Open-enrollment charter campus · Alternative Education Accountability
Innova Mercy Inspire Academy
Inspire Academies · New Braunfels · 10 students
Official school websiteSchool information and family resources
At a glance
TEA did not issue an overall rating for Innova Mercy Inspire Academy for 2025-26. Everything TEA did publish for this charter campus is below.
Read the full rating context and placement
TEA did not issue an overall rating for Innova Mercy Inspire Academy for 2025-26. Everything TEA did publish for this charter campus is below.
TEA did not issue an overall rating for Innova Mercy Inspire Academy for 2025-26. Everything TEA did publish for this charter campus is below.
TEA did not issue an overall rating for this school. Scores below are the figures TEA published; the letter grades are the state's where it issued them.
Put the numbers in context
Compare with
Jump to a section
1 year of ratings
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
View the yearly scores and comparisons
| Year | Rating | Score | Selected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rate | StateTexas charter average |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | Not Rated | — | 89.6 34 reporting | 81.7 829 reporting |
Where the score comes from
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
- Innova Mercy Inspire Academy
- Similar economic-disadvantage rate (34 in cohort)
| Domain | Score | Grade | Points to next grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| Student Achievement | — | Not rated | — |
| School Progress | — | Not rated | — |
| Closing the Gaps | — | Not rated | — |
| Academic Growth | — | Not rated | — |
| Relative Performance | — | Not rated | — |
The scores above are the ones TEA published. TEA did not issue letter grades for this school, so none are shown: the A–F thresholds marked on the chart are the state's, but applying them here would produce a grade the state chose to withhold.
Student outcomes
Completion
- Four-Year
- 0.0%±0.0 pts vs similar economic context average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1 rated charter campuses reporting
- Five-Year
- 0.0%±0.0 pts vs similar economic context average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1 rated charter campuses reporting
- Six-Year
- 0.0%±0.0 pts vs similar economic context average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1 rated charter campuses reporting
- Dropout Rate
- 0.0%−7.0 pts vs similar economic context average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1 rated charter campuses reporting
These measures use TEA's alternative-education accountability population. Each comparison average includes only charter campuses in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported charter campus rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only charter campuses for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
- Students
- 10
- Economically disadvantaged
- 0.0%−5.0 pts vs similar economic context
- English learners
- 0.0%−16.0 pts vs similar economic context
- Special education
- 0.0%−8.2 pts vs similar economic context
- Attendance
- 88.5%−7.3 pts vs similar economic context
- Chronically absent
- 52.9%+45.6 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Innova Mercy Inspire Academy
- African American 10%
- Hispanic 50%
- White 20%
- Asian 10%
- Two or More Races 10%
Selected comparison average For charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 34 reporting for every category shown · 34 in full cohort
- African American 8.8%
- Hispanic 15.9%
- White 29.2%
- American Indian 0.7%
- Asian 39.9%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 5.5%
Texas charter average 829 reporting for every category shown · 829 Texas charter campuses in full cohort
- African American 17.5%
- Hispanic 61.8%
- White 12.2%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 5.5%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 2.5%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
- Students in this TEA accountability summary
- 10
- Economically disadvantaged students
- 0
- Emergent bilingual students
- 0
- Special education students
- 0
TEA context labels
- New campus compared with last year’s fall enrollment
- Alternative education campus under AEA procedures
- Alternative education type: dropout recovery school
- Rated under AEA procedures
Campus mobility · 2024–25
- Mobile students
- 18
- Students in TEA mobility denominator
- 18
- TEA-published mobility rate
- 100%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
- Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
- Not reported
Rate not available
- Disciplinary actions
- Not reported
Rate not available
- Cumulative year-end enrollment
- 18
2024–25
| School year | Cumulative enrollment | Studentsall discipline | Students% of enrollment | Actionsall discipline | Actionsper 100 students | Studentsselected comparison average % | Actionsselected comparison average per 100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024–25 | 18 | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
See 2024–25 discipline categories
| Category | Students | Students% of enrollment | Actions | Actionsper 100 students | Studentsselected comparison average % | Actionsselected comparison average per 100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All discipline | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| In-school suspensions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Out-of-school suspensions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| DAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory DAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary DAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized charter campuses can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Teachers
- Average salary
- $75,465+$9,856 vs similar economic context
- Teachers
- 1−33.9 vs similar economic context
- Students per staff member
- 10−6.6 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Innova Mercy Inspire Academy
- 11 to 20 years 100%
Selected comparison average For charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 34 reporting for every category shown · 34 in full cohort
- Beginning 4%
- 1 to 5 years 19.6%
- 6 to 10 years 11.8%
- 11 to 20 years 15.7%
- 21 to 30 years 6.5%
- Over 30 years 1.2%
Texas charter average 829 reporting for every category shown · 829 Texas charter campuses in full cohort
- Beginning 13%
- 1 to 5 years 44.3%
- 6 to 10 years 19.6%
- 11 to 20 years 15.4%
- 21 to 30 years 4.8%
- Over 30 years 0.9%
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Download the full dataset · this campus's district
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 015808019.