since 2021–22
−36
Decrease · −5.8%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
585
Selected comparison
830.3
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 899 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Lubbock-Cooper West Elem
School year
Students enrolledLubbock-Cooper West Elem
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
621
First available year
845.4
2022–23
596
Decrease of 25 (4.0%)
849.4
2023–24
627
Increase of 31 (5.2%)
845.1
2024–25
624
Decrease of 3 (0.5%)
840.8
2025–26
585
Decrease of 39 (6.3%)
830.3
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
82
12.8% of cumulative year-end enrollment
Disciplinary actions
156
24.34 per 100 students
Cumulative year-end enrollment
641
2024–25
Share of students · 2024–25
This school
12.8%
Selected comparison
7.9%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 660 rated schools reporting
+4.9 pts vs similar economic context
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
This school
24.34
Selected comparison
15.8
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 744 rated schools reporting
+8.5 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Lubbock-Cooper West Elem
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
676
33
4.9%
45
6.66
6.2%
10.8
2021–22
663
22
3.3%
39
5.88
8.3%
16.6
2022–23
642
45
7.0%
91
14.17
8.6%
17.3
2023–24
662
56
8.5%
85
12.84
8.1%
16.6
2024–25
641
82
12.8%
156
24.34
7.9%
15.8
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Lubbock-Cooper West Elem in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
82
12.8%
156
24.34
7.9%
15.8
In-school suspensions
80
12.5%
143
22.31
7.2%
12.4
Out-of-school suspensions
10
1.6%
13
2.03
3.9%
5.2
DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Lubbock-Cooper West Elem
Parent district: Lubbock-Cooper ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$7,512
Selected comparison
$11,340
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 895 rated schools reporting
−$3,828 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $7,512 per student for this campus, $25,005 per student for its parent district, Lubbock-Cooper ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Lubbock-Cooper West Elem
Parent district: Lubbock-Cooper ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$5,094
$17,009
$13,054
$7,554
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 800 rated schools reporting
2019
$5,611
$17,392
$13,108
$7,640
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 816 rated schools reporting
2020
$5,833
$17,033
$14,058
$7,953
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 827 rated schools reporting
2021
$6,490
$17,712
$14,797
$8,420
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 834 rated schools reporting
2022
$6,879
$21,210
$15,708
$9,579
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 852 rated schools reporting
2023
$7,504
$22,780
$16,792
$10,148
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 870 rated schools reporting
2024
$11,369
$24,711
$18,125
$11,308
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 883 rated schools reporting
2025
$7,512
$25,005
$18,972
$11,340
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 895 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$56,450−$11,993 vs similar economic context
Teachers
45−8.3 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
12.9−1.8 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Lubbock-Cooper West Elem
1 to 5 years 31%
6 to 10 years 15.3%
11 to 20 years 33.8%
21 to 30 years 17.7%
Over 30 years 2.2%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 906 reporting for every category shown · 906 in full cohort
Beginning 4.8%
1 to 5 years 22.5%
6 to 10 years 19.7%
11 to 20 years 32.4%
21 to 30 years 17.3%
Over 30 years 3.1%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 17: Lubbock · 182 reporting for every category shown · 182 in full cohort
Beginning 7.4%
1 to 5 years 25.5%
6 to 10 years 18.1%
11 to 20 years 27.1%
21 to 30 years 16.6%
Over 30 years 4.7%
Selected comparison averageFor Lubbock County · 84 reporting for every category shown · 84 in full cohort
Beginning 8%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.1%
11 to 20 years 26.9%
21 to 30 years 15.6%
Over 30 years 3.6%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,725 reporting for every category shown · 4,725 in full cohort
Beginning 6.1%
1 to 5 years 26.4%
6 to 10 years 19.7%
11 to 20 years 29%
21 to 30 years 15.5%
Over 30 years 3.1%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Lubbock-Cooper West Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classLubbock-Cooper West Elem · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten
18.8
18.5
Grade 1
26.1
19
Grade 2
23.5
19.7
Grade 3
19.5
20.6
Grade 4
18.6
20.1
Grade 5
22.2
21.8
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Out of 105 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
8 measures
4of 82
Chronically absent (lowest is best)
Lubbock County · of the 82 that report this measure
4of 81
Math — Meets
Lubbock County · of the 81 that report this measure · tied with 1
7of 81
Math — Masters
Lubbock County · of the 81 that report this measure · tied with 1
8of 82
All Subjects — Meets
Lubbock County · of the 82 that report this measure · tied with 2
8of 82
All Subjects — Masters
Lubbock County · of the 82 that report this measure · tied with 1
9of 82
Reading — Masters
Lubbock County · of the 82 that report this measure · tied with 2
9of 82
Attendance
Lubbock County · of the 82 that report this measure · tied with 2
9of 81
Math — Approaches
Lubbock County · of the 81 that report this measure · tied with 1
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 152906104.