Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

James M Steele Early College HS

Denton County · Region 11: Fort Worth · 341 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
99/1002025-26
Change
+6 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+10.0 ptsvs 89 average · 847 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
2 of 847tied with 6 others
A99

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 94 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 89 average for 847 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Recent domain gain

Academic Growth rose 4 points

86 to 90 2024-25 to 2025-26

  • 90 is 7.6 points above the 82.4 average among 820 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Current strength

Closing the Gaps above the similar-context average

100 +13.5 pts vs 86.5

  • 100 is 13.5 points above the 86.5 average among 827 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
  • Tied for 1st of 827 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure; 8 schools share that value.
See the full measure

Current strength

Overall score above the similar-context average

99 +10 pts vs 89

  • 99 is 10 points above the 89 average among 847 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
  • Tied for 2nd of 847 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure; 7 schools share that value.
See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

James M Steele Early College HS is rated A by TEA, scoring 99 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 89 average for 847 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 6 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 2nd of 847 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 6 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. After high school: the following fall
  6. Who this school serves
  7. Student counts behind the percentages
  8. Enrollment over time
  9. Discipline and removal from class
  10. Spending per student
  11. Teachers and actual class size
  12. Where this school ranks best
  13. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
908070 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageJames M Steele Early College HS 9395989899 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 94 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26A9989.0 847 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25A9888.9 840 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24A9887.6 826 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23A9588.0 810 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22A9389.1 795 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement98 A+8.2 vs similar economic context · 833 reporting
  • School Progress97 A+11.7 vs similar economic context · 831 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps100 A+13.5 vs similar economic context · 827 reporting
  • Academic Growth90 A+7.6 vs similar economic context · 820 reporting
  • Relative Performance97 A+17.1 vs similar economic context · 831 reporting
  • James M Steele Early College HS
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (847 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement98A—
School Progress97A—
Closing the Gaps100A—
Academic Growth90A—
Relative Performance97A—

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (98), so School Progress (97) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 98.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level99%+12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 833 reporting
  • Meets grade level94%+26 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 833 reporting
  • Masters grade level57%+20 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 833 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level98%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 833 reporting
  • Meets grade level96%+23 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 833 reporting
  • Masters grade level51%+13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 833 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level99%+14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 831 reporting
  • Meets grade level81%+18 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 831 reporting
  • Masters grade level21%−11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 831 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level99%+12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 764 reporting
  • Meets grade level97%+31 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 764 reporting
  • Masters grade level80%+41 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 764 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level100%+14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 401 reporting
  • Meets grade level99%+34 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 401 reporting
  • Masters grade level85%+47 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 401 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (847 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Graduation

Four-Year
100.0%+10.6 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 222 rated schools reporting
Five-Year
98.0%+8.9 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 221 rated schools reporting
Six-Year
97.6%+8.9 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 222 rated schools reporting
Dropout Rate
0.0%−0.3 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 223 rated schools reporting

These measures use TEA's standard-accountability population. Each comparison average includes only schools in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported school rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.

College, career and military readiness

Total credit for CCMR criteria
100.0%+10.5 pts vs similar economic context
CCMR criteria
CriterionThis school% of graduatesAveragesimilar economic contextDifferencepercentage pointsReportingselected comparison
Total credit for CCMR criteria100.0%89.5%+10.5 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 217 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course92.7%67.4%+25.3 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 219 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA90.2%49.4%+40.8 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 219 rated schools reporting
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)4.9%26.4%−21.5 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 219 rated schools reporting
Earned college credit for a dual credit course92.7%38.1%+54.6 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 219 rated schools reporting
Earned an industry-based certification82.9%32.1%+50.8 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 219 rated schools reporting
Earned a level I or level II certificate0.0%0.4%−0.4 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 219 rated schools reporting
Earned an associate degree85.4%3.9%+81.5 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 219 rated schools reporting
Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit0.0%8.2%−8.2 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 219 rated schools reporting
Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness0.0%2.4%−2.4 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 219 rated schools reporting
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student7.3%6.3%+1.0 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 219 rated schools reporting
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces0.0%2.7%−2.7 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 219 rated schools reporting

Every row is a share of this school's graduates, and every row is a way of meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this school minus the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate, counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported school percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

After high school: the following fall

Where school graduates appeared in Texas public higher-education records the fall after graduation. This is a limited next-step measure, not an eventual college-going or completion rate.

Graduates in the report
48

Class of 2023–24

Enrolled in Texas public higher education
23

47.9% of graduates

Not found in Texas public higher-ed records
21

43.8% of graduates

Not trackable
4

Fall 2024

Graduates in the report

This school
48
Selected comparison
361.8

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 183 rated schools reporting

Enrolled in Texas public higher education

This school
23
Selected comparison
176.3

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 183 rated schools reporting

Texas-public enrollment rate

This school
47.9%
Selected comparison
50.4%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 183 rated schools reporting

−2.5 pts vs similar economic context

Not-found rate

This school
43.8%
Selected comparison
41.4%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 183 rated schools reporting

+2.4 pts vs similar economic context

Not-trackable rate

This school
8.3%
Selected comparison
8.2%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 183 rated schools reporting

+0.1 pts vs similar economic context

Most common named Texas public destinations

  1. UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS (003594)10

Selected comparison counts are neutral cohort scale context. The percentages put differently sized graduating classes on the same basis, but still cover only the limited Texas-public system observed by this report.

Source: Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board, high-school graduates enrolled in higher education, fetched 24 August 2026. The report covers graduates who enrolled in a Texas public college or university the following fall and includes only districts or campuses with more than 25 graduates.

“Not found” does not mean a graduate did not continue their education. It can include private or out-of-state college, work, military service, enrollment after the fall term, or another path the Texas public system does not observe.

“Not trackable” is not an outcome. THECB uses it for graduates with a non-standard identifier that could not be matched to higher-education records.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
341
Economically disadvantaged
23.5%−0.9 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
1.5%−8.4 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
5.0%−11.9 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
96.1%+0.6 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
7.4%−1.9 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

James M Steele Early College HS

African American: 14.4%Hispanic: 24.9%White: 47.2%American Indian: 1.2%Asian: 10%Two or More Races: 2.3%
  • African American 14.4%
  • Hispanic 24.9%
  • White 47.2%
  • American Indian 1.2%
  • Asian 10%
  • Two or More Races 2.3%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 847 reporting for every category shown · 847 in full cohort

African American: 8.2%Hispanic: 26.5%White: 48.7%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 11%Pacific Islander: 0.1%Two or More Races: 5.2%
  • African American 8.2%
  • Hispanic 26.5%
  • White 48.7%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 11%
  • Pacific Islander 0.1%
  • Two or More Races 5.2%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
341
Economically disadvantaged students
80
Emergent bilingual students
5
Special education students
17

Early college pathways

Early College High School
341

TEA-published share: 100%

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
12
Students in TEA mobility denominator
312
TEA-published mobility rate
3.8%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 341 students in 2025–26, an increase of 32 (10.4%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
341

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
+32

Increase · +10.4%

Change since 2021–22
+105

Increase · +44.5%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
341
Selected comparison
859.5

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 842 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for James M Steele Early College HS
School yearStudents enrolledJames M Steele Early College HSChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 236 First available year 871.5
2022–23 226 Decrease of 10 (4.2%) 877.1
2023–24 257 Increase of 31 (13.7%) 873.4
2024–25 309 Increase of 52 (20.2%) 868.2
2025–26 341 Increase of 32 (10.4%) 859.5

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
11

3.6% of cumulative year-end enrollment

Disciplinary actions
16

5.18 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
309

2024–25

Share of students · 2024–25

This school
3.6%
Selected comparison
7.6%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 611 rated schools reporting

−4.0 pts vs similar economic context

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
5.18
Selected comparison
14.9

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 694 rated schools reporting

−9.7 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for James M Steele Early College HS
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 247 Suppressed — 12 4.86 — 10
2021–22 212 21 9.9% 39 18.40 7.9% 15.8
2022–23 226 12 5.3% 13 5.75 8.2% 16.4
2023–24 260 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
2024–25 309 11 3.6% 16 5.18 7.6% 14.9
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for James M Steele Early College HS in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline 11 3.6% 16 5.18 7.6% 14.9
In-school suspensions Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Out-of-school suspensions Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$7k$20k$32k20182020202220242025
  • James M Steele Early College HS
  • Parent district: Northwest ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$12,455
Selected comparison
$11,250

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 839 rated schools reporting

+$1,205 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $12,455 per student for this campus, $30,943 per student for its parent district, Northwest ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearJames M Steele Early College HSParent district: Northwest ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$15,181$16,804$13,054$7,550 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 747 rated schools reporting
2019$11,347$16,136$13,108$7,605 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 761 rated schools reporting
2020$12,224$18,022$14,058$7,936 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 772 rated schools reporting
2021$10,878$16,443$14,797$8,499 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 778 rated schools reporting
2022$9,468$16,810$15,708$9,550 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 794 rated schools reporting
2023$11,112$25,982$16,792$10,103 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 811 rated schools reporting
2024$13,198$25,273$18,125$11,122 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 826 rated schools reporting
2025$12,455$30,943$18,972$11,250 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 839 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$72,004+$3,379 vs similar economic context
Teachers
20−35.2 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
17.2+2.4 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

James M Steele Early College HS

Beginning: 5.1%1 to 5 years: 21.2%6 to 10 years: 20.2%11 to 20 years: 15.2%21 to 30 years: 33.8%Over 30 years: 5.1%
  • Beginning 5.1%
  • 1 to 5 years 21.2%
  • 6 to 10 years 20.2%
  • 11 to 20 years 15.2%
  • 21 to 30 years 33.8%
  • Over 30 years 5.1%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 847 reporting for every category shown · 847 in full cohort

Beginning: 4.8%1 to 5 years: 22.6%6 to 10 years: 19.8%11 to 20 years: 32.5%21 to 30 years: 17.1%Over 30 years: 3.1%
  • Beginning 4.8%
  • 1 to 5 years 22.6%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.8%
  • 11 to 20 years 32.5%
  • 21 to 30 years 17.1%
  • Over 30 years 3.1%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for James M Steele Early College HS in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classJames M Steele Early College HS · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Secondary English13.817.5
Secondary languages other than English14.619.7
Secondary math17.218.1
Secondary science1419.8
Secondary social studies12.819.9

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 5 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this school ranks best

Out of 200 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

#1 rankings

First-place results

22 measures

  • 1of 7,185

    Closing the Gaps

    Texas average · of the 7,185 that report this measure · tied with 39 · full ranking

  • 1of 839

    Overall score

    Region 11: Fort Worth · of the 839 that report this measure · tied with 2

  • 1of 174

    Student Achievement

    Denton County · of the 174 that report this measure

  • 1of 174

    School Progress

    Denton County · of the 174 that report this measure

  • 1of 174

    Relative Performance

    Denton County · of the 174 that report this measure

  • 1of 174

    All Subjects — Approaches

    Denton County · of the 174 that report this measure

  • 1of 174

    All Subjects — Meets

    Denton County · of the 174 that report this measure

  • 1of 174

    Reading — Meets

    Denton County · of the 174 that report this measure

  • 1of 174

    Math — Approaches

    Denton County · of the 174 that report this measure

  • 1of 172

    Science — Approaches

    Denton County · of the 172 that report this measure · tied with 3

  • 1of 172

    Science — Meets

    Denton County · of the 172 that report this measure

  • 1of 172

    Science — Masters

    Denton County · of the 172 that report this measure

  • 1of 65

    Social Studies — Approaches

    Denton County · of the 65 that report this measure

  • 1of 65

    Social Studies — Meets

    Denton County · of the 65 that report this measure

  • 1of 65

    Social Studies — Masters

    Denton County · of the 65 that report this measure

  • 1of 24

    College, career or military ready

    Denton County · of the 24 that report this measure

  • 1of 24

    Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course

    Denton County · of the 24 that report this measure

  • 1of 24

    Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA

    Denton County · of the 24 that report this measure

  • 1of 24

    Earned college credit for a dual credit course

    Denton County · of the 24 that report this measure

  • 1of 24

    Earned an industry-based certification

    Denton County · of the 24 that report this measure

  • 1of 24

    Earned an associate degree

    Denton County · of the 24 that report this measure

  • 1of 22

    Four-Year Graduation Rate

    Denton County (standard accountability only) · of the 22 that report this measure · tied with 1

#2–3 rankings

Second- and third-place results

2 measures

  • 2of 174

    Reading — Approaches

    Denton County · of the 174 that report this measure

  • 3of 174

    All Subjects — Masters

    Denton County · of the 174 that report this measure

#4–10 rankings

Fourth- through tenth-place results

2 measures

  • 5of 174

    Math — Meets

    Denton County · of the 174 that report this measure

  • 9of 24

    Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student

    Denton County · of the 24 that report this measure

Other top-5% rankings

High placements in larger reporting groups

1 measure

  • 112of 3,052

    Reading — Masters

    Similar size · of the 3,052 that report this measure · tied with 14

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 061911010.