Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Honey Grove MS

Fannin County · Region 08: Mt Pleasant · 153 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
91/1002025-26
Change
+1 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+10.0 ptsvs 81 average · 1,893 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
205 of 1,893tied with 85 others
A91

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 88 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 81 average for 1,893 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

STAAR result

All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
60%vs 50.6% avg · +9.4 pts
Masters
25%vs 21.2% avg · +3.8 pts

Among 1,822 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

STAAR result

Math above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
63%vs 44.4% avg · +18.6 pts
Masters
23%vs 17.4% avg · +5.6 pts

Among 1,809 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

STAAR result

Reading above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
65%vs 55.5% avg · +9.5 pts
Masters
32%vs 22.7% avg · +9.3 pts

Among 1,819 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Honey Grove MS is rated A by TEA, scoring 91 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81 average for 1,893 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 1 point since 2021-22.

Ranks 205th of 1,893 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 85 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Enrollment over time
  8. Discipline and removal from class
  9. Spending per student
  10. Teachers and actual class size
  11. Where this school ranks best
  12. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
908070 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageHoney Grove MS 9090919291 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 88 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26A9181.0 1,893 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25A9281.0 1,866 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24A9179.0 1,841 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23A9079.6 1,810 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22A9082.6 1,783 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement87 B+7.0 vs similar economic context · 1,822 reporting
  • School Progress90 A+8.7 vs similar economic context · 1,814 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps92 A+13.8 vs similar economic context · 1,798 reporting
  • Academic Growth84 B+9.4 vs similar economic context · 1,763 reporting
  • Relative Performance90 A+10.6 vs similar economic context · 1,814 reporting
  • Honey Grove MS
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,893 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement87B3
School Progress90A—
Closing the Gaps92A—
Academic Growth84B6
Relative Performance90A—

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (90), so Student Achievement (87) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 90.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level85%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,822 reporting
  • Meets grade level60%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,822 reporting
  • Masters grade level25%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,822 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level85%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,819 reporting
  • Meets grade level65%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,819 reporting
  • Masters grade level32%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,819 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level90%+17 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,809 reporting
  • Meets grade level63%+19 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,809 reporting
  • Masters grade level23%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,809 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level85%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,668 reporting
  • Meets grade level51%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,668 reporting
  • Masters grade level20%−3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,668 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level68%−8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 932 reporting
  • Meets grade level39%−9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 932 reporting
  • Masters grade level12%−10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 932 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,893 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
153
Economically disadvantaged
56.9%−0.4 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
4.6%−10.1 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
16.3%−2.5 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
95.6%+1.3 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
9.9%−5.6 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Honey Grove MS

African American: 7.2%Hispanic: 21.6%White: 62.7%Asian: 0.7%Two or More Races: 7.8%
  • African American 7.2%
  • Hispanic 21.6%
  • White 62.7%
  • Asian 0.7%
  • Two or More Races 7.8%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,893 reporting for every category shown · 1,893 in full cohort

African American: 10%Hispanic: 45.7%White: 37.4%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 2.5%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 3.9%
  • African American 10%
  • Hispanic 45.7%
  • White 37.4%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 2.5%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 3.9%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
153
Economically disadvantaged students
87
Emergent bilingual students
7
Special education students
25

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
17
Students in TEA mobility denominator
154
TEA-published mobility rate
11%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 153 students in 2025–26, an increase of 11 (7.7%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
153

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
+11

Increase · +7.7%

Change since 2021–22
−1

Decrease · −0.6%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
153
Selected comparison
628.1

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,855 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Honey Grove MS
School yearStudents enrolledHoney Grove MSChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 154 First available year 632.6
2022–23 138 Decrease of 16 (10.4%) 638.9
2023–24 139 Increase of 1 (0.7%) 638
2024–25 142 Increase of 3 (2.2%) 634.3
2025–26 153 Increase of 11 (7.7%) 628.1

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
19

12.3% of cumulative year-end enrollment

Disciplinary actions
46

29.87 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
154

2024–25

Share of students · 2024–25

This school
12.3%
Selected comparison
12.4%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,433 rated schools reporting

−0.1 pts vs similar economic context

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
29.87
Selected comparison
27.8

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,556 rated schools reporting

+2.1 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Honey Grove MS
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 178 29 16.3% 61 34.27 9.7% 18.7
2021–22 167 33 19.8% 60 35.93 12.4% 27.9
2022–23 146 21 14.4% 44 30.14 12.8% 29.6
2023–24 146 12 8.2% 27 18.49 12.8% 29.6
2024–25 154 19 12.3% 46 29.87 12.4% 27.8
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Honey Grove MS in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline 19 12.3% 46 29.87 12.4% 27.8
In-school suspensions 17 11.0% 24 15.58 11.2% 21.6
Out-of-school suspensions 10 6.5% 19 12.34 6.4% 9.1
DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$5k$16k$27k20182020202220242025
  • Honey Grove MS
  • Parent district: Honey Grove ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$8,209
Selected comparison
$12,404

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,863 rated schools reporting

−$4,195 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $8,209 per student for this campus, $20,504 per student for its parent district, Honey Grove ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearHoney Grove MSParent district: Honey Grove ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$5,876$12,965$13,054$7,954 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,717 rated schools reporting
2019$7,046$13,006$13,108$8,116 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,736 rated schools reporting
2020$6,212$12,241$14,058$8,710 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,755 rated schools reporting
2021$6,086$13,803$14,797$9,084 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,767 rated schools reporting
2022$6,360$15,080$15,708$10,510 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,785 rated schools reporting
2023$8,136$18,003$16,792$11,060 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,810 rated schools reporting
2024$7,945$26,116$18,125$11,804 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,838 rated schools reporting
2025$8,209$20,504$18,972$12,404 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,863 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$70,463+$3,923 vs similar economic context
Teachers
12−29.2 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
12.4−6.9 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Honey Grove MS

1 to 5 years: 1.6%6 to 10 years: 24.2%11 to 20 years: 52.4%21 to 30 years: 8.1%Over 30 years: 12.9%
  • 1 to 5 years 1.6%
  • 6 to 10 years 24.2%
  • 11 to 20 years 52.4%
  • 21 to 30 years 8.1%
  • Over 30 years 12.9%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,893 reporting for every category shown · 1,893 in full cohort

Beginning: 5.8%1 to 5 years: 25%6 to 10 years: 19.3%11 to 20 years: 28.7%21 to 30 years: 16.4%Over 30 years: 4.3%
  • Beginning 5.8%
  • 1 to 5 years 25%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.3%
  • 11 to 20 years 28.7%
  • 21 to 30 years 16.4%
  • Over 30 years 4.3%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Honey Grove MS in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classHoney Grove MS · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Grade 61917.4
Secondary English23.714.8
Secondary math24.515.6
Secondary science23.417.1
Secondary social studies23.217

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 5 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this school ranks best

Out of 120 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

#1 rankings

First-place results

2 measures

  • 1of 20

    Math — Approaches

    Fannin County · of the 20 that report this measure

  • 1of 20

    Math — Meets

    Fannin County · of the 20 that report this measure

#2–3 rankings

Second- and third-place results

6 measures

  • 2of 20

    School Progress

    Fannin County · of the 20 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 2of 20

    Relative Performance

    Fannin County · of the 20 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 2of 20

    All Subjects — Masters

    Fannin County · of the 20 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 3of 21

    Overall score

    Fannin County · of the 21 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 3of 20

    Closing the Gaps

    Fannin County · of the 20 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 3of 20

    Math — Masters

    Fannin County · of the 20 that report this measure · tied with 1

#4–10 rankings

Fourth- through tenth-place results

14 measures

  • 4of 20

    All Subjects — Approaches

    Fannin County · of the 20 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 4of 20

    All Subjects — Meets

    Fannin County · of the 20 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 4of 19

    Academic Growth

    Fannin County · of the 19 that report this measure

  • 5of 20

    Reading — Approaches

    Fannin County · of the 20 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 5of 20

    Reading — Masters

    Fannin County · of the 20 that report this measure

  • 5of 20

    Attendance

    Fannin County · of the 20 that report this measure

  • 6of 20

    Reading — Meets

    Fannin County · of the 20 that report this measure

  • 6of 20

    Chronically absent (lowest is best)

    Fannin County · of the 20 that report this measure

  • 7of 20

    Student Achievement

    Fannin County · of the 20 that report this measure

  • 9of 18

    Science — Approaches

    Fannin County · of the 18 that report this measure

  • 9of 18

    Science — Masters

    Fannin County · of the 18 that report this measure

  • 9of 12

    Social Studies — Approaches

    Fannin County · of the 12 that report this measure

  • 9of 12

    Social Studies — Meets

    Fannin County · of the 12 that report this measure

  • 9of 12

    Social Studies — Masters

    Fannin County · of the 12 that report this measure

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 074907041.