Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Inspirational Hope House

Brown County · Region 15: San Angelo · 13 students

Not Rated

At a glance

TEA did not issue an overall rating for Inspirational Hope House for 2025-26. Everything TEA did publish for this school is below.

Read the full rating context and placement

TEA did not issue an overall rating for Inspirational Hope House for 2025-26. Everything TEA did publish for this school is below.

TEA did not issue an overall rating for this school. Scores below are the figures TEA published; the letter grades are the state's where it issued them.

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 1 year of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Who this school serves
  5. Student counts behind the percentages
  6. Teachers
  7. Where this comes from

1 year of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
908070 2025-26

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26Not Rated—77.8 1,200 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement—Not reported · similar economic context 69.8 · 1,112 reporting
  • School Progress—Not reported · similar economic context 78.9 · 1,111 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps—Not reported · similar economic context 75.3 · 1,104 reporting
  • Academic Growth—Not reported · similar economic context 73.7 · 1,096 reporting
  • Relative Performance—Not reported · similar economic context 76.6 · 1,110 reporting
  • Inspirational Hope House
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,200 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement—Not rated—
School Progress—Not rated—
Closing the Gaps—Not rated—
Academic Growth—Not rated—
Relative Performance—Not rated—

The scores above are the ones TEA published. TEA did not issue letter grades for this school, so none are shown: the A–F thresholds marked on the chart are the state's, but applying them here would produce a grade the state chose to withhold.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
13
Economically disadvantaged
100.0%+5.4 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
0.0%−44.6 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
61.5%+44.5 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
—
Chronically absent
—

Student demographics

Inspirational Hope House

African American: 30.8%Hispanic: 30.8%White: 30.8%Two or More Races: 7.7%
  • African American 30.8%
  • Hispanic 30.8%
  • White 30.8%
  • Two or More Races 7.7%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,200 reporting for every category shown · 1,200 in full cohort

African American: 15.5%Hispanic: 77.8%White: 4%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 1.1%Pacific Islander: 0.1%Two or More Races: 1.3%
  • African American 15.5%
  • Hispanic 77.8%
  • White 4%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 1.1%
  • Pacific Islander 0.1%
  • Two or More Races 1.3%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
13
Economically disadvantaged students
13
Emergent bilingual students
0
Special education students
8

TEA context labels

  • New campus compared with last year’s fall enrollment
  • Residential treatment facility under AEA or AskTED

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
Not reported
Students in TEA mobility denominator
Not reported
TEA-published mobility rate
Not reported

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Teachers

Average salary
$93,000+$24,156 vs similar economic context
Teachers
1−37.1 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
13−1.5 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Inspirational Hope House

21 to 30 years: 100%
  • 21 to 30 years 100%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,200 reporting for every category shown · 1,200 in full cohort

Beginning: 8%1 to 5 years: 26.9%6 to 10 years: 18.5%11 to 20 years: 26.8%21 to 30 years: 14.9%Over 30 years: 3.4%
  • Beginning 8%
  • 1 to 5 years 26.9%
  • 6 to 10 years 18.5%
  • 11 to 20 years 26.8%
  • 21 to 30 years 14.9%
  • Over 30 years 3.4%

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 025908013.