Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus · Alternative Education Accountability

Lead Academy HS

Gregg County · Region 07: Kilgore · 145 students

Current score
88/1002025-26
Change
−3 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+10.6 ptsvs 77.4 average · 2,388 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
367 of 2,388tied with 59 others
B88

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 94 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 77.4 average for 2,388 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Recent domain gain

Closing the Gaps rose 4 points

78 to 82 2024-25 to 2025-26

  • 82 is 7.3 points above the 74.7 average among 2,207 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

STAAR result

All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
49%vs 40.5% avg · +8.5 pts
Masters
22%vs 15.9% avg · +6.1 pts

Among 2,227 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

STAAR result

Science above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
74%vs 34.1% avg · +39.9 pts
Masters
35%vs 13.9% avg · +21.1 pts

Among 2,082 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Lead Academy HS is rated B by TEA, scoring 88 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 77.4 average for 2,388 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 3 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 367th of 2,388 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 59 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. After high school: the following fall
  6. Who this school serves
  7. Student counts behind the percentages
  8. Enrollment over time
  9. Discipline and removal from class
  10. Spending per student
  11. Teachers and actual class size
  12. Where this school ranks best
  13. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
90807060 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageLead Academy HS 9194948988 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 94 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26B8877.4 2,388 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25B8977.0 2,377 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24A9473.8 2,359 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23A9473.7 2,349 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22A9181.7 2,321 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement89 B+18.5 vs similar economic context · 2,227 reporting
  • School Progress91 A+12.4 vs similar economic context · 2,221 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps82 B+7.3 vs similar economic context · 2,207 reporting
  • Academic Growth84 B+11.3 vs similar economic context · 2,184 reporting
  • Relative Performance91 A+14.4 vs similar economic context · 2,221 reporting
  • Lead Academy HS
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,388 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement89B1
School Progress91A—
Closing the Gaps82B8
Academic Growth84B6
Relative Performance91A—

Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 8 points below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (91), so Student Achievement (89) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 91.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level75%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,227 reporting
  • Meets grade level49%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,227 reporting
  • Masters grade level22%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,227 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level56%−13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,226 reporting
  • Meets grade level36%−8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,226 reporting
  • Masters grade level1%−17 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,226 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level88%+22 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,218 reporting
  • Meets grade level36%−2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,218 reporting
  • Masters grade level28%+14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,218 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level96%+32 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,082 reporting
  • Meets grade level74%+40 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,082 reporting
  • Masters grade level35%+21 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,082 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level90%+27 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 761 reporting
  • Meets grade level64%+29 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 761 reporting
  • Masters grade level46%+31 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 761 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,388 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Completion

Four-Year
95.0%+25.5 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 56 rated schools reporting
Five-Year
98.5%+24.6 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 56 rated schools reporting
Six-Year
98.1%+23.6 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 56 rated schools reporting
Dropout Rate
3.6%−2.1 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 56 rated schools reporting

These measures use TEA's alternative-education accountability population. Each comparison average includes only schools in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported school rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.

College, career and military readiness

Total credit for CCMR criteria
30.0%−53.3 pts vs similar economic context
CCMR criteria
CriterionThis school% of graduatesAveragesimilar economic contextDifferencepercentage pointsReportingselected comparison
Total credit for CCMR criteria30.0%83.3%−53.3 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 313 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course15.7%56.4%−40.7 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 315 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA8.2%20.4%−12.2 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 315 rated schools reporting
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)0.0%12.8%−12.8 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 315 rated schools reporting
Earned college credit for a dual credit course0.0%26.5%−26.5 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 315 rated schools reporting
Earned an industry-based certification3.0%33.9%−30.9 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 315 rated schools reporting
Earned a level I or level II certificate0.7%2.6%−1.9 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 315 rated schools reporting
Earned an associate degree0.0%6.6%−6.6 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 315 rated schools reporting
Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit0.0%6.3%−6.3 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 315 rated schools reporting
Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness0.0%2.8%−2.8 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 315 rated schools reporting
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student11.2%7.6%+3.6 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 315 rated schools reporting
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces1.5%2.7%−1.2 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 315 rated schools reporting

Every row is a share of this school's graduates, and every row is a way of meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this school minus the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate, counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported school percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

After high school: the following fall

Where school graduates appeared in Texas public higher-education records the fall after graduation. This is a limited next-step measure, not an eventual college-going or completion rate.

Graduates in the report
189

Class of 2023–24

Enrolled in Texas public higher education
22

11.6% of graduates

Not found in Texas public higher-ed records
160

84.7% of graduates

Not trackable
7

Fall 2024

Graduates in the report

This school
189
Selected comparison
264.4

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 288 rated schools reporting

Enrolled in Texas public higher education

This school
22
Selected comparison
101.2

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 288 rated schools reporting

Texas-public enrollment rate

This school
11.6%
Selected comparison
36.9%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 288 rated schools reporting

−25.3 pts vs similar economic context

Not-found rate

This school
84.7%
Selected comparison
55.6%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 288 rated schools reporting

+29.1 pts vs similar economic context

Not-trackable rate

This school
3.7%
Selected comparison
7.5%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 288 rated schools reporting

−3.8 pts vs similar economic context

Most common named Texas public destinations

  1. KILGORE COLLEGE (003580)12
  2. TYLER JUNIOR COLLEGE (003648)5

Selected comparison counts are neutral cohort scale context. The percentages put differently sized graduating classes on the same basis, but still cover only the limited Texas-public system observed by this report.

Source: Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board, high-school graduates enrolled in higher education, fetched 24 August 2026. The report covers graduates who enrolled in a Texas public college or university the following fall and includes only districts or campuses with more than 25 graduates.

“Not found” does not mean a graduate did not continue their education. It can include private or out-of-state college, work, military service, enrollment after the fall term, or another path the Texas public system does not observe.

“Not trackable” is not an outcome. THECB uses it for graduates with a non-standard identifier that could not be matched to higher-education records.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
145
Economically disadvantaged
88.3%−0.3 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
27.6%−10.4 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
13.8%−4.3 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
88.6%−4.4 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
35.2%+12.6 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Lead Academy HS

African American: 37.9%Hispanic: 41.4%White: 13.8%Asian: 0.7%Pacific Islander: 0.7%Two or More Races: 5.5%
  • African American 37.9%
  • Hispanic 41.4%
  • White 13.8%
  • Asian 0.7%
  • Pacific Islander 0.7%
  • Two or More Races 5.5%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,388 reporting for every category shown · 2,388 in full cohort

African American: 14.5%Hispanic: 74.7%White: 7.2%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 1.3%Pacific Islander: 0.1%Two or More Races: 1.8%
  • African American 14.5%
  • Hispanic 74.7%
  • White 7.2%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 1.3%
  • Pacific Islander 0.1%
  • Two or More Races 1.8%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
145
Economically disadvantaged students
128
Emergent bilingual students
40
Special education students
20

TEA context labels

  • Alternative education campus under AEA procedures
  • Alternative education type: dropout recovery school
  • Rated under AEA procedures

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
186
Students in TEA mobility denominator
274
TEA-published mobility rate
67.9%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 145 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 56 (27.9%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
145

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
−56

Decrease · −27.9%

Change since 2021–22
−65

Decrease · −31.0%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
145
Selected comparison
587.6

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,361 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Lead Academy HS
School yearStudents enrolledLead Academy HSChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 210 First available year 628.9
2022–23 191 Decrease of 19 (9.0%) 624.8
2023–24 149 Decrease of 42 (22.0%) 615.8
2024–25 201 Increase of 52 (34.9%) 609.9
2025–26 145 Decrease of 56 (27.9%) 587.6

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
27

9.8% of cumulative year-end enrollment

Disciplinary actions
47

17.15 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
274

2024–25

Share of students · 2024–25

This school
9.8%
Selected comparison
13.3%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,546 rated schools reporting

−3.5 pts vs similar economic context

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
17.15
Selected comparison
32

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,663 rated schools reporting

−14.9 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Lead Academy HS
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 295 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
2021–22 423 18 4.3% 18 4.26 12.9% 30.8
2022–23 339 27 8.0% 30 8.85 13.8% 33.8
2023–24 374 21 5.6% 22 5.88 13.9% 33.9
2024–25 274 27 9.8% 47 17.15 13.3% 32
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Lead Academy HS in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline 27 9.8% 47 17.15 13.3% 32
In-school suspensions Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Out-of-school suspensions 22 8.0% 31 11.31 9.1% 14.9
DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$5k$15k$25k20182020202220242025
  • Lead Academy HS
  • Parent district: Longview ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$10,578
Selected comparison
$13,015

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,375 rated schools reporting

−$2,437 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $10,578 per student for this campus, $23,597 per student for its parent district, Longview ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearLead Academy HSParent district: Longview ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$6,898$11,258$13,054$8,287 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,256 rated schools reporting
2019$8,335$12,245$13,108$8,321 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,287 rated schools reporting
2020$5,915$13,308$14,058$8,846 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,297 rated schools reporting
2021$13,134$15,792$14,797$9,590 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,302 rated schools reporting
2022$9,219$17,809$15,708$11,083 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,321 rated schools reporting
2023$9,721$17,283$16,792$11,636 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,347 rated schools reporting
2024$12,105$19,461$18,125$12,463 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,360 rated schools reporting
2025$10,578$23,597$18,972$13,015 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,375 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$62,539−$5,443 vs similar economic context
Teachers
14−26.7 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
10−4.5 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Lead Academy HS

Beginning: 20.8%1 to 5 years: 20.8%6 to 10 years: 24.3%11 to 20 years: 13.9%21 to 30 years: 13.9%Over 30 years: 6.9%
  • Beginning 20.8%
  • 1 to 5 years 20.8%
  • 6 to 10 years 24.3%
  • 11 to 20 years 13.9%
  • 21 to 30 years 13.9%
  • Over 30 years 6.9%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,388 reporting for every category shown · 2,388 in full cohort

Beginning: 7.4%1 to 5 years: 27.4%6 to 10 years: 18.9%11 to 20 years: 27%21 to 30 years: 15%Over 30 years: 3.5%
  • Beginning 7.4%
  • 1 to 5 years 27.4%
  • 6 to 10 years 18.9%
  • 11 to 20 years 27%
  • 21 to 30 years 15%
  • Over 30 years 3.5%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Lead Academy HS in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classLead Academy HS · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Secondary social studies1517.8

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 1 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this school ranks best

Out of 180 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

#1 rankings

First-place results

1 measure

  • 1of 18

    Social Studies — Masters

    Gregg County · of the 18 that report this measure

#4–10 rankings

Fourth- through tenth-place results

12 measures

  • 4of 35

    Math — Approaches

    Gregg County · of the 35 that report this measure

  • 4of 30

    Science — Approaches

    Gregg County · of the 30 that report this measure

  • 5of 33

    Academic Growth

    Gregg County · of the 33 that report this measure

  • 5of 30

    Science — Meets

    Gregg County · of the 30 that report this measure

  • 5of 30

    Science — Masters

    Gregg County · of the 30 that report this measure

  • 6of 46

    Five-Year Completion Rate

    Similar size (alternative-education accountability only) · of the 46 that report this measure

  • 6of 35

    Math — Masters

    Gregg County · of the 35 that report this measure

  • 6of 18

    Social Studies — Meets

    Gregg County · of the 18 that report this measure

  • 7of 18

    Social Studies — Approaches

    Gregg County · of the 18 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 8of 46

    Six-Year Completion Rate

    Similar size (alternative-education accountability only) · of the 46 that report this measure

  • 9of 35

    Student Achievement

    Gregg County · of the 35 that report this measure

  • 10of 46

    Four-Year Completion Rate

    Similar size (alternative-education accountability only) · of the 46 that report this measure

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 092903004.