STAAR result
Science above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
- Meets
- 74%vs 54.7% avg · +19.3 pts
- Masters
- 35%vs 26.8% avg · +8.2 pts
Among 1,374 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measureTraditional public school campus
Lone Oak HS
Hunt County · Region 10: Richardson · 325 students
Official school websiteSchool information and family resources
- Current score
- 92/1002025-26
- Change
- +4 ptssince 2021-22
- Score vs similar economic context
- +9.0 ptsvs 83 average · 1,531 rated schools serving a similar economic context
- Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
- 152 of 1,531tied with 82 others
- Score vs region
- +9.8 ptsvs 82.2 average · 1,157 rated schools in Region 10: Richardson
- Region 10: Richardson placement
- 161 of 1,157tied with 55 others
- Score vs county
- +13.8 ptsvs 78.2 average · 39 rated schools in Hunt County
- Hunt County placement
- 6 of 39among reporting schools
- Score vs similar-size group
- +11.5 ptsvs 80.5 average · 3,112 similarly sized rated schools
- Similar size placement
- 305 of 3,112tied with 109 others
- Score vs state
- +10.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
- Texas placement
- 838 of 7,646tied with 318 others
A92
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 91 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 83 average for 1,531 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 82.2 average for 1,157 rated schools in Region 10: Richardson.The current score is above the 78.2 average for 39 rated schools in Hunt County.The current score is above the 80.5 average for 3,112 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
Current strength
Overall score above the similar-context average
92 +9 pts vs 83
- 92 is 9 points above the 83 average among 1,531 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
Current strength
Closing the Gaps above the similar-context average
93 +12.7 pts vs 80.3
- 93 is 12.7 points above the 80.3 average among 1,473 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
STAAR result
Science above Region 10: Richardson averages at Meets and Masters
- Meets
- 74%vs 46.8% avg · +27.2 pts
- Masters
- 35%vs 23.6% avg · +11.4 pts
Among 1,037 schools in Region 10: Richardson reporting this measure.
See the full measureCurrent strength
Overall score above the Region 10: Richardson average
92 +9.8 pts vs 82.2
- 92 is 9.8 points above the 82.2 average among 1,157 schools in Region 10: Richardson reporting this measure.
Current strength
Closing the Gaps above the Region 10: Richardson average
93 +13.6 pts vs 79.4
- 93 is 13.6 points above the 79.4 average among 1,102 schools in Region 10: Richardson reporting this measure.
Top placement
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)
16.7% 1st of 11 schools in Hunt County reporting this measure · 2025-26
See the full measureTop placement
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA
36.4% 1st of 11 schools in Hunt County reporting this measure · 2025-26
See the full measureCurrent strength
Closing the Gaps above the Hunt County average
93 +17.2 pts vs 75.8
- 93 is 17.2 points above the 75.8 average among 36 schools in Hunt County reporting this measure.
- 2nd of 36 schools in Hunt County reporting this measure.
STAAR result
Science above similar-size averages at Meets and Masters
- Meets
- 74%vs 43.7% avg · +30.3 pts
- Masters
- 35%vs 20% avg · +15 pts
Among 2,605 similarly sized schools reporting this measure.
See the full measureCurrent strength
Overall score above the similar-size average
92 +11.5 pts vs 80.5
- 92 is 11.5 points above the 80.5 average among 3,112 similarly sized schools reporting this measure.
Current strength
Closing the Gaps above the similar-size average
93 +15 pts vs 78
- 93 is 15 points above the 78 average among 2,856 similarly sized schools reporting this measure.
STAAR result
Science above Texas averages at Meets and Masters
- Meets
- 74%vs 47.1% avg · +26.9 pts
- Masters
- 35%vs 22.8% avg · +12.2 pts
Among 6,717 Texas schools reporting this measure.
See the full measureCurrent strength
Overall score above the Texas average
92 +10.7 pts vs 81.3
- 92 is 10.7 points above the 81.3 average among 7,646 Texas schools reporting this measure.
Current strength
Closing the Gaps above the Texas average
93 +14.3 pts vs 78.7
- 93 is 14.3 points above the 78.7 average among 7,185 Texas schools reporting this measure.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Lone Oak HS is rated A by TEA, scoring 92 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 83 average for 1,531 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 4 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 152nd of 1,531 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 82 others).
Lone Oak HS is rated A by TEA, scoring 92 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 82.2 average for 1,157 rated schools in Region 10: Richardson. It is up 4 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 161st of 1,157 rated schools in Region 10: Richardson (tied with 55 others).
Lone Oak HS is rated A by TEA, scoring 92 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 78.2 average for 39 rated schools in Hunt County. It is up 4 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 6th of 39 rated schools in Hunt County.
Lone Oak HS is rated A by TEA, scoring 92 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.5 average for 3,112 similarly sized rated schools. It is up 4 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 305th of 3,112 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 109 others).
Lone Oak HS is rated A by TEA, scoring 92 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is up 4 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 838th of 7,646 rated Texas schools (tied with 318 others).
Put the numbers in context
Compare with
Jump to a section
- Overview
- 5 years of ratings
- Where the score comes from
- Student outcomes
- After high school: the following fall
- Who this school serves
- Student counts behind the percentages
- Enrollment over time
- Discipline and removal from class
- Spending per student
- Teachers and actual class size
- Where this school ranks best
- Where this comes from
5 years of ratings
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 91 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
View the yearly scores and comparisons
| Year | Rating | Score | Selected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rate | StateTexas average |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | A | 92 | 83.0 1,531 reporting | 81.3 7,646 reporting |
| 2024-25 | A | 94 | 83.4 1,501 reporting | 81.2 7,554 reporting |
| 2023-24 | A | 94 | 81.4 1,474 reporting | 78.9 7,466 reporting |
| 2022-23 | A | 93 | 82.0 1,458 reporting | 79.1 7,377 reporting |
| 2021-22 | B | 88 | 84.2 1,438 reporting | 83.7 7,283 reporting |
Where the score comes from
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
- Lone Oak HS
- Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,531 in cohort)
| Domain | Score | Grade | Points to next grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| Student Achievement | 92 | A | — |
| School Progress | 92 | A | — |
| Closing the Gaps | 93 | A | — |
| Academic Growth | 83 | B | 7 |
| Relative Performance | 92 | A | — |
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
- Approaches grade level
- Meets grade level
- Masters grade level
- Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,531 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Graduation
- Four-Year
- 95.6%+2.8 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 425 rated schools reporting
- Five-Year
- 98.6%+6.0 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 424 rated schools reporting
- Six-Year
- 98.5%+6.6 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 423 rated schools reporting
- Dropout Rate
- 0.3%−0.1 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 426 rated schools reporting
These measures use TEA's standard-accountability population. Each comparison average includes only schools in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported school rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.
College, career and military readiness
- Total credit for CCMR criteria
- 95.0%+6.4 pts vs similar economic context
| Criterion | This school% of graduates | Averagesimilar economic context | Differencepercentage points | Reportingselected comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total credit for CCMR criteria | 95.0% | 88.6% | +6.4 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 432 rated schools reporting |
| Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course | 80.3% | 59.7% | +20.6 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 433 rated schools reporting |
| Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA | 36.4% | 31.4% | +5.0 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 433 rated schools reporting |
| Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s) | 16.7% | 11.9% | +4.8 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 433 rated schools reporting |
| Earned college credit for a dual credit course | 47.0% | 34.9% | +12.1 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 433 rated schools reporting |
| Earned an industry-based certification | 53.0% | 38.4% | +14.6 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 433 rated schools reporting |
| Earned a level I or level II certificate | 0.0% | 1.5% | −1.5 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 433 rated schools reporting |
| Earned an associate degree | 0.0% | 4.1% | −4.1 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 433 rated schools reporting |
| Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit | 0.0% | 5.1% | −5.1 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 433 rated schools reporting |
| Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness | 10.6% | 2.9% | +7.7 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 433 rated schools reporting |
| Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student | 12.1% | 7.3% | +4.8 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 433 rated schools reporting |
| Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces | 1.5% | 3.3% | −1.8 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 433 rated schools reporting |
Every row is a share of this school's graduates, and every row is a way of meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this school minus the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate, counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported school percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
After high school: the following fall
Where school graduates appeared in Texas public higher-education records the fall after graduation. This is a limited next-step measure, not an eventual college-going or completion rate.
- Graduates in the report
- 69
Class of 2023–24
- Enrolled in Texas public higher education
- 37
53.6% of graduates
- Not found in Texas public higher-ed records
- 31
44.9% of graduates
- Not trackable
- 1
Fall 2024
Graduates in the report
- This school
- 69
- Selected comparison
- 220.3
Enrolled in Texas public higher education
- This school
- 37
- Selected comparison
- 97.5
Texas-public enrollment rate
- This school
- 53.6%
- Selected comparison
- 46.9%
Not-found rate
- This school
- 44.9%
- Selected comparison
- 48.7%
Not-trackable rate
- This school
- 1.4%
- Selected comparison
- 4.4%
Most common named Texas public destinations
- EAST TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY (003565)9
- PARIS JUNIOR COLLEGE (003601)8
Selected comparison counts are neutral cohort scale context. The percentages put differently sized graduating classes on the same basis, but still cover only the limited Texas-public system observed by this report.
Source: Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board, high-school graduates enrolled in higher education, fetched 24 August 2026. The report covers graduates who enrolled in a Texas public college or university the following fall and includes only districts or campuses with more than 25 graduates.
“Not found” does not mean a graduate did not continue their education. It can include private or out-of-state college, work, military service, enrollment after the fall term, or another path the Texas public system does not observe.
“Not trackable” is not an outcome. THECB uses it for graduates with a non-standard identifier that could not be matched to higher-education records.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
- Students
- 325
- Economically disadvantaged
- 45.2%−0.8 pts vs similar economic context
- English learners
- 5.8%−6.3 pts vs similar economic context
- Special education
- 16.6%−1.8 pts vs similar economic context
- Attendance
- 96.1%+1.4 pts vs similar economic context
- Chronically absent
- 9.3%−4.1 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Lone Oak HS
- African American 0.9%
- Hispanic 20%
- White 74.5%
- American Indian 0.9%
- Pacific Islander 0.3%
- Two or More Races 3.4%
Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,531 reporting for every category shown · 1,531 in full cohort
- African American 9.3%
- Hispanic 38.2%
- White 43.9%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 3.7%
- Pacific Islander 0.2%
- Two or More Races 4.3%
Selected comparison average For Region 10: Richardson · 1,157 reporting for every category shown · 1,157 in full cohort
- African American 17.4%
- Hispanic 43.5%
- White 24.5%
- American Indian 0.6%
- Asian 9.9%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 4%
Selected comparison average For Hunt County · 39 reporting for every category shown · 39 in full cohort
- African American 7.5%
- Hispanic 36.3%
- White 50.3%
- American Indian 0.5%
- Asian 0.4%
- Pacific Islander 0.2%
- Two or More Races 4.7%
Selected comparison average For similarly sized schools · 3,112 reporting for every category shown · 3,112 in full cohort
- African American 11%
- Hispanic 53.8%
- White 29.2%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 2.3%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 3.2%
Statewide average 7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
- African American 11.5%
- Hispanic 52.6%
- White 27.8%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 4.2%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
- Students in this TEA accountability summary
- 325
- Economically disadvantaged students
- 147
- Emergent bilingual students
- 19
- Special education students
- 54
Campus mobility · 2024–25
- Mobile students
- 59
- Students in TEA mobility denominator
- 360
- TEA-published mobility rate
- 16.4%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 325 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 10 (3.0%) from 2024–25.
- Latest enrollment
- 325
2025–26
- Change from 2024–25
- −10
Decrease · −3.0%
- Change since 2021–22
- +2
Increase · +0.6%
Enrollment in 2025–26
- This school
- 325
- Selected comparison
- 674
| School year | Students enrolledLone Oak HS | Change from previous school year | Average enrollmentselected comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021–22 | 323 | First available year | 671 |
| 2022–23 | 340 | Increase of 17 (5.3%) | 677.2 |
| 2023–24 | 345 | Increase of 5 (1.5%) | 677.3 |
| 2024–25 | 335 | Decrease of 10 (2.9%) | 673.1 |
| 2025–26 | 325 | Decrease of 10 (3.0%) | 674 |
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
- Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
- 18
5.1% of cumulative year-end enrollment
- Disciplinary actions
- 30
8.45 per 100 students
- Cumulative year-end enrollment
- 355
2024–25
Share of students · 2024–25
- This school
- 5.1%
- Selected comparison
- 11.5%
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
- This school
- 8.45
- Selected comparison
- 24.8
| School year | Cumulative enrollment | Studentsall discipline | Students% of enrollment | Actionsall discipline | Actionsper 100 students | Studentsselected comparison average % | Actionsselected comparison average per 100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020–21 | 365 | 35 | 9.6% | 49 | 13.42 | 9.3% | 17.7 |
| 2021–22 | 352 | 48 | 13.6% | 78 | 22.16 | 11.4% | 24.5 |
| 2022–23 | 361 | 45 | 12.5% | 86 | 23.82 | 11.8% | 25.9 |
| 2023–24 | 370 | 50 | 13.5% | 106 | 28.65 | 11.8% | 26.5 |
| 2024–25 | 355 | 18 | 5.1% | 30 | 8.45 | 11.5% | 24.8 |
See 2024–25 discipline categories
| Category | Students | Students% of enrollment | Actions | Actionsper 100 students | Studentsselected comparison average % | Actionsselected comparison average per 100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All discipline | 18 | 5.1% | 30 | 8.45 | 11.5% | 24.8 |
| In-school suspensions | 13 | 3.7% | 18 | 5.07 | 10.3% | 19.2 |
| Out-of-school suspensions | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
| DAEP placements | Suppressed | — | 10 | 2.82 | — | 4.9 |
| Mandatory DAEP placements | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
| Discretionary DAEP placements | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
| JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
- Lone Oak HS
- Parent district: Lone Oak ISD
- Texas average
- Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
- This school
- $48,863
- Selected comparison
- $11,983
For 2025, TEA reported $48,863 per student for this campus, $26,969 per student for its parent district, Lone Oak ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
| Year | Lone Oak HS | Parent district: Lone Oak ISD | Texas average | Selected comparison average | Reportingselected comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | $9,093 | $10,594 | $13,054 | $7,779 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,378 rated schools reporting |
| 2019 | $9,981 | $12,414 | $13,108 | $7,974 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,398 rated schools reporting |
| 2020 | $13,442 | $15,075 | $14,058 | $8,432 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,409 rated schools reporting |
| 2021 | $11,208 | $13,204 | $14,797 | $8,861 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,428 rated schools reporting |
| 2022 | $12,007 | $17,266 | $15,708 | $10,233 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,441 rated schools reporting |
| 2023 | $16,193 | $25,946 | $16,792 | $10,597 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,458 rated schools reporting |
| 2024 | $57,429 | $32,147 | $18,125 | $11,617 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,474 rated schools reporting |
| 2025 | $48,863 | $26,969 | $18,972 | $11,983 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,500 rated schools reporting |
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
- Average salary
- $70,370+$3,195 vs similar economic context
- Teachers
- 29−14.8 vs similar economic context
- Students per staff member
- 11.2−9.4 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Lone Oak HS
- Beginning 3.1%
- 1 to 5 years 16.2%
- 6 to 10 years 15.5%
- 11 to 20 years 40.3%
- 21 to 30 years 13.1%
- Over 30 years 11.7%
Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,531 reporting for every category shown · 1,531 in full cohort
- Beginning 5.5%
- 1 to 5 years 23.7%
- 6 to 10 years 19.6%
- 11 to 20 years 30.2%
- 21 to 30 years 16.7%
- Over 30 years 4.1%
Selected comparison average For Region 10: Richardson · 1,157 reporting for every category shown · 1,157 in full cohort
- Beginning 6.9%
- 1 to 5 years 29%
- 6 to 10 years 20.1%
- 11 to 20 years 27.5%
- 21 to 30 years 13.7%
- Over 30 years 2.8%
Selected comparison average For Hunt County · 39 reporting for every category shown · 39 in full cohort
- Beginning 6%
- 1 to 5 years 27.6%
- 6 to 10 years 17.7%
- 11 to 20 years 27.7%
- 21 to 30 years 16.9%
- Over 30 years 4.2%
Selected comparison average For similarly sized schools · 3,112 reporting for every category shown · 3,112 in full cohort
- Beginning 6.2%
- 1 to 5 years 25.1%
- 6 to 10 years 18.7%
- 11 to 20 years 28.8%
- 21 to 30 years 16.9%
- Over 30 years 4%
Statewide average 7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
- Beginning 6.2%
- 1 to 5 years 25.6%
- 6 to 10 years 19.2%
- 11 to 20 years 28.7%
- 21 to 30 years 15.9%
- Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
| Grade or subject | Average students per classLone Oak HS · 2024–25 | Average students per classselected comparison |
|---|---|---|
| Secondary English | 17.1 | 15.4 |
| Secondary languages other than English | 15.1 | 17.7 |
| Secondary math | 14.9 | 16.4 |
| Secondary science | 17.1 | 17.8 |
| Secondary social studies | 18.2 | 17.8 |
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 5 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
Where this school ranks best
Out of 200 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#1 rankings
First-place results
3 measures
-
1of 38
Per-student spending
Hunt County · of the 38 that report this measure
-
1of 11
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA
Hunt County · of the 11 that report this measure
-
1of 11
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)
Hunt County · of the 11 that report this measure
#2–3 rankings
Second- and third-place results
10 measures
-
2of 36
Closing the Gaps
Hunt County · of the 36 that report this measure
-
2of 28
Science — Approaches
Hunt County · of the 28 that report this measure · tied with 2
-
2of 20
Social Studies — Meets
Hunt County · of the 20 that report this measure
-
2of 11
Earned college credit for a dual credit course
Hunt County · of the 11 that report this measure
-
2of 11
Earned an industry-based certification
Hunt County · of the 11 that report this measure
-
3of 36
All Subjects — Approaches
Hunt County · of the 36 that report this measure · tied with 1
-
3of 36
All Subjects — Meets
Hunt County · of the 36 that report this measure
-
3of 36
Reading — Approaches
Hunt County · of the 36 that report this measure · tied with 2
-
3of 20
Social Studies — Masters
Hunt County · of the 20 that report this measure
-
3of 11
Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness
Hunt County · of the 11 that report this measure
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
18 measures
-
4of 36
School Progress
Hunt County · of the 36 that report this measure
-
4of 36
Relative Performance
Hunt County · of the 36 that report this measure
-
4of 36
Reading — Meets
Hunt County · of the 36 that report this measure · tied with 1
-
4of 11
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course
Hunt County · of the 11 that report this measure
-
5of 36
Student Achievement
Hunt County · of the 36 that report this measure · tied with 1
-
5of 28
Science — Meets
Hunt County · of the 28 that report this measure · tied with 1
-
5of 20
Social Studies — Approaches
Hunt County · of the 20 that report this measure
-
6of 39
Overall score
Hunt County · of the 39 that report this measure
-
6of 11
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student
Hunt County · of the 11 that report this measure
-
6of 10
Six-Year Graduation Rate
Hunt County (standard accountability only) · of the 10 that report this measure
-
7of 35
Academic Growth
Hunt County · of the 35 that report this measure
-
7of 11
College, career or military ready
Hunt County · of the 11 that report this measure
-
7of 10
Dropout Rate (lowest is best)
Hunt County (standard accountability only) · of the 10 that report this measure
-
8of 10
Five-Year Graduation Rate
Hunt County (standard accountability only) · of the 10 that report this measure
-
9of 37
Chronically absent (lowest is best)
Hunt County · of the 37 that report this measure
-
9of 28
Science — Masters
Hunt County · of the 28 that report this measure
-
9of 11
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces
Hunt County · of the 11 that report this measure
-
9of 10
Four-Year Graduation Rate
Hunt County (standard accountability only) · of the 10 that report this measure
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Download the full dataset · this campus's district
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 116906001.