Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Open-enrollment charter campus · Alternative Education Accountability

Letot Campus

Academy for Academic Excellence · Dallas · 26 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Not Rated

At a glance

TEA did not issue an overall rating for Letot Campus for 2025-26. Everything TEA did publish for this charter campus is below.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Current strength

Chronically absent lower than the similar-context average

0% −23.5 pts vs 23.5%

  • 0% is 23.5 percentage points lower than the 23.5% average among 204 charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Current strength

Attendance above the similar-context average

100% +7.3 pts vs 92.7%

  • 100% is 7.3 percentage points above the 92.7% average among 204 charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

TEA did not issue an overall rating for Letot Campus for 2025-26. Everything TEA did publish for this charter campus is below.

TEA did not issue an overall rating for this school. Scores below are the figures TEA published; the letter grades are the state's where it issued them.

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Discipline and removal from class
  8. Spending per student
  9. Teachers and actual class size
  10. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
908070 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas charter average 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas charter average
2025-26Not Rated—80.0 207 reporting81.7 829 reporting
2024-25Not Rated—78.3 202 reporting81.3 797 reporting
2023-24Not Rated—76.1 196 reporting79.5 776 reporting
2022-23Not Rated—75.4 188 reporting79.6 749 reporting
2021-22Not Rated—83.6 174 reporting84.5 700 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement—Not reported · similar economic context 73.9 · 207 reporting
  • School Progress—Not reported · similar economic context 80.9 · 207 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps—Not reported · similar economic context 76.4 · 202 reporting
  • Academic Growth—Not reported · similar economic context 72.9 · 195 reporting
  • Relative Performance—Not reported · similar economic context 79.3 · 203 reporting
  • Letot Campus
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (207 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement—Not rated—
School Progress—Not rated—
Closing the Gaps—Not rated—
Academic Growth—Not rated—
Relative Performance—Not rated—

The scores above are the ones TEA published. TEA did not issue letter grades for this school, so none are shown: the A–F thresholds marked on the chart are the state's, but applying them here would produce a grade the state chose to withhold.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level—Not reported · Similar economic-disadvantage rate 67.3% · 207 reporting
  • Meets grade level—Not reported · Similar economic-disadvantage rate 39.8% · 207 reporting
  • Masters grade level—Not reported · Similar economic-disadvantage rate 15.1% · 207 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level—Not reported · Similar economic-disadvantage rate 67.1% · 207 reporting
  • Meets grade level—Not reported · Similar economic-disadvantage rate 42.9% · 207 reporting
  • Masters grade level—Not reported · Similar economic-disadvantage rate 15.7% · 207 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level—Not reported · Similar economic-disadvantage rate 69.8% · 189 reporting
  • Meets grade level—Not reported · Similar economic-disadvantage rate 38.2% · 189 reporting
  • Masters grade level—Not reported · Similar economic-disadvantage rate 15.2% · 189 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (207 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only charter campuses for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
26
Economically disadvantaged
100.0%+5.5 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
3.8%−43.2 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
26.9%+14.9 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
100.0%+7.3 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
0.0%−23.5 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Letot Campus

African American: 57.7%Hispanic: 30.8%White: 3.8%Two or More Races: 7.7%
  • African American 57.7%
  • Hispanic 30.8%
  • White 3.8%
  • Two or More Races 7.7%

Selected comparison average For charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 207 reporting for every category shown · 207 in full cohort

African American: 18.4%Hispanic: 75.6%White: 2.7%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 1.7%Two or More Races: 1.3%
  • African American 18.4%
  • Hispanic 75.6%
  • White 2.7%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 1.7%
  • Two or More Races 1.3%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
26
Economically disadvantaged students
26
Emergent bilingual students
1
Special education students
7

TEA context labels

  • Alternative education type: residential facility
  • Rated under AEA procedures
  • Residential treatment facility under AEA or AskTED

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
161
Students in TEA mobility denominator
163
TEA-published mobility rate
98.8%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Not reported

Rate not available

Disciplinary actions
Not reported

Rate not available

Cumulative year-end enrollment
134

2024–25

TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Letot Campus
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 40 Not reported — Not reported — — —
2021–22 68 Not reported — Not reported — — —
2022–23 102 Not reported — Not reported — — —
2023–24 152 Not reported — Not reported — — —
2024–25 134 Not reported — Not reported — — —
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Letot Campus in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline Not reported — Not reported — — —
In-school suspensions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Out-of-school suspensions Not reported — Not reported — — —
DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized charter campuses can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$7k$33k$58k20182020202220242025
  • Letot Campus
  • Parent district: Academy for Academic Excellence
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$27,995
Selected comparison
$12,072

average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 204 rated charter campuses reporting

+$15,923 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $27,995 per student for this campus, $28,732 per student for its parent district, Academy for Academic Excellence, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearLetot CampusParent district: Academy for Academic ExcellenceTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$23,683$15,154$13,054$8,688 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 114 rated charter campuses reporting
2019$20,233$15,964$13,108$8,362 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 154 rated charter campuses reporting
2020$22,420$17,116$14,058$8,934 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 158 rated charter campuses reporting
2021$55,230$26,955$14,797$9,395 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 172 rated charter campuses reporting
2022$46,767$27,295$15,708$11,442 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 183 rated charter campuses reporting
2023$46,069$22,589$16,792$11,382 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 190 rated charter campuses reporting
2024$35,030$24,942$18,125$11,168 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 197 rated charter campuses reporting
2025$27,995$28,732$18,972$12,072 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 204 rated charter campuses reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$62,339−$1,833 vs similar economic context
Teachers
8−19.9 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
3.2−15.1 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Letot Campus

6 to 10 years: 9.9%11 to 20 years: 61.7%21 to 30 years: 24.7%Over 30 years: 3.7%
  • 6 to 10 years 9.9%
  • 11 to 20 years 61.7%
  • 21 to 30 years 24.7%
  • Over 30 years 3.7%

Selected comparison average For charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 207 reporting for every category shown · 207 in full cohort

Beginning: 13.3%1 to 5 years: 47.9%6 to 10 years: 19.4%11 to 20 years: 14.9%21 to 30 years: 3.9%Over 30 years: 0.6%
  • Beginning 13.3%
  • 1 to 5 years 47.9%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.4%
  • 11 to 20 years 14.9%
  • 21 to 30 years 3.9%
  • Over 30 years 0.6%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Letot Campus in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classLetot Campus · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Grade 5123.5
Grade 6123.2
Secondary English5.119
Secondary languages other than English118.1
Secondary math5.519.8
Secondary science5.520.5
Secondary social studies5.220.8

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 7 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 057814005.