Lipan Elem

5 years of ratings

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 86 that year.

How this school's change over time is ranked

TEA publishes most measures for one year only, so a change ranking exists just where the same figure is published across years — the overall score, the five score domains, and per-student spending. This page does not yet state where Lipan Elem itself places on these lists, only that the lists exist; open one to find this school's own row.

Texas schools

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

• Student Achievement80 B+0.6 vs similar · +2.0 vs region
• School Progress83 B+1.6 vs similar · +3.7 vs region
• Closing the Gaps73 C−5.1 vs similar · −4.8 vs region
• Academic Growth53 F−21.6 vs similar · −22.6 vs region
• Relative Performance83 B+3.5 vs similar · +7.9 vs region

• Lipan Elem
• Similar student population (1,935)
• Region 11: Fort Worth (839)

Closest to moving up: School Progress, 7 points below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (83), so Student Achievement (80) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 83.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

• Approaches grade level
• Meets grade level
• Masters grade level
• Tick: Similar student population (1,935)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The tick on each bar marks the average for Similar student population (1,935 schools) — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students

237

Economically disadvantaged

59.5%−0.3 pts vs similar

English learners

4.2%−11.4 pts vs similar

Special education

15.6%−3.2 pts vs similar

Attendance

95.7%+1.4 pts vs similar

Chronically absent

4.5%−11.3 pts vs similar

Student demographics

• African American 1.3%
• Hispanic 12.7%
• White 78.9%
• Two or More Races 7.2%

Spending per student

Compared against TEA's own peer group, which controls for size and student population, and against the state.

• Lipan Elem
• TEA peer group
• Texas average

TEA's published file does not include peer-group spending for this entity, so no comparison is shown.

Not reported by TEA for this entity: peer.

Teachers

Average salary

$61,105−$5,385 vs similar

Teachers

17

Students per staff member

14.2

Teaching experience

• Beginning 11.4%
• 1 to 5 years 33.7%
• 6 to 10 years 16.9%
• 11 to 20 years 33.7%
• 21 to 30 years 5.4%

Where this school ranks best

Out of 88 rankings computed across every published metric and every comparison group, these are the placements that stand out. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

• 1of 15

  Per-student spending

  Hood County · of the 15 that report this measure · tied with 1

  Copy
• 1of 14

  Chronically absent (lowest is best)

  Hood County · of the 14 that report this measure

  Copy
• 2of 14

  Reading — Approaches

  Hood County · of the 14 that report this measure

  Copy
• 2of 14

  Attendance

  Hood County · of the 14 that report this measure · tied with 1

  Copy
• 3of 14

  Reading — Meets

  Hood County · of the 14 that report this measure

  Copy
• 3of 14

  Science — Approaches

  Hood County · of the 14 that report this measure · tied with 1

  Copy
• 5of 14

  Reading — Masters

  Hood County · of the 14 that report this measure

  Copy
• 5of 13

  School Progress

  Hood County · of the 13 that report this measure

  Copy
• 5of 13

  Relative Performance

  Hood County · of the 13 that report this measure

  Copy
• 6of 14

  All Subjects — Meets

  Hood County · of the 14 that report this measure

  Copy
• 7of 14

  All Subjects — Approaches

  Hood County · of the 14 that report this measure

  Copy
• 8of 14

  Math — Approaches

  Hood County · of the 14 that report this measure

  Copy

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this campus ranks poorly. Each statement below states its cohort and its denominator so it can be checked — a rank without an n is a boast, not a fact. Ties are shown because a shared ceiling is not a sole first place. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

Every figure on this page comes from data the Texas Education Agency publishes at txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026 and archived with a checksum so each number stays traceable to the bytes TEA served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for districts only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here — 9,086 entities in two formats is 18,172 assets, on top of everything else this site publishes, and that is past the 20,000-asset limit this site is published under. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 111902102.