−2.9 ptsvs 77.9 average · 2,123 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
1,331 of 2,123tied with 69 others
Score vs region
−7.2 ptsvs 82.2 average · 1,157 rated schools in Region 10: Richardson
Region 10: Richardson placement
879 of 1,157tied with 30 others
Score vs county
−6.4 ptsvs 81.4 average · 563 rated schools in Dallas County
Dallas County placement
423 of 563tied with 14 others
Score vs similar-size group
−6.4 ptsvs 81.4 average · 1,235 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
921 of 1,235tied with 42 others
Score vs state
−6.3 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
5,641 of 7,646tied with 202 others
C75
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 81 in 2021-22. The current score is below the 77.9 average for 2,123 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is below the 82.2 average for 1,157 rated schools in Region 10: Richardson.The current score is below the 81.4 average for 563 rated schools in Dallas County.The current score is below the 81.4 average for 1,235 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is below the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
44%vs 42.8% avg · +1.2 pts
Masters
19%vs 16.8% avg · +2.2 pts
Among 1,962 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Kimball Elem is rated C by TEA, scoring 75 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 77.9 average for 2,123 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 10 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 1,331st of 2,123 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 69 others).
Kimball Elem is rated C by TEA, scoring 75 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 82.2 average for 1,157 rated schools in Region 10: Richardson. It is down 10 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 879th of 1,157 rated schools in Region 10: Richardson (tied with 30 others).
Kimball Elem is rated C by TEA, scoring 75 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 81.4 average for 563 rated schools in Dallas County. It is down 10 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 423rd of 563 rated schools in Dallas County (tied with 14 others).
Kimball Elem is rated C by TEA, scoring 75 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 81.4 average for 1,235 similarly sized rated schools. It is down 10 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 921st of 1,235 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 42 others).
Kimball Elem is rated C by TEA, scoring 75 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is down 10 points since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 81 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement72 C−0.9 vs similar economic context · 1,962 reporting
School Progress79 C−0.1 vs similar economic context · 1,957 reporting
Closing the Gaps64 D−11.1 vs similar economic context · 1,943 reporting
Academic Growth56 F−16.4 vs similar economic context · 1,909 reporting
Relative Performance79 C+1.5 vs similar economic context · 1,957 reporting
Kimball Elem
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,123 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
72
C
8
School Progress
79
C
1
Closing the Gaps
64
D
6
Academic Growth
56
F
4
Relative Performance
79
C
1
Closest to moving up: School Progress, 1 point below B in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (79), so
Student Achievement (72) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 79.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level70%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,962 reporting
Meets grade level44%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,962 reporting
Masters grade level19%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,962 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level72%+0 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,960 reporting
Meets grade level53%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,960 reporting
Masters grade level30%+11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,960 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level69%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,952 reporting
Meets grade level44%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,952 reporting
Masters grade level11%−4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,952 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level67%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,812 reporting
Meets grade level21%−17 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,812 reporting
Masters grade level10%−6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,812 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,123 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
195
Economically disadvantaged
78.5%−0.4 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
20.5%−7.0 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
30.8%+12.1 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
94.7%+1.3 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
14.8%−5.4 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Kimball Elem
African American 28.2%
Hispanic 40%
White 23.1%
Asian 5.1%
Two or More Races 3.6%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,123 reporting for every category shown · 2,123 in full cohort
African American 13.8%
Hispanic 66%
White 15.1%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 1.8%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 2.8%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 10: Richardson · 1,157 reporting for every category shown · 1,157 in full cohort
African American 17.4%
Hispanic 43.5%
White 24.5%
American Indian 0.6%
Asian 9.9%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 4%
Selected comparison averageFor Dallas County · 563 reporting for every category shown · 563 in full cohort
African American 21.3%
Hispanic 59%
White 10.9%
American Indian 0.6%
Asian 5.4%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 2.6%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 1,235 reporting for every category shown · 1,235 in full cohort
African American 7.9%
Hispanic 46.8%
White 40.7%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 1.1%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.1%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
195
Economically disadvantaged students
153
Emergent bilingual students
40
Special education students
60
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
24
Students in TEA mobility denominator
185
TEA-published mobility rate
13%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Suppressed
Rate not available
Disciplinary actions
Suppressed
Rate not available
Cumulative year-end enrollment
234
2024–25
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Kimball Elem
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
229
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2021–22
231
Suppressed
—
10
4.33
—
31.2
2022–23
234
11
4.7%
16
6.84
13.8%
34.2
2023–24
254
15
5.9%
20
7.87
13.7%
34
2024–25
234
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Kimball Elem in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
In-school suspensions
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Out-of-school suspensions
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Kimball Elem
Parent district: Mesquite ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$18,122
Selected comparison
$13,034
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,111 rated schools reporting
+$5,089 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $18,122 per student for this campus, $15,844 per student for its parent district, Mesquite ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Kimball Elem
Parent district: Mesquite ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$10,532
$13,769
$13,054
$8,094
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,996 rated schools reporting
2019
$13,206
$13,140
$13,108
$8,246
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,016 rated schools reporting
2020
$13,157
$14,912
$14,058
$8,747
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,033 rated schools reporting
2021
$11,482
$11,625
$14,797
$9,389
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,046 rated schools reporting
2022
$14,146
$15,447
$15,708
$10,752
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,063 rated schools reporting
2023
$13,391
$16,822
$16,792
$11,309
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,080 rated schools reporting
2024
$15,026
$16,875
$18,125
$12,309
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,097 rated schools reporting
2025
$18,122
$15,844
$18,972
$13,034
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,111 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$76,145+$9,242 vs similar economic context
Teachers
19−24.2 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
10.1−3.9 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Kimball Elem
1 to 5 years 13%
6 to 10 years 26.4%
11 to 20 years 44%
21 to 30 years 16.6%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,123 reporting for every category shown · 2,123 in full cohort
Beginning 6.9%
1 to 5 years 27.6%
6 to 10 years 18.9%
11 to 20 years 27.1%
21 to 30 years 15.1%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 10: Richardson · 1,157 reporting for every category shown · 1,157 in full cohort
Beginning 6.9%
1 to 5 years 29%
6 to 10 years 20.1%
11 to 20 years 27.5%
21 to 30 years 13.7%
Over 30 years 2.8%
Selected comparison averageFor Dallas County · 563 reporting for every category shown · 563 in full cohort
Beginning 7.5%
1 to 5 years 30.2%
6 to 10 years 21.2%
11 to 20 years 26.5%
21 to 30 years 11.9%
Over 30 years 2.7%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 1,235 reporting for every category shown · 1,235 in full cohort
Beginning 6.7%
1 to 5 years 23.5%
6 to 10 years 17.4%
11 to 20 years 28.3%
21 to 30 years 17.7%
Over 30 years 5.5%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Kimball Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classKimball Elem · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten
12
18
Grade 1
15
18.3
Grade 2
13.5
18.4
Grade 3
17
18.8
Grade 4
18.5
19.1
Grade 5
14.5
20.1
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 057914122.