Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Irma Dru Hutchison Elem

Fort Bend County · Region 04: Houston · 508 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
83/1002025-26
Change
−10 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+0.5 ptsvs 82.5 average · 1,581 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
790 of 1,581tied with 61 others
B83

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 90 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 82.5 average for 1,581 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

STAAR result

All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
58%vs 54.6% avg · +3.4 pts
Masters
31%vs 24.1% avg · +6.9 pts

Among 1,533 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

STAAR result

Math above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
58%vs 48.2% avg · +9.8 pts
Masters
30%vs 19.9% avg · +10.1 pts

Among 1,526 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

STAAR result

Reading above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
64%vs 59.6% avg · +4.4 pts
Masters
34%vs 25.9% avg · +8.1 pts

Among 1,531 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Irma Dru Hutchison Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 83 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 82.5 average for 1,581 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 10 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 790th of 1,581 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 61 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Enrollment over time
  8. Discipline and removal from class
  9. Spending per student
  10. Teachers and actual class size
  11. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
908070 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageIrma Dru Hutchison Elem 9384789183 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 90 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26B8382.5 1,581 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25A9182.9 1,552 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24C7880.8 1,525 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23B8481.4 1,509 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22A9383.9 1,489 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement85 B+2.5 vs similar economic context · 1,533 reporting
  • School Progress82 B+0.2 vs similar economic context · 1,529 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps79 C−0.8 vs similar economic context · 1,518 reporting
  • Academic Growth81 B+4.7 vs similar economic context · 1,501 reporting
  • Relative Performance82 B+2.8 vs similar economic context · 1,529 reporting
  • Irma Dru Hutchison Elem
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,581 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement85B5
School Progress82B8
Closing the Gaps79C1
Academic Growth81B9
Relative Performance82B8

Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 1 point below B in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (85), so School Progress (82) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 85.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level78%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,533 reporting
  • Meets grade level58%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,533 reporting
  • Masters grade level31%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,533 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level81%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,531 reporting
  • Meets grade level64%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,531 reporting
  • Masters grade level34%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,531 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level78%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,526 reporting
  • Meets grade level58%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,526 reporting
  • Masters grade level30%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,526 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level70%−10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,418 reporting
  • Meets grade level38%−16 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,418 reporting
  • Masters grade level26%−0 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,418 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,581 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
508
Economically disadvantaged
46.9%−0.7 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
27.0%+14.6 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
17.5%−0.9 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
94.8%+0.1 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
11.8%−2.0 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Irma Dru Hutchison Elem

African American: 29.1%Hispanic: 31.5%White: 11.8%American Indian: 0.4%Asian: 20.7%Pacific Islander: 0.4%Two or More Races: 6.1%
  • African American 29.1%
  • Hispanic 31.5%
  • White 11.8%
  • American Indian 0.4%
  • Asian 20.7%
  • Pacific Islander 0.4%
  • Two or More Races 6.1%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,581 reporting for every category shown · 1,581 in full cohort

African American: 9.3%Hispanic: 39.1%White: 43.3%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 3.4%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 4.3%
  • African American 9.3%
  • Hispanic 39.1%
  • White 43.3%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 3.4%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 4.3%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
508
Economically disadvantaged students
238
Emergent bilingual students
137
Special education students
89

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
81
Students in TEA mobility denominator
462
TEA-published mobility rate
17.5%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 508 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 35 (6.4%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
508

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
−35

Decrease · −6.4%

Change since 2021–22
−256

Decrease · −33.5%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
508
Selected comparison
666.2

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,541 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Irma Dru Hutchison Elem
School yearStudents enrolledIrma Dru Hutchison ElemChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 764 First available year 663.4
2022–23 554 Decrease of 210 (27.5%) 668.8
2023–24 568 Increase of 14 (2.5%) 668.6
2024–25 543 Decrease of 25 (4.4%) 665.9
2025–26 508 Decrease of 35 (6.4%) 666.2

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
21

3.7% of cumulative year-end enrollment

Disciplinary actions
35

6.11 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
573

2024–25

Share of students · 2024–25

This school
3.7%
Selected comparison
11.8%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,235 rated schools reporting

−8.1 pts vs similar economic context

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
6.11
Selected comparison
26.1

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,324 rated schools reporting

−20.0 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Irma Dru Hutchison Elem
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 841 10 1.2% 28 3.33 9.5% 18.1
2021–22 879 19 2.2% 39 4.44 11.8% 25.6
2022–23 600 24 4.0% 34 5.67 12.1% 27.1
2023–24 629 20 3.2% 32 5.09 12.1% 27.8
2024–25 573 21 3.7% 35 6.11 11.8% 26.1
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Irma Dru Hutchison Elem in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline 21 3.7% 35 6.11 11.8% 26.1
In-school suspensions 14 2.4% 18 3.14 10.7% 20.1
Out-of-school suspensions Suppressed — 17 2.97 — 8.3
DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$7k$17k$28k20182020202220242025
  • Irma Dru Hutchison Elem
  • Parent district: Lamar CISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$10,721
Selected comparison
$11,952

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,551 rated schools reporting

−$1,231 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $10,721 per student for this campus, $24,943 per student for its parent district, Lamar CISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearIrma Dru Hutchison ElemParent district: Lamar CISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$7,222$13,594$13,054$7,811 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,428 rated schools reporting
2019$7,816$14,455$13,108$7,996 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,447 rated schools reporting
2020$8,148$18,941$14,058$8,478 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,459 rated schools reporting
2021$7,869$16,144$14,797$8,883 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,479 rated schools reporting
2022$9,181$15,842$15,708$10,139 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,492 rated schools reporting
2023$10,655$19,614$16,792$10,605 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,509 rated schools reporting
2024$10,545$26,311$18,125$11,566 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,525 rated schools reporting
2025$10,721$24,943$18,972$11,952 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,551 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$75,080+$8,021 vs similar economic context
Teachers
33−10.3 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
15.4−5.0 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Irma Dru Hutchison Elem

Beginning: 3%1 to 5 years: 21.2%6 to 10 years: 30.3%11 to 20 years: 30.3%21 to 30 years: 12.1%Over 30 years: 3%
  • Beginning 3%
  • 1 to 5 years 21.2%
  • 6 to 10 years 30.3%
  • 11 to 20 years 30.3%
  • 21 to 30 years 12.1%
  • Over 30 years 3%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,581 reporting for every category shown · 1,581 in full cohort

Beginning: 5.6%1 to 5 years: 24%6 to 10 years: 19.4%11 to 20 years: 29.8%21 to 30 years: 16.7%Over 30 years: 4.1%
  • Beginning 5.6%
  • 1 to 5 years 24%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.4%
  • 11 to 20 years 29.8%
  • 21 to 30 years 16.7%
  • Over 30 years 4.1%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Irma Dru Hutchison Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classIrma Dru Hutchison Elem · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten21.418
Grade 116.718.4
Grade 219.418.6
Grade 32019.2
Grade 417.219.1
Grade 520.420

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 079901121.