Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Lorenzo Dow Hendricks Elem

Collin County · Region 10: Richardson · 793 students

Current score
74/1002025-26
Score vs similar economic context
−8.5 ptsvs 82.5 average · 1,590 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
1,302 of 1,590tied with 54 others
C74

At a glance

The current score is below the 82.5 average for 1,590 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Read the full rating context and placement

Lorenzo Dow Hendricks Elem is rated C by TEA, scoring 74 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 82.5 average for 1,590 rated schools serving a similar economic context. TEA has published 1 year of scores for this school, so there is no trend to read yet.

Ranks 1,302nd of 1,590 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 54 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 1 year of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Teachers
  8. Where this comes from

1 year of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
908070 74 2025-26

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26C7482.5 1,590 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement72 C−10.5 vs similar economic context · 1,542 reporting
  • School Progress74 C−7.7 vs similar economic context · 1,538 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps74 C−5.8 vs similar economic context · 1,527 reporting
  • Academic Growth74 C−2.2 vs similar economic context · 1,510 reporting
  • Relative Performance62 D−17.2 vs similar economic context · 1,538 reporting
  • Lorenzo Dow Hendricks Elem
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,590 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement72C8
School Progress74C6
Closing the Gaps74C6
Academic Growth74C6
Relative Performance62D8

Closest to moving up: School Progress, 6 points below B in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (74), so Student Achievement (72) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 74.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level69%−10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,542 reporting
  • Meets grade level44%−11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,542 reporting
  • Masters grade level19%−5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,542 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level79%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,540 reporting
  • Meets grade level54%−6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,540 reporting
  • Masters grade level26%+0 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,540 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level64%−12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,535 reporting
  • Meets grade level36%−12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,535 reporting
  • Masters grade level15%−5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,535 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level54%−26 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,424 reporting
  • Meets grade level36%−18 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,424 reporting
  • Masters grade level11%−15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,424 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,590 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
793
Economically disadvantaged
47.0%−0.6 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
7.3%−5.1 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
22.3%+3.9 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
—
Chronically absent
—

Student demographics

Lorenzo Dow Hendricks Elem

African American: 30.7%Hispanic: 21%White: 33.9%American Indian: 0.1%Asian: 6.2%Pacific Islander: 0.1%Two or More Races: 7.9%
  • African American 30.7%
  • Hispanic 21%
  • White 33.9%
  • American Indian 0.1%
  • Asian 6.2%
  • Pacific Islander 0.1%
  • Two or More Races 7.9%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,590 reporting for every category shown · 1,590 in full cohort

African American: 9.3%Hispanic: 39.1%White: 43.4%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 3.4%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 4.3%
  • African American 9.3%
  • Hispanic 39.1%
  • White 43.4%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 3.4%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 4.3%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
785
Economically disadvantaged students
369
Emergent bilingual students
57
Special education students
175

TEA context labels

  • New campus compared with last year’s fall enrollment

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
Not reported
Students in TEA mobility denominator
Not reported
TEA-published mobility rate
Not reported

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Teachers

Average salary
$74,812+$7,787 vs similar economic context
Teachers
46+2.8 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
17.1−3.3 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Lorenzo Dow Hendricks Elem

Beginning: 7.2%1 to 5 years: 30.9%6 to 10 years: 24.1%11 to 20 years: 17%21 to 30 years: 20.9%
  • Beginning 7.2%
  • 1 to 5 years 30.9%
  • 6 to 10 years 24.1%
  • 11 to 20 years 17%
  • 21 to 30 years 20.9%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,590 reporting for every category shown · 1,590 in full cohort

Beginning: 5.6%1 to 5 years: 24%6 to 10 years: 19.4%11 to 20 years: 29.8%21 to 30 years: 16.7%Over 30 years: 4.1%
  • Beginning 5.6%
  • 1 to 5 years 24%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.4%
  • 11 to 20 years 29.8%
  • 21 to 30 years 16.7%
  • Over 30 years 4.1%

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 043902109.