−11.3 ptsvs 80.3 average · 410 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
334 of 410tied with 18 others
Score vs similar-size group
−11.6 ptsvs 80.6 average · 445 similarly sized rated charter campuses
Similar size placement
372 of 445tied with 13 others
Score vs state
−12.7 ptsvs 81.7 average · 829 rated Texas charter campuses
Texas charter placement
704 of 829tied with 27 others
D69
At a glance
The available rating history is moving up. The current score is below the 80.3 average for 410 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context.The current score is below the 80.6 average for 445 similarly sized rated charter campuses.The current score is below the 81.7 average for 829 rated Texas charter campuses.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
Current strength
Chronically absent lower than the similar-context average
12.5%−11.4 pts vs 23.9%
12.5% is 11.4 percentage points lower than
the 23.9% average among 407 charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
KIPP Paseo Pri is rated D by TEA, scoring 69 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 80.3 average for 410 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context. It is up 4 points since 2022-23.
Ranks 334th of 410 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context (tied with 18 others).
KIPP Paseo Pri is rated D by TEA, scoring 69 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 80.6 average for 445 similarly sized rated charter campuses. It is up 4 points since 2022-23.
Ranks 372nd of 445 similarly sized rated charter campuses (tied with 13 others).
KIPP Paseo Pri is rated D by TEA, scoring 69 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 81.7 average for 829 rated Texas charter campuses. It is up 4 points since 2022-23.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement60 D−14.3 vs similar economic context · 410 reporting
School Progress75 C−6.3 vs similar economic context · 410 reporting
Closing the Gaps63 D−14.1 vs similar economic context · 404 reporting
Academic Growth75 C+1.6 vs similar economic context · 391 reporting
Relative Performance67 D−12.4 vs similar economic context · 406 reporting
KIPP Paseo Pri
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (410 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
60
D
10
School Progress
75
C
5
Closing the Gaps
63
D
7
Academic Growth
75
C
5
Relative Performance
67
D
3
Closest to moving up: School Progress, 5 points below B in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (75), so
Student Achievement (60) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 75.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level57%−11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 410 reporting
Meets grade level34%−7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 410 reporting
Masters grade level13%−2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 410 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level54%−15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 410 reporting
Meets grade level32%−13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 410 reporting
Masters grade level11%−5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 410 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level60%−7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 408 reporting
Meets grade level37%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 408 reporting
Masters grade level13%−0 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 408 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level55%−16 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 385 reporting
Meets grade level35%−4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 385 reporting
Masters grade level19%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 385 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (410 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only charter campuses for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
567
Economically disadvantaged
90.8%+0.9 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
67.4%+23.8 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
9.9%−2.7 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
95.0%+2.3 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
12.5%−11.4 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
KIPP Paseo Pri
African American 5.5%
Hispanic 88.7%
White 2.8%
American Indian 0.4%
Asian 0.7%
Two or More Races 1.9%
Selected comparison averageFor charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 410 reporting for every category shown · 410 in full cohort
African American 18.8%
Hispanic 74.6%
White 3.5%
American Indian 0.2%
Asian 1.4%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 1.4%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized charter campuses · 445 reporting for every category shown · 445 in full cohort
African American 16.3%
Hispanic 65.8%
White 9.7%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 5.7%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 2.1%
Texas charter average829 reporting for every category shown · 829 Texas charter campuses in full cohort
African American 17.5%
Hispanic 61.8%
White 12.2%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 5.5%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 2.5%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
567
Economically disadvantaged students
515
Emergent bilingual students
382
Special education students
56
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
55
Students in TEA mobility denominator
414
TEA-published mobility rate
13.3%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 567 students in 2025–26, an increase of 7 (1.3%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
567
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
+7
Increase · +1.3%
Change since 2021–22
+332
Increase · +141.3%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
567
Selected comparison
507.6
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 408 rated charter campuses reporting
Student enrollment by school year for KIPP Paseo Pri
School year
Students enrolledKIPP Paseo Pri
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
235
First available year
488.4
2022–23
404
Increase of 169 (71.9%)
501.2
2023–24
547
Increase of 143 (35.4%)
507.9
2024–25
560
Increase of 13 (2.4%)
510.7
2025–26
567
Increase of 7 (1.3%)
507.6
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting charter campuses in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Suppressed
Rate not available
Disciplinary actions
Suppressed
Rate not available
Cumulative year-end enrollment
603
2024–25
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for KIPP Paseo Pri
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
137
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
2021–22
258
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
2022–23
426
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2023–24
607
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2024–25
603
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for KIPP Paseo Pri in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
In-school suspensions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Out-of-school suspensions
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized charter campuses can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
KIPP Paseo Pri
Parent district: KIPP Texas Public Schools
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$9,117
Selected comparison
$11,840
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 404 rated charter campuses reporting
−$2,723 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $9,117 per student for this campus, $14,741 per student for its parent district, KIPP Texas Public Schools, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
KIPP Paseo Pri
Parent district: KIPP Texas Public Schools
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2021
$13,997
$11,442
$14,797
$9,514
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 350 rated charter campuses reporting
2022
$12,335
$13,586
$15,708
$11,418
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 369 rated charter campuses reporting
2023
$9,876
$14,554
$16,792
$11,486
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 381 rated charter campuses reporting
2024
$8,934
$13,823
$18,125
$11,531
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 392 rated charter campuses reporting
2025
$9,117
$14,741
$18,972
$11,840
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 404 rated charter campuses reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$61,439−$2,460 vs similar economic context
Teachers
29±0.0 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
19.5+1.7 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
KIPP Paseo Pri
Beginning 17.2%
1 to 5 years 55%
6 to 10 years 13.4%
11 to 20 years 14.4%
Selected comparison averageFor charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 410 reporting for every category shown · 410 in full cohort
Beginning 13.1%
1 to 5 years 47.1%
6 to 10 years 19.9%
11 to 20 years 14.9%
21 to 30 years 4.4%
Over 30 years 0.8%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized charter campuses · 445 reporting for every category shown · 445 in full cohort
Beginning 13.4%
1 to 5 years 47%
6 to 10 years 20.1%
11 to 20 years 13.4%
21 to 30 years 3.8%
Over 30 years 0.5%
Texas charter average829 reporting for every category shown · 829 Texas charter campuses in full cohort
Beginning 13%
1 to 5 years 44.3%
6 to 10 years 19.6%
11 to 20 years 15.4%
21 to 30 years 4.8%
Over 30 years 0.9%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for KIPP Paseo Pri in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classKIPP Paseo Pri · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten
21.8
21.6
Grade 1
18.5
22
Grade 2
20.2
23
Grade 3
21.5
24.3
Grade 4
25
24.4
Grade 5
16.3
23.8
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 227820105.