+8.2 ptsvs 80.8 average · 1,922 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
360 of 1,922tied with 66 others
Score vs region
+8.3 ptsvs 80.7 average · 191 rated schools in Region 02: Corpus Christi
Region 02: Corpus Christi placement
35 of 191tied with 7 others
Score vs county
+6.5 ptsvs 82.5 average · 97 rated schools in Nueces County
Nueces County placement
19 of 97tied with 3 others
Score vs similar-size group
+8.6 ptsvs 80.4 average · 3,230 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
699 of 3,230tied with 109 others
Score vs state
+7.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
1,913 of 7,646tied with 285 others
B89
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 94 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 80.8 average for 1,922 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 80.7 average for 191 rated schools in Region 02: Corpus Christi.The current score is above the 82.5 average for 97 rated schools in Nueces County.The current score is above the 80.4 average for 3,230 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
58%vs 49.8% avg · +8.2 pts
Masters
30%vs 20.6% avg · +9.4 pts
Among 1,840 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Lillion E Luehrs JH is rated B by TEA, scoring 89 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.8 average for 1,922 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 4 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 360th of 1,922 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 66 others).
Lillion E Luehrs JH is rated B by TEA, scoring 89 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.7 average for 191 rated schools in Region 02: Corpus Christi. It is down 4 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 35th of 191 rated schools in Region 02: Corpus Christi (tied with 7 others).
Lillion E Luehrs JH is rated B by TEA, scoring 89 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 82.5 average for 97 rated schools in Nueces County. It is down 4 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 19th of 97 rated schools in Nueces County (tied with 3 others).
Lillion E Luehrs JH is rated B by TEA, scoring 89 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.4 average for 3,230 similarly sized rated schools. It is down 4 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 699th of 3,230 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 109 others).
Lillion E Luehrs JH is rated B by TEA, scoring 89 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is down 4 points since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 94 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement86 B+6.7 vs similar economic context · 1,840 reporting
School Progress90 A+8.7 vs similar economic context · 1,833 reporting
Closing the Gaps87 B+9.0 vs similar economic context · 1,816 reporting
Academic Growth85 B+10.5 vs similar economic context · 1,781 reporting
Relative Performance90 A+10.5 vs similar economic context · 1,833 reporting
Lillion E Luehrs JH
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,922 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
86
B
4
School Progress
90
A
—
Closing the Gaps
87
B
3
Academic Growth
85
B
5
Relative Performance
90
A
—
Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 3 points below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (90), so
Student Achievement (86) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 90.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level80%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,840 reporting
Meets grade level58%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,840 reporting
Masters grade level30%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,840 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level86%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,837 reporting
Meets grade level66%+12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,837 reporting
Masters grade level36%+14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,837 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level82%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,829 reporting
Meets grade level61%+17 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,829 reporting
Masters grade level30%+13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,829 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level78%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,684 reporting
Meets grade level53%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,684 reporting
Masters grade level25%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,684 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
Approaches grade level63%−13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 929 reporting
Meets grade level35%−13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 929 reporting
Masters grade level18%−4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 929 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,922 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
334
Economically disadvantaged
59.9%−0.3 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
3.3%−12.6 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
19.5%+0.7 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
95.5%+1.2 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
10.0%−5.9 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Lillion E Luehrs JH
African American 0.6%
Hispanic 82.6%
White 14.7%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 0.9%
Two or More Races 0.9%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,922 reporting for every category shown · 1,922 in full cohort
African American 10.3%
Hispanic 47.9%
White 35%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 2.3%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 3.9%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 02: Corpus Christi · 191 reporting for every category shown · 191 in full cohort
African American 1.9%
Hispanic 77.5%
White 17.9%
American Indian 0.2%
Asian 1%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 1.5%
Selected comparison averageFor Nueces County · 97 reporting for every category shown · 97 in full cohort
African American 3%
Hispanic 77.7%
White 15.9%
American Indian 0.1%
Asian 1.4%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 1.8%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 3,230 reporting for every category shown · 3,230 in full cohort
African American 11.1%
Hispanic 54.1%
White 28.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 2.4%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.2%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
334
Economically disadvantaged students
200
Emergent bilingual students
11
Special education students
65
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
32
Students in TEA mobility denominator
340
TEA-published mobility rate
9.4%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 334 students in 2025–26, an increase of 4 (1.2%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
334
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
+4
Increase · +1.2%
Change since 2021–22
−9
Decrease · −2.6%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
334
Selected comparison
632.1
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,888 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Lillion E Luehrs JH
School year
Students enrolledLillion E Luehrs JH
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
343
First available year
639
2022–23
327
Decrease of 16 (4.7%)
643.5
2023–24
306
Decrease of 21 (6.4%)
642.6
2024–25
330
Increase of 24 (7.8%)
639.9
2025–26
334
Increase of 4 (1.2%)
632.1
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
51
15.0% of cumulative year-end enrollment
Disciplinary actions
109
32.06 per 100 students
Cumulative year-end enrollment
340
2024–25
Share of students · 2024–25
This school
15.0%
Selected comparison
12.5%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,464 rated schools reporting
+2.5 pts vs similar economic context
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
This school
32.06
Selected comparison
28
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,583 rated schools reporting
+4.1 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Lillion E Luehrs JH
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
414
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2021–22
361
78
21.6%
155
42.94
12.4%
28.1
2022–23
346
69
19.9%
160
46.24
12.9%
30
2023–24
328
66
20.1%
177
53.96
12.8%
29.7
2024–25
340
51
15.0%
109
32.06
12.5%
28
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Lillion E Luehrs JH in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
51
15.0%
109
32.06
12.5%
28
In-school suspensions
39
11.5%
81
23.82
11.2%
21.7
Out-of-school suspensions
13
3.8%
14
4.12
6.6%
9.5
DAEP placements
14
4.1%
14
4.12
4.8%
5.7
Mandatory DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
14
4.1%
14
4.12
2.7%
3.1
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Lillion E Luehrs JH
Parent district: Bishop CISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$9,678
Selected comparison
$12,453
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,894 rated schools reporting
−$2,775 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $9,678 per student for this campus, $20,036 per student for its parent district, Bishop CISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Lillion E Luehrs JH
Parent district: Bishop CISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$5,213
$11,496
$13,054
$7,931
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,751 rated schools reporting
2019
$5,996
$15,582
$13,108
$8,080
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,770 rated schools reporting
2020
$6,184
$18,930
$14,058
$8,694
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,788 rated schools reporting
2021
$6,667
$14,218
$14,797
$9,106
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,801 rated schools reporting
2022
$8,386
$16,500
$15,708
$10,433
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,819 rated schools reporting
2023
$9,078
$18,642
$16,792
$11,111
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,843 rated schools reporting
2024
$9,642
$18,398
$18,125
$11,929
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,873 rated schools reporting
2025
$9,678
$20,036
$18,972
$12,453
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,894 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$63,807−$2,689 vs similar economic context
Teachers
25−16.7 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
13.3−5.9 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Lillion E Luehrs JH
1 to 5 years 12%
6 to 10 years 23.9%
11 to 20 years 31.9%
21 to 30 years 25.9%
Over 30 years 6.4%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,922 reporting for every category shown · 1,922 in full cohort
Beginning 5.9%
1 to 5 years 25.4%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.4%
21 to 30 years 16.3%
Over 30 years 4.2%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 02: Corpus Christi · 191 reporting for every category shown · 191 in full cohort
Beginning 5%
1 to 5 years 23.1%
6 to 10 years 17.7%
11 to 20 years 28.6%
21 to 30 years 17.3%
Over 30 years 5.2%
Selected comparison averageFor Nueces County · 97 reporting for every category shown · 97 in full cohort
Beginning 5.7%
1 to 5 years 23%
6 to 10 years 17.3%
11 to 20 years 27.6%
21 to 30 years 16.3%
Over 30 years 3.9%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 3,230 reporting for every category shown · 3,230 in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.2%
6 to 10 years 18.7%
11 to 20 years 28.8%
21 to 30 years 16.8%
Over 30 years 3.9%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Lillion E Luehrs JH in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classLillion E Luehrs JH · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Grade 6
15.2
17.5
Secondary English
12.6
14.8
Secondary math
13
15.6
Secondary science
18.1
17.1
Secondary social studies
18.2
17
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 5 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Out of 120 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
2 measures
9of 82
Reading — Masters
Nueces County · of the 82 that report this measure · tied with 2
10of 87
Attendance
Nueces County · of the 87 that report this measure · tied with 1
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 178902041.