Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Hillsboro JH

Hill County · Region 12: Waco · 301 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
92/1002025-26
Change
−1 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+13.7 ptsvs 78.3 average · 2,087 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
123 of 2,087tied with 31 others
A92

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 94 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 78.3 average for 2,087 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Recent domain gain

Student Achievement rose 2 points

89 to 91 2024-25 to 2025-26

  • 91 is 17 points above the 74 average among 1,939 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

STAAR result

All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
66%vs 43.9% avg · +22.1 pts
Masters
35%vs 17.4% avg · +17.6 pts

Among 1,939 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

STAAR result

Math above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
73%vs 39.3% avg · +33.7 pts
Masters
36%vs 14.7% avg · +21.3 pts

Among 1,928 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Hillsboro JH is rated A by TEA, scoring 92 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 78.3 average for 2,087 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 1 point since 2021-22.

Ranks 123rd of 2,087 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 31 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Discipline and removal from class
  8. Spending per student
  9. Teachers and actual class size
  10. Where this school ranks best
  11. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
908070 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageHillsboro JH 9392929292 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 94 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26A9278.3 2,087 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25A9277.9 2,073 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24A9275.6 2,061 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23A9276.1 2,039 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22A9381.7 2,024 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement91 A+17.0 vs similar economic context · 1,939 reporting
  • School Progress92 A+12.5 vs similar economic context · 1,933 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps93 A+17.5 vs similar economic context · 1,918 reporting
  • Academic Growth88 B+15.4 vs similar economic context · 1,878 reporting
  • Relative Performance92 A+14.2 vs similar economic context · 1,933 reporting
  • Hillsboro JH
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,087 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement91A—
School Progress92A—
Closing the Gaps93A—
Academic Growth88B2
Relative Performance92A—

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (92), so Student Achievement (91) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 92.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level85%+15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,939 reporting
  • Meets grade level66%+22 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,939 reporting
  • Masters grade level35%+18 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,939 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level93%+20 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,936 reporting
  • Meets grade level71%+22 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,936 reporting
  • Masters grade level42%+23 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,936 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level87%+19 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,928 reporting
  • Meets grade level73%+34 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,928 reporting
  • Masters grade level36%+21 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,928 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level81%+12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,785 reporting
  • Meets grade level64%+24 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,785 reporting
  • Masters grade level35%+18 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,785 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level69%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 835 reporting
  • Meets grade level44%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 835 reporting
  • Masters grade level22%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 835 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,087 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
301
Economically disadvantaged
75.4%−0.1 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
12.0%−12.5 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
16.6%−2.2 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
96.6%+3.0 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
3.2%−15.9 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Hillsboro JH

African American: 12%Hispanic: 63.8%White: 19.9%Asian: 0.7%Pacific Islander: 0.3%Two or More Races: 3.3%
  • African American 12%
  • Hispanic 63.8%
  • White 19.9%
  • Asian 0.7%
  • Pacific Islander 0.3%
  • Two or More Races 3.3%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,087 reporting for every category shown · 2,087 in full cohort

African American: 13.3%Hispanic: 62.4%White: 18.9%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 1.9%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 3.1%
  • African American 13.3%
  • Hispanic 62.4%
  • White 18.9%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 1.9%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 3.1%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
301
Economically disadvantaged students
227
Emergent bilingual students
36
Special education students
50

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
30
Students in TEA mobility denominator
310
TEA-published mobility rate
9.7%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
52

16.8% of cumulative year-end enrollment

Disciplinary actions
101

32.58 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
310

2024–25

Share of students · 2024–25

This school
16.8%
Selected comparison
13.2%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,569 rated schools reporting

+3.6 pts vs similar economic context

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
32.58
Selected comparison
31.8

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,674 rated schools reporting

+0.8 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Hillsboro JH
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 452 71 15.7% 192 42.48 9.0% 18
2021–22 310 77 24.8% 184 59.35 12.9% 30.8
2022–23 283 53 18.7% 124 43.82 13.6% 33.5
2023–24 289 40 13.8% 75 25.95 13.5% 33.1
2024–25 310 52 16.8% 101 32.58 13.2% 31.8
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Hillsboro JH in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline 52 16.8% 101 32.58 13.2% 31.8
In-school suspensions 50 16.1% 92 29.68 11.7% 23.5
Out-of-school suspensions Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
JJAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$5k$16k$27k20182020202220242025
  • Hillsboro JH
  • Parent district: Hillsboro ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$9,456
Selected comparison
$13,064

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,071 rated schools reporting

−$3,608 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $9,456 per student for this campus, $16,471 per student for its parent district, Hillsboro ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearHillsboro JHParent district: Hillsboro ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$6,316$11,433$13,054$8,054 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,957 rated schools reporting
2019$6,470$12,268$13,108$8,190 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,974 rated schools reporting
2020$6,035$13,564$14,058$8,738 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,994 rated schools reporting
2021$6,305$25,904$14,797$9,305 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,006 rated schools reporting
2022$7,573$15,866$15,708$10,646 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,024 rated schools reporting
2023$8,866$16,048$16,792$11,172 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,039 rated schools reporting
2024$10,246$18,408$18,125$12,291 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,059 rated schools reporting
2025$9,456$16,471$18,972$13,064 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,071 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$62,086−$4,599 vs similar economic context
Teachers
23−20.1 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
12.9−1.2 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Hillsboro JH

Beginning: 12.4%1 to 5 years: 33%6 to 10 years: 20.2%11 to 20 years: 16.3%21 to 30 years: 14.2%Over 30 years: 3.9%
  • Beginning 12.4%
  • 1 to 5 years 33%
  • 6 to 10 years 20.2%
  • 11 to 20 years 16.3%
  • 21 to 30 years 14.2%
  • Over 30 years 3.9%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,087 reporting for every category shown · 2,087 in full cohort

Beginning: 6.7%1 to 5 years: 27.5%6 to 10 years: 19%11 to 20 years: 27.3%21 to 30 years: 15.2%Over 30 years: 3.7%
  • Beginning 6.7%
  • 1 to 5 years 27.5%
  • 6 to 10 years 19%
  • 11 to 20 years 27.3%
  • 21 to 30 years 15.2%
  • Over 30 years 3.7%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Hillsboro JH in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classHillsboro JH · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Secondary English14.715.4
Secondary languages other than English2318.2
Secondary math17.816.4
Secondary science13.617.7
Secondary social studies16.717.7

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 5 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this school ranks best

Out of 120 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

#1 rankings

First-place results

6 measures

  • 1of 20

    All Subjects — Masters

    Hill County · of the 20 that report this measure

  • 1of 20

    Reading — Meets

    Hill County · of the 20 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 1of 20

    Reading — Masters

    Hill County · of the 20 that report this measure

  • 1of 20

    Math — Meets

    Hill County · of the 20 that report this measure

  • 1of 20

    Math — Masters

    Hill County · of the 20 that report this measure

  • 1of 19

    Academic Growth

    Hill County · of the 19 that report this measure · tied with 1

#2–3 rankings

Second- and third-place results

8 measures

  • 2of 20

    All Subjects — Meets

    Hill County · of the 20 that report this measure

  • 2of 20

    Reading — Approaches

    Hill County · of the 20 that report this measure

  • 2of 20

    Math — Approaches

    Hill County · of the 20 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 2of 19

    Science — Masters

    Hill County · of the 19 that report this measure

  • 3of 21

    Attendance

    Hill County · of the 21 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 3of 21

    Chronically absent (lowest is best)

    Hill County · of the 21 that report this measure

  • 3of 20

    School Progress

    Hill County · of the 20 that report this measure

  • 3of 20

    Relative Performance

    Hill County · of the 20 that report this measure

#4–10 rankings

Fourth- through tenth-place results

7 measures

  • 4of 21

    Overall score

    Hill County · of the 21 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 4of 20

    All Subjects — Approaches

    Hill County · of the 20 that report this measure

  • 4of 19

    Science — Meets

    Hill County · of the 19 that report this measure

  • 5of 20

    Student Achievement

    Hill County · of the 20 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 6of 14

    Social Studies — Masters

    Hill County · of the 14 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 7of 19

    Science — Approaches

    Hill County · of the 19 that report this measure

  • 9of 14

    Social Studies — Meets

    Hill County · of the 14 that report this measure

Other top-5% rankings

High placements in larger reporting groups

1 measure

  • 71of 1,918

    Closing the Gaps

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,918 that report this measure · tied with 27

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 109904041.