+4.9 ptsvs 87.1 average · 1,058 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
211 of 1,058tied with 111 others
Score vs region
+8.7 ptsvs 83.3 average · 1,303 rated schools in Region 04: Houston
Region 04: Houston placement
185 of 1,303tied with 67 others
Score vs county
+8.0 ptsvs 84 average · 140 rated schools in Fort Bend County
Fort Bend County placement
22 of 140tied with 11 others
Score vs similar-size group
+10.1 ptsvs 81.9 average · 2,447 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
268 of 2,447tied with 121 others
Score vs state
+10.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
838 of 7,646tied with 318 others
A92
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 96 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 87.1 average for 1,058 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 83.3 average for 1,303 rated schools in Region 04: Houston.The current score is above the 84 average for 140 rated schools in Fort Bend County.The current score is above the 81.9 average for 2,447 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
71%vs 63.8% avg · +7.2 pts
Masters
43%vs 31.7% avg · +11.3 pts
Among 1,036 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Judge James C Adolphus Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 92 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 87.1 average for 1,058 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 4 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 211th of 1,058 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 111 others).
Judge James C Adolphus Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 92 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 83.3 average for 1,303 rated schools in Region 04: Houston. It is down 4 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 185th of 1,303 rated schools in Region 04: Houston (tied with 67 others).
Judge James C Adolphus Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 92 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 84 average for 140 rated schools in Fort Bend County. It is down 4 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 22nd of 140 rated schools in Fort Bend County (tied with 11 others).
Judge James C Adolphus Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 92 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.9 average for 2,447 similarly sized rated schools. It is down 4 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 268th of 2,447 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 121 others).
Judge James C Adolphus Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 92 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is down 4 points since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 96 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement92 A+4.2 vs similar economic context · 1,036 reporting
School Progress88 B+3.9 vs similar economic context · 1,034 reporting
Closing the Gaps92 A+7.5 vs similar economic context · 1,026 reporting
Academic Growth88 B+7.9 vs similar economic context · 1,016 reporting
Relative Performance85 B+5.1 vs similar economic context · 1,034 reporting
Judge James C Adolphus Elem
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,058 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
92
A
—
School Progress
88
B
2
Closing the Gaps
92
A
—
Academic Growth
88
B
2
Relative Performance
85
B
5
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (92), so
School Progress (88) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 92.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level88%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,036 reporting
Meets grade level71%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,036 reporting
Masters grade level43%+11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,036 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level92%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,035 reporting
Meets grade level77%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,035 reporting
Masters grade level48%+15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,035 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level88%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,033 reporting
Meets grade level72%+14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,033 reporting
Masters grade level42%+15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,033 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level80%−5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 945 reporting
Meets grade level52%−11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 945 reporting
Masters grade level32%−3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 945 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,058 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
1,036
Economically disadvantaged
31.0%−0.9 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
24.2%+13.9 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
13.6%−3.7 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
96.3%+1.1 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
6.4%−4.4 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Judge James C Adolphus Elem
African American 23.7%
Hispanic 21.4%
White 30.6%
American Indian 0.1%
Asian 19.9%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 4.3%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,058 reporting for every category shown · 1,058 in full cohort
African American 9.1%
Hispanic 30.2%
White 48%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 7.4%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 4.8%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 04: Houston · 1,303 reporting for every category shown · 1,303 in full cohort
African American 19.1%
Hispanic 53.8%
White 16.9%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 6.7%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.1%
Selected comparison averageFor Fort Bend County · 140 reporting for every category shown · 140 in full cohort
African American 26.7%
Hispanic 34.3%
White 15.3%
American Indian 0.5%
Asian 19%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.9%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 2,447 reporting for every category shown · 2,447 in full cohort
African American 12.6%
Hispanic 51.7%
White 24.6%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 6.9%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 3.7%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
1,031
Economically disadvantaged students
320
Emergent bilingual students
249
Special education students
140
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
102
Students in TEA mobility denominator
863
TEA-published mobility rate
11.8%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 1,036 students in 2025–26, an increase of 11 (1.1%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
1,036
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
+11
Increase · +1.1%
Change since 2021–22
+131
Increase · +14.5%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
1,036
Selected comparison
792.2
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,046 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Judge James C Adolphus Elem
School year
Students enrolledJudge James C Adolphus Elem
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
905
First available year
803.9
2022–23
971
Increase of 66 (7.3%)
806.6
2023–24
996
Increase of 25 (2.6%)
804.1
2024–25
1,025
Increase of 29 (2.9%)
800.7
2025–26
1,036
Increase of 11 (1.1%)
792.2
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
25
2.3% of cumulative year-end enrollment
Disciplinary actions
40
3.70 per 100 students
Cumulative year-end enrollment
1,080
2024–25
Share of students · 2024–25
This school
2.3%
Selected comparison
9.1%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 796 rated schools reporting
−6.8 pts vs similar economic context
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
This school
3.7
Selected comparison
18.5
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 883 rated schools reporting
−14.8 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Judge James C Adolphus Elem
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
948
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2021–22
975
27
2.8%
35
3.59
9.5%
19.3
2022–23
1,029
16
1.6%
20
1.94
9.7%
20
2023–24
1,087
24
2.2%
32
2.94
9.4%
19.9
2024–25
1,080
25
2.3%
40
3.70
9.1%
18.5
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Judge James C Adolphus Elem in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
25
2.3%
40
3.70
9.1%
18.5
In-school suspensions
20
1.9%
28
2.59
8.2%
14.5
Out-of-school suspensions
Suppressed
—
10
0.93
—
6
DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Judge James C Adolphus Elem
Parent district: Lamar CISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$9,125
Selected comparison
$11,697
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,038 rated schools reporting
−$2,572 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $9,125 per student for this campus, $24,943 per student for its parent district, Lamar CISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Judge James C Adolphus Elem
Parent district: Lamar CISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$7,034
$13,594
$13,054
$7,630
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 934 rated schools reporting
2019
$8,497
$14,455
$13,108
$7,766
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 949 rated schools reporting
2020
$8,226
$18,941
$14,058
$8,103
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 959 rated schools reporting
2021
$8,369
$16,144
$14,797
$8,517
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 970 rated schools reporting
2022
$8,700
$15,842
$15,708
$9,740
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 990 rated schools reporting
2023
$8,760
$19,614
$16,792
$10,273
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,007 rated schools reporting
2024
$9,067
$26,311
$18,125
$11,436
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,020 rated schools reporting
2025
$9,125
$24,943
$18,972
$11,697
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,038 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$77,123+$8,935 vs similar economic context
Teachers
59+7.5 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
17.4+2.9 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Judge James C Adolphus Elem
Beginning 1.7%
1 to 5 years 17.1%
6 to 10 years 18.6%
11 to 20 years 42.3%
21 to 30 years 13.5%
Over 30 years 6.8%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,058 reporting for every category shown · 1,058 in full cohort
Beginning 4.8%
1 to 5 years 22.6%
6 to 10 years 19.7%
11 to 20 years 32.2%
21 to 30 years 17.3%
Over 30 years 3.2%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 04: Houston · 1,303 reporting for every category shown · 1,303 in full cohort
Beginning 7.7%
1 to 5 years 27.3%
6 to 10 years 20.6%
11 to 20 years 27.2%
21 to 30 years 13.5%
Over 30 years 2.6%
Selected comparison averageFor Fort Bend County · 140 reporting for every category shown · 140 in full cohort
Beginning 5.7%
1 to 5 years 23.9%
6 to 10 years 21.9%
11 to 20 years 30.1%
21 to 30 years 15.4%
Over 30 years 2.9%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 2,447 reporting for every category shown · 2,447 in full cohort
Beginning 6.3%
1 to 5 years 27%
6 to 10 years 20.5%
11 to 20 years 28.8%
21 to 30 years 14.5%
Over 30 years 2.7%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Judge James C Adolphus Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classJudge James C Adolphus Elem · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten
17.3
18.5
Grade 1
20
19.1
Grade 2
21.1
19.6
Grade 3
20.5
20.4
Grade 4
20.9
19.9
Grade 5
24.4
21.4
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 079901127.