Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

IM Terrell Academy for STEM and Vpa

Tarrant County · Region 11: Fort Worth · 415 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
95/1002025-26
Change
+1 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+11.6 ptsvs 83.4 average · 1,498 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
46 of 1,498tied with 23 others
A95

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 93 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 83.4 average for 1,498 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Recent domain gain

Student Achievement rose 2 points

92 to 94 2024-25 to 2025-26

  • 94 is 10.4 points above the 83.6 average among 1,455 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

STAAR result

All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
78%vs 56.2% avg · +21.8 pts
Masters
32%vs 25.2% avg · +6.8 pts

Among 1,455 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

STAAR result

Science above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
75%vs 55.4% avg · +19.6 pts
Masters
39%vs 27.4% avg · +11.6 pts

Among 1,345 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

IM Terrell Academy for STEM and Vpa is rated A by TEA, scoring 95 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 83.4 average for 1,498 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 1 point since 2021-22.

Ranks 46th of 1,498 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 23 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. After high school: the following fall
  6. Who this school serves
  7. Student counts behind the percentages
  8. Enrollment over time
  9. Discipline and removal from class
  10. Spending per student
  11. Teachers and actual class size
  12. Where this school ranks best
  13. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
908070 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageIM Terrell Academy for STEM and Vpa 9491919495 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 93 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26A9583.4 1,498 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25A9483.7 1,467 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24A9181.7 1,445 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23A9182.2 1,430 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22A9484.4 1,410 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement94 A+10.4 vs similar economic context · 1,455 reporting
  • School Progress93 A+10.9 vs similar economic context · 1,452 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps98 A+17.3 vs similar economic context · 1,442 reporting
  • Academic Growth79 C+2.1 vs similar economic context · 1,425 reporting
  • Relative Performance93 A+13.5 vs similar economic context · 1,452 reporting
  • IM Terrell Academy for STEM and Vpa
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,498 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement94A—
School Progress93A—
Closing the Gaps98A—
Academic Growth79C1
Relative Performance93A—

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (94), so School Progress (93) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 94.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level96%+16 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,455 reporting
  • Meets grade level78%+22 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,455 reporting
  • Masters grade level32%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,455 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level95%+14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,454 reporting
  • Meets grade level87%+26 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,454 reporting
  • Masters grade level27%+0 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,454 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level91%+14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,450 reporting
  • Meets grade level57%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,450 reporting
  • Masters grade level11%−10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,450 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level97%+16 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,345 reporting
  • Meets grade level75%+20 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,345 reporting
  • Masters grade level39%+12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,345 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level100%+21 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 754 reporting
  • Meets grade level89%+36 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 754 reporting
  • Masters grade level55%+29 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 754 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,498 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Graduation

Four-Year
99.2%+6.2 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 417 rated schools reporting
Five-Year
98.9%+6.1 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 416 rated schools reporting
Six-Year
0.0%−92.1 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 415 rated schools reporting
Dropout Rate
0.0%−0.4 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 418 rated schools reporting

These measures use TEA's standard-accountability population. Each comparison average includes only schools in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported school rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.

College, career and military readiness

Total credit for CCMR criteria
94.0%+5.7 pts vs similar economic context
CCMR criteria
CriterionThis school% of graduatesAveragesimilar economic contextDifferencepercentage pointsReportingselected comparison
Total credit for CCMR criteria94.0%88.3%+5.7 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 425 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course74.0%59.1%+14.9 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 426 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA48.0%31.8%+16.2 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 426 rated schools reporting
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)45.5%12.0%+33.5 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 426 rated schools reporting
Earned college credit for a dual credit course1.6%35.2%−33.6 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 426 rated schools reporting
Earned an industry-based certification15.4%38.0%−22.6 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 426 rated schools reporting
Earned a level I or level II certificate0.0%1.5%−1.5 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 426 rated schools reporting
Earned an associate degree0.0%4.0%−4.0 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 426 rated schools reporting
Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit56.9%5.4%+51.5 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 426 rated schools reporting
Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness0.0%2.9%−2.9 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 426 rated schools reporting
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student4.9%7.4%−2.5 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 426 rated schools reporting
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces0.8%3.3%−2.5 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 426 rated schools reporting

Every row is a share of this school's graduates, and every row is a way of meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this school minus the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate, counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported school percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

After high school: the following fall

Where school graduates appeared in Texas public higher-education records the fall after graduation. This is a limited next-step measure, not an eventual college-going or completion rate.

Graduates in the report
90

Class of 2023–24

Enrolled in Texas public higher education
52

57.8% of graduates

Not found in Texas public higher-ed records
27

30.0% of graduates

Not trackable
11

Fall 2024

Graduates in the report

This school
90
Selected comparison
220.7

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 363 rated schools reporting

Enrolled in Texas public higher education

This school
52
Selected comparison
97.3

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 363 rated schools reporting

Texas-public enrollment rate

This school
57.8%
Selected comparison
47.0%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 363 rated schools reporting

+10.8 pts vs similar economic context

Not-found rate

This school
30.0%
Selected comparison
48.5%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 363 rated schools reporting

−18.5 pts vs similar economic context

Not-trackable rate

This school
12.2%
Selected comparison
4.5%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 363 rated schools reporting

+7.7 pts vs similar economic context

Most common named Texas public destinations

  1. TARRANT COUNTY COLLEGE DIST (003626)17
  2. UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS (003594)13

Selected comparison counts are neutral cohort scale context. The percentages put differently sized graduating classes on the same basis, but still cover only the limited Texas-public system observed by this report.

Source: Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board, high-school graduates enrolled in higher education, fetched 24 August 2026. The report covers graduates who enrolled in a Texas public college or university the following fall and includes only districts or campuses with more than 25 graduates.

“Not found” does not mean a graduate did not continue their education. It can include private or out-of-state college, work, military service, enrollment after the fall term, or another path the Texas public system does not observe.

“Not trackable” is not an outcome. THECB uses it for graduates with a non-standard identifier that could not be matched to higher-education records.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
415
Economically disadvantaged
44.1%−0.8 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
7.7%−4.1 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
9.4%−8.9 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
95.2%+0.5 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
10.9%−2.4 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

IM Terrell Academy for STEM and Vpa

African American: 19.3%Hispanic: 41.2%White: 35.2%American Indian: 0.2%Asian: 1%Two or More Races: 3.1%
  • African American 19.3%
  • Hispanic 41.2%
  • White 35.2%
  • American Indian 0.2%
  • Asian 1%
  • Two or More Races 3.1%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,498 reporting for every category shown · 1,498 in full cohort

African American: 9.2%Hispanic: 37.8%White: 44.4%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 3.8%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 4.3%
  • African American 9.2%
  • Hispanic 37.8%
  • White 44.4%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 3.8%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 4.3%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
415
Economically disadvantaged students
183
Emergent bilingual students
32
Special education students
39

Early college pathways

Pathways in Technology Early College High School (P-TECH)
102

TEA-published share: 24.6%

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
31
Students in TEA mobility denominator
480
TEA-published mobility rate
6.5%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 415 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 55 (11.7%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
415

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
−55

Decrease · −11.7%

Change since 2021–22
−79

Decrease · −16.0%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
415
Selected comparison
678.6

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,463 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for IM Terrell Academy for STEM and Vpa
School yearStudents enrolledIM Terrell Academy for STEM and VpaChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 494 First available year 676.9
2022–23 485 Decrease of 9 (1.8%) 682.6
2023–24 454 Decrease of 31 (6.4%) 682.1
2024–25 470 Increase of 16 (3.5%) 679.2
2025–26 415 Decrease of 55 (11.7%) 678.6

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
23

4.9% of cumulative year-end enrollment

Disciplinary actions
42

8.99 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
467

2024–25

Share of students · 2024–25

This school
4.9%
Selected comparison
11.3%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,156 rated schools reporting

−6.4 pts vs similar economic context

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
8.99
Selected comparison
24.5

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,240 rated schools reporting

−15.5 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for IM Terrell Academy for STEM and Vpa
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 382 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
2021–22 484 24 5.0% 30 6.20 11.3% 24.3
2022–23 486 29 6.0% 45 9.26 11.7% 25.5
2023–24 455 29 6.4% 36 7.91 11.6% 26.1
2024–25 467 23 4.9% 42 8.99 11.3% 24.5
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for IM Terrell Academy for STEM and Vpa in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline 23 4.9% 42 8.99 11.3% 24.5
In-school suspensions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Out-of-school suspensions 23 4.9% 38 8.14 5.4% 7.5
DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$7k$21k$36k2019202120232025
  • IM Terrell Academy for STEM and Vpa
  • Parent district: Fort Worth ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$13,904
Selected comparison
$12,029

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,468 rated schools reporting

+$1,875 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $13,904 per student for this campus, $18,965 per student for its parent district, Fort Worth ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearIM Terrell Academy for STEM and VpaParent district: Fort Worth ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2019$34,105$12,735$13,108$8,018 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,369 rated schools reporting
2020$14,931$14,060$14,058$8,452 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,378 rated schools reporting
2021$11,578$17,533$14,797$8,862 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,398 rated schools reporting
2022$11,870$16,930$15,708$10,249 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,411 rated schools reporting
2023$13,712$17,853$16,792$10,654 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,430 rated schools reporting
2024$13,320$18,199$18,125$11,690 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,446 rated schools reporting
2025$13,904$18,965$18,972$12,029 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,468 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$74,389+$7,144 vs similar economic context
Teachers
39−5.6 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
10.8−10.0 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

IM Terrell Academy for STEM and Vpa

Beginning: 5.2%1 to 5 years: 18.2%6 to 10 years: 23.9%11 to 20 years: 31.7%21 to 30 years: 15.6%Over 30 years: 5.5%
  • Beginning 5.2%
  • 1 to 5 years 18.2%
  • 6 to 10 years 23.9%
  • 11 to 20 years 31.7%
  • 21 to 30 years 15.6%
  • Over 30 years 5.5%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,498 reporting for every category shown · 1,498 in full cohort

Beginning: 5.4%1 to 5 years: 23.6%6 to 10 years: 19.5%11 to 20 years: 30.4%21 to 30 years: 17%Over 30 years: 3.9%
  • Beginning 5.4%
  • 1 to 5 years 23.6%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.5%
  • 11 to 20 years 30.4%
  • 21 to 30 years 17%
  • Over 30 years 3.9%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for IM Terrell Academy for STEM and Vpa in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classIM Terrell Academy for STEM and Vpa · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Secondary English2.515.4
Secondary languages other than English4.617.8
Secondary math4.616.4
Secondary science6.317.9
Secondary social studies6.717.8

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 5 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this school ranks best

Out of 200 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

#2–3 rankings

Second- and third-place results

1 measure

  • 3of 152

    Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit

    Region 11: Fort Worth · of the 152 that report this measure

#4–10 rankings

Fourth- through tenth-place results

6 measures

  • 4of 453

    Closing the Gaps

    Tarrant County · of the 453 that report this measure · tied with 7

  • 7of 155

    Social Studies — Meets

    Tarrant County · of the 155 that report this measure

  • 8of 64

    Five-Year Graduation Rate

    Tarrant County (standard accountability only) · of the 64 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 9of 74

    Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)

    Tarrant County · of the 74 that report this measure

  • 10of 457

    All Subjects — Approaches

    Tarrant County · of the 457 that report this measure · tied with 6

  • 10of 155

    Social Studies — Masters

    Tarrant County · of the 155 that report this measure

Other top-5% rankings

High placements in larger reporting groups

7 measures

  • 15of 399

    Science — Approaches

    Tarrant County · of the 399 that report this measure · tied with 5

  • 18of 456

    Reading — Meets

    Tarrant County · of the 456 that report this measure · tied with 4

  • 19of 466

    Overall score

    Tarrant County · of the 466 that report this measure · tied with 4

  • 19of 455

    Relative Performance

    Tarrant County · of the 455 that report this measure · tied with 2

  • 22of 456

    Reading — Approaches

    Tarrant County · of the 456 that report this measure · tied with 6

  • 24of 456

    School Progress

    Tarrant County · of the 456 that report this measure · tied with 7

  • 47of 1,455

    All Subjects — Meets

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,455 that report this measure · tied with 6

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 220905087.