Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Little Cypress JH

Orange County · Region 05: Beaumont · 539 students

Current score
74/1002025-26
Change
−1 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
−7.0 ptsvs 81 average · 1,879 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
1,434 of 1,879tied with 73 others
C74

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 73 in 2021-22. The current score is below the 81 average for 1,879 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

STAAR result

Science above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
51%vs 49.6% avg · +1.4 pts
Masters
24%vs 22.8% avg · +1.2 pts

Among 1,655 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Little Cypress JH is rated C by TEA, scoring 74 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 81 average for 1,879 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 1 point since 2021-22.

Ranks 1,434th of 1,879 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 73 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. Official improvement and transfer notices
  3. 5 years of ratings
  4. Where the score comes from
  5. Student outcomes
  6. Who this school serves
  7. Student counts behind the percentages
  8. Enrollment over time
  9. Discipline and removal from class
  10. Spending per student
  11. Teachers and actual class size
  12. Where this school ranks best
  13. Where this comes from

Official improvement and transfer notices

Official state and federal designations can carry support, reporting requirements or a family transfer option that a single A–F rating does not explain.

2026 federal improvement status

Targeted Support and Improvement

Official support label: TSI

Identification reason: English Learners, Special Education

TEA track year 0

Open the official TEA list and methodology

Schools identified for improvement

This school
Listed
Selected comparison
22.9%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,879 rated schools reporting

Schools on the PEG list

This school
Not listed
Selected comparison
1.6%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,879 rated schools reporting

Selected comparison percentages are the share of reporting schools in that group found on each dated list. They are neutral prevalence context; changing the comparison never changes this school's official status.

These are dated TEA statuses, fetched 24 August 2026; they are not added to or subtracted from this site's rating.

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
90807060 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageLittle Cypress JH 7572687774 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated C with 73 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26C7481.0 1,879 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25C7781.0 1,852 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24D6879.1 1,827 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23C7279.7 1,796 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22C7582.7 1,770 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement75 C−5.1 vs similar economic context · 1,809 reporting
  • School Progress75 C−6.3 vs similar economic context · 1,801 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps71 C−7.2 vs similar economic context · 1,785 reporting
  • Academic Growth72 C−2.7 vs similar economic context · 1,751 reporting
  • Relative Performance75 C−4.4 vs similar economic context · 1,801 reporting
  • Little Cypress JH
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,879 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement75C5
School Progress75C5
Closing the Gaps71C9
Academic Growth72C8
Relative Performance75C5

Closest to moving up: Student Achievement, 5 points below B in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level69%−7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,809 reporting
  • Meets grade level44%−7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,809 reporting
  • Masters grade level18%−3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,809 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level80%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,806 reporting
  • Meets grade level55%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,806 reporting
  • Masters grade level26%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,806 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level60%−13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,796 reporting
  • Meets grade level35%−9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,796 reporting
  • Masters grade level11%−7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,796 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level74%−3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,655 reporting
  • Meets grade level51%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,655 reporting
  • Masters grade level24%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,655 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level62%−14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 930 reporting
  • Meets grade level30%−18 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 930 reporting
  • Masters grade level10%−12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 930 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,879 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
539
Economically disadvantaged
56.6%−0.4 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
3.3%−11.3 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
19.1%+0.3 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
93.7%−0.6 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
20.5%+5.0 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Little Cypress JH

African American: 10.8%Hispanic: 15%White: 67.9%American Indian: 0.4%Asian: 1.3%Two or More Races: 4.6%
  • African American 10.8%
  • Hispanic 15%
  • White 67.9%
  • American Indian 0.4%
  • Asian 1.3%
  • Two or More Races 4.6%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,879 reporting for every category shown · 1,879 in full cohort

African American: 10%Hispanic: 45.6%White: 37.5%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 2.4%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 4%
  • African American 10%
  • Hispanic 45.6%
  • White 37.5%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 2.4%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 4%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
539
Economically disadvantaged students
305
Emergent bilingual students
18
Special education students
103

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
68
Students in TEA mobility denominator
559
TEA-published mobility rate
12.2%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 539 students in 2025–26, an increase of 16 (3.1%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
539

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
+16

Increase · +3.1%

Change since 2021–22
+71

Increase · +15.2%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
539
Selected comparison
632

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,841 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Little Cypress JH
School yearStudents enrolledLittle Cypress JHChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 468 First available year 635.8
2022–23 497 Increase of 29 (6.2%) 642.5
2023–24 477 Decrease of 20 (4.0%) 640.8
2024–25 523 Increase of 46 (9.6%) 637.7
2025–26 539 Increase of 16 (3.1%) 632

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
156

28.1% of cumulative year-end enrollment

Disciplinary actions
549

98.74 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
556

2024–25

Share of students · 2024–25

This school
28.1%
Selected comparison
12.5%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,433 rated schools reporting

+15.6 pts vs similar economic context

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
98.74
Selected comparison
27.9

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,554 rated schools reporting

+70.8 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Little Cypress JH
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 540 127 23.5% 334 61.85 9.7% 18.7
2021–22 500 136 27.2% 426 85.20 12.4% 28
2022–23 528 168 31.8% 642 121.59 12.9% 29.7
2023–24 520 131 25.2% 427 82.12 12.8% 29.7
2024–25 556 156 28.1% 549 98.74 12.5% 27.9
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Little Cypress JH in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline 156 28.1% 549 98.74 12.5% 27.9
In-school suspensions 143 25.7% 430 77.34 11.2% 21.7
Out-of-school suspensions 53 9.5% 86 15.47 6.4% 9.1
DAEP placements 29 5.2% 33 5.94 4.7% 5.6
Mandatory DAEP placements 12 2.2% 14 2.52 3.4% 3.9
Discretionary DAEP placements 17 3.1% 19 3.42 2.7% 3.1
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$6k$13k$20k20182020202220242025
  • Little Cypress JH
  • Parent district: Little Cypress-Mauriceville CISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$8,334
Selected comparison
$12,332

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,849 rated schools reporting

−$3,998 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $8,334 per student for this campus, $14,838 per student for its parent district, Little Cypress-Mauriceville CISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearLittle Cypress JHParent district: Little Cypress-Mauriceville CISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$13,339$18,781$13,054$7,942 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,703 rated schools reporting
2019$7,847$12,673$13,108$8,111 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,721 rated schools reporting
2020$7,173$13,444$14,058$8,701 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,740 rated schools reporting
2021$7,282$12,349$14,797$9,085 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,754 rated schools reporting
2022$8,551$13,840$15,708$10,486 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,772 rated schools reporting
2023$7,980$14,852$16,792$10,994 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,796 rated schools reporting
2024$9,347$14,707$18,125$11,803 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,824 rated schools reporting
2025$8,334$14,838$18,972$12,332 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,849 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$60,147−$6,374 vs similar economic context
Teachers
38−4.0 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
14.3−5.0 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Little Cypress JH

Beginning: 5%1 to 5 years: 37.7%6 to 10 years: 14.6%11 to 20 years: 18.6%21 to 30 years: 21.8%Over 30 years: 2.7%
  • Beginning 5%
  • 1 to 5 years 37.7%
  • 6 to 10 years 14.6%
  • 11 to 20 years 18.6%
  • 21 to 30 years 21.8%
  • Over 30 years 2.7%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,879 reporting for every category shown · 1,879 in full cohort

Beginning: 5.8%1 to 5 years: 24.9%6 to 10 years: 19.3%11 to 20 years: 28.8%21 to 30 years: 16.4%Over 30 years: 4.4%
  • Beginning 5.8%
  • 1 to 5 years 24.9%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.3%
  • 11 to 20 years 28.8%
  • 21 to 30 years 16.4%
  • Over 30 years 4.4%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Little Cypress JH in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classLittle Cypress JH · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Grade 619.717.4
Secondary English19.814.8
Secondary math17.215.6
Secondary science20.117.2
Secondary social studies21.417.1

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 5 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this school ranks best

Out of 120 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

#4–10 rankings

Fourth- through tenth-place results

13 measures

  • 5of 20

    Reading — Masters

    Orange County · of the 20 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 5of 17

    Science — Masters

    Orange County · of the 17 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 6of 20

    Reading — Approaches

    Orange County · of the 20 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 7of 20

    Reading — Meets

    Orange County · of the 20 that report this measure · tied with 2

  • 7of 17

    Science — Meets

    Orange County · of the 17 that report this measure

  • 7of 11

    Social Studies — Approaches

    Orange County · of the 11 that report this measure

  • 8of 11

    Social Studies — Meets

    Orange County · of the 11 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 9of 20

    School Progress

    Orange County · of the 20 that report this measure · tied with 2

  • 9of 20

    Relative Performance

    Orange County · of the 20 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 9of 20

    All Subjects — Masters

    Orange County · of the 20 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 9of 17

    Science — Approaches

    Orange County · of the 17 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 9of 11

    Social Studies — Masters

    Orange County · of the 11 that report this measure

  • 10of 20

    All Subjects — Meets

    Orange County · of the 20 that report this measure · tied with 2

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 181908041.