Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Open-enrollment charter campus · Alternative Education Accountability

Leadership Academy

Excel Academy · Katy · 58 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Not Rated

At a glance

TEA did not issue an overall rating for Leadership Academy for 2025-26. Everything TEA did publish for this charter campus is below.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Current strength

Chronically absent lower than the similar-context average

0% −15.2 pts vs 15.2%

  • 0% is 15.2 percentage points lower than the 15.2% average among 59 charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Current strength

Attendance above the similar-context average

98.2% +3.6 pts vs 94.6%

  • 98.2% is 3.6 percentage points above the 94.6% average among 59 charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

TEA did not issue an overall rating for Leadership Academy for 2025-26. Everything TEA did publish for this charter campus is below.

TEA did not issue an overall rating for this school. Scores below are the figures TEA published; the letter grades are the state's where it issued them.

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Enrollment over time
  8. Discipline and removal from class
  9. Spending per student
  10. Teachers and actual class size
  11. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
908070 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas charter average 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas charter average
2025-26Not Rated—82.6 63 reporting81.7 829 reporting
2024-25Not Rated—83.1 58 reporting81.3 797 reporting
2023-24Not Rated—82.2 57 reporting79.5 776 reporting
2022-23Not Rated—82.9 54 reporting79.6 749 reporting
2021-22Not Rated—84.4 48 reporting84.5 700 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement—Not reported · similar economic context 82.9 · 63 reporting
  • School Progress—Not reported · similar economic context 78.6 · 61 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps—Not reported · similar economic context 79.5 · 60 reporting
  • Academic Growth—Not reported · similar economic context 73.2 · 61 reporting
  • Relative Performance—Not reported · similar economic context 75.9 · 61 reporting
  • Leadership Academy
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (63 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement—Not rated—
School Progress—Not rated—
Closing the Gaps—Not rated—
Academic Growth—Not rated—
Relative Performance—Not rated—

The scores above are the ones TEA published. TEA did not issue letter grades for this school, so none are shown: the A–F thresholds marked on the chart are the state's, but applying them here would produce a grade the state chose to withhold.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level—Not reported · Similar economic-disadvantage rate 79.6% · 63 reporting
  • Meets grade level—Not reported · Similar economic-disadvantage rate 55.1% · 63 reporting
  • Masters grade level—Not reported · Similar economic-disadvantage rate 23.2% · 63 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level—Not reported · Similar economic-disadvantage rate 83.2% · 63 reporting
  • Meets grade level—Not reported · Similar economic-disadvantage rate 63.6% · 63 reporting
  • Masters grade level—Not reported · Similar economic-disadvantage rate 25.5% · 63 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (63 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only charter campuses for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
58
Economically disadvantaged
36.2%±0.0 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
20.7%+9.5 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
34.5%+20.9 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
98.2%+3.6 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
0.0%−15.2 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Leadership Academy

African American: 53.4%Hispanic: 41.4%White: 1.7%Two or More Races: 3.4%
  • African American 53.4%
  • Hispanic 41.4%
  • White 1.7%
  • Two or More Races 3.4%

Selected comparison average For charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 63 reporting for every category shown · 63 in full cohort

African American: 11.9%Hispanic: 37.3%White: 38.4%American Indian: 0.4%Asian: 7.2%Pacific Islander: 0.1%Two or More Races: 4.8%
  • African American 11.9%
  • Hispanic 37.3%
  • White 38.4%
  • American Indian 0.4%
  • Asian 7.2%
  • Pacific Islander 0.1%
  • Two or More Races 4.8%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
58
Economically disadvantaged students
21
Emergent bilingual students
12
Special education students
20

TEA context labels

  • Alternative education type: residential facility
  • Rated under AEA procedures
  • Residential treatment facility under AEA or AskTED

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
151
Students in TEA mobility denominator
154
TEA-published mobility rate
98.1%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 58 students in 2025–26, an increase of 22 (61.1%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
58

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
+22

Increase · +61.1%

Change since 2021–22
+12

Increase · +26.1%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
58
Selected comparison
505.6

average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 63 rated charter campuses reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Leadership Academy
School yearStudents enrolledLeadership AcademyChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 46 First available year 417.2
2022–23 41 Decrease of 5 (10.9%) 450.9
2023–24 35 Decrease of 6 (14.6%) 475.7
2024–25 36 Increase of 1 (2.9%) 486.5
2025–26 58 Increase of 22 (61.1%) 505.6

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting charter campuses in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Not reported

Rate not available

Disciplinary actions
Not reported

Rate not available

Cumulative year-end enrollment
135

2024–25

TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Leadership Academy
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 120 Not reported — Not reported — — —
2021–22 101 Not reported — Not reported — — —
2022–23 93 Not reported — Not reported — — —
2023–24 78 Not reported — Not reported — — —
2024–25 135 Not reported — Not reported — — —
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Leadership Academy in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline Not reported — Not reported — — —
In-school suspensions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Out-of-school suspensions Not reported — Not reported — — —
DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized charter campuses can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$7k$19k$31k20182020202220242025
  • Leadership Academy
  • Parent district: Excel Academy
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$29,380
Selected comparison
$13,142

average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 59 rated charter campuses reporting

+$16,238 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $29,380 per student for this campus, $17,968 per student for its parent district, Excel Academy, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearLeadership AcademyParent district: Excel AcademyTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$10,548$15,422$13,054$7,257 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 36 rated charter campuses reporting
2019$11,545$17,180$13,108$8,085 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 39 rated charter campuses reporting
2020$13,080$18,173$14,058$8,529 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 40 rated charter campuses reporting
2021$17,839$20,038$14,797$9,012 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 42 rated charter campuses reporting
2022$15,964$20,650$15,708$10,488 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 50 rated charter campuses reporting
2023$17,563$17,631$16,792$10,428 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 54 rated charter campuses reporting
2024$23,857$21,971$18,125$11,958 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 58 rated charter campuses reporting
2025$29,380$17,968$18,972$13,142 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 59 rated charter campuses reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$75,339+$15,557 vs similar economic context
Teachers
6−26.0 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
9.7−10.5 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Leadership Academy

11 to 20 years: 66.7%21 to 30 years: 33.3%
  • 11 to 20 years 66.7%
  • 21 to 30 years 33.3%

Selected comparison average For charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 63 reporting for every category shown · 63 in full cohort

Beginning: 14%1 to 5 years: 41.8%6 to 10 years: 20.8%11 to 20 years: 16.5%21 to 30 years: 6.4%Over 30 years: 0.6%
  • Beginning 14%
  • 1 to 5 years 41.8%
  • 6 to 10 years 20.8%
  • 11 to 20 years 16.5%
  • 21 to 30 years 6.4%
  • Over 30 years 0.6%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Leadership Academy in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classLeadership Academy · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Secondary English4.615.5
Secondary math4.814.7
Secondary science4.616.5
Secondary social studies4.815.7

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 4 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 101811006.