Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Junction HS

Kimble County · Region 15: San Angelo · 162 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
79/1002025-26
Change
−1 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
−1.5 ptsvs 80.5 average · 1,970 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
1,135 of 1,970tied with 72 others
C79

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 86 in 2021-22. The current score is below the 80.5 average for 1,970 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Junction HS is rated C by TEA, scoring 79 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 80.5 average for 1,970 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 1 point since 2021-22.

Ranks 1,135th of 1,970 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 72 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Enrollment over time
  8. Discipline and removal from class
  9. Spending per student
  10. Teachers and actual class size
  11. Where this school ranks best
  12. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
90807060 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageJunction HS 8076768079 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 86 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26C7980.5 1,970 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25B8080.3 1,945 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24C7678.2 1,925 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23C7678.7 1,894 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22B8082.3 1,869 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement80 B+1.3 vs similar economic context · 1,883 reporting
  • School Progress80 B−1.2 vs similar economic context · 1,876 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps76 C−1.7 vs similar economic context · 1,858 reporting
  • Academic Growth65 D−9.2 vs similar economic context · 1,820 reporting
  • Relative Performance80 B+0.5 vs similar economic context · 1,876 reporting
  • Junction HS
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,970 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement80B10
School Progress80B10
Closing the Gaps76C4
Academic Growth65D5
Relative Performance80B10

Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 4 points below B in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level81%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,883 reporting
  • Meets grade level54%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,883 reporting
  • Masters grade level17%−3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,883 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level72%−5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,880 reporting
  • Meets grade level50%−4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,880 reporting
  • Masters grade level4%−18 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,880 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level75%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,872 reporting
  • Meets grade level23%−20 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,872 reporting
  • Masters grade level5%−12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,872 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level92%+17 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,724 reporting
  • Meets grade level70%+23 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,724 reporting
  • Masters grade level22%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,724 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level93%+18 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 953 reporting
  • Meets grade level78%+31 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 953 reporting
  • Masters grade level49%+28 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 953 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,970 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Graduation

Four-Year
100.0%+5.8 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 483 rated schools reporting
Five-Year
100.0%+6.4 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 479 rated schools reporting
Six-Year
100.0%+7.0 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 480 rated schools reporting
Dropout Rate
0.0%−0.5 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 486 rated schools reporting

These measures use TEA's standard-accountability population. Each comparison average includes only schools in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported school rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.

College, career and military readiness

Total credit for CCMR criteria
69.0%−19.0 pts vs similar economic context
CCMR criteria
CriterionThis school% of graduatesAveragesimilar economic contextDifferencepercentage pointsReportingselected comparison
Total credit for CCMR criteria69.0%88.0%−19.0 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 519 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course46.7%60.3%−13.6 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 523 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA24.4%28.1%−3.7 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 523 rated schools reporting
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)17.8%10.6%+7.2 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 523 rated schools reporting
Earned college credit for a dual credit course31.1%33.4%−2.3 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 523 rated schools reporting
Earned an industry-based certification24.4%37.7%−13.3 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 523 rated schools reporting
Earned a level I or level II certificate0.0%1.6%−1.6 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 523 rated schools reporting
Earned an associate degree0.0%6.5%−6.5 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 523 rated schools reporting
Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit0.0%3.6%−3.6 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 523 rated schools reporting
Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness0.0%3.2%−3.2 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 523 rated schools reporting
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student6.7%7.9%−1.2 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 523 rated schools reporting
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces2.2%3.4%−1.2 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 523 rated schools reporting

Every row is a share of this school's graduates, and every row is a way of meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this school minus the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate, counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported school percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
162
Economically disadvantaged
61.7%−0.4 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
2.5%−14.1 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
16.7%−2.1 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
92.5%−1.7 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
24.7%+8.5 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Junction HS

Hispanic: 36.4%White: 61.1%Two or More Races: 2.5%
  • Hispanic 36.4%
  • White 61.1%
  • Two or More Races 2.5%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,970 reporting for every category shown · 1,970 in full cohort

African American: 10.7%Hispanic: 49.3%White: 33.5%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 2.3%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 3.8%
  • African American 10.7%
  • Hispanic 49.3%
  • White 33.5%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 2.3%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 3.8%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
162
Economically disadvantaged students
100
Emergent bilingual students
4
Special education students
27

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
12
Students in TEA mobility denominator
183
TEA-published mobility rate
6.6%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 162 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 15 (8.5%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
162

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
−15

Decrease · −8.5%

Change since 2021–22
−23

Decrease · −12.4%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
162
Selected comparison
627.1

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,934 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Junction HS
School yearStudents enrolledJunction HSChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 185 First available year 639.8
2022–23 190 Increase of 5 (2.7%) 644.1
2023–24 174 Decrease of 16 (8.4%) 641.4
2024–25 177 Increase of 3 (1.7%) 638
2025–26 162 Decrease of 15 (8.5%) 627.1

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
16

8.7% of cumulative year-end enrollment

Disciplinary actions
28

15.30 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
183

2024–25

Share of students · 2024–25

This school
8.7%
Selected comparison
12.8%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,503 rated schools reporting

−4.1 pts vs similar economic context

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
15.3
Selected comparison
29.3

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,627 rated schools reporting

−14.0 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Junction HS
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 170 26 15.3% 38 22.35 9.7% 19.2
2021–22 195 29 14.9% 48 24.62 12.7% 29.2
2022–23 196 24 12.2% 38 19.39 13.2% 31.2
2023–24 177 19 10.7% 38 21.47 13.0% 31
2024–25 183 16 8.7% 28 15.30 12.8% 29.3
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Junction HS in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline 16 8.7% 28 15.30 12.8% 29.3
In-school suspensions 13 7.1% 22 12.02 11.5% 22.6
Out-of-school suspensions Not reported — Not reported — — —
DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$7k$13k$20k20182020202220242025
  • Junction HS
  • Parent district: Junction ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$14,223
Selected comparison
$12,510

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,941 rated schools reporting

+$1,713 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $14,223 per student for this campus, $16,752 per student for its parent district, Junction ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearJunction HSParent district: Junction ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$9,220$10,439$13,054$7,928 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,798 rated schools reporting
2019$10,187$12,271$13,108$8,074 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,814 rated schools reporting
2020$11,139$12,157$14,058$8,680 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,836 rated schools reporting
2021$11,606$13,648$14,797$9,106 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,850 rated schools reporting
2022$10,984$13,727$15,708$10,460 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,870 rated schools reporting
2023$10,849$14,748$16,792$11,134 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,894 rated schools reporting
2024$12,381$15,677$18,125$11,962 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,921 rated schools reporting
2025$14,223$16,752$18,972$12,510 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,941 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$65,402−$977 vs similar economic context
Teachers
21−21.8 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
7.9−11.2 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Junction HS

1 to 5 years: 35.6%6 to 10 years: 7.8%11 to 20 years: 28.3%21 to 30 years: 25.9%Over 30 years: 2.4%
  • 1 to 5 years 35.6%
  • 6 to 10 years 7.8%
  • 11 to 20 years 28.3%
  • 21 to 30 years 25.9%
  • Over 30 years 2.4%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,970 reporting for every category shown · 1,970 in full cohort

Beginning: 6.1%1 to 5 years: 25.7%6 to 10 years: 19.1%11 to 20 years: 28.3%21 to 30 years: 16%Over 30 years: 4.2%
  • Beginning 6.1%
  • 1 to 5 years 25.7%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.1%
  • 11 to 20 years 28.3%
  • 21 to 30 years 16%
  • Over 30 years 4.2%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Junction HS in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classJunction HS · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Grade 61.217.7
Secondary English14.314.9
Secondary languages other than English18.817.4
Secondary math14.815.8
Secondary science16.317.3
Secondary social studies14.517.2

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this school ranks best

Out of 160 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

#4–10 rankings

Fourth- through tenth-place results

3 measures

  • 4of 47

    Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)

    Region 15: San Angelo · of the 47 that report this measure

  • 5of 69

    Social Studies — Masters

    Region 15: San Angelo · of the 69 that report this measure

  • 7of 69

    Social Studies — Meets

    Region 15: San Angelo · of the 69 that report this measure · tied with 1

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 134901001.