Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Open-enrollment charter campus

KIPP Austin Collegiate

KIPP Texas Public Schools · Austin · 859 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
86/1002025-26
Change
+4 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+5.8 ptsvs 80.2 average · 367 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
133 of 367tied with 9 others
B86

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 86 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 80.2 average for 367 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Recent movement

Overall score rose 4 points

82 to 86 2024-25 to 2025-26

  • 86 is 5.8 points above the 80.2 average among 367 charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Recent domain gain

Closing the Gaps rose 12 points

73 to 85 2024-25 to 2025-26

  • 85 is 8 points above the 77 average among 361 charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

STAAR result

Science above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
65%vs 38.6% avg · +26.4 pts
Masters
26%vs 15.1% avg · +10.9 pts

Among 345 charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

KIPP Austin Collegiate is rated B by TEA, scoring 86 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.2 average for 367 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context. It is up 4 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 133rd of 367 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context (tied with 9 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. After high school: the following fall
  6. Who this school serves
  7. Student counts behind the percentages
  8. Enrollment over time
  9. Discipline and removal from class
  10. Spending per student
  11. Teachers and actual class size
  12. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
908070 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas charter averageKIPP Austin Collegiate 8279898286 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 86 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas charter average
2025-26B8680.2 367 reporting81.7 829 reporting
2024-25B8278.6 361 reporting81.3 797 reporting
2023-24B8976.2 353 reporting79.5 776 reporting
2022-23C7975.8 343 reporting79.6 749 reporting
2021-22B8283.3 323 reporting84.5 700 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement84 B+9.8 vs similar economic context · 367 reporting
  • School Progress87 B+5.8 vs similar economic context · 367 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps85 B+8.0 vs similar economic context · 361 reporting
  • Academic Growth62 D−11.2 vs similar economic context · 351 reporting
  • Relative Performance87 B+7.7 vs similar economic context · 363 reporting
  • KIPP Austin Collegiate
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (367 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement84B6
School Progress87B3
Closing the Gaps85B5
Academic Growth62D8
Relative Performance87B3

Closest to moving up: School Progress, 3 points below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (87), so Student Achievement (84) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 87.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level71%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 367 reporting
  • Meets grade level41%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 367 reporting
  • Masters grade level9%−6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 367 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level61%−7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 367 reporting
  • Meets grade level38%−6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 367 reporting
  • Masters grade level4%−12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 367 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level73%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 365 reporting
  • Meets grade level25%−10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 365 reporting
  • Masters grade level2%−11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 365 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level92%+22 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 345 reporting
  • Meets grade level65%+26 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 345 reporting
  • Masters grade level26%+11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 345 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level80%+12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 234 reporting
  • Meets grade level50%+13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 234 reporting
  • Masters grade level19%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 234 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (367 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Graduation

Four-Year
95.7%+32.6 pts vs similar economic context average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 107 rated charter campuses reporting
Five-Year
96.7%+38.2 pts vs similar economic context average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 107 rated charter campuses reporting
Six-Year
96.6%+45.8 pts vs similar economic context average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 106 rated charter campuses reporting
Dropout Rate
1.3%+0.3 pts vs similar economic context average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 107 rated charter campuses reporting

These measures use TEA's standard-accountability population. Each comparison average includes only charter campuses in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported charter campus rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.

College, career and military readiness

Total credit for CCMR criteria
100.0%+16.8 pts vs similar economic context
CCMR criteria
CriterionThis school% of graduatesAveragesimilar economic contextDifferencepercentage pointsReportingselected comparison
Total credit for CCMR criteria100.0%83.2%+16.8 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 124 rated charter campuses reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course98.3%66.1%+32.2 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 125 rated charter campuses reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA37.6%33.3%+4.3 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 125 rated charter campuses reporting
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)59.0%28.4%+30.6 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 125 rated charter campuses reporting
Earned college credit for a dual credit course0.0%10.0%−10.0 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 125 rated charter campuses reporting
Earned an industry-based certification13.5%15.0%−1.5 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 125 rated charter campuses reporting
Earned a level I or level II certificate0.0%0.4%−0.4 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 125 rated charter campuses reporting
Earned an associate degree0.0%1.8%−1.8 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 125 rated charter campuses reporting
Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit0.0%4.3%−4.3 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 125 rated charter campuses reporting
Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness0.6%2.1%−1.5 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 125 rated charter campuses reporting
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student13.5%8.5%+5.0 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 125 rated charter campuses reporting
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces1.1%1.9%−0.8 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 125 rated charter campuses reporting

Every row is a share of this school's graduates, and every row is a way of meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this school minus the average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate, counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported charter campus percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only charter campuses for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

After high school: the following fall

Where school graduates appeared in Texas public higher-education records the fall after graduation. This is a limited next-step measure, not an eventual college-going or completion rate.

Graduates in the report
178

Class of 2023–24

Enrolled in Texas public higher education
96

53.9% of graduates

Not found in Texas public higher-ed records
71

39.9% of graduates

Not trackable
11

Fall 2024

Graduates in the report

This school
178
Selected comparison
81.8

average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 102 rated charter campuses reporting

Enrolled in Texas public higher education

This school
96
Selected comparison
39.6

average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 102 rated charter campuses reporting

Texas-public enrollment rate

This school
53.9%
Selected comparison
45.1%

average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 102 rated charter campuses reporting

+8.8 pts vs similar economic context

Not-found rate

This school
39.9%
Selected comparison
49.3%

average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 102 rated charter campuses reporting

−9.4 pts vs similar economic context

Not-trackable rate

This school
6.2%
Selected comparison
5.6%

average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 102 rated charter campuses reporting

+0.6 pts vs similar economic context

Most common named Texas public destinations

  1. AUSTIN COMMUNITY COLLEGE (012015)29
  2. TEXAS STATE UNIVERSITY (003615)27
  3. U. OF TEXAS AT DALLAS (009741)6

Selected comparison counts are neutral cohort scale context. The percentages put differently sized graduating classes on the same basis, but still cover only the limited Texas-public system observed by this report.

Source: Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board, high-school graduates enrolled in higher education, fetched 24 August 2026. The report covers graduates who enrolled in a Texas public college or university the following fall and includes only districts or campuses with more than 25 graduates.

“Not found” does not mean a graduate did not continue their education. It can include private or out-of-state college, work, military service, enrollment after the fall term, or another path the Texas public system does not observe.

“Not trackable” is not an outcome. THECB uses it for graduates with a non-standard identifier that could not be matched to higher-education records.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
859
Economically disadvantaged
92.8%+1.9 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
55.4%+11.4 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
15.1%+2.5 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
94.3%+1.6 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
16.1%−7.8 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

KIPP Austin Collegiate

African American: 2.5%Hispanic: 93.9%White: 2.4%American Indian: 0.4%Asian: 0.6%Two or More Races: 0.4%
  • African American 2.5%
  • Hispanic 93.9%
  • White 2.4%
  • American Indian 0.4%
  • Asian 0.6%
  • Two or More Races 0.4%

Selected comparison average For charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 367 reporting for every category shown · 367 in full cohort

African American: 18.6%Hispanic: 74.8%White: 3.4%American Indian: 0.2%Asian: 1.5%Pacific Islander: 0.1%Two or More Races: 1.4%
  • African American 18.6%
  • Hispanic 74.8%
  • White 3.4%
  • American Indian 0.2%
  • Asian 1.5%
  • Pacific Islander 0.1%
  • Two or More Races 1.4%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
846
Economically disadvantaged students
785
Emergent bilingual students
469
Special education students
128

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
52
Students in TEA mobility denominator
860
TEA-published mobility rate
6%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 859 students in 2025–26, an increase of 12 (1.4%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
859

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
+12

Increase · +1.4%

Change since 2021–22
+57

Increase · +7.1%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
859
Selected comparison
510.7

average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 365 rated charter campuses reporting

Student enrollment by school year for KIPP Austin Collegiate
School yearStudents enrolledKIPP Austin CollegiateChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 802 First available year 486.4
2022–23 826 Increase of 24 (3.0%) 500.7
2023–24 823 Decrease of 3 (0.4%) 510.7
2024–25 847 Increase of 24 (2.9%) 512.1
2025–26 859 Increase of 12 (1.4%) 510.7

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting charter campuses in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
60

7.0% of cumulative year-end enrollment

Disciplinary actions
110

12.81 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
859

2024–25

Share of students · 2024–25

This school
7.0%
Selected comparison
11.0%

average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 227 rated charter campuses reporting

−4.0 pts vs similar economic context

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
12.81
Selected comparison
18.5

average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 241 rated charter campuses reporting

−5.7 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for KIPP Austin Collegiate
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 756 Not reported — Not reported — — —
2021–22 808 63 7.8% 94 11.63 11.1% 18.2
2022–23 830 69 8.3% 122 14.70 11.5% 19.6
2023–24 830 92 11.1% 169 20.36 11.3% 19.4
2024–25 859 60 7.0% 110 12.81 11.0% 18.5
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for KIPP Austin Collegiate in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline 60 7.0% 110 12.81 11.0% 18.5
In-school suspensions Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Out-of-school suspensions 55 6.4% 76 8.85 8.8% 12.4
DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Suppressed — Suppressed — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized charter campuses can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$7k$14k$20k20182020202220242025
  • KIPP Austin Collegiate
  • Parent district: KIPP Texas Public Schools
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$11,104
Selected comparison
$11,966

average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 363 rated charter campuses reporting

−$862 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $11,104 per student for this campus, $14,741 per student for its parent district, KIPP Texas Public Schools, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearKIPP Austin CollegiateParent district: KIPP Texas Public SchoolsTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$8,147$10,983$13,054$8,606 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 219 rated charter campuses reporting
2019$8,994$11,096$13,108$8,620 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 276 rated charter campuses reporting
2020$9,085$11,081$14,058$9,218 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 292 rated charter campuses reporting
2021$9,945$11,442$14,797$9,618 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 316 rated charter campuses reporting
2022$10,168$13,586$15,708$11,549 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 334 rated charter campuses reporting
2023$11,561$14,554$16,792$11,554 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 344 rated charter campuses reporting
2024$11,839$13,823$18,125$11,547 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 353 rated charter campuses reporting
2025$11,104$14,741$18,972$11,966 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 363 rated charter campuses reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$58,975−$5,042 vs similar economic context
Teachers
54+25.1 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
15.6−2.2 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

KIPP Austin Collegiate

Beginning: 19.3%1 to 5 years: 35.9%6 to 10 years: 23.8%11 to 20 years: 15.8%21 to 30 years: 5.3%
  • Beginning 19.3%
  • 1 to 5 years 35.9%
  • 6 to 10 years 23.8%
  • 11 to 20 years 15.8%
  • 21 to 30 years 5.3%

Selected comparison average For charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 367 reporting for every category shown · 367 in full cohort

Beginning: 13.3%1 to 5 years: 47.2%6 to 10 years: 19.8%11 to 20 years: 14.6%21 to 30 years: 4.4%Over 30 years: 0.8%
  • Beginning 13.3%
  • 1 to 5 years 47.2%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.8%
  • 11 to 20 years 14.6%
  • 21 to 30 years 4.4%
  • Over 30 years 0.8%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for KIPP Austin Collegiate in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classKIPP Austin Collegiate · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Secondary English22.318.9
Secondary languages other than English21.817.8
Secondary math22.819.4
Secondary science23.620.1
Secondary social studies21.920.3

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 5 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 227820001.