−1.3 ptsvs 90.3 average · 706 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
474 of 706tied with 47 others
Score vs region
+9.1 ptsvs 79.9 average · 519 rated schools in Region 13: Austin
Region 13: Austin placement
134 of 519tied with 19 others
Score vs county
+11.1 ptsvs 77.9 average · 195 rated schools in Travis County
Travis County placement
48 of 195tied with 7 others
Score vs similar-size group
+6.8 ptsvs 82.2 average · 2,127 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
603 of 2,127tied with 80 others
Score vs state
+7.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
1,913 of 7,646tied with 285 others
B89
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 88 in 2021-22. The current score is below the 90.3 average for 706 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 79.9 average for 519 rated schools in Region 13: Austin.The current score is above the 77.9 average for 195 rated schools in Travis County.The current score is above the 82.2 average for 2,127 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
74%vs 71.9% avg · +2.1 pts
Masters
51%vs 41.5% avg · +9.5 pts
Among 694 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Lamar MS is rated B by TEA, scoring 89 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 90.3 average for 706 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 1 point since 2021-22.
Ranks 474th of 706 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 47 others).
Lamar MS is rated B by TEA, scoring 89 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 79.9 average for 519 rated schools in Region 13: Austin. It is down 1 point since 2021-22.
Ranks 134th of 519 rated schools in Region 13: Austin (tied with 19 others).
Lamar MS is rated B by TEA, scoring 89 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 77.9 average for 195 rated schools in Travis County. It is down 1 point since 2021-22.
Ranks 48th of 195 rated schools in Travis County (tied with 7 others).
Lamar MS is rated B by TEA, scoring 89 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 82.2 average for 2,127 similarly sized rated schools. It is down 1 point since 2021-22.
Ranks 603rd of 2,127 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 80 others).
Lamar MS is rated B by TEA, scoring 89 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is down 1 point since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 88 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement93 A+1.8 vs similar economic context · 694 reporting
School Progress87 B+0.5 vs similar economic context · 692 reporting
Closing the Gaps78 C−9.8 vs similar economic context · 690 reporting
Academic Growth87 B+2.5 vs similar economic context · 688 reporting
Relative Performance83 B+4.0 vs similar economic context · 692 reporting
Lamar MS
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (706 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
93
A
—
School Progress
87
B
3
Closing the Gaps
78
C
2
Academic Growth
87
B
3
Relative Performance
83
B
7
Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 2 points below B in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (93), so
School Progress (87) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 93.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level89%+0 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 694 reporting
Meets grade level74%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 694 reporting
Masters grade level51%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 694 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level92%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 694 reporting
Meets grade level81%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 694 reporting
Masters grade level61%+17 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 694 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level86%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 692 reporting
Meets grade level66%−2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 692 reporting
Masters grade level36%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 692 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level94%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 652 reporting
Meets grade level89%+22 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 652 reporting
Masters grade level78%+37 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 652 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
Approaches grade level84%−3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 279 reporting
Meets grade level65%−3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 279 reporting
Masters grade level42%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 279 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (706 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
1,099
Economically disadvantaged
17.0%−0.7 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
6.7%−4.2 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
18.6%+2.2 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
95.1%−0.7 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
11.6%+4.0 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Lamar MS
African American 2.5%
Hispanic 27.9%
White 61.3%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 2.5%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 5.3%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 706 reporting for every category shown · 706 in full cohort
African American 7%
Hispanic 22.2%
White 48.4%
American Indian 0.4%
Asian 16.4%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 5.5%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 13: Austin · 519 reporting for every category shown · 519 in full cohort
African American 6.8%
Hispanic 49.9%
White 31.9%
American Indian 0.2%
Asian 6.7%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 4.4%
Selected comparison averageFor Travis County · 195 reporting for every category shown · 195 in full cohort
African American 9.2%
Hispanic 55.1%
White 25.8%
American Indian 0.2%
Asian 5.6%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.9%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 2,127 reporting for every category shown · 2,127 in full cohort
African American 12.6%
Hispanic 51.4%
White 24.7%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 7%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 3.8%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
1,099
Economically disadvantaged students
187
Emergent bilingual students
74
Special education students
204
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
76
Students in TEA mobility denominator
1,153
TEA-published mobility rate
6.6%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 1,099 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 10 (0.9%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
1,099
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
−10
Decrease · −0.9%
Change since 2021–22
−104
Decrease · −8.6%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
1,099
Selected comparison
860.9
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 702 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Lamar MS
School year
Students enrolledLamar MS
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
1,203
First available year
877.4
2022–23
1,182
Decrease of 21 (1.7%)
890.4
2023–24
1,100
Decrease of 82 (6.9%)
878
2024–25
1,109
Increase of 9 (0.8%)
869.6
2025–26
1,099
Decrease of 10 (0.9%)
860.9
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
100
8.7% of cumulative year-end enrollment
Disciplinary actions
152
13.26 per 100 students
Cumulative year-end enrollment
1,146
2024–25
Share of students · 2024–25
This school
8.7%
Selected comparison
6.0%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 465 rated schools reporting
+2.7 pts vs similar economic context
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
This school
13.26
Selected comparison
11.1
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 535 rated schools reporting
+2.2 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Lamar MS
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
1,258
18
1.4%
26
2.07
4.7%
7.6
2021–22
1,243
141
11.3%
372
29.93
6.4%
11.7
2022–23
1,228
103
8.4%
209
17.02
6.5%
11.8
2023–24
1,160
100
8.6%
174
15.00
6.2%
11.6
2024–25
1,146
100
8.7%
152
13.26
6.0%
11.1
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Lamar MS in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
100
8.7%
152
13.26
6.0%
11.1
In-school suspensions
92
8.0%
126
10.99
5.6%
8.9
Out-of-school suspensions
15
1.3%
15
1.31
2.8%
3.8
DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
11
0.96
—
2.3
Mandatory DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
11
0.96
—
1.9
Discretionary DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Lamar MS
Parent district: Austin ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$8,535
Selected comparison
$11,018
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 700 rated schools reporting
−$2,483 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $8,535 per student for this campus, $26,839 per student for its parent district, Austin ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Lamar MS
Parent district: Austin ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$7,058
$13,757
$13,054
$7,336
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 613 rated schools reporting
2019
$6,832
$14,067
$13,108
$7,429
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 628 rated schools reporting
2020
$6,638
$16,747
$14,058
$7,734
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 639 rated schools reporting
2021
$6,598
$18,042
$14,797
$8,288
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 645 rated schools reporting
2022
$7,353
$18,220
$15,708
$9,535
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 655 rated schools reporting
2023
$11,033
$16,721
$16,792
$10,012
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 670 rated schools reporting
2024
$8,963
$19,064
$18,125
$10,937
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 685 rated schools reporting
2025
$8,535
$26,839
$18,972
$11,018
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 700 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$64,725−$4,426 vs similar economic context
Teachers
62+6.9 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
17.7+2.7 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Lamar MS
Beginning 6.5%
1 to 5 years 30.6%
6 to 10 years 30.6%
11 to 20 years 24.2%
21 to 30 years 8.1%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 706 reporting for every category shown · 706 in full cohort
Beginning 4.4%
1 to 5 years 23%
6 to 10 years 20%
11 to 20 years 32.6%
21 to 30 years 17.1%
Over 30 years 2.7%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 13: Austin · 519 reporting for every category shown · 519 in full cohort
Beginning 5.9%
1 to 5 years 28%
6 to 10 years 19.4%
11 to 20 years 28.3%
21 to 30 years 14.4%
Over 30 years 3.2%
Selected comparison averageFor Travis County · 195 reporting for every category shown · 195 in full cohort
Beginning 6%
1 to 5 years 30.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 26.7%
21 to 30 years 13.2%
Over 30 years 2.8%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 2,127 reporting for every category shown · 2,127 in full cohort
Beginning 6.5%
1 to 5 years 27.2%
6 to 10 years 20.5%
11 to 20 years 28.8%
21 to 30 years 14.3%
Over 30 years 2.7%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Lamar MS in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classLamar MS · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Grade 6
24.3
19.3
Secondary English
24
18.2
Secondary languages other than English
27
20.4
Secondary math
23.1
18.3
Secondary science
27.1
20.7
Secondary social studies
26.6
20.9
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Out of 120 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#2–3 rankings
Second- and third-place results
1 measure
2of 191
Science — Masters
Travis County · of the 191 that report this measure
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
1 measure
5of 191
Science — Meets
Travis County · of the 191 that report this measure · tied with 2
Other top-5% rankings
High placements in larger reporting groups
2 measures
24of 505
Reading — Masters
Region 13: Austin · of the 505 that report this measure · tied with 2
26of 506
All Subjects — Masters
Region 13: Austin · of the 506 that report this measure · tied with 2
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 227901045.