Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Howard Dobbs Elem

Rockwall County · Region 10: Richardson · 482 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
88/1002025-26
Change
−1 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+5.9 ptsvs 82.1 average · 1,703 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
439 of 1,703tied with 67 others
B88

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 90 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 82.1 average for 1,703 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Recent movement

Overall score rose 7 points

81 to 88 2024-25 to 2025-26

  • 88 is 5.9 points above the 82.1 average among 1,703 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Recent domain gain

Closing the Gaps rose 18 points

73 to 91 2024-25 to 2025-26

  • 91 is 11.6 points above the 79.4 average among 1,625 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

STAAR result

All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
55%vs 53.4% avg · +1.6 pts
Masters
28%vs 23.3% avg · +4.7 pts

Among 1,644 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Howard Dobbs Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 88 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 82.1 average for 1,703 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 1 point since 2021-22.

Ranks 439th of 1,703 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 67 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Enrollment over time
  8. Discipline and removal from class
  9. Spending per student
  10. Teachers and actual class size
  11. Where this school ranks best
  12. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
908070 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageHoward Dobbs Elem 8983908188 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 90 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26B8882.1 1,703 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25B8182.4 1,679 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24A9080.3 1,652 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23B8381.0 1,631 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22B8983.6 1,608 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement82 B+0.2 vs similar economic context · 1,644 reporting
  • School Progress87 B+5.3 vs similar economic context · 1,639 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps91 A+11.6 vs similar economic context · 1,625 reporting
  • Academic Growth87 B+11.1 vs similar economic context · 1,607 reporting
  • Relative Performance81 B+1.6 vs similar economic context · 1,639 reporting
  • Howard Dobbs Elem
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,703 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement82B8
School Progress87B3
Closing the Gaps91A—
Academic Growth87B3
Relative Performance81B9

Closest to moving up: School Progress, 3 points below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (87), so Student Achievement (82) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 87.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level79%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,644 reporting
  • Meets grade level55%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,644 reporting
  • Masters grade level28%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,644 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level85%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,642 reporting
  • Meets grade level67%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,642 reporting
  • Masters grade level35%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,642 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level78%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,636 reporting
  • Meets grade level53%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,636 reporting
  • Masters grade level26%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,636 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level64%−15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,518 reporting
  • Meets grade level32%−20 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,518 reporting
  • Masters grade level14%−11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,518 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,703 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
482
Economically disadvantaged
49.9%−0.6 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
38.1%+25.1 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
22.7%+4.0 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
95.7%+1.1 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
6.1%−8.2 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Howard Dobbs Elem

African American: 6.9%Hispanic: 51.7%White: 36.5%American Indian: 0.2%Asian: 0.9%Two or More Races: 3.8%
  • African American 6.9%
  • Hispanic 51.7%
  • White 36.5%
  • American Indian 0.2%
  • Asian 0.9%
  • Two or More Races 3.8%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,703 reporting for every category shown · 1,703 in full cohort

African American: 9.4%Hispanic: 40.8%White: 42%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 3.1%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 4.2%
  • African American 9.4%
  • Hispanic 40.8%
  • White 42%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 3.1%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 4.2%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
449
Economically disadvantaged students
224
Emergent bilingual students
171
Special education students
102

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
33
Students in TEA mobility denominator
428
TEA-published mobility rate
7.7%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 482 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 83 (14.7%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
482

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
−83

Decrease · −14.7%

Change since 2021–22
−121

Decrease · −20.1%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
482
Selected comparison
646.5

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,665 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Howard Dobbs Elem
School yearStudents enrolledHoward Dobbs ElemChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 603 First available year 648.4
2022–23 617 Increase of 14 (2.3%) 652.9
2023–24 533 Decrease of 84 (13.6%) 652.6
2024–25 565 Increase of 32 (6.0%) 649.6
2025–26 482 Decrease of 83 (14.7%) 646.5

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
13

2.4% of cumulative year-end enrollment

Disciplinary actions
20

3.69 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
542

2024–25

Share of students · 2024–25

This school
2.4%
Selected comparison
12.0%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,318 rated schools reporting

−9.6 pts vs similar economic context

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
3.69
Selected comparison
26.8

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,413 rated schools reporting

−23.1 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Howard Dobbs Elem
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 577 14 2.4% 18 3.12 9.6% 18.3
2021–22 612 21 3.4% 42 6.86 11.9% 26.2
2022–23 607 15 2.5% 17 2.80 12.4% 28.1
2023–24 541 Suppressed — 10 1.85 — 28.4
2024–25 542 13 2.4% 20 3.69 12.0% 26.8
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Howard Dobbs Elem in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline 13 2.4% 20 3.69 12.0% 26.8
In-school suspensions 10 1.9% 11 2.03 10.8% 20.6
Out-of-school suspensions Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$7k$17k$27k20182020202220242025
  • Howard Dobbs Elem
  • Parent district: Rockwall ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$9,207
Selected comparison
$11,961

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,677 rated schools reporting

−$2,754 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $9,207 per student for this campus, $22,334 per student for its parent district, Rockwall ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearHoward Dobbs ElemParent district: Rockwall ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$9,716$15,108$13,054$7,823 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,551 rated schools reporting
2019$8,950$13,589$13,108$8,009 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,570 rated schools reporting
2020$7,587$13,339$14,058$8,511 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,582 rated schools reporting
2021$8,457$14,484$14,797$8,915 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,599 rated schools reporting
2022$8,280$12,862$15,708$10,241 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,610 rated schools reporting
2023$8,581$18,988$16,792$10,720 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,630 rated schools reporting
2024$10,195$25,294$18,125$11,501 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,650 rated schools reporting
2025$9,207$22,334$18,972$11,961 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,677 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$72,285+$5,392 vs similar economic context
Teachers
30−12.0 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
14.8−5.1 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Howard Dobbs Elem

Beginning: 1%1 to 5 years: 9.9%6 to 10 years: 32.9%11 to 20 years: 43.1%21 to 30 years: 13.2%
  • Beginning 1%
  • 1 to 5 years 9.9%
  • 6 to 10 years 32.9%
  • 11 to 20 years 43.1%
  • 21 to 30 years 13.2%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,703 reporting for every category shown · 1,703 in full cohort

Beginning: 5.6%1 to 5 years: 24.3%6 to 10 years: 19.3%11 to 20 years: 29.5%21 to 30 years: 16.8%Over 30 years: 4.3%
  • Beginning 5.6%
  • 1 to 5 years 24.3%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.3%
  • 11 to 20 years 29.5%
  • 21 to 30 years 16.8%
  • Over 30 years 4.3%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Howard Dobbs Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classHoward Dobbs Elem · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten2018
Grade 11718.3
Grade 216.918.5
Grade 319.519
Grade 417.719
Grade 514.820
Grade 619.317.7
Secondary math216

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 8 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this school ranks best

Out of 105 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

#2–3 rankings

Second- and third-place results

2 measures

  • 3of 31

    Attendance

    Rockwall County · of the 31 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 3of 31

    Chronically absent (lowest is best)

    Rockwall County · of the 31 that report this measure

#4–10 rankings

Fourth- through tenth-place results

4 measures

  • 7of 33

    Relative Performance

    Rockwall County · of the 33 that report this measure · tied with 2

  • 8of 33

    Academic Growth

    Rockwall County · of the 33 that report this measure · tied with 2

  • 10of 33

    School Progress

    Rockwall County · of the 33 that report this measure · tied with 2

  • 10of 33

    Closing the Gaps

    Rockwall County · of the 33 that report this measure

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 199901102.