Districts, charter school systems & campuses · Source: Texas Education Agency
Lakewood ElemB88vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Traditional public school campus
Lakewood Elem
Tarrant County · Region 11: Fort Worth · 562 students
Current score
88/1002025-26
Change
−2 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+8.0 ptsvs 80 average · 2,000 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
416 of 2,000tied with 67 others
Score vs region
+7.5 ptsvs 80.5 average · 839 rated schools in Region 11: Fort Worth
Region 11: Fort Worth placement
216 of 839tied with 26 others
Score vs county
+8.0 ptsvs 80 average · 466 rated schools in Tarrant County
Tarrant County placement
115 of 466tied with 14 others
Score vs similar-size group
+7.7 ptsvs 80.3 average · 4,744 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
1,204 of 4,744tied with 137 others
Score vs state
+6.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
2,199 of 7,646tied with 256 others
B88
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 87 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 80 average for 2,000 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 80.5 average for 839 rated schools in Region 11: Fort Worth.The current score is above the 80 average for 466 rated schools in Tarrant County.The current score is above the 80.3 average for 4,744 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
58%vs 48.2% avg · +9.8 pts
Masters
32%vs 19.6% avg · +12.4 pts
Among 1,897 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Lakewood Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 88 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80 average for 2,000 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 2 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 416th of 2,000 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 67 others).
Lakewood Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 88 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.5 average for 839 rated schools in Region 11: Fort Worth. It is down 2 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 216th of 839 rated schools in Region 11: Fort Worth (tied with 26 others).
Lakewood Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 88 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80 average for 466 rated schools in Tarrant County. It is down 2 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 115th of 466 rated schools in Tarrant County (tied with 14 others).
Lakewood Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 88 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.3 average for 4,744 similarly sized rated schools. It is down 2 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 1,204th of 4,744 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 137 others).
Lakewood Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 88 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is down 2 points since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 87 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement86 B+8.1 vs similar economic context · 1,897 reporting
School Progress88 B+7.2 vs similar economic context · 1,889 reporting
Closing the Gaps88 B+10.8 vs similar economic context · 1,870 reporting
Academic Growth85 B+11.1 vs similar economic context · 1,832 reporting
Relative Performance88 B+8.9 vs similar economic context · 1,889 reporting
Lakewood Elem
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,000 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
86
B
4
School Progress
88
B
2
Closing the Gaps
88
B
2
Academic Growth
85
B
5
Relative Performance
88
B
2
Closest to moving up: School Progress, 2 points below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (88), so
Student Achievement (86) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 88.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level81%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,897 reporting
Meets grade level58%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,897 reporting
Masters grade level32%+12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,897 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level86%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,893 reporting
Meets grade level68%+15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,893 reporting
Masters grade level42%+21 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,893 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level82%+11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,884 reporting
Meets grade level54%+12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,884 reporting
Masters grade level26%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,884 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level63%−11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,736 reporting
Meets grade level38%−8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,736 reporting
Masters grade level14%−7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,736 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,000 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
562
Economically disadvantaged
64.1%−0.2 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
14.8%−2.8 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
18.6%−0.3 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
96.0%+1.9 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
6.2%−10.4 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Lakewood Elem
African American 27.3%
Hispanic 29.6%
White 24.5%
Asian 8.2%
Pacific Islander 2.9%
Two or More Races 7.5%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,000 reporting for every category shown · 2,000 in full cohort
African American 11.1%
Hispanic 51.2%
White 31.3%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 2.2%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 3.7%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 11: Fort Worth · 839 reporting for every category shown · 839 in full cohort
African American 15.4%
Hispanic 39.6%
White 34.4%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 5.3%
Pacific Islander 0.3%
Two or More Races 4.6%
Selected comparison averageFor Tarrant County · 466 reporting for every category shown · 466 in full cohort
African American 21.3%
Hispanic 45.2%
White 22.9%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 5.4%
Pacific Islander 0.3%
Two or More Races 4.6%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,744 reporting for every category shown · 4,744 in full cohort
African American 12.1%
Hispanic 54.7%
White 24.6%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.6%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.5%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
560
Economically disadvantaged students
359
Emergent bilingual students
83
Special education students
104
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
72
Students in TEA mobility denominator
486
TEA-published mobility rate
14.8%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 562 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 11 (1.9%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
562
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
−11
Decrease · −1.9%
Change since 2021–22
−36
Decrease · −6.0%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
562
Selected comparison
621.2
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,963 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Lakewood Elem
School year
Students enrolledLakewood Elem
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
598
First available year
636
2022–23
586
Decrease of 12 (2.0%)
642.5
2023–24
568
Decrease of 18 (3.1%)
639.1
2024–25
573
Increase of 5 (0.9%)
634.5
2025–26
562
Decrease of 11 (1.9%)
621.2
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
45
7.1% of cumulative year-end enrollment
Disciplinary actions
72
11.41 per 100 students
Cumulative year-end enrollment
631
2024–25
Share of students · 2024–25
This school
7.1%
Selected comparison
12.9%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,536 rated schools reporting
−5.8 pts vs similar economic context
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
This school
11.41
Selected comparison
30.1
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,654 rated schools reporting
−18.7 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Lakewood Elem
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
627
25
4.0%
38
6.06
9.7%
19.3
2021–22
645
64
9.9%
133
20.62
12.8%
29.7
2022–23
635
47
7.4%
94
14.80
13.3%
31.9
2023–24
628
49
7.8%
90
14.33
13.1%
31.6
2024–25
631
45
7.1%
72
11.41
12.9%
30.1
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Lakewood Elem in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
45
7.1%
72
11.41
12.9%
30.1
In-school suspensions
45
7.1%
70
11.09
11.5%
23.1
Out-of-school suspensions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Lakewood Elem
Parent district: Hurst-Euless-Bedford ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$8,736
Selected comparison
$12,657
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,972 rated schools reporting
−$3,921 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $8,736 per student for this campus, $17,072 per student for its parent district, Hurst-Euless-Bedford ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Lakewood Elem
Parent district: Hurst-Euless-Bedford ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$6,853
$10,047
$13,054
$7,919
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,827 rated schools reporting
2019
$6,873
$11,598
$13,108
$8,077
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,843 rated schools reporting
2020
$7,191
$15,516
$14,058
$8,661
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,866 rated schools reporting
2021
$7,916
$12,690
$14,797
$9,089
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,878 rated schools reporting
2022
$7,641
$12,184
$15,708
$10,429
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,900 rated schools reporting
2023
$8,345
$14,299
$16,792
$11,140
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,923 rated schools reporting
2024
$8,823
$15,258
$18,125
$12,058
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,952 rated schools reporting
2025
$8,736
$17,072
$18,972
$12,657
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,972 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$72,693+$6,319 vs similar economic context
Teachers
38−4.5 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
14.8+0.9 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Lakewood Elem
Beginning 12.2%
1 to 5 years 5.3%
6 to 10 years 23.8%
11 to 20 years 45.5%
21 to 30 years 13.2%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,000 reporting for every category shown · 2,000 in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 26.3%
6 to 10 years 19.1%
11 to 20 years 28%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 4.1%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 11: Fort Worth · 839 reporting for every category shown · 839 in full cohort
Beginning 5.6%
1 to 5 years 24%
6 to 10 years 20.6%
11 to 20 years 30%
21 to 30 years 16.7%
Over 30 years 2.8%
Selected comparison averageFor Tarrant County · 466 reporting for every category shown · 466 in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 24%
6 to 10 years 20.5%
11 to 20 years 29.9%
21 to 30 years 16.3%
Over 30 years 2.7%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,744 reporting for every category shown · 4,744 in full cohort
Beginning 6.1%
1 to 5 years 26.4%
6 to 10 years 19.7%
11 to 20 years 29%
21 to 30 years 15.6%
Over 30 years 3.1%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Lakewood Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classLakewood Elem · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten
21.5
18
Grade 1
20.7
18.2
Grade 2
19.8
18.4
Grade 3
21.8
18.6
Grade 4
23.6
19
Grade 5
24.1
19.8
Grade 6
28.2
17.7
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 7 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Out of 105 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
Other top-5% rankings
High placements in larger reporting groups
2 measures
57of 1,893
Reading — Masters
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,893 that report this measure · tied with 7
106of 1,937
Chronically absent (lowest is best)
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,937 that report this measure · tied with 2
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 220916118.