Recent domain gain
Closing the Gaps rose 5 points
78 to 83 2024-25 to 2025-26
- 83 is 8.5 points above the 74.5 average among 2,206 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
Traditional public school campus
Kenedy Elem
Karnes County · Region 03: Victoria · 364 students
Official school websiteSchool information and family resources
- Current score
- 82/1002025-26
- Change
- −14 ptssince 2021-22
- Score vs similar economic context
- +4.7 ptsvs 77.3 average · 2,389 rated schools serving a similar economic context
- Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
- 814 of 2,389tied with 112 others
- Score vs region
- +2.2 ptsvs 79.8 average · 129 rated schools in Region 03: Victoria
- Region 03: Victoria placement
- 64 of 129tied with 4 others
- Score vs county
- +2.7 ptsvs 79.3 average · 11 rated schools in Karnes County
- Karnes County placement
- 7 of 11among reporting schools
- Score vs similar-size group
- +1.7 ptsvs 80.3 average · 3,593 similarly sized rated schools
- Similar size placement
- 1,638 of 3,593tied with 143 others
- Score vs state
- +0.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
- Texas placement
- 3,846 of 7,646tied with 294 others
B82
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 88 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 77.3 average for 2,389 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 79.8 average for 129 rated schools in Region 03: Victoria.The current score is above the 79.3 average for 11 rated schools in Karnes County.The current score is above the 80.3 average for 3,593 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
- Meets
- 47%vs 40.7% avg · +6.3 pts
- Masters
- 19%vs 15.9% avg · +3.1 pts
Among 2,227 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measureSTAAR result
Math above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
- Meets
- 46%vs 38.1% avg · +7.9 pts
- Masters
- 17%vs 14.4% avg · +2.6 pts
Among 2,216 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measureRecent domain gain
Closing the Gaps rose 5 points
78 to 83 2024-25 to 2025-26
- 83 is 6 points above the 77 average among 116 schools in Region 03: Victoria reporting this measure.
Current strength
Overall score above the Region 03: Victoria average
82 +2.2 pts vs 79.8
- 82 is 2.2 points above the 79.8 average among 129 schools in Region 03: Victoria reporting this measure.
Current strength
Academic Growth above the Region 03: Victoria average
79 +3.9 pts vs 75.1
- 79 is 3.9 points above the 75.1 average among 114 schools in Region 03: Victoria reporting this measure.
Recent domain gain
Closing the Gaps rose 5 points
78 to 83 2024-25 to 2025-26
See the full measureTop placement
All Subjects — Masters
19% 3rd of 10 schools in Karnes County reporting this measure · 2025-26
See the full measureTop placement
Math — Masters
17% 3rd of 10 schools in Karnes County reporting this measure · 2025-26
See the full measureRecent domain gain
Closing the Gaps rose 5 points
78 to 83 2024-25 to 2025-26
- 83 is 5.2 points above the 77.8 average among 3,337 similarly sized schools reporting this measure.
STAAR result
Science above similar-size averages at Meets and Masters
- Meets
- 46%vs 42.9% avg · +3.1 pts
- Masters
- 25%vs 19.9% avg · +5.1 pts
Among 3,031 similarly sized schools reporting this measure.
See the full measureCurrent strength
Academic Growth above the similar-size average
79 +3.7 pts vs 75.3
- 79 is 3.7 points above the 75.3 average among 3,287 similarly sized schools reporting this measure.
Recent domain gain
Closing the Gaps rose 5 points
78 to 83 2024-25 to 2025-26
- 83 is 4.3 points above the 78.7 average among 7,185 Texas schools reporting this measure.
Current strength
Academic Growth above the Texas average
79 +3.3 pts vs 75.7
- 79 is 3.3 points above the 75.7 average among 7,090 Texas schools reporting this measure.
Current strength
Relative Performance above the Texas average
82 +3.6 pts vs 78.4
- 82 is 3.6 points above the 78.4 average among 7,237 Texas schools reporting this measure.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Kenedy Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 82 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 77.3 average for 2,389 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 14 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 814th of 2,389 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 112 others).
Kenedy Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 82 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 79.8 average for 129 rated schools in Region 03: Victoria. It is down 14 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 64th of 129 rated schools in Region 03: Victoria (tied with 4 others).
Kenedy Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 82 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 79.3 average for 11 rated schools in Karnes County. It is down 14 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 7th of 11 rated schools in Karnes County.
Kenedy Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 82 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.3 average for 3,593 similarly sized rated schools. It is down 14 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 1,638th of 3,593 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 143 others).
Kenedy Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 82 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is down 14 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 3,846th of 7,646 rated Texas schools (tied with 294 others).
Put the numbers in context
Compare with
Jump to a section
5 years of ratings
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 88 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
View the yearly scores and comparisons
| Year | Rating | Score | Selected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rate | StateTexas average |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | B | 82 | 77.3 2,389 reporting | 81.3 7,646 reporting |
| 2024-25 | B | 81 | 77.1 2,376 reporting | 81.2 7,554 reporting |
| 2023-24 | B | 80 | 73.9 2,359 reporting | 78.9 7,466 reporting |
| 2022-23 | D | 66 | 74.1 2,347 reporting | 79.1 7,377 reporting |
| 2021-22 | A | 96 | 81.6 2,317 reporting | 83.7 7,283 reporting |
Where the score comes from
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
- Kenedy Elem
- Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,389 in cohort)
| Domain | Score | Grade | Points to next grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| Student Achievement | 74 | C | 6 |
| School Progress | 82 | B | 8 |
| Closing the Gaps | 83 | B | 7 |
| Academic Growth | 79 | C | 1 |
| Relative Performance | 82 | B | 8 |
Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 7 points below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (82), so Student Achievement (74) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 82.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
- Approaches grade level
- Meets grade level
- Masters grade level
- Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,389 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
- Students
- 364
- Economically disadvantaged
- 86.5%−0.6 pts vs similar economic context
- English learners
- 6.3%−30.0 pts vs similar economic context
- Special education
- 23.1%+4.8 pts vs similar economic context
- Attendance
- 94.7%+1.6 pts vs similar economic context
- Chronically absent
- 11.1%−11.2 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Kenedy Elem
- African American 1.4%
- Hispanic 87.9%
- White 9.6%
- Asian 0.8%
- Two or More Races 0.3%
Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,389 reporting for every category shown · 2,389 in full cohort
- African American 14.2%
- Hispanic 73.8%
- White 8.3%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 1.4%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 1.9%
Selected comparison average For Region 03: Victoria · 129 reporting for every category shown · 129 in full cohort
- African American 6%
- Hispanic 57.6%
- White 33.3%
- American Indian 0.2%
- Asian 0.7%
- Two or More Races 2.1%
Selected comparison average For Karnes County · 11 reporting for every category shown · 11 in full cohort
- African American 1%
- Hispanic 73.2%
- White 24.3%
- American Indian 0.1%
- Asian 0.4%
- Two or More Races 1%
Selected comparison average For similarly sized schools · 3,593 reporting for every category shown · 3,593 in full cohort
- African American 11.3%
- Hispanic 54.5%
- White 27.6%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 2.8%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 3.3%
Statewide average 7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
- African American 11.5%
- Hispanic 52.6%
- White 27.8%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 4.2%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
- Students in this TEA accountability summary
- 363
- Economically disadvantaged students
- 314
- Emergent bilingual students
- 23
- Special education students
- 84
Campus mobility · 2024–25
- Mobile students
- 34
- Students in TEA mobility denominator
- 307
- TEA-published mobility rate
- 11.1%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 364 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 20 (5.2%) from 2024–25.
- Latest enrollment
- 364
2025–26
- Change from 2024–25
- −20
Decrease · −5.2%
- Change since 2021–22
- +21
Increase · +6.1%
Enrollment in 2025–26
- This school
- 364
- Selected comparison
- 603.8
| School year | Students enrolledKenedy Elem | Change from previous school year | Average enrollmentselected comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021–22 | 343 | First available year | 638.4 |
| 2022–23 | 356 | Increase of 13 (3.8%) | 636.1 |
| 2023–24 | 383 | Increase of 27 (7.6%) | 628.3 |
| 2024–25 | 384 | Increase of 1 (0.3%) | 624.8 |
| 2025–26 | 364 | Decrease of 20 (5.2%) | 603.8 |
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
- Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
- 32
7.8% of cumulative year-end enrollment
- Disciplinary actions
- 44
10.78 per 100 students
- Cumulative year-end enrollment
- 408
2024–25
Share of students · 2024–25
- This school
- 7.8%
- Selected comparison
- 13.3%
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
- This school
- 10.78
- Selected comparison
- 31.9
| School year | Cumulative enrollment | Studentsall discipline | Students% of enrollment | Actionsall discipline | Actionsper 100 students | Studentsselected comparison average % | Actionsselected comparison average per 100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020–21 | 379 | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
| 2021–22 | 381 | 27 | 7.1% | 53 | 13.91 | 12.7% | 30.3 |
| 2022–23 | 386 | 20 | 5.2% | 40 | 10.36 | 13.6% | 33.7 |
| 2023–24 | 419 | 33 | 7.9% | 60 | 14.32 | 13.7% | 33.9 |
| 2024–25 | 408 | 32 | 7.8% | 44 | 10.78 | 13.3% | 31.9 |
See 2024–25 discipline categories
| Category | Students | Students% of enrollment | Actions | Actionsper 100 students | Studentsselected comparison average % | Actionsselected comparison average per 100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All discipline | 32 | 7.8% | 44 | 10.78 | 13.3% | 31.9 |
| In-school suspensions | 32 | 7.8% | 43 | 10.54 | 11.7% | 22.9 |
| Out-of-school suspensions | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
| DAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory DAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary DAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
- Kenedy Elem
- Parent district: Kenedy ISD
- Texas average
- Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
- This school
- $9,758
- Selected comparison
- $13,329
For 2025, TEA reported $9,758 per student for this campus, $28,509 per student for its parent district, Kenedy ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
| Year | Kenedy Elem | Parent district: Kenedy ISD | Texas average | Selected comparison average | Reportingselected comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | $7,446 | $14,301 | $13,054 | $8,272 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,245 rated schools reporting |
| 2019 | $7,720 | $23,879 | $13,108 | $8,329 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,278 rated schools reporting |
| 2020 | $6,974 | $26,186 | $14,058 | $8,850 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,289 rated schools reporting |
| 2021 | $8,773 | $22,648 | $14,797 | $9,570 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,295 rated schools reporting |
| 2022 | $9,755 | $20,353 | $15,708 | $11,076 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,317 rated schools reporting |
| 2023 | $10,844 | $21,557 | $16,792 | $11,597 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,345 rated schools reporting |
| 2024 | $9,727 | $20,913 | $18,125 | $12,577 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,359 rated schools reporting |
| 2025 | $9,758 | $28,509 | $18,972 | $13,329 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,374 rated schools reporting |
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
- Average salary
- $69,080+$1,340 vs similar economic context
- Teachers
- 27−15.3 vs similar economic context
- Students per staff member
- 13.7−0.7 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Kenedy Elem
- Beginning 15.1%
- 1 to 5 years 7.5%
- 6 to 10 years 6.8%
- 11 to 20 years 48.7%
- 21 to 30 years 22.3%
Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,389 reporting for every category shown · 2,389 in full cohort
- Beginning 7.1%
- 1 to 5 years 27.3%
- 6 to 10 years 19%
- 11 to 20 years 27.2%
- 21 to 30 years 15.1%
- Over 30 years 3.5%
Selected comparison average For Region 03: Victoria · 129 reporting for every category shown · 129 in full cohort
- Beginning 7.1%
- 1 to 5 years 24.6%
- 6 to 10 years 15.4%
- 11 to 20 years 29.3%
- 21 to 30 years 17.1%
- Over 30 years 6.4%
Selected comparison average For Karnes County · 11 reporting for every category shown · 11 in full cohort
- Beginning 9.5%
- 1 to 5 years 28.9%
- 6 to 10 years 13.4%
- 11 to 20 years 27.5%
- 21 to 30 years 15.9%
- Over 30 years 4.8%
Selected comparison average For similarly sized schools · 3,593 reporting for every category shown · 3,593 in full cohort
- Beginning 6.1%
- 1 to 5 years 25.4%
- 6 to 10 years 18.9%
- 11 to 20 years 29%
- 21 to 30 years 16.6%
- Over 30 years 3.7%
Statewide average 7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
- Beginning 6.2%
- 1 to 5 years 25.6%
- 6 to 10 years 19.2%
- 11 to 20 years 28.7%
- 21 to 30 years 15.9%
- Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
| Grade or subject | Average students per classKenedy Elem · 2024–25 | Average students per classselected comparison |
|---|---|---|
| Kindergarten | 15.2 | 18.1 |
| Grade 1 | 19.7 | 18.4 |
| Grade 2 | 21.7 | 18.4 |
| Grade 3 | 18.3 | 18.8 |
| Grade 4 | 21.3 | 18.7 |
| Grade 5 | 22 | 19.7 |
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
Where this school ranks best
Out of 105 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#2–3 rankings
Second- and third-place results
6 measures
-
3of 11
Chronically absent (lowest is best)
Karnes County · of the 11 that report this measure
-
3of 10
All Subjects — Masters
Karnes County · of the 10 that report this measure
-
3of 10
Reading — Masters
Karnes County · of the 10 that report this measure
-
3of 10
Math — Meets
Karnes County · of the 10 that report this measure
-
3of 10
Math — Masters
Karnes County · of the 10 that report this measure
-
3of 10
Science — Masters
Karnes County · of the 10 that report this measure
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
15 measures
-
4of 10
Relative Performance
Karnes County · of the 10 that report this measure · tied with 2
-
4of 10
All Subjects — Meets
Karnes County · of the 10 that report this measure
-
4of 10
Science — Meets
Karnes County · of the 10 that report this measure
-
5of 11
Attendance
Karnes County · of the 11 that report this measure
-
5of 10
Closing the Gaps
Karnes County · of the 10 that report this measure
-
5of 10
All Subjects — Approaches
Karnes County · of the 10 that report this measure
-
5of 10
Reading — Meets
Karnes County · of the 10 that report this measure · tied with 1
-
6of 10
Student Achievement
Karnes County · of the 10 that report this measure
-
6of 10
Reading — Approaches
Karnes County · of the 10 that report this measure · tied with 1
-
6of 10
Math — Approaches
Karnes County · of the 10 that report this measure
-
6of 10
Science — Approaches
Karnes County · of the 10 that report this measure
-
7of 11
Overall score
Karnes County · of the 11 that report this measure
-
7of 10
School Progress
Karnes County · of the 10 that report this measure
-
7of 10
Academic Growth
Karnes County · of the 10 that report this measure
-
9of 11
Per-student spending
Karnes County · of the 11 that report this measure
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Download the full dataset · this campus's district
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 128902104.