Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Hughes Road Elem

Galveston County · Region 04: Houston · 581 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
72/1002025-26
Change
+2 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
−7.9 ptsvs 79.9 average · 2,000 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
1,551 of 2,000tied with 48 others
C72

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 68 in 2021-22. The current score is below the 79.9 average for 2,000 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Read the full rating context and placement

Hughes Road Elem is rated C by TEA, scoring 72 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 79.9 average for 2,000 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 2 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 1,551st of 2,000 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 48 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. Official improvement and transfer notices
  3. 5 years of ratings
  4. Where the score comes from
  5. Student outcomes
  6. Who this school serves
  7. Student counts behind the percentages
  8. Enrollment over time
  9. Discipline and removal from class
  10. Spending per student
  11. Teachers and actual class size
  12. Where this comes from

Official improvement and transfer notices

Official state and federal designations can carry support, reporting requirements or a family transfer option that a single A–F rating does not explain.

Schools identified for improvement

This school
Listed
Selected comparison
27.5%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,000 rated schools reporting

Schools on the PEG list

This school
Not listed
Selected comparison
2.9%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,000 rated schools reporting

Selected comparison percentages are the share of reporting schools in that group found on each dated list. They are neutral prevalence context; changing the comparison never changes this school's official status.

These are dated TEA statuses, fetched 24 August 2026; they are not added to or subtracted from this site's rating.

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
90807060 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageHughes Road Elem 7068687372 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated Not Rated with 68 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26C7279.9 2,000 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25C7379.7 1,977 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24D6877.7 1,961 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23D6878.3 1,928 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22C7082.2 1,904 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement72 C−5.8 vs similar economic context · 1,893 reporting
  • School Progress72 C−8.8 vs similar economic context · 1,885 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps73 C−4.2 vs similar economic context · 1,866 reporting
  • Academic Growth—Not reported · similar economic context 73.9 · 1,826 reporting
  • Relative Performance72 C−7.2 vs similar economic context · 1,885 reporting
  • Hughes Road Elem
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,000 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement72C8
School Progress72C8
Closing the Gaps73C7
Academic Growth—Not rated—
Relative Performance72C8

Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 7 points below B in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level65%−9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,893 reporting
  • Meets grade level43%−5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,893 reporting
  • Masters grade level21%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,893 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level73%−3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,889 reporting
  • Meets grade level52%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,889 reporting
  • Masters grade level24%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,889 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level57%−14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,880 reporting
  • Meets grade level33%−9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,880 reporting
  • Masters grade level17%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,880 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,000 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
581
Economically disadvantaged
64.6%−0.1 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
6.0%−11.8 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
18.8%−0.1 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
94.7%+0.6 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
16.4%−0.3 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Hughes Road Elem

African American: 20.4%Hispanic: 47.7%White: 24.5%Asian: 2.2%Two or More Races: 5.2%
  • African American 20.4%
  • Hispanic 47.7%
  • White 24.5%
  • Asian 2.2%
  • Two or More Races 5.2%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,000 reporting for every category shown · 2,000 in full cohort

African American: 11.3%Hispanic: 51.6%White: 30.7%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 2.2%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 3.7%
  • African American 11.3%
  • Hispanic 51.6%
  • White 30.7%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 2.2%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 3.7%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
579
Economically disadvantaged students
374
Emergent bilingual students
35
Special education students
109

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
58
Students in TEA mobility denominator
433
TEA-published mobility rate
13.4%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 581 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 4 (0.7%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
581

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
−4

Decrease · −0.7%

Change since 2021–22
−104

Decrease · −15.2%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
581
Selected comparison
624.4

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,966 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Hughes Road Elem
School yearStudents enrolledHughes Road ElemChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 685 First available year 640.8
2022–23 707 Increase of 22 (3.2%) 646.9
2023–24 611 Decrease of 96 (13.6%) 643
2024–25 585 Decrease of 26 (4.3%) 638.6
2025–26 581 Decrease of 4 (0.7%) 624.4

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Suppressed

Rate not available

Disciplinary actions
13

2.09 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
623

2024–25

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
2.09
Selected comparison
30.3

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,651 rated schools reporting

−28.2 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Hughes Road Elem
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 722 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
2021–22 750 12 1.6% 28 3.73 12.9% 30.1
2022–23 771 Suppressed — 16 2.08 — 32.2
2023–24 659 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
2024–25 623 Suppressed — 13 2.09 — 30.3
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Hughes Road Elem in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline Suppressed — 13 2.09 — 30.3
In-school suspensions Suppressed — 12 1.93 — 23.1
Out-of-school suspensions Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$7k$13k$20k20182020202220242025
  • Hughes Road Elem
  • Parent district: Dickinson ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$13,400
Selected comparison
$12,643

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,973 rated schools reporting

+$757 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $13,400 per student for this campus, $18,124 per student for its parent district, Dickinson ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearHughes Road ElemParent district: Dickinson ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$7,496$15,492$13,054$7,908 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,833 rated schools reporting
2019$7,280$13,197$13,108$8,063 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,849 rated schools reporting
2020$7,431$12,049$14,058$8,647 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,871 rated schools reporting
2021$8,191$13,933$14,797$9,077 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,884 rated schools reporting
2022$9,015$17,191$15,708$10,434 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,905 rated schools reporting
2023$8,621$18,592$16,792$11,137 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,928 rated schools reporting
2024$9,226$16,357$18,125$12,039 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,957 rated schools reporting
2025$13,400$18,124$18,972$12,643 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,973 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$66,505+$103 vs similar economic context
Teachers
39−3.6 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
14.9+1.0 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Hughes Road Elem

Beginning: 12.6%1 to 5 years: 15.4%6 to 10 years: 20.6%11 to 20 years: 36%21 to 30 years: 12.9%Over 30 years: 2.6%
  • Beginning 12.6%
  • 1 to 5 years 15.4%
  • 6 to 10 years 20.6%
  • 11 to 20 years 36%
  • 21 to 30 years 12.9%
  • Over 30 years 2.6%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,000 reporting for every category shown · 2,000 in full cohort

Beginning: 6.2%1 to 5 years: 26.3%6 to 10 years: 19.1%11 to 20 years: 27.9%21 to 30 years: 15.8%Over 30 years: 4.1%
  • Beginning 6.2%
  • 1 to 5 years 26.3%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.1%
  • 11 to 20 years 27.9%
  • 21 to 30 years 15.8%
  • Over 30 years 4.1%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Hughes Road Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classHughes Road Elem · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten19.218
Grade 12018.3
Grade 220.518.5
Grade 31818.6

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 4 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 084901106.