txschools.net

Unofficial · not affiliated with the Texas Education Agency · what this is

Campus · Traditional

Jim Barnes MS

Guadalupe County · Region 20: San Antonio · 769 students

Learn more & enroll

D66

Jim Barnes MS is rated D by TEA, scoring 66 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 79.6 average of the 2,026 schools serving a similar share of economically disadvantaged students, and below the statewide average of 81.3. It is unchanged since 2021-22 — both years scored under TEA's current rules, since TEA rewrote them in 2023; under the rules in force back then it scored 66.

Ranks 7,013th of 7,646 Texas schools (tied with 80 others), and 575th of 650 in Region 20: San Antonio (tied with 7 others).

1 consecutive year rated unacceptable.

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. How this school's change over time is ranked
  4. Where the score comes from
  5. Student outcomes
  6. Who this school serves
  7. Spending per student
  8. Teachers
  9. Where this school ranks best
  10. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Compare against
9080706050 Schools like this oneTexas averageJim Barnes MS 6678605566 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated Not Rated with 66 that year.

Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSimilarState
2025-26D6679.681.3
2024-25F5579.381.2
2023-24D6077.478.9
2022-23C7878.079.1
2021-22D6682.183.7

How this school's change over time is ranked

TEA publishes most measures for one year only, so a change ranking exists just where the same figure is published across years — the overall score, the five score domains, and per-student spending. This page does not yet state where Jim Barnes MS itself places on these lists, only that the lists exist; open one to find this school's own row.

Texas schools

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement64 D−13.1 vs similar · −11.2 vs region
  • School Progress60 D−20.6 vs similar · −18.3 vs region
  • Closing the Gaps69 D−7.8 vs similar · −7.4 vs region
  • Academic Growth58 F−15.7 vs similar · −16.4 vs region
  • Relative Performance60 D−18.9 vs similar · −15.0 vs region
  • Jim Barnes MS
  • Similar student population (2,026)
  • Region 20: San Antonio (650)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement64D6
School Progress60D10
Closing the Gaps69D1
Academic Growth58F2
Relative Performance60D10

Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 1 point below C in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (64), so School Progress (60) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 64.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level58%−15 vs Similar student population
  • Meets grade level31%−16 vs Similar student population
  • Masters grade level12%−7 vs Similar student population

Reading

  • Approaches grade level67%−8 vs Similar student population
  • Meets grade level41%−11 vs Similar student population
  • Masters grade level17%−4 vs Similar student population

Math

  • Approaches grade level53%−17 vs Similar student population
  • Meets grade level23%−18 vs Similar student population
  • Masters grade level7%−9 vs Similar student population

Science

  • Approaches grade level67%−5 vs Similar student population
  • Meets grade level42%−2 vs Similar student population
  • Masters grade level16%−4 vs Similar student population

Social Studies

  • Approaches grade level40%−33 vs Similar student population
  • Meets grade level15%−30 vs Similar student population
  • Masters grade level6%−14 vs Similar student population
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar student population (2,026)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The tick on each bar marks the average for Similar student population (2,026 schools) — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
769
Economically disadvantaged
66.8%±0.0 pts vs similar
English learners
14.0%−4.9 pts vs similar
Special education
25.4%+6.5 pts vs similar
Attendance
91.6%−2.5 pts vs similar
Chronically absent
31.5%+14.5 pts vs similar

Student demographics

African American: 4%Hispanic: 71.4%White: 21.7%American Indian: 0.1%Asian: 0.5%Pacific Islander: 0.1%Two or More Races: 2.1%
  • African American 4%
  • Hispanic 71.4%
  • White 21.7%
  • American Indian 0.1%
  • Asian 0.5%
  • Pacific Islander 0.1%
  • Two or More Races 2.1%

Spending per student

Compared against TEA's own peer group, which controls for size and student population, and against the state.

$10k$18k$25k20182020202220242025
  • Jim Barnes MS
  • TEA peer group
  • Texas average

TEA's published file does not include peer-group spending for this entity, so no comparison is shown.

Not reported by TEA for this entity: peer.

Teachers

Average salary
$63,554−$2,912 vs similar
Teachers
50
Students per staff member
15.3

Teaching experience

Beginning: 9.4%1 to 5 years: 46%6 to 10 years: 15.9%11 to 20 years: 21.7%21 to 30 years: 3.4%Over 30 years: 3.4%
  • Beginning 9.4%
  • 1 to 5 years 46%
  • 6 to 10 years 15.9%
  • 11 to 20 years 21.7%
  • 21 to 30 years 3.4%
  • Over 30 years 3.4%

Where this school ranks best

Out of 100 rankings computed across every published metric and every comparison group, these are the placements that stand out. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

  • 9of 36

    Per-student spending

    Guadalupe County · of the 36 that report this measure · tied with 11

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this campus ranks poorly. Each statement below states its cohort and its denominator so it can be checked — a rank without an n is a boast, not a fact. Ties are shown because a shared ceiling is not a sole first place. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

Every figure on this page comes from data the Texas Education Agency publishes at txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026 and archived with a checksum so each number stays traceable to the bytes TEA served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for districts only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here — 9,086 entities in two formats is 18,172 assets, on top of everything else this site publishes, and that is past the 20,000-asset limit this site is published under. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 094901041.