+4.2 ptsvs 86.8 average · 1,091 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
324 of 1,091tied with 90 others
Score vs region
+10.5 ptsvs 80.5 average · 122 rated schools in Region 14: Abilene
Region 14: Abilene placement
19 of 122tied with 7 others
Score vs county
+11.2 ptsvs 79.8 average · 37 rated schools in Taylor County
Taylor County placement
4 of 37tied with 3 others
Score vs similar-size group
+10.5 ptsvs 80.5 average · 2,608 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
364 of 2,608tied with 120 others
Score vs state
+9.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
1,157 of 7,646tied with 413 others
A91
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 84 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 86.8 average for 1,091 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 80.5 average for 122 rated schools in Region 14: Abilene.The current score is above the 79.8 average for 37 rated schools in Taylor County.The current score is above the 80.5 average for 2,608 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
72%vs 63.3% avg · +8.7 pts
Masters
40%vs 31.2% avg · +8.8 pts
Among 1,066 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Lawn Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 91 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 86.8 average for 1,091 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 5 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 324th of 1,091 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 90 others).
Lawn Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 91 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.5 average for 122 rated schools in Region 14: Abilene. It is up 5 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 19th of 122 rated schools in Region 14: Abilene (tied with 7 others).
Lawn Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 91 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 79.8 average for 37 rated schools in Taylor County. It is up 5 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 4th of 37 rated schools in Taylor County (tied with 3 others).
Lawn Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 91 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.5 average for 2,608 similarly sized rated schools. It is up 5 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 364th of 2,608 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 120 others).
Lawn Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 91 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is up 5 points since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 84 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement92 A+4.5 vs similar economic context · 1,066 reporting
School Progress88 B+4.1 vs similar economic context · 1,063 reporting
Closing the Gaps90 A+5.8 vs similar economic context · 1,055 reporting
Relative Performance88 B+8.0 vs similar economic context · 1,063 reporting
Lawn Elem
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,091 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
92
A
—
School Progress
88
B
2
Closing the Gaps
90
A
—
Academic Growth
—
Not rated
—
Relative Performance
88
B
2
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (92), so
School Progress (88) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 92.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level94%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,066 reporting
Meets grade level72%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,066 reporting
Masters grade level40%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,066 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level98%+13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,065 reporting
Meets grade level83%+16 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,065 reporting
Masters grade level56%+24 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,065 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level89%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,062 reporting
Meets grade level61%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,062 reporting
Masters grade level23%−3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,062 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,091 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
293
Economically disadvantaged
31.9%−1.0 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
2.8%−7.5 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
21.9%+4.5 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
95.5%+0.4 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
8.3%−2.9 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Lawn Elem
African American 1%
Hispanic 23.6%
White 70.1%
Asian 1.4%
Pacific Islander 0.3%
Two or More Races 3.5%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,091 reporting for every category shown · 1,091 in full cohort
African American 9%
Hispanic 30.7%
White 48%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 7%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 4.8%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 14: Abilene · 122 reporting for every category shown · 122 in full cohort
African American 4.1%
Hispanic 36.9%
White 54.4%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 0.8%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Selected comparison averageFor Taylor County · 37 reporting for every category shown · 37 in full cohort
African American 9.3%
Hispanic 36.4%
White 47.3%
American Indian 0.4%
Asian 1.5%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 5%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 2,608 reporting for every category shown · 2,608 in full cohort
African American 10.8%
Hispanic 52.4%
White 31.1%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 2.1%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.2%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
288
Economically disadvantaged students
92
Emergent bilingual students
8
Special education students
63
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
10
Students in TEA mobility denominator
207
TEA-published mobility rate
4.8%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 293 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 3 (1.0%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
293
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
−3
Decrease · −1.0%
Change since 2021–22
−91
Decrease · −23.7%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
293
Selected comparison
785
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,076 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Lawn Elem
School year
Students enrolledLawn Elem
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
384
First available year
796.8
2022–23
400
Increase of 16 (4.2%)
799.3
2023–24
298
Decrease of 102 (25.5%)
796.8
2024–25
296
Decrease of 2 (0.7%)
793.4
2025–26
293
Decrease of 3 (1.0%)
785
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Suppressed
Rate not available
Disciplinary actions
Suppressed
Rate not available
Cumulative year-end enrollment
305
2024–25
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Lawn Elem
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
382
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2021–22
413
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2022–23
421
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2023–24
306
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2024–25
305
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Lawn Elem in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
In-school suspensions
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Out-of-school suspensions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Lawn Elem
Parent district: Jim Ned CISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$8,305
Selected comparison
$11,774
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,070 rated schools reporting
−$3,469 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $8,305 per student for this campus, $23,109 per student for its parent district, Jim Ned CISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Lawn Elem
Parent district: Jim Ned CISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$7,503
$11,487
$13,054
$7,650
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 966 rated schools reporting
2019
$7,059
$13,387
$13,108
$7,801
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 982 rated schools reporting
2020
$6,860
$12,062
$14,058
$8,127
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 992 rated schools reporting
2021
$7,282
$12,670
$14,797
$8,550
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,004 rated schools reporting
2022
$6,654
$21,966
$15,708
$9,814
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,024 rated schools reporting
2023
$7,218
$21,844
$16,792
$10,336
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,042 rated schools reporting
2024
$8,017
$17,565
$18,125
$11,469
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,054 rated schools reporting
2025
$8,305
$23,109
$18,972
$11,774
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,070 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$61,097−$7,091 vs similar economic context
Teachers
23−28.7 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
12.8−1.6 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Lawn Elem
Beginning 4.4%
1 to 5 years 21.3%
6 to 10 years 8.9%
11 to 20 years 40%
21 to 30 years 25.3%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,091 reporting for every category shown · 1,091 in full cohort
Beginning 4.9%
1 to 5 years 22.4%
6 to 10 years 19.6%
11 to 20 years 32.2%
21 to 30 years 17.4%
Over 30 years 3.3%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 14: Abilene · 122 reporting for every category shown · 122 in full cohort
Beginning 6.7%
1 to 5 years 25.9%
6 to 10 years 16.7%
11 to 20 years 27.4%
21 to 30 years 16.6%
Over 30 years 5.9%
Selected comparison averageFor Taylor County · 37 reporting for every category shown · 37 in full cohort
Beginning 5.2%
1 to 5 years 27.1%
6 to 10 years 20.2%
11 to 20 years 31%
21 to 30 years 13.4%
Over 30 years 3.2%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 2,608 reporting for every category shown · 2,608 in full cohort
Beginning 6.3%
1 to 5 years 25%
6 to 10 years 18.4%
11 to 20 years 28.8%
21 to 30 years 17%
Over 30 years 4.3%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Lawn Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classLawn Elem · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten
18.5
18.5
Grade 1
18.5
19.1
Grade 2
21
19.5
Grade 3
21.7
20.2
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 4 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Out of 85 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#1 rankings
First-place results
2 measures
1of 114
Reading — Masters
Region 14: Abilene · of the 114 that report this measure
1of 34
Reading — Approaches
Taylor County · of the 34 that report this measure · tied with 2
#2–3 rankings
Second- and third-place results
4 measures
3of 114
All Subjects — Masters
Region 14: Abilene · of the 114 that report this measure
3of 34
Student Achievement
Taylor County · of the 34 that report this measure · tied with 2
3of 34
All Subjects — Approaches
Taylor County · of the 34 that report this measure · tied with 1
3of 34
Reading — Meets
Taylor County · of the 34 that report this measure
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
8 measures
4of 34
Relative Performance
Taylor County · of the 34 that report this measure
5of 34
School Progress
Taylor County · of the 34 that report this measure · tied with 1
6of 35
Chronically absent (lowest is best)
Taylor County · of the 35 that report this measure
6of 34
All Subjects — Meets
Taylor County · of the 34 that report this measure
8of 34
Closing the Gaps
Taylor County · of the 34 that report this measure · tied with 1
8of 34
Math — Approaches
Taylor County · of the 34 that report this measure
9of 34
Math — Masters
Taylor County · of the 34 that report this measure · tied with 2
10of 34
Math — Meets
Taylor County · of the 34 that report this measure
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 221911101.