Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Kaufman HS

Kaufman County · Region 10: Richardson · 1,187 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
95/1002025-26
Change
+1 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+16.0 ptsvs 79 average · 2,011 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
55 of 2,011tied with 18 others
A95

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 90 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 79 average for 2,011 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Recent domain gain

Academic Growth rose 5 points

80 to 85 2024-25 to 2025-26

  • 85 is 11.9 points above the 73.1 average among 1,824 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

STAAR result

Math above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
70%vs 40.4% avg · +29.6 pts
Masters
17%vs 15.3% avg · +1.7 pts

Among 1,876 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

STAAR result

Science above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
68%vs 42.8% avg · +25.2 pts
Masters
30%vs 18.6% avg · +11.4 pts

Among 1,733 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Kaufman HS is rated A by TEA, scoring 95 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 79 average for 2,011 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 1 point since 2021-22.

Ranks 55th of 2,011 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 18 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. After high school: the following fall
  6. Who this school serves
  7. Student counts behind the percentages
  8. Enrollment over time
  9. Discipline and removal from class
  10. Spending per student
  11. Teachers and actual class size
  12. Where this school ranks best
  13. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
908070 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageKaufman HS 9494949495 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 90 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26A9579.0 2,011 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25A9478.8 1,993 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24A9476.7 1,977 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23A9477.2 1,952 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22A9482.0 1,933 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement94 A+18.2 vs similar economic context · 1,886 reporting
  • School Progress95 A+14.9 vs similar economic context · 1,879 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps96 A+19.8 vs similar economic context · 1,868 reporting
  • Academic Growth85 B+11.9 vs similar economic context · 1,824 reporting
  • Relative Performance95 A+16.5 vs similar economic context · 1,879 reporting
  • Kaufman HS
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,011 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement94A—
School Progress95A—
Closing the Gaps96A—
Academic Growth85B5
Relative Performance95A—

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (95), so Student Achievement (94) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 95.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level87%+15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,886 reporting
  • Meets grade level64%+18 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,886 reporting
  • Masters grade level19%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,886 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level78%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,884 reporting
  • Meets grade level57%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,884 reporting
  • Masters grade level11%−9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,884 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level95%+26 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,876 reporting
  • Meets grade level70%+30 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,876 reporting
  • Masters grade level17%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,876 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level95%+24 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,733 reporting
  • Meets grade level68%+25 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,733 reporting
  • Masters grade level30%+11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,733 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level92%+20 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 876 reporting
  • Meets grade level70%+26 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 876 reporting
  • Masters grade level30%+11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 876 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,011 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Graduation

Four-Year
97.9%+4.2 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 422 rated schools reporting
Five-Year
100.0%+6.7 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 422 rated schools reporting
Six-Year
99.7%+7.5 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 420 rated schools reporting
Dropout Rate
0.0%−0.8 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 425 rated schools reporting

These measures use TEA's standard-accountability population. Each comparison average includes only schools in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported school rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.

College, career and military readiness

Total credit for CCMR criteria
99.0%+12.0 pts vs similar economic context
CCMR criteria
CriterionThis school% of graduatesAveragesimilar economic contextDifferencepercentage pointsReportingselected comparison
Total credit for CCMR criteria99.0%87.0%+12.0 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 457 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course95.2%59.3%+35.9 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 461 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA53.4%26.5%+26.9 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 461 rated schools reporting
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)16.8%11.3%+5.5 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 461 rated schools reporting
Earned college credit for a dual credit course36.3%33.8%+2.5 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 461 rated schools reporting
Earned an industry-based certification38.0%37.3%+0.7 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 461 rated schools reporting
Earned a level I or level II certificate0.0%2.2%−2.2 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 461 rated schools reporting
Earned an associate degree0.3%7.5%−7.2 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 461 rated schools reporting
Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit0.0%4.4%−4.4 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 461 rated schools reporting
Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness0.0%3.3%−3.3 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 461 rated schools reporting
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student5.8%8.3%−2.5 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 461 rated schools reporting
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces1.7%3.0%−1.3 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 461 rated schools reporting

Every row is a share of this school's graduates, and every row is a way of meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this school minus the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate, counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported school percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

After high school: the following fall

Where school graduates appeared in Texas public higher-education records the fall after graduation. This is a limited next-step measure, not an eventual college-going or completion rate.

Graduates in the report
283

Class of 2023–24

Enrolled in Texas public higher education
118

41.7% of graduates

Not found in Texas public higher-ed records
154

54.4% of graduates

Not trackable
11

Fall 2024

Graduates in the report

This school
283
Selected comparison
245.6

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 376 rated schools reporting

Enrolled in Texas public higher education

This school
118
Selected comparison
106

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 376 rated schools reporting

Texas-public enrollment rate

This school
41.7%
Selected comparison
43.5%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 376 rated schools reporting

−1.8 pts vs similar economic context

Not-found rate

This school
54.4%
Selected comparison
50.9%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 376 rated schools reporting

+3.5 pts vs similar economic context

Not-trackable rate

This school
3.9%
Selected comparison
5.6%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 376 rated schools reporting

−1.7 pts vs similar economic context

Most common named Texas public destinations

  1. TRINITY VALLEY COMM COLLEGE (003572)48
  2. TYLER JUNIOR COLLEGE (003648)12
  3. EAST TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY (003565)11

Selected comparison counts are neutral cohort scale context. The percentages put differently sized graduating classes on the same basis, but still cover only the limited Texas-public system observed by this report.

Source: Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board, high-school graduates enrolled in higher education, fetched 24 August 2026. The report covers graduates who enrolled in a Texas public college or university the following fall and includes only districts or campuses with more than 25 graduates.

“Not found” does not mean a graduate did not continue their education. It can include private or out-of-state college, work, military service, enrollment after the fall term, or another path the Texas public system does not observe.

“Not trackable” is not an outcome. THECB uses it for graduates with a non-standard identifier that could not be matched to higher-education records.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
1,187
Economically disadvantaged
70.8%±0.0 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
23.8%+2.8 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
12.2%−6.6 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
93.0%−0.9 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
22.9%+5.0 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Kaufman HS

African American: 4.3%Hispanic: 59.9%White: 32.8%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 0.3%Two or More Races: 2.5%
  • African American 4.3%
  • Hispanic 59.9%
  • White 32.8%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 0.3%
  • Two or More Races 2.5%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,011 reporting for every category shown · 2,011 in full cohort

African American: 12.5%Hispanic: 57.4%White: 24.2%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 2%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 3.4%
  • African American 12.5%
  • Hispanic 57.4%
  • White 24.2%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 2%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 3.4%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
1,187
Economically disadvantaged students
840
Emergent bilingual students
282
Special education students
145

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
222
Students in TEA mobility denominator
1,377
TEA-published mobility rate
16.1%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 1,187 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 107 (8.3%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
1,187

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
−107

Decrease · −8.3%

Change since 2021–22
−23

Decrease · −1.9%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
1,187
Selected comparison
634.7

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,975 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Kaufman HS
School yearStudents enrolledKaufman HSChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 1,210 First available year 646.3
2022–23 1,303 Increase of 93 (7.7%) 653
2023–24 1,321 Increase of 18 (1.4%) 651.3
2024–25 1,294 Decrease of 27 (2.0%) 649.9
2025–26 1,187 Decrease of 107 (8.3%) 634.7

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
291

22.2% of cumulative year-end enrollment

Disciplinary actions
825

62.98 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
1,310

2024–25

Share of students · 2024–25

This school
22.2%
Selected comparison
13.0%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,539 rated schools reporting

+9.2 pts vs similar economic context

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
62.98
Selected comparison
30.8

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,648 rated schools reporting

+32.2 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Kaufman HS
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 1,206 296 24.5% 998 82.75 9.5% 19
2021–22 1,280 315 24.6% 977 76.33 13.0% 30.5
2022–23 1,354 359 26.5% 1,318 97.34 13.5% 32.5
2023–24 1,374 370 26.9% 1,313 95.56 13.3% 32.3
2024–25 1,310 291 22.2% 825 62.98 13.0% 30.8
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Kaufman HS in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline 291 22.2% 825 62.98 13.0% 30.8
In-school suspensions 225 17.2% 549 41.91 11.6% 23.3
Out-of-school suspensions 124 9.5% 170 12.98 7.4% 11.1
DAEP placements 92 7.0% 106 8.09 5.2% 6.3
Mandatory DAEP placements 65 5.0% 71 5.42 3.7% 4.2
Discretionary DAEP placements 32 2.4% 35 2.67 3.0% 3.6
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$6k$13k$20k20182020202220242025
  • Kaufman HS
  • Parent district: Kaufman ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$9,683
Selected comparison
$13,190

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,992 rated schools reporting

−$3,507 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $9,683 per student for this campus, $15,525 per student for its parent district, Kaufman ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearKaufman HSParent district: Kaufman ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$8,418$13,033$13,054$8,039 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,855 rated schools reporting
2019$7,325$10,781$13,108$8,202 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,874 rated schools reporting
2020$8,132$11,518$14,058$8,742 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,896 rated schools reporting
2021$7,916$11,996$14,797$9,250 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,910 rated schools reporting
2022$8,832$13,095$15,708$10,511 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,934 rated schools reporting
2023$8,103$13,715$16,792$11,220 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,954 rated schools reporting
2024$8,724$14,263$18,125$12,420 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,976 rated schools reporting
2025$9,683$15,525$18,972$13,190 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,992 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$70,682+$4,234 vs similar economic context
Teachers
88+44.8 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
13.5−0.5 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Kaufman HS

Beginning: 4.7%1 to 5 years: 24%6 to 10 years: 14.6%11 to 20 years: 21.3%21 to 30 years: 28.1%Over 30 years: 7.2%
  • Beginning 4.7%
  • 1 to 5 years 24%
  • 6 to 10 years 14.6%
  • 11 to 20 years 21.3%
  • 21 to 30 years 28.1%
  • Over 30 years 7.2%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,011 reporting for every category shown · 2,011 in full cohort

Beginning: 6.6%1 to 5 years: 27.1%6 to 10 years: 18.9%11 to 20 years: 27.4%21 to 30 years: 15.4%Over 30 years: 3.9%
  • Beginning 6.6%
  • 1 to 5 years 27.1%
  • 6 to 10 years 18.9%
  • 11 to 20 years 27.4%
  • 21 to 30 years 15.4%
  • Over 30 years 3.9%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Kaufman HS in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classKaufman HS · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Secondary English13.915.2
Secondary languages other than English19.417.9
Secondary math20.616.1
Secondary science20.517.5
Secondary social studies23.617.4

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 5 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this school ranks best

Out of 196 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

#1 rankings

First-place results

5 measures

  • 1of 57

    School Progress

    Kaufman County · of the 57 that report this measure

  • 1of 57

    Relative Performance

    Kaufman County · of the 57 that report this measure

  • 1of 57

    Math — Approaches

    Kaufman County · of the 57 that report this measure

  • 1of 56

    Closing the Gaps

    Kaufman County · of the 56 that report this measure

  • 1of 13

    Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA

    Kaufman County · of the 13 that report this measure

#2–3 rankings

Second- and third-place results

12 measures

  • 2of 62

    Overall score

    Kaufman County · of the 62 that report this measure

  • 2of 13

    College, career or military ready

    Kaufman County · of the 13 that report this measure · tied with 2

  • 2of 13

    Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course

    Kaufman County · of the 13 that report this measure

  • 2of 13

    Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)

    Kaufman County · of the 13 that report this measure

  • 2of 13

    Earned college credit for a dual credit course

    Kaufman County · of the 13 that report this measure

  • 3of 59

    Student Achievement

    Kaufman County · of the 59 that report this measure

  • 3of 59

    All Subjects — Approaches

    Kaufman County · of the 59 that report this measure · tied with 2

  • 3of 57

    Math — Meets

    Kaufman County · of the 57 that report this measure

  • 3of 41

    Science — Approaches

    Kaufman County · of the 41 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 3of 41

    Science — Meets

    Kaufman County · of the 41 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 3of 24

    Social Studies — Meets

    Kaufman County · of the 24 that report this measure

  • 3of 13

    Earned an industry-based certification

    Kaufman County · of the 13 that report this measure

#4–10 rankings

Fourth- through tenth-place results

7 measures

  • 4of 59

    All Subjects — Meets

    Kaufman County · of the 59 that report this measure

  • 4of 41

    Science — Masters

    Kaufman County · of the 41 that report this measure

  • 4of 24

    Social Studies — Masters

    Kaufman County · of the 24 that report this measure

  • 6of 24

    Social Studies — Approaches

    Kaufman County · of the 24 that report this measure · tied with 2

  • 6of 13

    Earned an associate degree

    Kaufman County · of the 13 that report this measure

  • 7of 54

    Academic Growth

    Kaufman County · of the 54 that report this measure · tied with 2

  • 10of 13

    Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student

    Kaufman County · of the 13 that report this measure

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 129903001.