Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Open-enrollment charter campus

KIPP Generations Collegiate

KIPP Texas Public Schools · Houston · 592 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
87/1002025-26
Change
+11 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+6.8 ptsvs 80.2 average · 324 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
102 of 324tied with 13 others
B87

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 83 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 80.2 average for 324 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Recent movement

Overall score rose 2 points

85 to 87 2024-25 to 2025-26

  • 87 is 6.8 points above the 80.2 average among 324 charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Recent domain gain

Closing the Gaps rose 5 points

81 to 86 2024-25 to 2025-26

  • 86 is 9.1 points above the 76.9 average among 319 charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

STAAR result

Science above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
54%vs 39% avg · +15 pts
Masters
17%vs 15.4% avg · +1.6 pts

Among 302 charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

KIPP Generations Collegiate is rated B by TEA, scoring 87 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.2 average for 324 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context. It is up 11 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 102nd of 324 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context (tied with 13 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. After high school: the following fall
  6. Who this school serves
  7. Student counts behind the percentages
  8. Enrollment over time
  9. Discipline and removal from class
  10. Spending per student
  11. Teachers and actual class size
  12. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
908070 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas charter averageKIPP Generations Collegiate 7676868587 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 83 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas charter average
2025-26B8780.2 324 reporting81.7 829 reporting
2024-25B8578.6 318 reporting81.3 797 reporting
2023-24B8676.5 310 reporting79.5 776 reporting
2022-23C7675.9 300 reporting79.6 749 reporting
2021-22C7683.6 283 reporting84.5 700 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement86 B+11.9 vs similar economic context · 324 reporting
  • School Progress87 B+5.8 vs similar economic context · 324 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps86 B+9.1 vs similar economic context · 319 reporting
  • Academic Growth58 F−15.1 vs similar economic context · 310 reporting
  • Relative Performance87 B+7.7 vs similar economic context · 320 reporting
  • KIPP Generations Collegiate
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (324 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement86B4
School Progress87B3
Closing the Gaps86B4
Academic Growth58F2
Relative Performance87B3

Closest to moving up: School Progress, 3 points below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (87), so Student Achievement (86) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 87.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level72%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 324 reporting
  • Meets grade level45%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 324 reporting
  • Masters grade level9%−6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 324 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level61%−7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 324 reporting
  • Meets grade level44%−0 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 324 reporting
  • Masters grade level4%−12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 324 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level67%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 322 reporting
  • Meets grade level27%−8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 322 reporting
  • Masters grade level3%−10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 322 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level89%+18 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 302 reporting
  • Meets grade level54%+15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 302 reporting
  • Masters grade level17%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 302 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level89%+21 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 206 reporting
  • Meets grade level54%+17 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 206 reporting
  • Masters grade level18%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 206 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (324 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Graduation

Four-Year
94.9%+33.7 pts vs similar economic context average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 98 rated charter campuses reporting
Five-Year
95.7%+39.7 pts vs similar economic context average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 98 rated charter campuses reporting
Six-Year
98.5%+48.8 pts vs similar economic context average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 97 rated charter campuses reporting
Dropout Rate
2.0%+0.9 pts vs similar economic context average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 98 rated charter campuses reporting

These measures use TEA's standard-accountability population. Each comparison average includes only charter campuses in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported charter campus rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.

College, career and military readiness

Total credit for CCMR criteria
97.0%+13.7 pts vs similar economic context
CCMR criteria
CriterionThis school% of graduatesAveragesimilar economic contextDifferencepercentage pointsReportingselected comparison
Total credit for CCMR criteria97.0%83.3%+13.7 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 110 rated charter campuses reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course93.1%66.1%+27.0 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 111 rated charter campuses reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA22.3%35.2%−12.9 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 111 rated charter campuses reporting
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)37.7%29.9%+7.8 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 111 rated charter campuses reporting
Earned college credit for a dual credit course0.0%9.9%−9.9 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 111 rated charter campuses reporting
Earned an industry-based certification0.8%14.9%−14.1 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 111 rated charter campuses reporting
Earned a level I or level II certificate0.0%0.4%−0.4 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 111 rated charter campuses reporting
Earned an associate degree0.0%1.9%−1.9 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 111 rated charter campuses reporting
Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit0.0%4.3%−4.3 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 111 rated charter campuses reporting
Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness0.0%2.2%−2.2 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 111 rated charter campuses reporting
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student15.4%8.8%+6.6 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 111 rated charter campuses reporting
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces0.8%1.8%−1.0 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 111 rated charter campuses reporting

Every row is a share of this school's graduates, and every row is a way of meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this school minus the average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate, counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported charter campus percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only charter campuses for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

After high school: the following fall

Where school graduates appeared in Texas public higher-education records the fall after graduation. This is a limited next-step measure, not an eventual college-going or completion rate.

Graduates in the report
114

Class of 2023–24

Enrolled in Texas public higher education
62

54.4% of graduates

Not found in Texas public higher-ed records
47

41.2% of graduates

Not trackable
5

Fall 2024

Graduates in the report

This school
114
Selected comparison
83.2

average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 90 rated charter campuses reporting

Enrolled in Texas public higher education

This school
62
Selected comparison
40.4

average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 90 rated charter campuses reporting

Texas-public enrollment rate

This school
54.4%
Selected comparison
45.5%

average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 90 rated charter campuses reporting

+8.9 pts vs similar economic context

Not-found rate

This school
41.2%
Selected comparison
48.9%

average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 90 rated charter campuses reporting

−7.7 pts vs similar economic context

Not-trackable rate

This school
4.4%
Selected comparison
5.7%

average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 90 rated charter campuses reporting

−1.3 pts vs similar economic context

Most common named Texas public destinations

  1. U. OF HOUSTON-DOWNTOWN (012826)15
  2. HOUSTON CITY COLLEGE (010633)10
  3. UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON (003652)7

Selected comparison counts are neutral cohort scale context. The percentages put differently sized graduating classes on the same basis, but still cover only the limited Texas-public system observed by this report.

Source: Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board, high-school graduates enrolled in higher education, fetched 24 August 2026. The report covers graduates who enrolled in a Texas public college or university the following fall and includes only districts or campuses with more than 25 graduates.

“Not found” does not mean a graduate did not continue their education. It can include private or out-of-state college, work, military service, enrollment after the fall term, or another path the Texas public system does not observe.

“Not trackable” is not an outcome. THECB uses it for graduates with a non-standard identifier that could not be matched to higher-education records.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
592
Economically disadvantaged
94.8%+3.0 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
51.5%+6.5 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
10.0%−2.6 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
91.0%−1.7 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
29.0%+5.1 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

KIPP Generations Collegiate

African American: 9.6%Hispanic: 89.2%White: 1%Two or More Races: 0.2%
  • African American 9.6%
  • Hispanic 89.2%
  • White 1%
  • Two or More Races 0.2%

Selected comparison average For charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 324 reporting for every category shown · 324 in full cohort

African American: 18.6%Hispanic: 75.1%White: 3.1%American Indian: 0.2%Asian: 1.6%Pacific Islander: 0.1%Two or More Races: 1.3%
  • African American 18.6%
  • Hispanic 75.1%
  • White 3.1%
  • American Indian 0.2%
  • Asian 1.6%
  • Pacific Islander 0.1%
  • Two or More Races 1.3%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
592
Economically disadvantaged students
561
Emergent bilingual students
305
Special education students
59

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
65
Students in TEA mobility denominator
648
TEA-published mobility rate
10%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 592 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 22 (3.6%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
592

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
−22

Decrease · −3.6%

Change since 2021–22
−4

Decrease · −0.7%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
592
Selected comparison
513.9

average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 322 rated charter campuses reporting

Student enrollment by school year for KIPP Generations Collegiate
School yearStudents enrolledKIPP Generations CollegiateChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 596 First available year 484.8
2022–23 583 Decrease of 13 (2.2%) 499.6
2023–24 584 Increase of 1 (0.2%) 512
2024–25 614 Increase of 30 (5.1%) 513.8
2025–26 592 Decrease of 22 (3.6%) 513.9

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting charter campuses in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
84

13.0% of cumulative year-end enrollment

Disciplinary actions
105

16.20 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
648

2024–25

Share of students · 2024–25

This school
13.0%
Selected comparison
11.0%

average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 201 rated charter campuses reporting

+2.0 pts vs similar economic context

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
16.2
Selected comparison
18.6

average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 211 rated charter campuses reporting

−2.4 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for KIPP Generations Collegiate
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 593 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
2021–22 614 50 8.1% 75 12.21 11.0% 17.9
2022–23 598 67 11.2% 84 14.05 11.4% 19.2
2023–24 601 69 11.5% 88 14.64 11.0% 18.8
2024–25 648 84 13.0% 105 16.20 11.0% 18.6
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for KIPP Generations Collegiate in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline 84 13.0% 105 16.20 11.0% 18.6
In-school suspensions Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Out-of-school suspensions 81 12.5% 99 15.28 8.6% 12.3
DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized charter campuses can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$8k$14k$20k2019202120232025
  • KIPP Generations Collegiate
  • Parent district: KIPP Texas Public Schools
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$9,635
Selected comparison
$12,046

average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 321 rated charter campuses reporting

−$2,411 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $9,635 per student for this campus, $14,741 per student for its parent district, KIPP Texas Public Schools, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearKIPP Generations CollegiateParent district: KIPP Texas Public SchoolsTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2019$9,632$11,096$13,108$8,654 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 243 rated charter campuses reporting
2020$9,542$11,081$14,058$9,281 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 257 rated charter campuses reporting
2021$10,546$11,442$14,797$9,648 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 278 rated charter campuses reporting
2022$11,377$13,586$15,708$11,604 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 294 rated charter campuses reporting
2023$11,691$14,554$16,792$11,623 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 303 rated charter campuses reporting
2024$9,979$13,823$18,125$11,589 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 311 rated charter campuses reporting
2025$9,635$14,741$18,972$12,046 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 321 rated charter campuses reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$63,838−$476 vs similar economic context
Teachers
36+6.5 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
16.5−1.3 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

KIPP Generations Collegiate

Beginning: 24%1 to 5 years: 54.5%6 to 10 years: 13.1%11 to 20 years: 5.6%21 to 30 years: 2.8%
  • Beginning 24%
  • 1 to 5 years 54.5%
  • 6 to 10 years 13.1%
  • 11 to 20 years 5.6%
  • 21 to 30 years 2.8%

Selected comparison average For charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 324 reporting for every category shown · 324 in full cohort

Beginning: 13.3%1 to 5 years: 47%6 to 10 years: 19.7%11 to 20 years: 14.9%21 to 30 years: 4.3%Over 30 years: 0.8%
  • Beginning 13.3%
  • 1 to 5 years 47%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.7%
  • 11 to 20 years 14.9%
  • 21 to 30 years 4.3%
  • Over 30 years 0.8%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for KIPP Generations Collegiate in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classKIPP Generations Collegiate · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Secondary English21.518.9
Secondary languages other than English21.817.9
Secondary math21.219.3
Secondary science22.620
Secondary social studies22.620.3

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 5 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 227820014.