Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

John M Tidwell MS

Denton County · Region 11: Fort Worth · 1,064 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
91/1002025-26
Change
±0 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+2.0 ptsvs 89 average · 847 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
331 of 847tied with 84 others
A91

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is flat; under the rules in force back then it scored 89 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 89 average for 847 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Recent movement

Overall score rose 6 points

85 to 91 2024-25 to 2025-26

  • 91 is 2 points above the 89 average among 847 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Recent domain gain

Closing the Gaps rose 16 points

74 to 90 2024-25 to 2025-26

  • 90 is 3.5 points above the 86.5 average among 827 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

STAAR result

Reading above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
74%vs 72.6% avg · +1.4 pts
Masters
46%vs 38.5% avg · +7.5 pts

Among 833 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

John M Tidwell MS is rated A by TEA, scoring 91 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 89 average for 847 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is unchanged since 2021-22.

Ranks 331st of 847 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 84 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Enrollment over time
  8. Discipline and removal from class
  9. Spending per student
  10. Teachers and actual class size
  11. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
908070 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageJohn M Tidwell MS 9187908591 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 89 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26A9189.0 847 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25B8588.9 840 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24A9087.6 826 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23B8788.0 810 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22A9189.1 795 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement91 A+1.2 vs similar economic context · 833 reporting
  • School Progress87 B+1.7 vs similar economic context · 831 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps90 A+3.5 vs similar economic context · 827 reporting
  • Academic Growth87 B+4.6 vs similar economic context · 820 reporting
  • Relative Performance81 B+1.1 vs similar economic context · 831 reporting
  • John M Tidwell MS
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (847 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement91A—
School Progress87B3
Closing the Gaps90A—
Academic Growth87B3
Relative Performance81B9

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (91), so School Progress (87) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 91.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level86%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 833 reporting
  • Meets grade level68%−0 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 833 reporting
  • Masters grade level37%+0 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 833 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level89%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 833 reporting
  • Meets grade level74%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 833 reporting
  • Masters grade level46%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 833 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level85%−0 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 831 reporting
  • Meets grade level66%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 831 reporting
  • Masters grade level32%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 831 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level86%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 764 reporting
  • Meets grade level70%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 764 reporting
  • Masters grade level36%−3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 764 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level79%−7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 401 reporting
  • Meets grade level53%−12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 401 reporting
  • Masters grade level30%−8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 401 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (847 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
1,064
Economically disadvantaged
23.5%−0.9 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
4.3%−5.6 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
18.1%+1.2 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
95.4%−0.1 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
10.0%+0.7 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

John M Tidwell MS

African American: 13.5%Hispanic: 21.7%White: 52.1%American Indian: 0.7%Asian: 8.3%Pacific Islander: 0.5%Two or More Races: 3.3%
  • African American 13.5%
  • Hispanic 21.7%
  • White 52.1%
  • American Indian 0.7%
  • Asian 8.3%
  • Pacific Islander 0.5%
  • Two or More Races 3.3%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 847 reporting for every category shown · 847 in full cohort

African American: 8.2%Hispanic: 26.5%White: 48.7%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 11%Pacific Islander: 0.1%Two or More Races: 5.2%
  • African American 8.2%
  • Hispanic 26.5%
  • White 48.7%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 11%
  • Pacific Islander 0.1%
  • Two or More Races 5.2%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
1,064
Economically disadvantaged students
250
Emergent bilingual students
46
Special education students
193

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
100
Students in TEA mobility denominator
1,118
TEA-published mobility rate
8.9%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 1,064 students in 2025–26, an increase of 2 (0.2%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
1,064

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
+2

Increase · +0.2%

Change since 2021–22
−6

Decrease · −0.6%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
1,064
Selected comparison
859.5

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 842 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for John M Tidwell MS
School yearStudents enrolledJohn M Tidwell MSChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 1,070 First available year 871.5
2022–23 1,039 Decrease of 31 (2.9%) 877.1
2023–24 1,051 Increase of 12 (1.2%) 873.4
2024–25 1,062 Increase of 11 (1.0%) 868.2
2025–26 1,064 Increase of 2 (0.2%) 859.5

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
156

14.1% of cumulative year-end enrollment

Disciplinary actions
342

30.84 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
1,109

2024–25

Share of students · 2024–25

This school
14.1%
Selected comparison
7.6%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 611 rated schools reporting

+6.5 pts vs similar economic context

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
30.84
Selected comparison
14.9

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 694 rated schools reporting

+15.9 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for John M Tidwell MS
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 1,092 89 8.2% 162 14.84 5.8% 10
2021–22 1,121 138 12.3% 348 31.04 7.9% 15.8
2022–23 1,088 169 15.5% 425 39.06 8.2% 16.4
2023–24 1,104 161 14.6% 401 36.32 7.8% 15.7
2024–25 1,109 156 14.1% 342 30.84 7.6% 14.9
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for John M Tidwell MS in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline 156 14.1% 342 30.84 7.6% 14.9
In-school suspensions 120 10.8% 214 19.30 6.9% 11.9
Out-of-school suspensions 78 7.0% 113 10.19 3.6% 4.9
DAEP placements 14 1.3% 15 1.35 2.6% 3
Mandatory DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$6k$19k$32k20182020202220242025
  • John M Tidwell MS
  • Parent district: Northwest ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$10,254
Selected comparison
$11,250

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 839 rated schools reporting

−$996 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $10,254 per student for this campus, $30,943 per student for its parent district, Northwest ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearJohn M Tidwell MSParent district: Northwest ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$6,115$16,804$13,054$7,550 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 747 rated schools reporting
2019$7,068$16,136$13,108$7,605 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 761 rated schools reporting
2020$6,754$18,022$14,058$7,936 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 772 rated schools reporting
2021$6,955$16,443$14,797$8,499 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 778 rated schools reporting
2022$6,527$16,810$15,708$9,550 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 794 rated schools reporting
2023$7,312$25,982$16,792$10,103 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 811 rated schools reporting
2024$8,907$25,273$18,125$11,122 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 826 rated schools reporting
2025$10,254$30,943$18,972$11,250 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 839 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$70,122+$1,497 vs similar economic context
Teachers
58+3.1 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
18.3+3.5 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

John M Tidwell MS

1 to 5 years: 26.2%6 to 10 years: 28.7%11 to 20 years: 24.1%21 to 30 years: 21%
  • 1 to 5 years 26.2%
  • 6 to 10 years 28.7%
  • 11 to 20 years 24.1%
  • 21 to 30 years 21%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 847 reporting for every category shown · 847 in full cohort

Beginning: 4.8%1 to 5 years: 22.6%6 to 10 years: 19.8%11 to 20 years: 32.5%21 to 30 years: 17.1%Over 30 years: 3.1%
  • Beginning 4.8%
  • 1 to 5 years 22.6%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.8%
  • 11 to 20 years 32.5%
  • 21 to 30 years 17.1%
  • Over 30 years 3.1%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for John M Tidwell MS in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classJohn M Tidwell MS · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Grade 62019.2
Secondary English17.417.5
Secondary languages other than English25.319.7
Secondary math23.118.1
Secondary science23.619.8
Secondary social studies24.419.9

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 061911045.