Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Iraan HS

Pecos County · Region 18: Midland · 101 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
86/1002025-26
Change
+4 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+3.6 ptsvs 82.4 average · 1,611 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
591 of 1,611tied with 68 others
B86

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 87 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 82.4 average for 1,611 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Recent domain gain

Closing the Gaps rose 8 points

79 to 87 2024-25 to 2025-26

  • 87 is 7.2 points above the 79.8 average among 1,546 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Current strength

Overall score above the similar-context average

86 +3.6 pts vs 82.4

  • 86 is 3.6 points above the 82.4 average among 1,611 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Current strength

Student Achievement above the similar-context average

86 +3.6 pts vs 82.4

  • 86 is 3.6 points above the 82.4 average among 1,561 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Iraan HS is rated B by TEA, scoring 86 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 82.4 average for 1,611 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 4 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 591st of 1,611 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 68 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Enrollment over time
  8. Discipline and removal from class
  9. Spending per student
  10. Teachers and actual class size
  11. Where this school ranks best
  12. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
9080706050 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageIraan HS 8274818586 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 87 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26B8682.4 1,611 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25B8582.8 1,583 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24B8180.7 1,557 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23C7481.3 1,539 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22B8283.8 1,518 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement86 B+3.6 vs similar economic context · 1,561 reporting
  • School Progress83 B+1.3 vs similar economic context · 1,556 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps87 B+7.2 vs similar economic context · 1,546 reporting
  • Academic Growth83 B+6.9 vs similar economic context · 1,529 reporting
  • Relative Performance83 B+3.7 vs similar economic context · 1,556 reporting
  • Iraan HS
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,611 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement86B4
School Progress83B7
Closing the Gaps87B3
Academic Growth83B7
Relative Performance83B7

Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 3 points below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (86), so School Progress (83) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 86.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level90%+12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,561 reporting
  • Meets grade level53%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,561 reporting
  • Masters grade level10%−14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,561 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level79%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,559 reporting
  • Meets grade level53%−6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,559 reporting
  • Masters grade level4%−22 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,559 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level100%+24 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,553 reporting
  • Meets grade level58%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,553 reporting
  • Masters grade level17%−3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,553 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level96%+16 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,442 reporting
  • Meets grade level74%+21 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,442 reporting
  • Masters grade level22%−4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,442 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level93%+16 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 814 reporting
  • Meets grade level40%−11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 814 reporting
  • Masters grade level9%−15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 814 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,611 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Graduation

Four-Year
96.7%+3.4 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 431 rated schools reporting
Five-Year
100.0%+7.1 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 430 rated schools reporting
Six-Year
100.0%+7.7 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 430 rated schools reporting
Dropout Rate
0.0%−0.4 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 433 rated schools reporting

These measures use TEA's standard-accountability population. Each comparison average includes only schools in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported school rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.

College, career and military readiness

Total credit for CCMR criteria
86.0%−2.6 pts vs similar economic context
CCMR criteria
CriterionThis school% of graduatesAveragesimilar economic contextDifferencepercentage pointsReportingselected comparison
Total credit for CCMR criteria86.0%88.6%−2.6 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 444 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course20.7%59.5%−38.8 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 445 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA20.7%30.3%−9.6 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 445 rated schools reporting
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)0.0%11.0%−11.0 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 445 rated schools reporting
Earned college credit for a dual credit course72.4%34.3%+38.1 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 445 rated schools reporting
Earned an industry-based certification41.4%38.8%+2.6 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 445 rated schools reporting
Earned a level I or level II certificate24.1%1.4%+22.7 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 445 rated schools reporting
Earned an associate degree24.1%4.0%+20.1 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 445 rated schools reporting
Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit0.0%4.8%−4.8 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 445 rated schools reporting
Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness0.0%3.0%−3.0 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 445 rated schools reporting
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student10.3%7.4%+2.9 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 445 rated schools reporting
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces3.4%3.4%+0.0 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 445 rated schools reporting

Every row is a share of this school's graduates, and every row is a way of meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this school minus the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate, counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported school percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
101
Economically disadvantaged
47.5%−0.7 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
17.8%+5.2 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
7.9%−10.6 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
93.8%−0.8 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
16.2%+2.4 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Iraan HS

African American: 1%Hispanic: 71.3%White: 25.7%Asian: 2%
  • African American 1%
  • Hispanic 71.3%
  • White 25.7%
  • Asian 2%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,611 reporting for every category shown · 1,611 in full cohort

African American: 9.3%Hispanic: 39.5%White: 43.2%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 3.3%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 4.2%
  • African American 9.3%
  • Hispanic 39.5%
  • White 43.2%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 3.3%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 4.2%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
101
Economically disadvantaged students
48
Emergent bilingual students
18
Special education students
8

Early college pathways

Pathways in Technology Early College High School (P-TECH)
81

TEA-published share: 80.2%

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
15
Students in TEA mobility denominator
118
TEA-published mobility rate
12.7%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 101 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 11 (9.8%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
101

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
−11

Decrease · −9.8%

Change since 2021–22
+16

Increase · +18.8%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
101
Selected comparison
660.5

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,573 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Iraan HS
School yearStudents enrolledIraan HSChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 85 First available year 659.3
2022–23 100 Increase of 15 (17.6%) 664.5
2023–24 109 Increase of 9 (9.0%) 663.6
2024–25 112 Increase of 3 (2.8%) 660.7
2025–26 101 Decrease of 11 (9.8%) 660.5

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Suppressed

Rate not available

Disciplinary actions
11

9.32 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
118

2024–25

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
9.32
Selected comparison
26.2

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,349 rated schools reporting

−16.9 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Iraan HS
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 80 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
2021–22 90 Suppressed — 16 17.78 — 25.8
2022–23 111 Suppressed — 12 10.81 — 27.3
2023–24 110 Suppressed — 17 15.45 — 27.8
2024–25 118 Suppressed — 11 9.32 — 26.2
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Iraan HS in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline Suppressed — 11 9.32 — 26.2
In-school suspensions Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Out-of-school suspensions Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$7k$27k$47k20182020202220242025
  • Iraan HS
  • Parent district: Iraan-Sheffield Collegiate ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$22,639
Selected comparison
$12,036

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,581 rated schools reporting

+$10,603 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $22,639 per student for this campus, $42,053 per student for its parent district, Iraan-Sheffield Collegiate ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearIraan HSParent district: Iraan-Sheffield Collegiate ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$16,945$18,396$13,054$7,818 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,458 rated schools reporting
2019$19,292$24,603$13,108$8,003 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,477 rated schools reporting
2020$12,417$38,903$14,058$8,490 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,489 rated schools reporting
2021$21,026$27,912$14,797$8,904 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,508 rated schools reporting
2022$21,374$29,591$15,708$10,194 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,520 rated schools reporting
2023$16,628$27,721$16,792$10,634 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,538 rated schools reporting
2024$19,190$44,381$18,125$11,615 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,556 rated schools reporting
2025$22,639$42,053$18,972$12,036 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,581 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$71,012+$4,014 vs similar economic context
Teachers
14−29.3 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
7.3−13.0 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Iraan HS

1 to 5 years: 31.9%6 to 10 years: 17.4%11 to 20 years: 31.9%21 to 30 years: 12.3%Over 30 years: 6.5%
  • 1 to 5 years 31.9%
  • 6 to 10 years 17.4%
  • 11 to 20 years 31.9%
  • 21 to 30 years 12.3%
  • Over 30 years 6.5%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,611 reporting for every category shown · 1,611 in full cohort

Beginning: 5.6%1 to 5 years: 24.1%6 to 10 years: 19.4%11 to 20 years: 29.8%21 to 30 years: 16.7%Over 30 years: 4.2%
  • Beginning 5.6%
  • 1 to 5 years 24.1%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.4%
  • 11 to 20 years 29.8%
  • 21 to 30 years 16.7%
  • Over 30 years 4.2%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Iraan HS in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classIraan HS · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Secondary English11.515.2
Secondary languages other than English7.817.6
Secondary math11.116.2
Secondary science9.617.7
Secondary social studies12.117.7

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 5 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this school ranks best

Out of 181 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

#1 rankings

First-place results

8 measures

  • 1of 7,227

    Math — Approaches

    Texas average · of the 7,227 that report this measure · tied with 37

  • 1of 11

    All Subjects — Approaches

    Pecos County · of the 11 that report this measure

  • 1of 11

    All Subjects — Meets

    Pecos County · of the 11 that report this measure

  • 1of 11

    Reading — Meets

    Pecos County · of the 11 that report this measure

  • 1of 11

    Math — Meets

    Pecos County · of the 11 that report this measure

  • 1of 10

    Academic Growth

    Pecos County · of the 10 that report this measure

  • 1of 10

    Science — Meets

    Pecos County · of the 10 that report this measure

  • 1of 10

    Science — Masters

    Pecos County · of the 10 that report this measure

#2–3 rankings

Second- and third-place results

9 measures

  • 2of 43

    Earned a level I or level II certificate

    Region 18: Midland · of the 43 that report this measure

  • 2of 11

    Reading — Approaches

    Pecos County · of the 11 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 2of 11

    Math — Masters

    Pecos County · of the 11 that report this measure

  • 2of 10

    Science — Approaches

    Pecos County · of the 10 that report this measure

  • 3of 12

    Overall score

    Pecos County · of the 12 that report this measure

  • 3of 11

    Student Achievement

    Pecos County · of the 11 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 3of 11

    School Progress

    Pecos County · of the 11 that report this measure

  • 3of 11

    Closing the Gaps

    Pecos County · of the 11 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 3of 11

    Relative Performance

    Pecos County · of the 11 that report this measure

#4–10 rankings

Fourth- through tenth-place results

10 measures

  • 6of 10

    Per-student spending

    Pecos County · of the 10 that report this measure

  • 7of 12

    Attendance

    Pecos County · of the 12 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 7of 12

    Chronically absent (lowest is best)

    Pecos County · of the 12 that report this measure

  • 7of 11

    All Subjects — Masters

    Pecos County · of the 11 that report this measure

  • 8of 11

    Reading — Masters

    Pecos County · of the 11 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 9of 67

    Social Studies — Approaches

    Region 18: Midland · of the 67 that report this measure · tied with 2

  • 9of 43

    Earned college credit for a dual credit course

    Region 18: Midland · of the 43 that report this measure

  • 9of 43

    Earned an associate degree

    Region 18: Midland · of the 43 that report this measure

  • 9of 43

    Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces

    Region 18: Midland · of the 43 that report this measure

  • 10of 43

    Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student

    Region 18: Midland · of the 43 that report this measure

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 186903001.