Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Kieberger Elem

San Patricio County · Region 02: Corpus Christi · 32 students

Current score
75/1002025-26
Score vs similar economic context
−2.4 ptsvs 77.4 average · 2,390 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
1,488 of 2,390tied with 76 others
C75

At a glance

The current score is below the 77.4 average for 2,390 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Read the full rating context and placement

Kieberger Elem is rated C by TEA, scoring 75 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 77.4 average for 2,390 rated schools serving a similar economic context. TEA has published 1 year of scores for this school, so there is no trend to read yet.

Ranks 1,488th of 2,390 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 76 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 1 year of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Who this school serves
  5. Student counts behind the percentages
  6. Teachers
  7. Where this comes from

1 year of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
908070 75 2025-26

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26C7577.4 2,390 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement—Not reported · similar economic context 70.7 · 2,228 reporting
  • School Progress—Not reported · similar economic context 78.6 · 2,222 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps—Not reported · similar economic context 74.6 · 2,208 reporting
  • Academic Growth—Not reported · similar economic context 72.6 · 2,182 reporting
  • Relative Performance—Not reported · similar economic context 76.6 · 2,222 reporting
  • Kieberger Elem
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,390 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement—Not rated—
School Progress—Not rated—
Closing the Gaps—Not rated—
Academic Growth—Not rated—
Relative Performance—Not rated—

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
32
Economically disadvantaged
87.5%−0.4 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
3.1%−34.1 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
12.5%−5.7 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
—
Chronically absent
—

Student demographics

Kieberger Elem

Hispanic: 62.5%White: 21.9%American Indian: 3.1%Asian: 3.1%Two or More Races: 9.4%
  • Hispanic 62.5%
  • White 21.9%
  • American Indian 3.1%
  • Asian 3.1%
  • Two or More Races 9.4%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,390 reporting for every category shown · 2,390 in full cohort

African American: 14.4%Hispanic: 74.2%White: 7.7%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 1.4%Pacific Islander: 0.1%Two or More Races: 1.9%
  • African American 14.4%
  • Hispanic 74.2%
  • White 7.7%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 1.4%
  • Pacific Islander 0.1%
  • Two or More Races 1.9%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
32
Economically disadvantaged students
28
Emergent bilingual students
1
Special education students
4

TEA context labels

  • Highest grade is early education, pre-K or kindergarten
  • New campus compared with last year’s fall enrollment

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
Not reported
Students in TEA mobility denominator
Not reported
TEA-published mobility rate
Not reported

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Teachers

Average salary
$60,731−$7,128 vs similar economic context
Teachers
2−39.3 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
16+1.6 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Kieberger Elem

1 to 5 years: 50%11 to 20 years: 50%
  • 1 to 5 years 50%
  • 11 to 20 years 50%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,390 reporting for every category shown · 2,390 in full cohort

Beginning: 7.3%1 to 5 years: 27.3%6 to 10 years: 18.9%11 to 20 years: 27.1%21 to 30 years: 15.1%Over 30 years: 3.5%
  • Beginning 7.3%
  • 1 to 5 years 27.3%
  • 6 to 10 years 18.9%
  • 11 to 20 years 27.1%
  • 21 to 30 years 15.1%
  • Over 30 years 3.5%

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 205901105.