Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Lakewood Village Elmentary School

Denton County · Region 11: Fort Worth · 349 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
78/1002025-26
Score vs similar economic context
−5.0 ptsvs 83 average · 1,530 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
1,098 of 1,530tied with 42 others
C78

At a glance

The current score is below the 83 average for 1,530 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

STAAR result

Reading above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
64%vs 60.5% avg · +3.5 pts
Masters
33%vs 26.4% avg · +6.6 pts

Among 1,484 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Lakewood Village Elmentary School is rated C by TEA, scoring 78 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 83 average for 1,530 rated schools serving a similar economic context. TEA has published 1 year of scores for this school, so there is no trend to read yet.

Ranks 1,098th of 1,530 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 42 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 1 year of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Teachers
  8. Where this comes from

1 year of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
908070 78 2025-26

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26C7883.0 1,530 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement80 B−3.2 vs similar economic context · 1,486 reporting
  • School Progress78 C−3.9 vs similar economic context · 1,482 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps73 C−7.3 vs similar economic context · 1,473 reporting
  • Academic Growth70 C−6.6 vs similar economic context · 1,457 reporting
  • Relative Performance78 C−1.4 vs similar economic context · 1,482 reporting
  • Lakewood Village Elmentary School
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,530 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement80B10
School Progress78C2
Closing the Gaps73C7
Academic Growth70C10
Relative Performance78C2

Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 7 points below B in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (80), so School Progress (78) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 80.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level80%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,486 reporting
  • Meets grade level54%−2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,486 reporting
  • Masters grade level26%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,486 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level85%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,484 reporting
  • Meets grade level64%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,484 reporting
  • Masters grade level33%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,484 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level73%−4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,480 reporting
  • Meets grade level47%−2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,480 reporting
  • Masters grade level18%−3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,480 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level84%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,374 reporting
  • Meets grade level43%−12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,374 reporting
  • Masters grade level29%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,374 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,530 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
349
Economically disadvantaged
45.1%−0.8 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
9.2%−2.8 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
19.1%+0.7 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
—
Chronically absent
—

Student demographics

Lakewood Village Elmentary School

African American: 20.5%Hispanic: 25.4%White: 39.3%American Indian: 0.6%Asian: 6.6%Two or More Races: 7.5%
  • African American 20.5%
  • Hispanic 25.4%
  • White 39.3%
  • American Indian 0.6%
  • Asian 6.6%
  • Two or More Races 7.5%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,530 reporting for every category shown · 1,530 in full cohort

African American: 9.3%Hispanic: 38.1%White: 44.1%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 3.7%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 4.3%
  • African American 9.3%
  • Hispanic 38.1%
  • White 44.1%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 3.7%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 4.3%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
346
Economically disadvantaged students
156
Emergent bilingual students
32
Special education students
66

TEA context labels

  • New campus compared with last year’s fall enrollment

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
Not reported
Students in TEA mobility denominator
Not reported
TEA-published mobility rate
Not reported

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Teachers

Average salary
$67,991+$815 vs similar economic context
Teachers
25−18.7 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
13.7−7.0 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Lakewood Village Elmentary School

Beginning: 3.2%1 to 5 years: 35.7%6 to 10 years: 19.8%11 to 20 years: 23.8%21 to 30 years: 17.5%
  • Beginning 3.2%
  • 1 to 5 years 35.7%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.8%
  • 11 to 20 years 23.8%
  • 21 to 30 years 17.5%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,530 reporting for every category shown · 1,530 in full cohort

Beginning: 5.5%1 to 5 years: 23.7%6 to 10 years: 19.5%11 to 20 years: 30.2%21 to 30 years: 16.7%Over 30 years: 4.1%
  • Beginning 5.5%
  • 1 to 5 years 23.7%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.5%
  • 11 to 20 years 30.2%
  • 21 to 30 years 16.7%
  • Over 30 years 4.1%

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 061914111.