txschools.net

Unofficial · not affiliated with the Texas Education Agency · what this is

Campus · Traditional

Huntsville Elem

Walker County · Region 06: Huntsville · 655 students

D62

Huntsville Elem is rated D by TEA, scoring 62 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 78.1 average of the 2,104 schools serving a similar share of economically disadvantaged students, and below the statewide average of 81.3. It is down 25 points since 2021-22 — both years scored under TEA's current rules, since TEA rewrote them in 2023; under the rules in force back then it scored 80.

Ranks 7,249th of 7,646 Texas schools (tied with 35 others), and 297th of 314 in Region 06: Huntsville.

1 consecutive year rated unacceptable.

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. How this school's change over time is ranked
  4. Where the score comes from
  5. Student outcomes
  6. Who this school serves
  7. Spending per student
  8. Teachers
  9. Where this school ranks best
  10. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Compare against
9080706050 Schools like this oneTexas averageHuntsville Elem 8779745862 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 80 that year.

Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSimilarState
2025-26D6278.181.3
2024-25F5877.781.2
2023-24C7475.378.9
2022-23C7975.779.1
2021-22B8781.783.7

How this school's change over time is ranked

TEA publishes most measures for one year only, so a change ranking exists just where the same figure is published across years — the overall score, the five score domains, and per-student spending. This page does not yet state where Huntsville Elem itself places on these lists, only that the lists exist; open one to find this school's own row.

Texas schools

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement60 D−13.4 vs similar · −19.3 vs region
  • School Progress60 D−19.3 vs similar · −20.5 vs region
  • Closing the Gaps66 D−9.4 vs similar · −11.1 vs region
  • Academic Growth60 D−12.5 vs similar · −14.6 vs region
  • Relative Performance60 D−17.7 vs similar · −18.6 vs region
  • Huntsville Elem
  • Similar student population (2,104)
  • Region 06: Huntsville (314)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement60D10
School Progress60D10
Closing the Gaps66D4
Academic Growth60D10
Relative Performance60D10

Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 4 points below C in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level60%−10 vs Similar student population
  • Meets grade level33%−10 vs Similar student population
  • Masters grade level13%−4 vs Similar student population

Reading

  • Approaches grade level68%−4 vs Similar student population
  • Meets grade level40%−8 vs Similar student population
  • Masters grade level18%−1 vs Similar student population

Math

  • Approaches grade level54%−13 vs Similar student population
  • Meets grade level30%−9 vs Similar student population
  • Masters grade level10%−5 vs Similar student population

Science

  • Approaches grade level51%−17 vs Similar student population
  • Meets grade level21%−18 vs Similar student population
  • Masters grade level11%−5 vs Similar student population
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar student population (2,104)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The tick on each bar marks the average for Similar student population (2,104 schools) — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
655
Economically disadvantaged
77.3%−0.3 pts vs similar
English learners
23.2%−3.1 pts vs similar
Special education
20.3%+1.5 pts vs similar
Attendance
93.1%−0.4 pts vs similar
Chronically absent
20.8%+1.1 pts vs similar

Student demographics

African American: 26.6%Hispanic: 40.9%White: 24.9%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 0.5%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 6.7%
  • African American 26.6%
  • Hispanic 40.9%
  • White 24.9%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 0.5%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 6.7%

Spending per student

Compared against TEA's own peer group, which controls for size and student population, and against the state.

$8k$14k$20k20182020202220242025
  • Huntsville Elem
  • TEA peer group
  • Texas average

TEA's published file does not include peer-group spending for this entity, so no comparison is shown.

Not reported by TEA for this entity: peer.

Teachers

Average salary
$61,222−$5,544 vs similar
Teachers
44
Students per staff member
15.1

Teaching experience

Beginning: 5.7%1 to 5 years: 39.1%6 to 10 years: 16.1%11 to 20 years: 27.6%21 to 30 years: 6.9%Over 30 years: 4.6%
  • Beginning 5.7%
  • 1 to 5 years 39.1%
  • 6 to 10 years 16.1%
  • 11 to 20 years 27.6%
  • 21 to 30 years 6.9%
  • Over 30 years 4.6%

Where this school ranks best

Out of 88 rankings computed across every published metric and every comparison group, these are the placements that stand out. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

  • 7of 12

    Reading — Approaches

    Walker County · of the 12 that report this measure

  • 7of 12

    Reading — Masters

    Walker County · of the 12 that report this measure

  • 7of 12

    Math — Meets

    Walker County · of the 12 that report this measure

  • 7of 12

    Chronically absent (lowest is best)

    Walker County · of the 12 that report this measure

  • 8of 12

    Relative Performance

    Walker County · of the 12 that report this measure · tied with 2

  • 8of 12

    All Subjects — Approaches

    Walker County · of the 12 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 8of 12

    All Subjects — Masters

    Walker County · of the 12 that report this measure

  • 8of 12

    Math — Approaches

    Walker County · of the 12 that report this measure

  • 8of 12

    Math — Masters

    Walker County · of the 12 that report this measure

  • 8of 12

    Attendance

    Walker County · of the 12 that report this measure

  • 8of 11

    Academic Growth

    Walker County · of the 11 that report this measure

  • 8of 11

    Science — Approaches

    Walker County · of the 11 that report this measure

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this campus ranks poorly. Each statement below states its cohort and its denominator so it can be checked — a rank without an n is a boast, not a fact. Ties are shown because a shared ceiling is not a sole first place. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

Every figure on this page comes from data the Texas Education Agency publishes at txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026 and archived with a checksum so each number stays traceable to the bytes TEA served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for districts only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here — 9,086 entities in two formats is 18,172 assets, on top of everything else this site publishes, and that is past the 20,000-asset limit this site is published under. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 236902106.