Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Hooks HS

Bowie County · Region 08: Mt Pleasant · 315 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
85/1002025-26
Change
+2 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+3.6 ptsvs 81.4 average · 1,773 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
657 of 1,773tied with 61 others
B85

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 89 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 81.4 average for 1,773 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Recent domain gain

School Progress rose 4 points

83 to 87 2024-25 to 2025-26

  • 87 is 5.7 points above the 81.3 average among 1,697 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

STAAR result

Science above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
80%vs 50.7% avg · +29.3 pts
Masters
29%vs 23.7% avg · +5.3 pts

Among 1,562 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

Current strength

Overall score above the similar-context average

85 +3.6 pts vs 81.4

  • 85 is 3.6 points above the 81.4 average among 1,773 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Hooks HS is rated B by TEA, scoring 85 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.4 average for 1,773 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 2 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 657th of 1,773 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 61 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. After high school: the following fall
  6. Who this school serves
  7. Student counts behind the percentages
  8. Enrollment over time
  9. Discipline and removal from class
  10. Spending per student
  11. Teachers and actual class size
  12. Where this school ranks best
  13. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
908070 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageHooks HS 8381818485 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 89 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26B8581.4 1,773 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25B8481.6 1,750 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24B8179.5 1,724 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23B8180.1 1,697 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22B8383.0 1,673 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement88 B+7.2 vs similar economic context · 1,704 reporting
  • School Progress87 B+5.7 vs similar economic context · 1,697 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps79 C+0.3 vs similar economic context · 1,682 reporting
  • Academic Growth59 F−16.1 vs similar economic context · 1,657 reporting
  • Relative Performance87 B+7.8 vs similar economic context · 1,697 reporting
  • Hooks HS
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,773 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement88B2
School Progress87B3
Closing the Gaps79C1
Academic Growth59F1
Relative Performance87B3

Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 1 point below B in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (88), so School Progress (87) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 88.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level86%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,704 reporting
  • Meets grade level60%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,704 reporting
  • Masters grade level14%−8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,704 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level86%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,702 reporting
  • Meets grade level70%+13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,702 reporting
  • Masters grade level12%−12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,702 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level78%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,694 reporting
  • Meets grade level33%−13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,694 reporting
  • Masters grade level7%−11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,694 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level96%+18 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,562 reporting
  • Meets grade level80%+29 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,562 reporting
  • Masters grade level29%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,562 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level85%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 883 reporting
  • Meets grade level49%+0 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 883 reporting
  • Masters grade level13%−10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 883 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,773 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Graduation

Four-Year
100.0%+6.9 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 450 rated schools reporting
Five-Year
98.4%+5.6 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 446 rated schools reporting
Six-Year
100.0%+7.8 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 448 rated schools reporting
Dropout Rate
0.6%+0.2 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 452 rated schools reporting

These measures use TEA's standard-accountability population. Each comparison average includes only schools in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported school rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.

College, career and military readiness

Total credit for CCMR criteria
89.0%+0.8 pts vs similar economic context
CCMR criteria
CriterionThis school% of graduatesAveragesimilar economic contextDifferencepercentage pointsReportingselected comparison
Total credit for CCMR criteria89.0%88.2%+0.8 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 473 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course24.7%58.7%−34.0 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 476 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA24.7%28.3%−3.6 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 476 rated schools reporting
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)0.0%10.1%−10.1 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 476 rated schools reporting
Earned college credit for a dual credit course50.6%33.3%+17.3 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 476 rated schools reporting
Earned an industry-based certification67.9%38.9%+29.0 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 476 rated schools reporting
Earned a level I or level II certificate0.0%1.5%−1.5 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 476 rated schools reporting
Earned an associate degree0.0%4.8%−4.8 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 476 rated schools reporting
Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit0.0%4.3%−4.3 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 476 rated schools reporting
Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness7.4%3.3%+4.1 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 476 rated schools reporting
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student6.2%7.7%−1.5 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 476 rated schools reporting
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces3.7%3.5%+0.2 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 476 rated schools reporting

Every row is a share of this school's graduates, and every row is a way of meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this school minus the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate, counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported school percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

After high school: the following fall

Where school graduates appeared in Texas public higher-education records the fall after graduation. This is a limited next-step measure, not an eventual college-going or completion rate.

Graduates in the report
62

Class of 2023–24

Enrolled in Texas public higher education
21

33.9% of graduates

Not found in Texas public higher-ed records
41

66.1% of graduates

Not trackable
0

Fall 2024

Graduates in the report

This school
62
Selected comparison
219.9

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 379 rated schools reporting

Enrolled in Texas public higher education

This school
21
Selected comparison
95.9

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 379 rated schools reporting

Texas-public enrollment rate

This school
33.9%
Selected comparison
45.1%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 379 rated schools reporting

−11.2 pts vs similar economic context

Not-found rate

This school
66.1%
Selected comparison
50.3%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 379 rated schools reporting

+15.8 pts vs similar economic context

Not-trackable rate

This school
0.0%
Selected comparison
4.6%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 379 rated schools reporting

−4.6 pts vs similar economic context

Most common named Texas public destinations

  1. TEXARKANA COLLEGE (003628)9

Selected comparison counts are neutral cohort scale context. The percentages put differently sized graduating classes on the same basis, but still cover only the limited Texas-public system observed by this report.

Source: Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board, high-school graduates enrolled in higher education, fetched 24 August 2026. The report covers graduates who enrolled in a Texas public college or university the following fall and includes only districts or campuses with more than 25 graduates.

“Not found” does not mean a graduate did not continue their education. It can include private or out-of-state college, work, military service, enrollment after the fall term, or another path the Texas public system does not observe.

“Not trackable” is not an outcome. THECB uses it for graduates with a non-standard identifier that could not be matched to higher-education records.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
315
Economically disadvantaged
53.3%−0.4 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
3.2%−10.7 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
12.4%−6.4 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
93.8%−0.7 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
18.7%+3.9 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Hooks HS

African American: 13.3%Hispanic: 6.7%White: 68.6%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 0.3%Two or More Races: 10.8%
  • African American 13.3%
  • Hispanic 6.7%
  • White 68.6%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 0.3%
  • Two or More Races 10.8%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,773 reporting for every category shown · 1,773 in full cohort

African American: 9.8%Hispanic: 43%White: 39.7%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 2.8%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 4.1%
  • African American 9.8%
  • Hispanic 43%
  • White 39.7%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 2.8%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 4.1%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
315
Economically disadvantaged students
168
Emergent bilingual students
10
Special education students
39

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
46
Students in TEA mobility denominator
356
TEA-published mobility rate
12.9%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 315 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 19 (5.7%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
315

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
−19

Decrease · −5.7%

Change since 2021–22
+3

Increase · +1.0%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
315
Selected comparison
637.7

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,734 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Hooks HS
School yearStudents enrolledHooks HSChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 312 First available year 640.6
2022–23 319 Increase of 7 (2.2%) 646.7
2023–24 309 Decrease of 10 (3.1%) 646.2
2024–25 334 Increase of 25 (8.1%) 643.4
2025–26 315 Decrease of 19 (5.7%) 637.7

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
77

21.6% of cumulative year-end enrollment

Disciplinary actions
120

33.71 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
356

2024–25

Share of students · 2024–25

This school
21.6%
Selected comparison
12.4%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,377 rated schools reporting

+9.2 pts vs similar economic context

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
33.71
Selected comparison
27.7

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,482 rated schools reporting

+6.0 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Hooks HS
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 329 39 11.8% 65 19.76 9.8% 19
2021–22 325 50 15.4% 86 26.46 12.3% 27.8
2022–23 338 65 19.2% 92 27.22 12.8% 29.5
2023–24 330 58 17.6% 83 25.15 12.7% 29.7
2024–25 356 77 21.6% 120 33.71 12.4% 27.7
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Hooks HS in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline 77 21.6% 120 33.71 12.4% 27.7
In-school suspensions 64 18.0% 83 23.31 11.1% 21.4
Out-of-school suspensions Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
DAEP placements 27 7.6% 30 8.43 4.6% 5.4
Mandatory DAEP placements 18 5.1% 19 5.34 3.4% 3.9
Discretionary DAEP placements 10 2.8% 11 3.09 2.7% 3
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$7k$14k$21k20182020202220242025
  • Hooks HS
  • Parent district: Hooks ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$16,827
Selected comparison
$12,176

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,747 rated schools reporting

+$4,651 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $16,827 per student for this campus, $19,044 per student for its parent district, Hooks ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearHooks HSParent district: Hooks ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$10,564$11,183$13,054$7,879 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,617 rated schools reporting
2019$10,848$12,157$13,108$8,055 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,631 rated schools reporting
2020$13,295$13,385$14,058$8,601 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,646 rated schools reporting
2021$13,613$14,007$14,797$8,998 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,663 rated schools reporting
2022$18,455$16,147$15,708$10,269 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,676 rated schools reporting
2023$20,240$17,200$16,792$10,842 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,697 rated schools reporting
2024$18,171$17,843$18,125$11,759 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,721 rated schools reporting
2025$16,827$19,044$18,972$12,176 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,747 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$53,311−$13,300 vs similar economic context
Teachers
29−13.0 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
10.9−8.6 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Hooks HS

1 to 5 years: 18.3%6 to 10 years: 20.7%11 to 20 years: 37.9%21 to 30 years: 9.7%Over 30 years: 13.1%
  • 1 to 5 years 18.3%
  • 6 to 10 years 20.7%
  • 11 to 20 years 37.9%
  • 21 to 30 years 9.7%
  • Over 30 years 13.1%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,773 reporting for every category shown · 1,773 in full cohort

Beginning: 5.8%1 to 5 years: 24.9%6 to 10 years: 19.2%11 to 20 years: 28.9%21 to 30 years: 16.5%Over 30 years: 4.3%
  • Beginning 5.8%
  • 1 to 5 years 24.9%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.2%
  • 11 to 20 years 28.9%
  • 21 to 30 years 16.5%
  • Over 30 years 4.3%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Hooks HS in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classHooks HS · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Secondary English10.914.9
Secondary languages other than English2117.6
Secondary math16.315.9
Secondary science15.117.4
Secondary social studies15.817.4

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 5 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this school ranks best

Out of 200 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

#1 rankings

First-place results

1 measure

  • 1of 10

    Six-Year Graduation Rate

    Bowie County (standard accountability only) · of the 10 that report this measure · tied with 2

#2–3 rankings

Second- and third-place results

2 measures

  • 2of 11

    Earned an industry-based certification

    Bowie County · of the 11 that report this measure

  • 2of 11

    Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness

    Bowie County · of the 11 that report this measure

#4–10 rankings

Fourth- through tenth-place results

15 measures

  • 5of 33

    Science — Meets

    Bowie County · of the 33 that report this measure

  • 6of 41

    Per-student spending

    Bowie County · of the 41 that report this measure

  • 6of 11

    College, career or military ready

    Bowie County · of the 11 that report this measure · tied with 2

  • 6of 11

    Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA

    Bowie County · of the 11 that report this measure

  • 6of 11

    Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces

    Bowie County · of the 11 that report this measure

  • 6of 10

    Five-Year Graduation Rate

    Bowie County (standard accountability only) · of the 10 that report this measure

  • 7of 33

    Science — Approaches

    Bowie County · of the 33 that report this measure

  • 7of 11

    Earned college credit for a dual credit course

    Bowie County · of the 11 that report this measure

  • 7of 10

    Dropout Rate (lowest is best)

    Bowie County (standard accountability only) · of the 10 that report this measure

  • 8of 21

    Social Studies — Approaches

    Bowie County · of the 21 that report this measure

  • 8of 11

    Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student

    Bowie County · of the 11 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 9of 38

    All Subjects — Approaches

    Bowie County · of the 38 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 9of 11

    Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course

    Bowie County · of the 11 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 10of 38

    Reading — Meets

    Bowie County · of the 38 that report this measure

  • 10of 21

    Social Studies — Meets

    Bowie County · of the 21 that report this measure · tied with 1

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 019902002.