Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Language Development Center

Maverick County · Region 20: San Antonio · 390 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
84/1002025-26
Change
−8 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+6.6 ptsvs 77.4 average · 2,387 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
677 of 2,387tied with 68 others
B84

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 88 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 77.4 average for 2,387 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Current strength

Overall score above the similar-context average

84 +6.6 pts vs 77.4

  • 84 is 6.6 points above the 77.4 average among 2,387 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Language Development Center is rated B by TEA, scoring 84 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 77.4 average for 2,387 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 8 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 677th of 2,387 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 68 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Who this school serves
  5. Student counts behind the percentages
  6. Enrollment over time
  7. Discipline and removal from class
  8. Spending per student
  9. Teachers and actual class size
  10. Where this school ranks best
  11. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
90807060 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageLanguage Development Center 9282808784 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 88 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26B8477.4 2,387 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25B8777.1 2,375 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24B8073.9 2,357 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23B8274.0 2,346 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22A9281.7 2,317 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement—Not reported · similar economic context 70.8 · 2,223 reporting
  • School Progress—Not reported · similar economic context 78.6 · 2,217 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps—Not reported · similar economic context 74.6 · 2,203 reporting
  • Academic Growth—Not reported · similar economic context 72.5 · 2,177 reporting
  • Relative Performance—Not reported · similar economic context 76.7 · 2,217 reporting
  • Language Development Center
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,387 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement—Not rated—
School Progress—Not rated—
Closing the Gaps—Not rated—
Academic Growth—Not rated—
Relative Performance—Not rated—

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
390
Economically disadvantaged
87.1%−0.5 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
78.6%+41.8 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
15.0%−3.2 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
—
Chronically absent
—

Student demographics

Language Development Center

Hispanic: 99.5%Two or More Races: 0.5%
  • Hispanic 99.5%
  • Two or More Races 0.5%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,387 reporting for every category shown · 2,387 in full cohort

African American: 14.2%Hispanic: 74.2%White: 7.9%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 1.4%Pacific Islander: 0.1%Two or More Races: 1.9%
  • African American 14.2%
  • Hispanic 74.2%
  • White 7.9%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 1.4%
  • Pacific Islander 0.1%
  • Two or More Races 1.9%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
379
Economically disadvantaged students
330
Emergent bilingual students
298
Special education students
57

TEA context labels

  • Highest grade is early education, pre-K or kindergarten

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
Not reported
Students in TEA mobility denominator
Not reported
TEA-published mobility rate
Not reported

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 390 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 50 (11.4%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
390

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
−50

Decrease · −11.4%

Change since 2021–22
−47

Decrease · −10.8%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
390
Selected comparison
594.1

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,358 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Language Development Center
School yearStudents enrolledLanguage Development CenterChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 437 First available year 634.1
2022–23 442 Increase of 5 (1.1%) 630.3
2023–24 448 Increase of 6 (1.4%) 621
2024–25 440 Decrease of 8 (1.8%) 615.7
2025–26 390 Decrease of 50 (11.4%) 594.1

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Not reported

Rate not available

Disciplinary actions
Not reported

Rate not available

Cumulative year-end enrollment
445

2024–25

TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Language Development Center
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 464 Not reported — Not reported — — —
2021–22 468 Not reported — Not reported — — —
2022–23 463 Not reported — Not reported — — —
2023–24 470 Not reported — Not reported — — —
2024–25 445 Not reported — Not reported — — —
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Language Development Center in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline Not reported — Not reported — — —
In-school suspensions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Out-of-school suspensions Not reported — Not reported — — —
DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$7k$13k$20k20182020202220242025
  • Language Development Center
  • Parent district: Eagle Pass ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$10,649
Selected comparison
$12,956

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,373 rated schools reporting

−$2,307 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $10,649 per student for this campus, $14,008 per student for its parent district, Eagle Pass ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearLanguage Development CenterParent district: Eagle Pass ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$7,421$10,596$13,054$8,275 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,248 rated schools reporting
2019$7,954$10,878$13,108$8,333 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,280 rated schools reporting
2020$8,574$11,034$14,058$8,848 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,290 rated schools reporting
2021$10,683$11,721$14,797$9,571 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,296 rated schools reporting
2022$9,620$12,928$15,708$11,092 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,317 rated schools reporting
2023$10,510$13,823$16,792$11,617 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,344 rated schools reporting
2024$10,431$13,526$18,125$12,416 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,358 rated schools reporting
2025$10,649$14,008$18,972$12,956 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,373 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$68,873+$1,062 vs similar economic context
Teachers
20−21.7 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
19.1+4.7 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Language Development Center

1 to 5 years: 29.8%6 to 10 years: 5.1%11 to 20 years: 30.3%21 to 30 years: 20.2%Over 30 years: 15.2%
  • 1 to 5 years 29.8%
  • 6 to 10 years 5.1%
  • 11 to 20 years 30.3%
  • 21 to 30 years 20.2%
  • Over 30 years 15.2%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,387 reporting for every category shown · 2,387 in full cohort

Beginning: 7.2%1 to 5 years: 27.3%6 to 10 years: 19%11 to 20 years: 27.1%21 to 30 years: 15.1%Over 30 years: 3.5%
  • Beginning 7.2%
  • 1 to 5 years 27.3%
  • 6 to 10 years 19%
  • 11 to 20 years 27.1%
  • 21 to 30 years 15.1%
  • Over 30 years 3.5%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Language Development Center in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classLanguage Development Center · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten2318.1

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 1 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this school ranks best

Out of 10 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

#4–10 rankings

Fourth- through tenth-place results

2 measures

  • 6of 23

    Per-student spending

    Maverick County · of the 23 that report this measure

  • 9of 23

    Overall score

    Maverick County · of the 23 that report this measure · tied with 2

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 159901103.