Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Open-enrollment charter campus

KIPP Connect Preparatory

KIPP Texas Public Schools · Houston · 968 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
93/1002025-26
Change
+1 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+13.0 ptsvs 80 average · 313 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
31 of 313tied with 12 others
A93

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 90 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 80 average for 313 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Recent movement

Overall score rose 9 points

84 to 93 2024-25 to 2025-26

  • 93 is 13 points above the 80 average among 313 charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Recent domain gain

Closing the Gaps rose 13 points

78 to 91 2024-25 to 2025-26

  • 91 is 14.3 points above the 76.7 average among 308 charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

STAAR result

All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
53%vs 40.3% avg · +12.7 pts
Masters
24%vs 15.3% avg · +8.7 pts

Among 313 charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

KIPP Connect Preparatory is rated A by TEA, scoring 93 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80 average for 313 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context. It is up 1 point since 2021-22.

Ranks 31st of 313 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context (tied with 12 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. After high school: the following fall
  6. Who this school serves
  7. Student counts behind the percentages
  8. Enrollment over time
  9. Discipline and removal from class
  10. Spending per student
  11. Teachers and actual class size
  12. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
90807060 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas charter averageKIPP Connect Preparatory 9282708493 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 90 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas charter average
2025-26A9380.0 313 reporting81.7 829 reporting
2024-25B8478.5 307 reporting81.3 797 reporting
2023-24C7076.4 299 reporting79.5 776 reporting
2022-23B8275.8 289 reporting79.6 749 reporting
2021-22A9283.4 272 reporting84.5 700 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement81 B+7.1 vs similar economic context · 313 reporting
  • School Progress94 A+12.9 vs similar economic context · 313 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps91 A+14.3 vs similar economic context · 308 reporting
  • Academic Growth77 C+4.0 vs similar economic context · 299 reporting
  • Relative Performance94 A+14.8 vs similar economic context · 309 reporting
  • KIPP Connect Preparatory
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (313 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement81B9
School Progress94A—
Closing the Gaps91A—
Academic Growth77C3
Relative Performance94A—

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (94), so Student Achievement (81) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 94.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level80%+12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 313 reporting
  • Meets grade level53%+13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 313 reporting
  • Masters grade level24%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 313 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level75%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 313 reporting
  • Meets grade level54%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 313 reporting
  • Masters grade level22%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 313 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level78%+12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 311 reporting
  • Meets grade level45%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 311 reporting
  • Masters grade level20%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 311 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level90%+20 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 291 reporting
  • Meets grade level60%+21 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 291 reporting
  • Masters grade level30%+15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 291 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level87%+19 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 198 reporting
  • Meets grade level60%+23 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 198 reporting
  • Masters grade level30%+14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 198 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (313 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Graduation

Four-Year
0.0%−60.8 pts vs similar economic context average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 94 rated charter campuses reporting
Five-Year
0.0%−57.3 pts vs similar economic context average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 94 rated charter campuses reporting
Six-Year
0.0%−50.8 pts vs similar economic context average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 93 rated charter campuses reporting
Dropout Rate
3.8%+2.7 pts vs similar economic context average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 94 rated charter campuses reporting

These measures use TEA's standard-accountability population. Each comparison average includes only charter campuses in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported charter campus rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.

College, career and military readiness

Total credit for CCMR criteria
98.0%+14.6 pts vs similar economic context
CCMR criteria
CriterionThis school% of graduatesAveragesimilar economic contextDifferencepercentage pointsReportingselected comparison
Total credit for CCMR criteria98.0%83.4%+14.6 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 104 rated charter campuses reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course98.4%66.1%+32.3 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 105 rated charter campuses reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA51.2%33.9%+17.3 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 105 rated charter campuses reporting
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)59.8%29.2%+30.6 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 105 rated charter campuses reporting
Earned college credit for a dual credit course0.0%10.0%−10.0 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 105 rated charter campuses reporting
Earned an industry-based certification3.9%14.7%−10.8 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 105 rated charter campuses reporting
Earned a level I or level II certificate0.0%0.5%−0.5 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 105 rated charter campuses reporting
Earned an associate degree0.0%2.1%−2.1 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 105 rated charter campuses reporting
Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit0.8%4.3%−3.5 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 105 rated charter campuses reporting
Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness0.0%2.3%−2.3 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 105 rated charter campuses reporting
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student7.1%8.9%−1.8 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 105 rated charter campuses reporting
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces3.1%1.8%+1.3 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 105 rated charter campuses reporting

Every row is a share of this school's graduates, and every row is a way of meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this school minus the average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate, counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported charter campus percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only charter campuses for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

After high school: the following fall

Where school graduates appeared in Texas public higher-education records the fall after graduation. This is a limited next-step measure, not an eventual college-going or completion rate.

Graduates in the report
136

Class of 2023–24

Enrolled in Texas public higher education
78

57.4% of graduates

Not found in Texas public higher-ed records
47

34.6% of graduates

Not trackable
11

Fall 2024

Graduates in the report

This school
136
Selected comparison
83.1

average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 85 rated charter campuses reporting

Enrolled in Texas public higher education

This school
78
Selected comparison
40.5

average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 85 rated charter campuses reporting

Texas-public enrollment rate

This school
57.4%
Selected comparison
45.8%

average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 85 rated charter campuses reporting

+11.6 pts vs similar economic context

Not-found rate

This school
34.6%
Selected comparison
48.6%

average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 85 rated charter campuses reporting

−14.0 pts vs similar economic context

Not-trackable rate

This school
8.1%
Selected comparison
5.6%

average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 85 rated charter campuses reporting

+2.5 pts vs similar economic context

Most common named Texas public destinations

  1. HOUSTON CITY COLLEGE (010633)30
  2. U. OF HOUSTON-DOWNTOWN (012826)12
  3. UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON (003652)12

Selected comparison counts are neutral cohort scale context. The percentages put differently sized graduating classes on the same basis, but still cover only the limited Texas-public system observed by this report.

Source: Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board, high-school graduates enrolled in higher education, fetched 24 August 2026. The report covers graduates who enrolled in a Texas public college or university the following fall and includes only districts or campuses with more than 25 graduates.

“Not found” does not mean a graduate did not continue their education. It can include private or out-of-state college, work, military service, enrollment after the fall term, or another path the Texas public system does not observe.

“Not trackable” is not an outcome. THECB uses it for graduates with a non-standard identifier that could not be matched to higher-education records.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
968
Economically disadvantaged
95.1%+3.0 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
61.7%+16.5 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
7.5%−5.1 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
93.9%+1.1 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
18.6%−5.0 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

KIPP Connect Preparatory

African American: 6.6%Hispanic: 68.1%White: 4.1%American Indian: 0.6%Asian: 19.5%Two or More Races: 1%
  • African American 6.6%
  • Hispanic 68.1%
  • White 4.1%
  • American Indian 0.6%
  • Asian 19.5%
  • Two or More Races 1%

Selected comparison average For charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 313 reporting for every category shown · 313 in full cohort

African American: 18.5%Hispanic: 75.3%White: 3%American Indian: 0.2%Asian: 1.5%Two or More Races: 1.3%
  • African American 18.5%
  • Hispanic 75.3%
  • White 3%
  • American Indian 0.2%
  • Asian 1.5%
  • Two or More Races 1.3%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
968
Economically disadvantaged students
921
Emergent bilingual students
597
Special education students
73

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
85
Students in TEA mobility denominator
1,020
TEA-published mobility rate
8.3%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 968 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 11 (1.1%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
968

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
−11

Decrease · −1.1%

Change since 2021–22
+491

Increase · +102.9%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
968
Selected comparison
515

average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 311 rated charter campuses reporting

Student enrollment by school year for KIPP Connect Preparatory
School yearStudents enrolledKIPP Connect PreparatoryChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 477 First available year 487.1
2022–23 364 Decrease of 113 (23.7%) 501.9
2023–24 927 Increase of 563 (154.7%) 513.4
2024–25 979 Increase of 52 (5.6%) 514.9
2025–26 968 Decrease of 11 (1.1%) 515

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting charter campuses in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
196

19.3% of cumulative year-end enrollment

Disciplinary actions
395

38.88 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
1,016

2024–25

Share of students · 2024–25

This school
19.3%
Selected comparison
11.0%

average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 194 rated charter campuses reporting

+8.3 pts vs similar economic context

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
38.88
Selected comparison
18.9

average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 204 rated charter campuses reporting

+20.0 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for KIPP Connect Preparatory
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 465 Not reported — Not reported — — —
2021–22 487 102 20.9% 192 39.43 11.1% 18.3
2022–23 368 103 28.0% 171 46.47 11.6% 19.6
2023–24 951 229 24.1% 483 50.79 11.2% 19.2
2024–25 1,016 196 19.3% 395 38.88 11.0% 18.9
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for KIPP Connect Preparatory in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline 196 19.3% 395 38.88 11.0% 18.9
In-school suspensions 119 11.7% 162 15.94 7.6% 11.2
Out-of-school suspensions 123 12.1% 196 19.29 8.7% 12.4
DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Suppressed — Suppressed — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized charter campuses can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$7k$13k$20k2019202120232025
  • KIPP Connect Preparatory
  • Parent district: KIPP Texas Public Schools
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$7,561
Selected comparison
$12,060

average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 310 rated charter campuses reporting

−$4,499 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $7,561 per student for this campus, $14,741 per student for its parent district, KIPP Texas Public Schools, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearKIPP Connect PreparatoryParent district: KIPP Texas Public SchoolsTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2019$7,500$11,096$13,108$8,601 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 234 rated charter campuses reporting
2020$7,377$11,081$14,058$9,259 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 248 rated charter campuses reporting
2021$7,809$11,442$14,797$9,599 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 267 rated charter campuses reporting
2022$7,602$13,586$15,708$11,552 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 283 rated charter campuses reporting
2023$10,105$14,554$16,792$11,557 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 292 rated charter campuses reporting
2024$8,375$13,823$18,125$11,538 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 300 rated charter campuses reporting
2025$7,561$14,741$18,972$12,060 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 310 rated charter campuses reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$64,475+$179 vs similar economic context
Teachers
48+18.4 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
20.3+2.5 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

KIPP Connect Preparatory

Beginning: 4.2%1 to 5 years: 62.1%6 to 10 years: 22.4%11 to 20 years: 9.2%21 to 30 years: 2.1%
  • Beginning 4.2%
  • 1 to 5 years 62.1%
  • 6 to 10 years 22.4%
  • 11 to 20 years 9.2%
  • 21 to 30 years 2.1%

Selected comparison average For charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 313 reporting for every category shown · 313 in full cohort

Beginning: 13.5%1 to 5 years: 47%6 to 10 years: 19.7%11 to 20 years: 14.8%21 to 30 years: 4.2%Over 30 years: 0.9%
  • Beginning 13.5%
  • 1 to 5 years 47%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.7%
  • 11 to 20 years 14.8%
  • 21 to 30 years 4.2%
  • Over 30 years 0.9%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for KIPP Connect Preparatory in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classKIPP Connect Preparatory · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Grade 632.723.3
Secondary English24.318.9
Secondary languages other than English23.518.1
Secondary math25.419.4
Secondary science27.820.3
Secondary social studies26.920.5

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 227820056.