Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Johnie R Daniel Elem

Denton County · Region 11: Fort Worth · 706 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
88/1002025-26
Change
−1 ptssince 2023-24
Score vs similar economic context
−3.6 ptsvs 91.6 average · 476 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
401 of 476tied with 20 others
B88

At a glance

The available rating history is moving down. The current score is below the 91.6 average for 476 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

No academic result met this site’s published threshold for a selected positive signal against Similar economic-disadvantage rate.

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Johnie R Daniel Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 88 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 91.6 average for 476 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 1 point since 2023-24.

Ranks 401st of 476 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 20 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 3 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Enrollment over time
  8. Discipline and removal from class
  9. Spending per student
  10. Teachers and actual class size
  11. Where this comes from

3 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
908070 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageJohnie R Daniel Elem 899088 2023-242024-252025-26

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26B8891.6 476 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25A9092.0 467 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24B8991.1 455 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement91 A−1.7 vs similar economic context · 468 reporting
  • School Progress76 C−11.9 vs similar economic context · 466 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps81 B−8.2 vs similar economic context · 463 reporting
  • Academic Growth76 C−10.4 vs similar economic context · 463 reporting
  • Relative Performance59 F−19.4 vs similar economic context · 466 reporting
  • Johnie R Daniel Elem
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (476 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement91A—
School Progress76C4
Closing the Gaps81B9
Academic Growth76C4
Relative Performance59F1

Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 9 points below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (91), so School Progress (76) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 91.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level85%−6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 468 reporting
  • Meets grade level65%−11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 468 reporting
  • Masters grade level35%−12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 468 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level91%−2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 468 reporting
  • Meets grade level74%−7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 468 reporting
  • Masters grade level45%−5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 468 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level81%−9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 466 reporting
  • Meets grade level61%−12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 466 reporting
  • Masters grade level30%−12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 466 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level80%−10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 433 reporting
  • Meets grade level48%−22 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 433 reporting
  • Masters grade level20%−24 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 433 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (476 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
706
Economically disadvantaged
7.3%−2.6 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
24.4%+13.6 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
19.4%+4.1 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
95.6%−0.3 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
6.1%−0.3 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Johnie R Daniel Elem

African American: 7.5%Hispanic: 18.9%White: 41.9%American Indian: 0.9%Asian: 24.8%Two or More Races: 6%
  • African American 7.5%
  • Hispanic 18.9%
  • White 41.9%
  • American Indian 0.9%
  • Asian 24.8%
  • Two or More Races 6%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 476 reporting for every category shown · 476 in full cohort

African American: 5%Hispanic: 17.6%White: 48.5%American Indian: 0.5%Asian: 22.7%Pacific Islander: 0.1%Two or More Races: 5.7%
  • African American 5%
  • Hispanic 17.6%
  • White 48.5%
  • American Indian 0.5%
  • Asian 22.7%
  • Pacific Islander 0.1%
  • Two or More Races 5.7%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
702
Economically disadvantaged students
51
Emergent bilingual students
171
Special education students
136

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
44
Students in TEA mobility denominator
440
TEA-published mobility rate
10%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 706 students in 2025–26, an increase of 113 (19.1%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
706

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
+113

Increase · +19.1%

Change since 2023–24
+285

Increase · +67.7%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
706
Selected comparison
872.9

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 471 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Johnie R Daniel Elem
School yearStudents enrolledJohnie R Daniel ElemChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2023–24 421 First available year 891.9
2024–25 593 Increase of 172 (40.9%) 884.3
2025–26 706 Increase of 113 (19.1%) 872.9

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Suppressed

Rate not available

Disciplinary actions
Suppressed

Rate not available

Cumulative year-end enrollment
638

2024–25

TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Johnie R Daniel Elem
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2023–24 475 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
2024–25 638 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Johnie R Daniel Elem in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
In-school suspensions Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Out-of-school suspensions Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$8k$20k$32k20242025
  • Johnie R Daniel Elem
  • Parent district: Northwest ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$8,919
Selected comparison
$10,750

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 466 rated schools reporting

−$1,831 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $8,919 per student for this campus, $30,943 per student for its parent district, Northwest ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearJohnie R Daniel ElemParent district: Northwest ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2024$22,616$25,273$18,125$10,104 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 455 rated schools reporting
2025$8,919$30,943$18,972$10,750 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 466 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$68,249−$1,223 vs similar economic context
Teachers
45−11.3 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
15.6+0.8 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Johnie R Daniel Elem

Beginning: 6.7%1 to 5 years: 24.3%6 to 10 years: 20%11 to 20 years: 35.6%21 to 30 years: 13.4%
  • Beginning 6.7%
  • 1 to 5 years 24.3%
  • 6 to 10 years 20%
  • 11 to 20 years 35.6%
  • 21 to 30 years 13.4%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 476 reporting for every category shown · 476 in full cohort

Beginning: 4.2%1 to 5 years: 23.8%6 to 10 years: 20.1%11 to 20 years: 31.7%21 to 30 years: 16.9%Over 30 years: 2.5%
  • Beginning 4.2%
  • 1 to 5 years 23.8%
  • 6 to 10 years 20.1%
  • 11 to 20 years 31.7%
  • 21 to 30 years 16.9%
  • Over 30 years 2.5%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Johnie R Daniel Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classJohnie R Daniel Elem · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten21.419
Grade 120.719.2
Grade 218.419.7
Grade 319.121.6
Grade 419.820.4
Grade 522.822.4

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 061911125.